EPTIt also didn't help that MKP had 3 medivacs of units out of position.
[GSL] 2012 Season 1 Code A Ro24 D3 - Page 38
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
IMPrime
United States715 Posts
It also didn't help that MKP had 3 medivacs of units out of position. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:34 Dakkas wrote: How on earth was that an all-in? Answer that with a objective and legitimate answer Answer: I'm a Marineking fan and am upset he lost that game! | ||
|
Dakkas
2550 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:33 JJH777 wrote: Sigh terrible control by Killer both with his DTs and then in the actual engagement yet still wins the game. Denied mining and taking out the tech lab researching combat shields means that he was only a little bit behind. | ||
|
samurai80
Japan4225 Posts
For many guys here, a protoss doing a frontal attack before late game = all-in | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:35 Teoita wrote: A protoss attacked therefore he allined, easy. Don't you know how LR threads work? Pretty sure that needs to be in the rules.... DRAZERK | ||
|
SeaSwift
Scotland4486 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:35 IgnE wrote: lol? he got aggressive as soon as was feasibly possible after cleaning up the dts that game. the dts didn't even have to do that much damage. the terran is on a ticking clock once his marine/tank composition is shown, and killer knew he needed collosus/chargelots to shut it down and collect the win. without the dts, MKP hits 2 minutes earlier with tanks and marines vs at most 1 collosus and might have collected the win. He was forced to be passive. I didn't say that was MKP's fault. | ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
Scouted again! | ||
|
Dakkas
2550 Posts
| ||
|
snotboogie
Australia3550 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:35 Teoita wrote: A protoss attacked therefore he allined, easy. Don't you know how LR threads work? Any attack is a timing attack not an all in when it comes to LR threads. | ||
|
ActionpointTV
60 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:32 bittman wrote: If I see one "This is why you don't make tanks argument" after seeing them siege with zealots on top of them I'll laugh But, that's why "you don't make tanks argument" is true... | ||
|
vndods
United States3743 Posts
| ||
|
FrozenFrotie
Singapore156 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:31 Hassybaby wrote: Pretty sure ability and mental stability makes more of a difference than raw probability Then again, win rate after winning the 1st set doesn't tell us much about a player's mental strength doesn't it? Players should be more motivated than scared of losing after winning their first set anyway. I feel like stats for win rate after losing the 1st set should be much more meaningful, esp when applied to comeback kings like MMA. | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
| ||
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
Gave away his whole army in 2 manageable clumps. Well that and sieging when the Zealots were on top of him | ||
|
FrozenFrotie
Singapore156 Posts
| ||
|
covetousrat
2109 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:35 Hassybaby wrote: Pretty sure that needs to be in the rules.... DRAZERK Prefer my definitions | ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
 | ||
| ||
