EPT[GSL] 2012 Season 1 Code A Ro24 D3 - Page 37
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
ihasaKAROT
Netherlands4730 Posts
| ||
|
SeaSwift
Scotland4486 Posts
| ||
|
zul
Germany5427 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
| ||
|
0kz
Italy1118 Posts
| ||
|
TheRidd
713 Posts
| ||
|
vndods
United States3743 Posts
oh please. | ||
|
ViperPL
Poland1775 Posts
| ||
|
JJH777
United States4414 Posts
| ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
It wasn't an all-in, Killer had plenty to fall back on if it didn't kill MKP. He was just out of position with 3 medivacs full of units, and Killer jumped at the opportunity to win the game when he knew that. | ||
|
SigmaoctanusIV
United States3313 Posts
| ||
|
Jehct
New Zealand9115 Posts
+2/+2 colossus/archon/chargelot timing != all-in. The old colossus all-ins had +1 attack (at best) and no twilight tech. | ||
|
OneOddOrange
Canada215 Posts
| ||
|
Dakkas
2550 Posts
How on earth was that an all-in? Answer that with a objective and legitimate answer | ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:34 Dakkas wrote: How on earth was that an all-in? Answer that with a objective and legitimate answer TL LR thread! | ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:34 Dakkas wrote: How on earth was that an all-in? Answer that with a objective and legitimate answer A protoss attacked therefore he allined, easy. Don't you know how LR threads work? | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:34 Dakkas wrote: How on earth was that an all-in? Answer that with a objective and legitimate answer Errr, it was before 200/200? | ||
|
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:32 SeaSwift wrote: Yeah, that's passive Marine/Tank play against Protoss for you.. lol? he got aggressive as soon as was feasibly possible after cleaning up the dts that game. the dts didn't even have to do that much damage. the terran is on a ticking clock once his marine/tank composition is shown, and killer knew he needed collosus/chargelots to shut it down and collect the win. without the dts, MKP hits 2 minutes earlier with tanks and marines vs at most 1 collosus and might have collected the win. | ||
|
gillon
Sweden1578 Posts
On March 01 2012 19:32 bittman wrote: If I see one "This is why you don't make tanks argument" after seeing them siege with zealots on top of them I'll laugh The reason that you don't make tanks is that you still wouldn't have had a chance if that army walked into MKPs army perfectly sieged and spread up. It would still be a fucking face roll. That's why you don't make tanks. | ||
| ||
