EPT[GSL] Blizzard Cup Group B - Page 51
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Can't go to lunch without coming back to 20+ reports. This makes me upset. Stop the bullshit or get ready to hammered. Thanks --Pholon | ||
|
gibb
Sweden288 Posts
| ||
|
Madera
Sweden2672 Posts
| ||
|
TheSilverfox
Sweden1928 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On December 13 2011 18:56 Logros wrote: PvZ T.T Feels like the only way Protoss is winning lately is 2 base all-ins. what? lol if anything protosses are starting to win because they realize taking bases is good is what I have seen more then all ins finally... | ||
|
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
| ||
|
dmnum
Brazil6910 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
| ||
|
NaldoR
Singapore2198 Posts
 | ||
|
Caesarion
Australia8332 Posts
Unless Leenock pulls a LosirA, I don't see NaNi winning this. | ||
|
MarKeD
Australia183 Posts
| ||
|
ChaosTerran
Austria844 Posts
On December 13 2011 18:52 Giriath wrote: No, but it makes instant, unavoidable damage at a greater range than storm, allowing a bio-ball to melt gateway units and archons. Which is perfectly fine. On December 13 2011 18:54 mrtomjones wrote: It depends on perspective. If it is right before a battle can you argue that losing 100 HP instantly is not deadly? If it is simply a random EMP then no. Both are stronger in different situations. In a battle I would take 100 health instantly gone myself. You are ignoring the fact that terran units have alot less health than protoss units, so damage scales differently. 1 storm pretty much removes around 40 % of a marines health per second. A emp however only removes 33% of a zealot's shield without even having a chance to do more damage than that (you are assuming that a terran can perfectly dodge out of all storms, which is impossible even for top korean pros). EMP removes around 40% of a collossi's health and around 50% of a stalkers health. yes the damage is instant effect, but it has no chance of ever doing more damage than that. A storm that hits however pretty much instantly damages 40% of the marine's health and if the terran doesn't move within another second the marines health is already 80% removed, a second storm outright kills the marines (or if you stay in the storm for 3+ seconds too), a marauder loses around 15% of his health per second against a storm and can also die to storm, something protoss units can't from emp. So yes, it should be easier to hit emps than it is to hit storms, because of the health scale of terran units and the fact that emp can't kill. | ||
|
SoJu.WeRRa
Korea (South)820 Posts
| ||
|
EchoZ
Japan5041 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
On December 13 2011 18:56 darkness wrote: I can't understand why so many good protosses have full energy nexuses... no chrono? What is there to chrono with 3+ nexus when you build no more probes and have your upgrades done? Your production is usually limited by income not WG cooldown. | ||
|
Giriath
Sweden2412 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42411 Posts
| ||
|
PoisedYeTi
Australia167 Posts
| ||
|
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
| ||
|
Bulkers
Poland509 Posts
On December 13 2011 18:56 Logros wrote: PvZ T.T Feels like the only way Protoss is winning lately is 2 base all-ins. Thats why I keep god w/l ratio against zerg on ladder... theres nothing better than good old but strong 7 gate, and catching zerg with pants down beacue by the time ill be at hes expansion he would have first few mutas out, not 20+ | ||
|
BrassMonkey27
Canada616 Posts
| ||
| ||
