|
Contrary to popular belief Stephano is not from the States, any mindless spam asserting otherwise after this time (19:48 KST/ 5:48 AM EST/ 10:48 GMT) will meet a moderator response. We have enough confusing spam posting in LR threads these days. Lets try to keep the love for everyone's favourite French zerg reasonable.
And as always: - No player bashing. - No caster bashing. - No balance whining.
Enjoy the games. |
On December 12 2011 23:26 Squeegy wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2011 23:19 Ysellian wrote:On December 12 2011 23:15 Alokiya wrote: Is there a player (besides Idra) that inspires such strong feelings as Stephano? There's really not many people on the middle ground with him, it's absolutely a love/hate thing, which I don't get. Personally, I think he played solid today, there's no real shame in losing Bo1 to MVP and MC. It was good for him to have a super strong test, hopefully he enjoys the rest of his time in korea! Yeah with stephano it's odd. I mean Naniwa has Idra-like behaviour, but Stephano is well mannered. It's not odd at all because it's not the player. It's the fans.
Good point there. I've actually seen some of the accusations some people posted about MC losing on purpose. Seriously BM guys
|
On December 12 2011 23:12 SupLilSon wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2011 23:06 Ylrahc wrote: The problem with the games themselves were simply because they were BO1. However, the amount of bashing, specifically towards MC is sickening.
Actually not many ppl are bashing MC, most say he played perfectly against Stephano (who actually could have won with slightly better decision making on his push), and apart from 2 or 3 trolls noone is saying he threw his game against DRG. Watching the game just makes it obvious anyway. It's nice to see most ppl agree on 1 thing though, Bo1 devaluated this tournament by a lot :s It's a group stage format, aren't they usually a series of best of 1s? Otherwise it would have taken 6+ hours to finish all the games. And so what ? there is a freaking whole day to play the pool, and a full night of rest after...And actually in Europa Bo1 in big tournaments are long gone since 1) they are quite random (did the build I prepare blind counter my opponent build or the other way around ?) 2) don't favor macro games and overall show.
Anyways, I don't feel like the tournament was devalued at all. The level of player skill at this tournament is insanely high. Stephano showed some good games, but it's also clear that he is not living up to the hype his fans create for him.
I'd say going 2 - 2 is exactly living up to the hype his true fans created (ie those who claim he has his place among the best players in the world). Please don't count the trolls who claim he is the super best player of the universe and that he is an alien sent by Mars to defeat Koreans as true fans, thanks :-)
|
it's only bo1 format so pretty volatile but it seems Stephano is Code S material
|
On December 12 2011 23:28 Kahlgar wrote: it's only bo1 format so pretty volatile but it seems Stephano is Code S material
MVP sayd that in his post win interview also
|
the problem is its like a relationship... Idra fan boys can not love another player... it Idra or nothing and that is why Stephano gets so much grief on this forum lol
|
+ Show Spoiler +On December 12 2011 23:26 Squeegy wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2011 23:19 Ysellian wrote:On December 12 2011 23:15 Alokiya wrote: Is there a player (besides Idra) that inspires such strong feelings as Stephano? There's really not many people on the middle ground with him, it's absolutely a love/hate thing, which I don't get. Personally, I think he played solid today, there's no real shame in losing Bo1 to MVP and MC. It was good for him to have a super strong test, hopefully he enjoys the rest of his time in korea! Yeah with stephano it's odd. I mean Naniwa has Idra-like behaviour, but Stephano is well mannered. It's not odd at all because it's not the player. It's the fans.
its allmost like with MLP !
he is good, no doubt about it, but i don't get why he gets more talk by going 2-2 as the other players...even her0 who disappointed me a bit gets close to no place in the spotlight.
|
On December 12 2011 23:26 Squeegy wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2011 23:19 Ysellian wrote:On December 12 2011 23:15 Alokiya wrote: Is there a player (besides Idra) that inspires such strong feelings as Stephano? There's really not many people on the middle ground with him, it's absolutely a love/hate thing, which I don't get. Personally, I think he played solid today, there's no real shame in losing Bo1 to MVP and MC. It was good for him to have a super strong test, hopefully he enjoys the rest of his time in korea! Yeah with stephano it's odd. I mean Naniwa has Idra-like behaviour, but Stephano is well mannered. It's not odd at all because it's not the player. It's the fans. so people are antifans becos he has fans? wow... that's so sad.
|
Nice games today and quite unlucky result for stephano in the end.. Pool play often gets a bit silly till the end as the match becomes irrelevant for one player. DRG was lucky to get two games in the end that didn't matter for his opponent. First hero who was already out and then MC who was already through. They didn't throw their games but they did seem to play a little less then usual which is understandable, if the game is irrelevant why would they be bothered to invest in a long macro game..
|
woo woo well done DRG!
extremely surprised hero got 0-4'd.. but it WAS insane group so can't say anything poorly about him
|
On December 12 2011 23:35 Markwerf wrote: Nice games today and quite unlucky result for stephano in the end.. Pool play often gets a bit silly till the end as the match becomes irrelevant for one player. DRG was lucky to get two games in the end that didn't matter for his opponent. First hero who was already out and then MC who was already through. They didn't throw their games but they did seem to play a little less then usual which is understandable, if the game is irrelevant why would they be bothered to invest in a long macro game..
Agreed, they were obviously still playing to win, but from my judgement they weren't playing with the standard intensity. Not to discredit DRG in anyway though, he played two very good games.
|
BO1 for this kind of tournament... nc
|
MVP likes foreign zergs
|
Good effort from Stephano, didn't look out of his depth at all, sad to see him eliminated by a tie breaker.
At least Mvp advanced Maybe the TeamLiquid preview won't overrate HerO so much next time, too data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
|
On December 12 2011 23:27 quancer wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2011 23:11 redviper wrote:On December 12 2011 23:03 quancer wrote:On December 12 2011 22:49 redviper wrote:On December 12 2011 22:42 quancer wrote:On December 12 2011 22:30 Maenander wrote:On December 12 2011 22:27 quancer wrote:On December 12 2011 22:19 redviper wrote:On December 12 2011 22:13 quancer wrote:On December 12 2011 22:10 OopsOopsBaby wrote: [quote]
solved for you.
D 3-2 M 2-2 S 2-2 M > S His point is that the results say M > S as well as S > D > M, which are completely contradictory. Why should we favour one over the other? Tournaments are strictly about overall performance in that a better score regardless of who you face determines how far you go. To suddenly dispense of this in the case of ties makes absolutely no sense, especially when your choice is essentially arbitrary. Tournaments are most certainly NOT about overall performance. Otherwise they would have a fully connected graph. There is an inherent localization in tournaments and this is clearly an evidence of that. MC beat Stephano is more localized than Stephano beat DRG beat MC. Its quite obvious and that is why everyone uses tie breakers. I'm sorry, I don't understand your point about the "fully connected graph" part. I would address that if you could clarify for me. This is the first time I've heard that A > B should be given more priority over B > C > A. Especially in Starcraft, where match-up prowess is such an important variable, this sort of thing leaves too much up to luck. Again, if you could help me understand your first point then perhaps I could form a better response. What he is saying is that a Single Elimination tournament is even more unfair in your book, because direct encounters between players matter even more (highly "localized"). Only a full league system would meet your demands. I'm sorry if this seems obtuse (it's very early where I am) but I do not see what single-elimination has to do with this. My demands are simply that *group play* requires tiebreakers because it's the least-arbitrary decider available that is feasible. The demand is arbitrary because why tie breakers and not replay the entire group. head to head is a tie breaker and a good one, because it has a simple result (obviously 1 guy won, 1 lost) and because it doesn't require additional effort (game has already happened). Replaying the entire group is not feasible and discounts the performance of those not in a tie, obviously. Do you agree that in a 3-way tie tiebreakers need to be played? If so then you can obviously see why this decision should be valued over replaying the entire group. And head-to-head as a tiebreaker is not simply 1 guy won and 1 guy lost, because this result is part of the tally that makes the players tied in the first place. Pretend Stephano vs MC is the final match: Stephano is 2-1 and MC is 1-2. MC needs to beat Stephano to even be tied with him in the first place. Because there is no point to having a repeat tie breaker, it doesn't add any new information. MC already beat Stephano, so he qualifies. Why play the games again? Ok lets pretend that Stephano vs MC is the final match. Stephano loses and MC wins. MC goes through. I am sorry, I am not just getting this insipid desire to muddle things up by having MC and Stephano play again. What would be the end result of that? If MC wins he goes through (he is 2-0 to Stephano). If MC loses he doesn't qualify and yet he is 1-1 to stephano. So lets make it a BO3? If MC wins 1 and loses 2 he doesn't go through and he is still tied at 2-2 overall. Its most fair and most immediate to compare the head to head results. Because in this scenario MC needs to defeat Stephano to be even on score with him--MC is 1-2 and Stephano 2-1, remember. This is to say that it is a must-win for MC to be on at least equal footing with Stephano in the eyes of the tournament. Even though Stephano has already won 1 more match than MC, using head-to-head as a tiebreaker means that MC has more to gain from prevailing in this final match than Stephano has to gain from prevailing. You are artificially putting them on equal footing, when they are not, by allowing this one match determine who advances, even though Stephano comes into the match already having accomplished more than MC (i.e. has a better "score"). Say what now? They have an equal amount to gain. At the start of the match both haven't qualified. At the end of the match one has. Thats all there is to it.
Regardless the situation is hypothetical anyways since it didn't turn out like that. Stephano was 2-0 and proceeded to get knocked out 2-2.
A tiebreaker match is a discrete competition whose winner's group stage score is given priority over that of the loser's. The event is separate, and so the winner is simply given priority, regardless of previous results. All we know is that MC and Stephano are tied in the eyes of the tournament, and that whoever wins the tiebreaker match is given the go-ahead. Considerations of bo3 record or whatever do not need to enter into this.
Yes but you haven't explained the why of it. I get what a tie breaker discrete match is. But I don't get why should we have a discrete match when we already have a tie breaker built into the group matches. Why play them again when they already played once?
|
On December 12 2011 23:30 sopas wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2011 23:26 Squeegy wrote:On December 12 2011 23:19 Ysellian wrote:On December 12 2011 23:15 Alokiya wrote: Is there a player (besides Idra) that inspires such strong feelings as Stephano? There's really not many people on the middle ground with him, it's absolutely a love/hate thing, which I don't get. Personally, I think he played solid today, there's no real shame in losing Bo1 to MVP and MC. It was good for him to have a super strong test, hopefully he enjoys the rest of his time in korea! Yeah with stephano it's odd. I mean Naniwa has Idra-like behaviour, but Stephano is well mannered. It's not odd at all because it's not the player. It's the fans. so people are antifans becos he has fans? wow... that's so sad.
IMO they're two types of fans and 2 types of anti fans of stephano
Fans: 1. Those who fall for the hype a player like stephano has brought, beating quite a few koreans and foreigners in his short time and his ladder runs. 2. Those who actually like his play and style, and enjoy watching his stream.
Anti-Fans 1. Those who are tired of everyone so hyping him so much, they want him to fall because they're tired of reading "stephano best foreinger new bonjwa"
2. Fans of Idra
the second type of antifan is because of the fact Idra has said stephano is overrated...
|
On December 12 2011 23:35 Markwerf wrote: Nice games today and quite unlucky result for stephano in the end.. Pool play often gets a bit silly till the end as the match becomes irrelevant for one player. DRG was lucky to get two games in the end that didn't matter for his opponent. First hero who was already out and then MC who was already through. They didn't throw their games but they did seem to play a little less then usual which is understandable, if the game is irrelevant why would they be bothered to invest in a long macro game..
I think this is why Stephano isn't liked. Stephano was lucky he won a ZvZ and beat an out of form hero. When the time came to play less fickle matches against good opponents he couldn't cut it. Does that mean he is bad? No. But it also doesn't mean that DRG's 1st place should be undervalued. And it certainly doesn't mean that he can hang with the big boys.
|
So Stephano loses and people are claiming match-fixing issues?
Sigh... TL.. when will you grow
Also, how the fuck did MC win in those awful maps... I see people talking about Stephano allining. Why the hell would you all in MC when he's absolutely and terribly uncomfortable with macro PvZ in that map? It sounds ridiculous.
A tiebreaker match is a discrete competition whose winner's group stage score is given priority over that of the loser's. The event is separate, and so the winner is simply given priority, regardless of previous results. All we know is that MC and Stephano are tied in the eyes of the tournament, and that whoever wins the tiebreaker match is given the go-ahead. Considerations of bo3 record or whatever do not need to enter into this.
This is where you're wrong. Given that the system involves a head-to-head record, they are NOT tied in the eyes of the tournament, MC is placed higher. You're disregarding the tournament's format to fit your argument. The only situation in which players are tied in this format is when there's a 3-way tie with each player beating a different contestant. That's the only situation in which a tiebreaker should happen.
|
MC keep beating foreigner zergs...
sigh.
Also HerO dont be sad boy!
|
On December 12 2011 23:29 Tommylew wrote: the problem is its like a relationship... Idra fan boys can not love another player... it Idra or nothing and that is why Stephano gets so much grief on this forum lol
I don't know about that one, to be honest. Is Fanboy being defined as "an obsessed, crazy-ass fan who hates other players and only cares about one pro-gamer in particular"? I consider myself a big fan of IdrA, but also a big fan of other players, including other Zergs. I just don't happen to be a huge fan of Stephano, but I don't think that being a fan of Stephano or IdrA has to be dichotomous or even mutually exclusive.
I think, in general, some people who are fans of some players act a bit over the top, and it tends to stereotype the whole group of people who like a player (or even stereotype the player himself). And that's where the problem lies.
|
On December 12 2011 23:44 dapierow wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2011 23:30 sopas wrote:On December 12 2011 23:26 Squeegy wrote:On December 12 2011 23:19 Ysellian wrote:On December 12 2011 23:15 Alokiya wrote: Is there a player (besides Idra) that inspires such strong feelings as Stephano? There's really not many people on the middle ground with him, it's absolutely a love/hate thing, which I don't get. Personally, I think he played solid today, there's no real shame in losing Bo1 to MVP and MC. It was good for him to have a super strong test, hopefully he enjoys the rest of his time in korea! Yeah with stephano it's odd. I mean Naniwa has Idra-like behaviour, but Stephano is well mannered. It's not odd at all because it's not the player. It's the fans. so people are antifans becos he has fans? wow... that's so sad. IMO they're two types of fans and 2 types of anti fans of stephano Fans: 1. Those who fall for the hype a player like stephano has brought, beating quite a few koreans and foreigners in his short time and his ladder runs. 2. Those who actually like his play and style, and enjoy watching his stream. Anti-Fans 1. Those who are tired of everyone so hyping him so much, they want him to fall because they're tired of reading "stephano best foreinger new bonjwa" 2. Fans of Idra the second type of antifan is because of the fact Idra has said stephano is overrated...
I cant understand "part 2 of the anti fans"
I simply dont get it why Idra and his fans are so intimidated by Stephano. I have never once seen an interview where Stephano says anything negative about Idra. Matter in fact Stephano only got good things to say about Idra. I have seen pleanty of Idra interviews where he indirectly attack Stephano. Overrated etc
I dont get it
|
|
|
|