EPTOn September 21 2011 21:10 ViperPL wrote:
Awesome, all terrans + Nestea and 1 non-terran from group E. Worst GSL ever ?
Awesome, all terrans + Nestea and 1 non-terran from group E. Worst GSL ever ?
Worst GSL because the best players are advancing?
[GSL] Code S RO32 Day 2 - Page 116
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Rayansaki
Portugal1266 Posts
Worst GSL because the best players are advancing? | ||
|
Zaurus
Singapore676 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:10 chanseyy wrote: Zerg: "Dammit Terrans are OP, nerf them!" Protoss: "Dammit we suck, buff us!" Terran: "Z and P players are just making more mistakes, exhibit A, B, and C. It's not a balance issue, the players are just all bad." So you are terran, cause you say the players that lost are bad. haha | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:09 CroDeadman wrote: Got a feeling Zenio takes it and Virus Zenio advance... -.-a after that asd game you think Virus is better then asd / I think asd will win it all, he's not well known but his last code A games were steller to, much more impresive then i ever seen a virus play. | ||
|
kodas
United States418 Posts
| ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
I wanted to vote more then once too. I wonder if any of the non terrans even practise anything other then vT. On September 21 2011 21:12 Rayansaki wrote: Worst GSL because the best players are advancing? No. worst GSL because all the players play the same race. I don't wanna watch 29 TvT's that last 35 minutes each. I wanna see all 3 races playing and the best players winning. | ||
|
samaNo4
Spain245 Posts
| ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
| ||
|
Oboeman
Canada3980 Posts
Virus is a prime example of what polt was talking about in the group selections. zenio flanked quite a bit, which is great to see, but in a lot of the engagements he engaged while coming around a corner up a ramp, which chokes the units more and lines them up isntead of spreading them out. He also lost far too many mutas. that central location is very strong for terran, but I think zenio should have circumvented it more often like he did in the first few minutes.take out the destructible rocks at every 3rd for more paths, all that stuff. ling baneling muta doesn't beat terran when you're trading, you have to stomp his army into the ground without losing your mutas and still having banelings left over. | ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:12 Rayansaki wrote: Worst GSL because the best players are advancing? No worst GSL because mediocre players playing a better race are advancing. User was warned for this post | ||
|
Chise
Japan507 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:12 Doctorbeat wrote: You really think neither DRG, Leenock, Genius is going to make it? DRG and Leenock yes. And maybe some other Zerg(s). But to be honest, HuK was the Protoss I think has the highest chance of advancing. The other Protosses have harder groups and aren't neccessarily (a lot) better than HuK. I hope I'm not right though. I really don't want to see 0 Protosses in the RO16. Worst GSL because the best players are advancing? Do you really think that all the good players choose Terran? It's not neccessarily imbalance, but right now Protoss is at a huge disadvantage, which *might* change in a few weeks/months (just in case Protoss find a new way to play). Thinking all good players choose Terran is beyond stupid. | ||
|
labbe
Sweden1456 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:12 Doctorbeat wrote: You really think neither DRG, Leenock, Genius is going to make it? Yeah, this is more like DRG's wet dream. He is known as Terran Killer for a reason. | ||
|
vertical101
Hong Kong311 Posts
| ||
|
fixed_point
Germany4891 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:14 Oboeman wrote: asd earned his win. Virus is a prime example of what polt was talking about in the group selections. zenio flanked quite a bit, which is great to see, but in a lot of the engagements he engaged while coming around a corner up a ramp, which chokes the units more and lines them up isntead of spreading them out. He also lost far too many mutas. ling baneling muta doesn't beat terran when you're trading, you have to stomp his army into the ground without losing your mutas and still having banelings left over. What was polt talking about? I missed the selections. | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:08 mTw|NarutO wrote: I didn't say he needed a Colossus that game, I did name the counters to many marines. He didn't bring any of them or didn't control well enough, so he lost. Not saying its not easy to execute and strong for Terran, but calling it imbalanced or completely unbeatable is untrue. That asd guy even though playing against not the best Zerg (no offence to Zenio) is really good. Strong macro, continues to expand, good drops etc. Something doesn't have to be 'completely unbeatable' to be imbalanced. If it is far easier to execute than to defend that in itself is a problem. VR all-ins were never completely unbeatable either yet they were nerfed. But yeah, even if there no were no toss left in code S or A people like you would still be claiming there's no problem. | ||
|
ViperPL
Poland1775 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:12 Doctorbeat wrote: You really think neither DRG, Leenock, Genius is going to make it? I really hope all of them do advance, but it's gonna be tough. | ||
|
izgodlee
Canada133 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:12 AxionSteel wrote: Oh ok my bad!! So used to people on here doing everything in their power to discredit a terran player even if they outplayed their opponent. rofl, it also looks like you are blindly defending terran without reading posts. Hilarity. | ||
|
zenith8
55 Posts
coz we have an even racial distribution of Terran, Terran and Terran | ||
|
antilyon
Brazil2546 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:11 Drey wrote: Stop saying crap like that, a lot of terran have said protoss needs buffs and that terran is a bit op. As a terran, "complete" is the right term for terran. We just have more options. | ||
|
Nachor
Germany83 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:11 izgodlee wrote: This is actually what BALANCE is. If the situations were to be reversed, terran crushes the first toss push, and the terran suffers NO scv loss, the toss will mass up for 3 minutes and go and win? No, never. This. I think this is the main problem people (including myself) have with Terran 1 base pushes. It's the feeling that in a situation where the Terran is the victim of a 1 base push and comes out without economic damage they are miles ahead and usually win shortly after. Terran feels like it is the only race that comes back from a failed push and still wins with the next one. | ||
|
Oboeman
Canada3980 Posts
On September 21 2011 21:15 fixed_point wrote: What was polt talking about? I missed the selections. polt basically said that terran is imba, so some of them don't deserve to be there, and as one of the deserving terrans it is his duty to knock some bad terrans out. | ||
| ||
