EPT[GSL] Aug Code S RO8 Day 2 - Page 60
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Stop with the stupid TT1 discussion, this topic is no place for it and you can all express your likes and dislikes in a more respectful and constructive manner. ~Nyovne | ||
|
demonik187
United States575 Posts
| ||
|
StateAlchemist
France1946 Posts
On August 31 2011 18:50 provrorsbarn wrote: LOL at all the Mvp hate.....He did a prefect build......and hes playin for alot of money... You cant blame a guy for wanting to win..... This. He is just punishing Huk's greedy style too | ||
|
RealQ
1120 Posts
| ||
|
Montana[TK]
1624 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50629 Posts
| ||
|
hackertitan
Singapore105 Posts
T only need tank, marines, scvs and medivacs to win P I never though TvP is that easy until today match User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
jtrex
Japan94 Posts
| ||
|
Onlinejaguar
Australia2823 Posts
On August 31 2011 18:50 Probe1 wrote: Okay guys shut it with the balance talk, let's watch Game Three  Agreed. | ||
|
iky43210
United States2099 Posts
| ||
|
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
On August 31 2011 18:49 Netsky wrote: I don't think the Protoss players understand... 1gate fast expo is "all-in" because it is blind and you are relying on hope alone that the Terran doesn't execute a timing push. MVP knows that HuK almost exclusively plays this style so he is using strong one-base play. Protoss can stop 1-1-1, just because Protoss players choose not to and play risky fast expand builds, and then cry imba has nothing to do with real balance issues. I don't think you understand Protoss...or 1/1/1 | ||
|
Vapaach
Finland994 Posts
Just for fun anyway. Gogo HuK! | ||
|
Doko
Argentina1737 Posts
On August 31 2011 18:49 Zdrastochye wrote: How does rushing chargelots with sentries as your gas dump work vs 1-1-1? Depends on the timing of the terran push. Ie the 10 min push of puma vs mc would've gotten annihilated by chargelots. You just need a small group of 3-4 zealots to charge from the back to soak most of the tank fire. | ||
|
Tantaburs
Canada1825 Posts
the basic idea of his post is correct. i don't think he would ever be the favourite but: Anahiem - Korea - Finland - Korea - anahiem - korea - raliegh - korea and im pretty sure i missed a few trips. Cannot be good for your practice | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On August 31 2011 18:49 Netsky wrote: I don't think the Protoss players understand... 1gate fast expo is "all-in" because it is blind and you are relying on hope alone that the Terran doesn't execute a timing push. MVP knows that HuK almost exclusively plays this style so he is using strong one-base play. Protoss can stop 1-1-1, just because Protoss players choose not to and play risky fast expand builds, and then cry imba has nothing to do with real balance issues. that last game wasn't 1gate fast expo. it was 3gate stargate all in that did little damage. | ||
|
BeefEU
Netherlands260 Posts
On August 31 2011 18:48 Dommk wrote: He spent 100/150 on a Twilight Council he shouldn't have made. His expo paid it self off by the time MVP got there You think 100 minerals and 150 gas would win the game for him? | ||
|
Daniel C
Hong Kong1606 Posts
| ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On August 31 2011 18:46 AmericanUmlaut wrote: Yeah, this is just ridiculous. I mean, since when do professional players use the tactics they think give them the greatest chance of success? What an asshole. There's nothing wrong with using the strongest tactics to win but remember MVP was the one speaking out about how he wouldn't use this particular all-in. It seems a bit hypocritical or false of him to claim he wouldn't use the tactic because it's too strong and then go ahead and use it anyway. | ||
|
medic_ro
Romania105 Posts
| ||
|
PikaXchU
Singapore379 Posts
| ||
|
Merany
France890 Posts
| ||
| ||
, his travel schedule is just killing him. he'd have probably been the favorite for this match if he hadnt been travelling so much
