EPTSlayerS jacket > TSL jacket.
GSL Code A Round of 8 Day 1 - Page 86
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
It's alright to debate over the game, that's completely fine. It's alright to criticize casters/players/etc. It is not fine, however, to be an idiot and unnecessarily flame other users of this site, players, casters, etc etc etc for no reason. Any absurd and unnecessary flaming of anything/talking an absurd amount of shit/talking out of your ass/etc will be met with a 2day temp ban or longer. Please keep it civil. | ||
|
ch33psh33p
7650 Posts
SlayerS jacket > TSL jacket. | ||
|
bennyaus
Australia1833 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:32 Vorenius wrote: He became known for cheesing all the way from Ro64 to the finals (possibly excluding the vHongUn games) He did look pretty good this season, but he is still mostly known as a cheesy player. And, he didn't 'mix it up'. He won purely cheesy games from Ro32 to Ro4 in open season3 ( I don't remember his Ro64 match but I'll assume he cheesed that aswell) + Show Spoiler + Round 1 - he played DreamizER; game 1 was scv allin, game 2 was macro 2-0 Round 2 - he played genius; game 1 was scv allin as well, game 2 was macro 2-0 Round 3 - he played squirtle, all games are macro games, he won 2-1 Round 4 - he played nestea....we all know what happened Round 5 - HongUn - he played macro games Final - MC - he played macro games | ||
|
aoe2fan
Sweden700 Posts
| ||
|
flexy
United States182 Posts
| ||
|
ihasaKAROT
Netherlands4730 Posts
| ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
| ||
|
sqrt
1210 Posts
Poll: Recommendations for Game 2 Excellent! (32) If you have time (16) Meh...not my cup of tea. (13) 61 total votes Your vote: Recommendations for Game 2 (Vote): Excellent! | ||
|
kvn4444
1510 Posts
| ||
|
FarbrorAbavna
Sweden4856 Posts
| ||
Whitewing
United States7483 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:42 Roggay wrote: In PvT he is so right actually, DTs are used so much more and so usefull. Only on huge maps like Terminus RE, on small or middle size maps.... like all the ladder maps, you don't really have time to safely open DTs. You also have less room to stagger send DT's in, so terran doesn't have to save up as many scans. Not only that, but you have less safe time in between the opener and the expansion. So yeah, good strat, but requires a large map. | ||
|
bbQ4Aiur
Hong Kong2752 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:42 Encrypto wrote: Nope, it was stim. You could see it on the production tab. was shield and concussive shells | ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
| ||
|
Ashok
Australia339 Posts
| ||
|
gakkgakk
Norway902 Posts
| ||
|
evils_death
77 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:42 Encrypto wrote: Nope, it was stim. You could see it on the production tab. Actually, I saw it was combat shields on the production..... | ||
|
Cabinet Sanchez
Australia1097 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:43 iRRelevance wrote: DT into expand is NOT cheese. You have to assume it's Terrans making the comments on that kind of stuff. | ||
|
anatem
Romania1369 Posts
| ||
|
hazz.
United Kingdom83 Posts
| ||
|
o3.power91
Bahrain5288 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:42 jalstar wrote: I can see DT expand becoming a standard PvT opening, maybe without the hidden tech though. It is a very good opening however will die to earlier pushes since you get the tech TOO fast to get any decent starting army out. Also gets roflraped by banshees  | ||
|
Kyhol
Canada2574 Posts
| ||
| ||
