EPTOn December 18 2010 20:09 robin19999 wrote:
It would be a make gate if the gate was in the mineral line
It would be a make gate if the gate was in the mineral line
Wouldn't that be a Maynard gate
[GSL] S3 Grand Finals - Page 188
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
hidiliho
Canada685 Posts
Wouldn't that be a Maynard gate | ||
|
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
| ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:08 Lann555 wrote: Ye. Jinro lost on steppes to just a few zealots running in from a single proxy gate if I recall correctly. People here are just insanely biased against Rain for some reason, despite him beating Hongun, NexGenius and Nestea and now putting up a decent fight against the best PvT'er in the business. But he is obviously still a total n00b :/ I don`t understand the logic either. Jinro good? but Rain bad? Rain atleast puts up more of a fight and not get 4-0`d in 30 minutes. | ||
|
Maskedsatyr
Singapore1245 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:08 Voltaire wrote: Despite what Artosis thinks, the only possible way Rain could have stopped that was by sending SCVs to take out the initial pylon right as he scouted it, and then building the bunker so it was in range of the gateway. The placement of the pylon reduces the surface area for the attacking scvs. The units will just run by the bunker and own the scvs if the bunker was placed in range of the gateway. Placing the bunker in a position that covered all mineral patches would have been alot better I think. | ||
|
mizU
United States12125 Posts
Someone is stuck in SC1 mode. | ||
|
applejuice
307 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:09 Reminiscence wrote: Even a competent diamond player would have fended off that cheese and transitted rather easily but rain just had to do everything wrong. So, uh, that makes MC bad as well, by default? I mean, he's the one that did the strat that could have been beaten by the low level diamond player you are talking about? | ||
|
monsterDrakar
Bulgaria100 Posts
| ||
|
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
| ||
|
HollowLord
United States3862 Posts
| ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
Everlong
Czech Republic1973 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:11 mango_destroyer wrote: I don`t understand the logic either. Jinro good? but Rain bad? Rain atleast puts up more of a fight and not get 4-0`d in 30 minutes. Cos of 20 minute breaks.. :D | ||
|
Banginglife
United States92 Posts
You mean manner gate lol..... | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50930 Posts
THE PUN!!!!!!!!!! | ||
|
SC2Real
Germany184 Posts
as P is sacking a lot of econ it won't hurt you there anyway. | ||
|
Matoo-
Canada1397 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:05 Logican wrote: IU - Good Day I love you | ||
|
Gudeldar
United States1200 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:11 mordk wrote: Marauder was a good call, since stalkers were definitely coming, his defense crumbled solely and ONLY because of lousy bunker placement, leaving his flank open to stalker harass. As seen, even one stalker sealed the deal, because marauder cant kill stalker with zealots chasing him. Centered bunker would have effectively defended, even better if walled by rax By the time the Stalker came out the game was already over, he was down to 5 SCV vs 16 probes. Better bunker placement and more marines was what he needed. | ||
|
eloist
United States1017 Posts
| ||
Ninja4ever.
France231 Posts
But today, with all those non-players pros that think they figured the game out who are really getting on my nerves, I'll probably have to stop reading those kind of threads just in order to preserve my sanity. | ||
|
Sinborn
United States275 Posts
| ||
|
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:11 HollowLord wrote: Clearly this is another case of GOM rigging the matches to favor SlayerS_BoxeR Lolol, well played sir. That was quite the shift in metatrolling. | ||
| ||
