EPTESL Pro Series Finals - Page 15
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
| ||
|
Ropid
Germany3557 Posts
On December 05 2010 04:59 RmpL wrote: What are they supposed to do to prevent PC Crashes ? .. They could employ a Feng Shui consultant! | ||
|
fishinguy
Russian Federation798 Posts
| ||
|
Mattes
Germany1116 Posts
| ||
|
mdma-_-
Nauru1213 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
| ||
|
zurg
1923 Posts
ben fighting! | ||
|
jayt88
Singapore97 Posts
| ||
zere
Germany1287 Posts
Was Demu ahead at this point? Hell, yes. Would he have won the game? Most likely. Definifively? No. Would they have also given Goody the default win if the game would have crashed 10 minutes earlier? Because, at that point, it was the other way around: Goody was way ahead. Remember Dreamhack's Morrow vs. Mana, when Day9 kicked his PC? People were screaming "zomfg Morrow way ahead, need defwin", and in the end Mana won the game. The screaming for defaultwins is pathetic and pitiful, even in online tournaments. And when it comes to professional gaming, with thousands of Euros or Dollars on the line, there is no way eSports can be taken seriously when a game is being decided because the frikking event host, a multimillion Euro company, fails to provide a stable running PC for a player. This is ridiculous, this is unspeakably outraging. | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
| ||
|
kmkkmk
Germany418 Posts
On December 05 2010 05:18 zere wrote: The ESL fails to provide smoothly running PCs to the competitors, so Goody's chance to win the game has been taken away by the ESL. Was Demu ahead at this point? Hell, yes. Would he have won the game? Most likely. Definifively? No. Would they have also given Goody the default win if the game would have crashed 10 minutes earlier? Because, at that point, it was the other way around: Goody was way ahead. Remember Dreamhack's Morrow vs. Mana, when Day9 kicked his PC? People were screaming "zomfg Morrow way ahead, need defwin", and in the end Mana won the game. The screaming for defaultwins is pathetic and pitiful, even in online tournaments. And when it comes to professional gaming, with thousands of Euros or Dollars on the line, there is no way eSports can be taken seriously when a game is being decided because the frikking event host, a multimillion Euro company, fails to provide a stable running PC for a player. This is ridiculous, this is unspeakably outraging. Yes but the point is in contrast to you, the admins have to come up with a decission whereas you can fall back on complaining and not offering a solution. | ||
|
kmkkmk
Germany418 Posts
On December 05 2010 05:19 7mk wrote: heh, casters not explicility mentioning the hidden expo because of the hearing issue, I like that I think the credits should go to Hasu, smart player, smart caster, smart guy. | ||
|
kmkkmk
Germany418 Posts
| ||
|
zere
Germany1287 Posts
On December 05 2010 05:21 kmkkmk wrote: Yes but the point is in contrast to you, the admins have to come up with a decission whereas you can fall back on complaining and not offering a solution. There is no solution to be offered. Unless a player gives up the game, a disconnect has to lead to a regame. Otherwise, whenever a player feels ahead, he will simply hit the Windows-button on his keyboard and cancel the LAN connection in the task bar. | ||
|
4Servy
Netherlands1542 Posts
The combination of a kinda buggy game and battlenet 0.2 makes that SC2 isnt the proper platform yet for a good esport game. There are just way to many disc's, crashes in all sort of tournaments with alot of money on the line. ESL cant do alot in this situation tbh, its just blizzard who made a unstable game with a shity online service, and are unwilling to change anything. LAN support and a big big big big crash hunting action by blizzard would be the the best solution to all this bullshit because then when something goes wrong it will be most likely the fault of the organiser if the game itself is rocksolid (Brood war). | ||
|
kmkkmk
Germany418 Posts
On December 05 2010 05:24 zere wrote: There is no solution to be offered. Unless a player gives up the game, a disconnect has to lead to a regame. Otherwise, whenever a player feels ahead, he will simply hit the Windows-button on his keyboard and cancel the LAN connection in the task bar. I don't like your solution because it feels unfair when a player with a huge lead disconnects. You are just describing how a loosing player could abuse a yet to formulate rule. | ||
|
Cade)Flayer
United Kingdom279 Posts
| ||
|
kmkkmk
Germany418 Posts
| ||
|
Malinor
Germany4734 Posts
 | ||
|
zurg
1923 Posts
not ben's best game  | ||
| ||
