|
Stream died? Is there another site for VLC links like for the opening? THe one we used then isn't working for me.
|
|
|
On September 06 2010 20:41 Integra wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:40 mrblue182 wrote:On September 06 2010 20:39 Integra wrote:On September 06 2010 20:37 Entropic wrote:On September 06 2010 20:35 Integra wrote:
GOOD JOB TERRAN you won by pure skill. Fucking Ridiculous.
Terran vs Zerg, disgusting piece of imbalanced crap.
You expected the Zerg to win after a fail baneling bust or something? When the banelings didn't work game was already halfway over. He had higher chance compared to if he would play "normal" so yes I did. Terran isn't why you are still in bronze, get over it. I'm 1.3k Protoss diamond player.
![[image loading]](http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100828054703/uncyclopedia/images/b/b5/Exploding-head.gif)
User was banned for this post.
|
Worked for 2 hours, just died.
|
On September 06 2010 20:39 Vokasak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:38 Censured wrote:On September 06 2010 20:30 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:27 TRAP[yoo] wrote:On September 06 2010 20:26 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:23 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. So he did all the perfect responses and still got raped. I wonder why people complain, then. He got raped from the push, not from the harass. Did you miss the attack on Terran's natural? He was able to macro enough stuff. to do a scary attack forcing the pullback/delay of his second drop. He only "got raped" after the drops on the cliff stopped. Why do I bother, though? Zerg players can't see past their own overinflated sense of martyrdom. killing the hatch twice certainly helps terran. or am i wrong? He gave up two thors, four marines, a siege tank, and three medivacs for those two hatcheries. If I was on 3 bases as a zerg vs 2 base terran, I'd take that trade any day. He gave up... what? He lost 4 marines, and he bring all thors, all siege tanks and all medivacs back... seriously... Please watch the VOD when they come out. He didn't bring anything back. He lost it all. I swear Zerg players only see what they want to see when it comes to these games. >:[
if your talking about the 4 marine tank drop that killed the first hatch he lost his marines and saved the tank/medivac... i think 
|
Meaning that its just inappropriate for such a big event. its like they have been shoved aside for the korean commentators
Errr read into it?
|
On September 06 2010 20:43 rebuked wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:41 Integra wrote:On September 06 2010 20:40 mrblue182 wrote:On September 06 2010 20:39 Integra wrote:On September 06 2010 20:37 Entropic wrote:On September 06 2010 20:35 Integra wrote:
GOOD JOB TERRAN you won by pure skill. Fucking Ridiculous.
Terran vs Zerg, disgusting piece of imbalanced crap.
You expected the Zerg to win after a fail baneling bust or something? When the banelings didn't work game was already halfway over. He had higher chance compared to if he would play "normal" so yes I did. Terran isn't why you are still in bronze, get over it. I'm 1.3k Protoss diamond player.
you got banned and made another account didnt you
|
On September 06 2010 20:42 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
stream down?
hq is up amd lag free
|
On September 06 2010 20:41 cuppatea wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:29 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:25 ZapRoffo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:24 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 ZapRoffo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. Yeah and did you see how far behind he ended up? How far behind was he? He had enough stuff to take out every unit in Terran's army and force the drop to come back. He was obviously just fine. It's not until Terran stopped trying to do cute little drops and do an actual push that any real damage was done to Nestea. Umm, because he was so weakened from losing his natural hatch twice that he had way too few stuff to defend the push. He wasn't weakened. He had the third. He was so not-weakened that he did an attack and killed every siege tank, marine, bunker, and turret that the terran player had at that point. Were we watching different games? Or is this Zerg selective attention syndrome? He lost every unit he had in that desperation attack, which was easily held off despite the Terran having 2 thors and 2 medivacs on the other side of the map. After that the Terran just went and killed the natural anyway, while also dropping at the 3rd. What you're essentially saying is "hey, Terran being able to attack a Zerg expansion with zero resistance from a cliff is no problem because the Zerg can just attack head-on into a fortified position and sacrifice his entire army to keep the expansion alive for an additional 30 seconds (after which point it will go down anyway)!" Even most of the top Terran players will happily admit that cliffing stacks the matchup in their favour on LT, why do you refuse to accept that?
I can accept that it's a good thing to do, but I won't accept that it's imbalanced or that LT is a bad map because of it or that players who do it are cheesing peices of shit, or any of the bold claims Zergs make whenever this kind of thing happens.
|
|
|
On September 06 2010 20:42 telamascope wrote:
Yes, stream went down for me too. yep, it only goes down between games for me. quick restart from the website fixes it every time, so not a big deal. Very good stream quality, even on the free stream.
|
On September 06 2010 20:41 Entropic wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:40 diehilde wrote:
its really funny the level of play in korea is so bad atm. every go4sc2 cup has much higher level play from the quarterfinals on. I think 80% of top foreigners could easily qualify for GSL if they flew over there... Unfair to compare quarterfinals of go4 cups to ro64 dont ya think?
not if its a 100€ cup vs a 170k $ cup.I bet if top bw progamers would be allowed to play they would own faces up to ro16 with a weekend of SC2 practice. Its just detrimental to the hype to see people playing who are worse than oneself.
|
On September 06 2010 20:39 Vokasak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:38 Censured wrote:On September 06 2010 20:30 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:27 TRAP[yoo] wrote:On September 06 2010 20:26 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:23 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. So he did all the perfect responses and still got raped. I wonder why people complain, then. He got raped from the push, not from the harass. Did you miss the attack on Terran's natural? He was able to macro enough stuff. to do a scary attack forcing the pullback/delay of his second drop. He only "got raped" after the drops on the cliff stopped. Why do I bother, though? Zerg players can't see past their own overinflated sense of martyrdom. killing the hatch twice certainly helps terran. or am i wrong? He gave up two thors, four marines, a siege tank, and three medivacs for those two hatcheries. If I was on 3 bases as a zerg vs 2 base terran, I'd take that trade any day. He gave up... what? He lost 4 marines, and he bring all thors, all siege tanks and all medivacs back... seriously... Please watch the VOD when they come out. He didn't bring anything back. He lost it all. I swear Zerg players only see what they want to see when it comes to these games. >:[
Nah, you see only what you want to see. Im really looking forward to watching the vod and proving you wrong. And btw Im not a zerg player, I play random, but if you don't see that ZvT is broken, then try playing zerg for a second vs terran
|
On September 06 2010 20:41 Vokasak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:40 tomatriedes wrote:On September 06 2010 20:34 Vokasak wrote:
You know, I don't play Zerg often at all,:[ That must be why you give such great advice about how to play zerg. Pardon me. Ignore me, and feel free to keep doing your roach/hydra into whinethread builds. That's clearly working so well for you.
You are doing a great job representing terrans in this thread...
|
On September 06 2010 20:37 figq wrote:
So: August - LiveForever ..... TvP+TvZ = TvT ..... no surprises.
You really should be embarrassed by this mentality.
|
|
|
On September 06 2010 20:40 diehilde wrote:
its really funny the level of play in korea is so bad atm. every go4sc2 cup has much higher level play from the quarterfinals on. I think 80% of top foreigners could easily qualify for GSL if they flew over there...
Transition from online to LAN is not an easy thing to do for most people, that's might be one of the reason some of the Liquid guys didn't qualify.
Plus, this is the first tournament of SC2 in S. Korea, remember SC2 is not very popular. But I predict the popularity will increase after GSL.
|
|
|
On September 06 2010 20:44 Vokasak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:41 cuppatea wrote:On September 06 2010 20:29 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:25 ZapRoffo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:24 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 ZapRoffo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. Yeah and did you see how far behind he ended up? How far behind was he? He had enough stuff to take out every unit in Terran's army and force the drop to come back. He was obviously just fine. It's not until Terran stopped trying to do cute little drops and do an actual push that any real damage was done to Nestea. Umm, because he was so weakened from losing his natural hatch twice that he had way too few stuff to defend the push. He wasn't weakened. He had the third. He was so not-weakened that he did an attack and killed every siege tank, marine, bunker, and turret that the terran player had at that point. Were we watching different games? Or is this Zerg selective attention syndrome? He lost every unit he had in that desperation attack, which was easily held off despite the Terran having 2 thors and 2 medivacs on the other side of the map. After that the Terran just went and killed the natural anyway, while also dropping at the 3rd. What you're essentially saying is "hey, Terran being able to attack a Zerg expansion with zero resistance from a cliff is no problem because the Zerg can just attack head-on into a fortified position and sacrifice his entire army to keep the expansion alive for an additional 30 seconds (after which point it will go down anyway)!" Even most of the top Terran players will happily admit that cliffing stacks the matchup in their favour on LT, why do you refuse to accept that? I can accept that it's a good thing to do, but I won't accept that it's imbalanced or that LT is a bad map because of it or that players who do it are cheesing peices of shit, or any of the bold claims Zergs make whenever this kind of thing happens.
I don't get why you're so against the fact that cliffing on LT makes Terran really imba? It's been known since BW, its pretty established. Lost Temple really is just that bad.
|
On September 06 2010 20:41 cuppatea wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:29 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:25 ZapRoffo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:24 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 ZapRoffo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. Yeah and did you see how far behind he ended up? How far behind was he? He had enough stuff to take out every unit in Terran's army and force the drop to come back. He was obviously just fine. It's not until Terran stopped trying to do cute little drops and do an actual push that any real damage was done to Nestea. Umm, because he was so weakened from losing his natural hatch twice that he had way too few stuff to defend the push. He wasn't weakened. He had the third. He was so not-weakened that he did an attack and killed every siege tank, marine, bunker, and turret that the terran player had at that point. Were we watching different games? Or is this Zerg selective attention syndrome? He lost every unit he had in that desperation attack, which was easily held off despite the Terran having 2 thors and 2 medivacs on the other side of the map. After that the Terran just went and killed the natural anyway, while also dropping at the 3rd. What you're essentially saying is "hey, Terran being able to attack a Zerg expansion with zero resistance from a cliff is no problem because the Zerg can just attack head-on into a fortified position and sacrifice his entire army to keep the expansion alive for an additional 30 seconds (after which point it will go down anyway)!" Even most of the top Terran players will happily admit that cliffing stacks the matchup in their favour on LT, why do you refuse to accept that?
If zerg had healed his hatchery twice, he would have had enough time for the mutas to come out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
