• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:18
CEST 14:18
KST 21:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League56Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder Do we even care about balance? Young Players Tournament Announced by SOOP Starcraft player cRuZa Passed away. Rollback Netcode in Brood War
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament [BSL23] RO24 Group C
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion!
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
How Much Genes Contribute to…
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9606 users

[GSL] About GSL Streams and VODs - Page 42

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
1697 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 40 41 42 43 44 85 Next
krunaldo
Profile Joined September 2010
2 Posts
September 01 2010 19:33 GMT
#821
Also they could probably team this with blizzard AS they have a infrastructure and clients for bittorrent(to get the VODs) but that probbaly be a nono as they probably want easy viewing through flash.
Myles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5162 Posts
September 01 2010 19:34 GMT
#822
On September 02 2010 04:33 GenoZStriker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 04:26 Ome wrote:
On September 02 2010 04:22 Frankon wrote:
did some digging

Here is a confirmation that season is only 1 tourney (1 month)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=6173924

Post from 3 days ago about free stream:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=6173089


Okay if this is the truth 50$ is outrageous, laughably so.

They didn't say it was free. Don't think they ever did. The only time "free" is used in that post is for the KBS 88 Stadium.


Did you read the post?

"Well I guess another big question everyone has is "How the hell do we watch the games?!"
We will upload them on http://www.gomtv.net. It is NOT in Korean and you do NOT need to pay."

There's no reading between the lines or anything.
Moderator
Frankon
Profile Joined May 2010
3054 Posts
September 01 2010 19:35 GMT
#823
On September 02 2010 04:33 GenoZStriker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 04:26 Ome wrote:
On September 02 2010 04:22 Frankon wrote:
did some digging

Here is a confirmation that season is only 1 tourney (1 month)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=6173924

Post from 3 days ago about free stream:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=6173089


Okay if this is the truth 50$ is outrageous, laughably so.

They didn't say it was free. Don't think they ever did. The only time "free" is used in that post is for the KBS 88 Stadium.

Well I guess another big question everyone has is "How the hell do we watch the games?!"
We will upload them on http://www.gomtv.net. It is NOT in Korean and you do NOT need to pay.
Ome
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada157 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-01 19:39:15
September 01 2010 19:35 GMT
#824
On September 02 2010 04:33 GenoZStriker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 04:26 Ome wrote:
On September 02 2010 04:22 Frankon wrote:
did some digging

Here is a confirmation that season is only 1 tourney (1 month)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=6173924

Post from 3 days ago about free stream:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=6173089


Okay if this is the truth 50$ is outrageous, laughably so.

They didn't say it was free. Don't think they ever did. The only time "free" is used in that post is for the KBS 88 Stadium.


I'm not saying it should be free, I'm saying 50$ for a month (a season) is ridiculous.

Heck, it's only 200$ for 5 months of NHL center ice, 200$ for four months of NFL Sunday Ticket. Heck it's 140$ for MLB extra innings for 6 months.
emperorchampion
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada9496 Posts
September 01 2010 19:36 GMT
#825
On September 02 2010 04:25 JWD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 04:01 Chill wrote:
it was said as "We set up this international tournament and put in effort to cater to foreigners; By the way, if you are foreign, you will pay."

This is spot on, and what really grinds my gears. Why is GOM punishing non-Koreans?


As I understand it, it's because they can get Korean ads to an all Korean audience. However, it's a little difficult to get ads to a foreign audience because of the wide demographic. I'm not really sure if that's the true reason- and if it is, if it's legit, but whatever...

Some refinements that I think would help are:

-1 week trial, this way you can see if your schedule accommodates the GSL, and order accordingly

-Single day live views, maybe like $2.00- so you can watch VODs on the weekdays and live on the weekends

I guess I expected it to be free, but to be honest I don't mind paying if I know it's a quality product. Yeah, I'm disappointed- but that's life. If there was an option to pay for live matches individually I would pay 100% for those, and probably buy VODs as well, as it is I might not get either
TRUEESPORTS || your days as a respected member of team liquid are over
nvs.
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada3609 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-01 19:37:24
September 01 2010 19:37 GMT
#826
I shall continue to support tournaments that don't charge an exorbitant fee for a small level of service. Paying that much PER "season" seems pretty ridiculous.
Kishkumen
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States650 Posts
September 01 2010 19:37 GMT
#827
On September 02 2010 03:56 djWHEAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 03:42 Kishkumen wrote:
If a $20 fee was the only way this could be made viable, I'd understand it, but it seems as though there were plenty of other viable options and that GOM just made poor decisions. I think this is where many of us are having problems with it. We're not saying that this tournament doesn't cost money to produce, but we are saying that the structuring of where GOM put its money seems kind of ludicrous.


Do we have a comprehensive budget one-sheet of how GOM has spent this money? Do we have ANY detail on the "poor decisions" that have been made? Do we even know the justification as to WHY it's going to be this way?

I mean, we've all speculated in this thread, but can you really say those things in confidence?


I was just going off of your speculation that all the sponsor money went towards the prize pool. I felt as long as we were playing the speculation game that I could say that they probably made some poor decisions. Of course it could be completely justified that we have to pay so much, but I feel like the evidence doesn't point towards that. IEM and MLG didn't make me pay for an LQ stream and they don't seem to have gone bankrupt. Why couldn't GOM do something similar to what MLG and IEM did? I can't see what sort of extenuating circumstances would make GOM incapable of providing the same services that these smaller tournaments provided. That's why I suspect there's poor decision making involved. Perhaps if they offer a good explanation, I'll change my mind, but at the moment I'm more inclined to believe that they just goofed up and are asking me to foot part of the bill.
Weird, last time I checked the UN said you need to have at least 200 APM and be rainbow league to be called human. —Liquid`TLO
djWHEAT
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States925 Posts
September 01 2010 19:46 GMT
#828
On September 02 2010 04:37 Kishkumen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 03:56 djWHEAT wrote:
On September 02 2010 03:42 Kishkumen wrote:
If a $20 fee was the only way this could be made viable, I'd understand it, but it seems as though there were plenty of other viable options and that GOM just made poor decisions. I think this is where many of us are having problems with it. We're not saying that this tournament doesn't cost money to produce, but we are saying that the structuring of where GOM put its money seems kind of ludicrous.


Do we have a comprehensive budget one-sheet of how GOM has spent this money? Do we have ANY detail on the "poor decisions" that have been made? Do we even know the justification as to WHY it's going to be this way?

I mean, we've all speculated in this thread, but can you really say those things in confidence?


I was just going off of your speculation that all the sponsor money went towards the prize pool. I felt as long as we were playing the speculation game that I could say that they probably made some poor decisions. Of course it could be completely justified that we have to pay so much, but I feel like the evidence doesn't point towards that. IEM and MLG didn't make me pay for an LQ stream and they don't seem to have gone bankrupt. Why couldn't GOM do something similar to what MLG and IEM did? I can't see what sort of extenuating circumstances would make GOM incapable of providing the same services that these smaller tournaments provided. That's why I suspect there's poor decision making involved. Perhaps if they offer a good explanation, I'll change my mind, but at the moment I'm more inclined to believe that they just goofed up and are asking me to foot part of the bill.


Fair enough. I made the assumption because I doubt that GOM themselves have the money to create that sort of prize pool.

I like your question about why couldn't GOM do something similar to MLG and IEM... and I wonder how much of it has to do with cultural differences. Do they really know the Western audience? Those are also two organizations who've clawed through years of BS to get to where they are today, and even they still respect the Western/European approach to Pro-Gaming... meaning, they know many of us have spent the past 4 years never having to pay for a damn thing. Coincidentally, I've purchased both MLG and ESL premium streams.
OneMoreGame.tv // Weapon Of Choice // Kings Of Tin // Inside The Game // Live On Three
dvide
Profile Joined March 2010
United Kingdom287 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-01 19:48:01
September 01 2010 19:47 GMT
#829
On September 02 2010 04:36 emperorchampion wrote:
Single day live views, maybe like $2.00- so you can watch VODs on the weekdays and live on the weekends

They already have this. It's $1.95 for a 1 day live ticket. Depending on djWheat's review, I might buy this for the finals. And maybe for Idra's games if he goes far in the brackets.
Anomarad
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada565 Posts
September 01 2010 19:47 GMT
#830
I'll be watching the Korean version free on OGN, just like how I watch Brood War. :D
dybydx
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Canada1764 Posts
September 01 2010 19:49 GMT
#831
@Kishkumen,

$500k is a very large pool. i m pretty sure TG-Intel, the official sponsors, are not willing to shell that much since GOM do not own a TV channel. I know they have recently entered into a deal with OGN but the effectiveness of that is still up in the air.

i speculate that either blizz has guaranteed parts of the pool or that when gretech signed contract with blizz, gretech do not pay blizz but has agreed to a $500k pool.

e-sport is a cutthroat industry. ESWC, one of the largest e-sport organizers went into financial troubles this yr and they were not the only one.
...from the land of imba
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
September 01 2010 19:49 GMT
#832
$10 a month I would pay, $50 a month is ridiculous. I think I pay like $45 a month for internet, no way would I pay that much for SC2 games.
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
September 01 2010 19:52 GMT
#833
On September 02 2010 04:47 Anomarad wrote:
I'll be watching the Korean version free on OGN, just like how I watch Brood War. :D

Has this been confirmed officially?
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary26004 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-01 19:53:49
September 01 2010 19:53 GMT
#834
On September 02 2010 04:46 djWHEAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 04:37 Kishkumen wrote:
On September 02 2010 03:56 djWHEAT wrote:
On September 02 2010 03:42 Kishkumen wrote:
If a $20 fee was the only way this could be made viable, I'd understand it, but it seems as though there were plenty of other viable options and that GOM just made poor decisions. I think this is where many of us are having problems with it. We're not saying that this tournament doesn't cost money to produce, but we are saying that the structuring of where GOM put its money seems kind of ludicrous.


Do we have a comprehensive budget one-sheet of how GOM has spent this money? Do we have ANY detail on the "poor decisions" that have been made? Do we even know the justification as to WHY it's going to be this way?

I mean, we've all speculated in this thread, but can you really say those things in confidence?


I was just going off of your speculation that all the sponsor money went towards the prize pool. I felt as long as we were playing the speculation game that I could say that they probably made some poor decisions. Of course it could be completely justified that we have to pay so much, but I feel like the evidence doesn't point towards that. IEM and MLG didn't make me pay for an LQ stream and they don't seem to have gone bankrupt. Why couldn't GOM do something similar to what MLG and IEM did? I can't see what sort of extenuating circumstances would make GOM incapable of providing the same services that these smaller tournaments provided. That's why I suspect there's poor decision making involved. Perhaps if they offer a good explanation, I'll change my mind, but at the moment I'm more inclined to believe that they just goofed up and are asking me to foot part of the bill.


Fair enough. I made the assumption because I doubt that GOM themselves have the money to create that sort of prize pool.

I like your question about why couldn't GOM do something similar to MLG and IEM... and I wonder how much of it has to do with cultural differences. Do they really know the Western audience? Those are also two organizations who've clawed through years of BS to get to where they are today, and even they still respect the Western/European approach to Pro-Gaming... meaning, they know many of us have spent the past 4 years never having to pay for a damn thing. Coincidentally, I've purchased both MLG and ESL premium streams.

If I've learned something through years of Starcraft, it's that Koreans have absolutely no idea what works outside of Korea, and they seem to have no desire to find out.
Moderator
mmdmmd
Profile Joined June 2007
722 Posts
September 01 2010 20:04 GMT
#835
On September 02 2010 04:53 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 04:46 djWHEAT wrote:
On September 02 2010 04:37 Kishkumen wrote:
On September 02 2010 03:56 djWHEAT wrote:
On September 02 2010 03:42 Kishkumen wrote:
If a $20 fee was the only way this could be made viable, I'd understand it, but it seems as though there were plenty of other viable options and that GOM just made poor decisions. I think this is where many of us are having problems with it. We're not saying that this tournament doesn't cost money to produce, but we are saying that the structuring of where GOM put its money seems kind of ludicrous.


Do we have a comprehensive budget one-sheet of how GOM has spent this money? Do we have ANY detail on the "poor decisions" that have been made? Do we even know the justification as to WHY it's going to be this way?

I mean, we've all speculated in this thread, but can you really say those things in confidence?


I was just going off of your speculation that all the sponsor money went towards the prize pool. I felt as long as we were playing the speculation game that I could say that they probably made some poor decisions. Of course it could be completely justified that we have to pay so much, but I feel like the evidence doesn't point towards that. IEM and MLG didn't make me pay for an LQ stream and they don't seem to have gone bankrupt. Why couldn't GOM do something similar to what MLG and IEM did? I can't see what sort of extenuating circumstances would make GOM incapable of providing the same services that these smaller tournaments provided. That's why I suspect there's poor decision making involved. Perhaps if they offer a good explanation, I'll change my mind, but at the moment I'm more inclined to believe that they just goofed up and are asking me to foot part of the bill.


Fair enough. I made the assumption because I doubt that GOM themselves have the money to create that sort of prize pool.

I like your question about why couldn't GOM do something similar to MLG and IEM... and I wonder how much of it has to do with cultural differences. Do they really know the Western audience? Those are also two organizations who've clawed through years of BS to get to where they are today, and even they still respect the Western/European approach to Pro-Gaming... meaning, they know many of us have spent the past 4 years never having to pay for a damn thing. Coincidentally, I've purchased both MLG and ESL premium streams.

If I've learned something through years of Starcraft, it's that Koreans have absolutely no idea what works outside of Korea, and they seem to have no desire to find out.


Funny I just read an article on wfbrood saying that Blizzard have absolutely no idea what works in Asia. It went on to explain why several financially motivated moves Blizz have made in recent years in Korea/China all had a negative effect.

It's here if anyone want to read it (Chinese)
http://www.wfbrood.com/sc2/zatan/sc2_54577.html
Zocat
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2229 Posts
September 01 2010 20:08 GMT
#836
On September 02 2010 03:46 djWHEAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2010 03:38 Chill wrote:
On September 02 2010 03:08 djWHEAT wrote:
On September 02 2010 03:00 hypercube wrote:
On September 02 2010 02:40 djWHEAT wrote:
On September 02 2010 02:36 Kerotan wrote:
5. GOM's service is notoriously bad, stream is laggy and unstable, VODs are often broken, mislabelled and it took them 2.5 Classic seasons to work out that you should upload 3 files for a best of 3 VOD, so that the series isn't spoiled in game 1.


To me this is the best reason anyone can give for why this particular pricing model doesn't match the quality of the service you will receive. I can completely empathize with this.




Asking $25-$50/month for home entertainment is not a workable business model. Maybe if you have a great product that everyone knows is great. And I don't just mean great in the sense that it's professional and well produced. I mean great as in OMG I GOTTA SEE THIS!11. There's just so many substitutes both in entertainment in general and esports in particular that's cheaper and also high quality. Must be painful for guys like you who work very hard and would presumably like to see some returns at some point but it's just a very tough climate.

Especially esports where most of your potential customers have little disposable income. You can try to change attitudes but unless you have a plan to get rid of most forms of free entertainment you're stuck. That's why I think the correct model is to ask people who can afford to pay to pay (for some premium service but mostly to support the scene) and let others get the product free, especially since the marginal cost for additional viewers is close to 0.


I completely agree that you shouldn't overpay for a service that doesn't deliver.

However, I also look at alot of these things differently now than I did many years ago.

For example, I used to go, "OMG why would I pay 0.99$ for an iPhone app?" - Then I realized that I pay $1.99 for energy drinks which I enjoy for 30 minutes and then that's it. So I just stopped buying energy drinks and started buying iPhone apps and I get a ton of enjoyment out of it.

Also, I routinely purchase console games for $60... And then I spent 6 hours playing them. So when I see a potential product that could offer me more entertainment than the latest console title, I tend to be ok with that.


I can see your point but you have to be able to see others' perspective too. For some people the cost is too high, but for me, the cost is irrelevant. It could be $5, $20, or $200 and I would care the same amount. I don't like that GOM think they can force the foreign market to pay money to support their game, so I wouldn't pay anything for it. If there was more effort explaining why I should pay, what I will get, even some basic form of effort on their part it could change my opinion. If it was set up as a volunteer / upgrade system I would most definitely try the free stream and then consider and upgrade. As is I won't be watching if they continue with this pay model.


And for that matter... is it worth it to someone to say, buy a 1 day pass to determine if it's worth a damn? Or is that already BS?




I have to admit - I didnt think about that. So that's what I am going to do
Saturday morning. 11am. Beer in hand. In front of my PC.
If everything works I'm considering paying more. Oh ... and I hope they have a way in which I can pay them *G*
DaZe
Profile Joined November 2003
Sweden2111 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-01 20:16:13
September 01 2010 20:11 GMT
#837
On September 02 2010 03:00 hypercube wrote:

Asking $25-$50/month for home entertainment is not a workable business model. Maybe if you have a great product that everyone knows is great. And I don't just mean great in the sense that it's professional and well produced. I mean great as in OMG I GOTTA SEE THIS!11. There's just so many substitutes both in entertainment in general and esports in particular that's cheaper and also high quality. Must be painful for guys like you who work very hard and would presumably like to see some returns at some point but it's just a very tough climate.

Especially esports where most of your potential customers have little disposable income. You can try to change attitudes but unless you have a plan to get rid of most forms of free entertainment you're stuck. That's why I think the correct model is to ask people who can afford to pay to pay (for some premium service but mostly to support the scene) and let others get the product free, especially since the marginal cost for additional viewers is close to 0.


Spot on.
SevenAteNine
Profile Joined February 2010
126 Posts
September 01 2010 20:12 GMT
#838
their old business model worked quite well for us where it was free but higher quality was extra.
i feel like this new business model is just a ramp up of the old one

or that they just think all of us Americans are just big heads attached to designer jeans with huge wads of money and all you need is a big enough fishing rod to reel us in
omnomnomnom
Furycrab
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada456 Posts
September 01 2010 20:12 GMT
#839
I see alot of people saying 50$ a month... Wasn't there 2 seasons per year of Sc1 meaning a season pass would be good for about 6months, probably about 2-4 months of games? If you take just the VOD pass for example, it's not "that" bad.

Too tired to come up with something witty.
Frankon
Profile Joined May 2010
3054 Posts
September 01 2010 20:15 GMT
#840
season 2 starts in early october (qualification for it finishes on 3rd)
Prev 1 40 41 42 43 44 85 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
18:00
ScienceCraft - Day 1
RotterdaM526
IndyStarCraft 367
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 526
IndyStarCraft 367
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 48874
Horang2 2509
Bisu 1194
Shuttle 1050
Hyuk 817
BeSt 678
firebathero 399
Stork 325
Hyun 309
EffOrt 288
[ Show more ]
Mini 229
Zeus 211
Rush 137
Last 118
ggaemo 114
Barracks 76
hero 71
Mong 70
Shinee 56
Pusan 54
Sacsri 32
Noble 22
Aegong 21
Free 21
zelot 18
Sexy 17
yabsab 16
Dota 2
Gorgc16786
XcaliburYe112
Counter-Strike
fl0m1954
Other Games
singsing1677
B2W.Neo1153
mouzStarbuck304
Lowko277
Happy263
DeMusliM231
crisheroes220
Pyrionflax202
BRAT_OK 17
MindelVK7
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL24678
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 21
lovetv 9
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Dystopia_ 5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2993
• WagamamaTV553
Upcoming Events
Patches Events
42m
AI Arena Tournament
4h 42m
FEL
21h 42m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 42m
Replay Cast
1d 10h
WardiTV Weekly
1d 22h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.