[IEM] Gamescom Day 4 + TLO vs NaDa! - Page 244
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
teamsolid
Canada3668 Posts
| ||
dolpiff
France300 Posts
and i asked earlier but didnt ger response does flyer attack upgrade also increase the ricochet damage, or just the first glaive? | ||
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
Check it out. You can see that innovative stuff right there, i learnt it here, i'm pretty sure now: http://rapidshare.com/files/414282184/alex_vs_sid.SC2Replay http://rapidshare.com/files/414282228/alex_vs_sid.SC2Replay it's the same file, i just ULed for limitation issues. the T loses as he didnt know about this thing, back then, and made nothing against Blings. Btw i used it at least 30-40 times, and non of the terrans were shocked/surprised/outraged by it, ah, maybe 1 or 2, but still, you can understand how shocking is to see how ppl treat it as new. It's like roach unburrow from below of the T mech ball would be revolutionary now... | ||
Jimmeh
United Kingdom908 Posts
On August 22 2010 02:26 dolpiff wrote: anyway if the Terrans make splitted balls of stimmed marines instead of those thors i think it pretty much shut down any kind of muta agression doesnt it? and i asked earlier but didnt ger response does flyer attack upgrade also increase the ricochet damage, or just the first glaive? Banelings. | ||
lac29
United States1485 Posts
On August 22 2010 02:11 Zinbiel wrote: I feel bad when people compare idra to jaedong. Jaedong can micro 2 muta groups in sc1. Jaedong has killed entire proteams with his stare. Idra is winning against foreigners in sc2, while skilled, he is no jaedong. So true. I'm sure Idra is enjoying his stay at top right now. But I think if any SC1 pro ... even lowly SC1 pro comes to play SC2 ... I don't think Idra will be on top anymore. | ||
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
We'll see how Morrow deals with this. IdrA has complained about Terran in the past, but his complaints have always been about the early game and the variety of strategies Terran is able to surprise the Zerg with, which Zerg is basically unable to deal with if they are denied scouting. Notice what he never said: that any particular Terran strategy cannot be countered. | ||
Jakalo
Latvia2350 Posts
| ||
Entropic
Canada2837 Posts
On August 22 2010 02:27 lac29 wrote: So ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() "lowly" SC1 pro? ![]() | ||
Seze
42 Posts
| ||
Highways
Australia6098 Posts
Morrow looked very scrappy, while Idra dominated. | ||
Garnet
Vietnam9011 Posts
On August 22 2010 02:26 dolpiff wrote: anyway if the Terrans make splitted balls of stimmed marines instead of those thors i think it pretty much shut down any kind of muta agression doesnt it? and i asked earlier but didnt ger response does flyer attack upgrade also increase the ricochet damage, or just the first glaive? +1 for first glaive, +0.3 for second, +0.1 for third. | ||
dolpiff
France300 Posts
On August 22 2010 02:29 Garnet wrote: + Show Spoiler + On August 22 2010 02:26 dolpiff wrote: anyway if the Terrans make splitted balls of stimmed marines instead of those thors i think it pretty much shut down any kind of muta agression doesnt it? and i asked earlier but didnt ger response does flyer attack upgrade also increase the ricochet damage, or just the first glaive? +1 for first glaive, +0.3 for second, +0.1 for third. so they get 40% more out of it than other units nice | ||
tYsopz
Norway215 Posts
THIS IS AN OUTRAGE, ZERG NEEDS A NERF. WILL the Terran have to respond to what the overpowered zerg is doing, or will he yet again emerge triumphant massing lowtier units?! THE PLOT THICKENS, WHAT IS AND WHAT ISN'T TO BE DECIDED ON AUGUST 22TH. | ||
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
| ||
Fruscainte
4596 Posts
| ||
vyyye
Sweden3917 Posts
On August 22 2010 02:26 teamsolid wrote: Rofl, Terrans crying about when at least 2-3x the gas cost of thors get beat by mutas... The reason Tarson lost on Xel Naga was that he spent WAY too much money on hellions and too much gas on tanks. What he needed was a mix of marine/thor/hellion. Which might require the Terran to actually scout the Zerg army composition for once and adapt? Oh noes. I've seen about 4 posts saying "LOL terran whining tehre were so many mutas thors shouldnt win" and 0 posts saying Mutas need a nerf. What the hell people? Pretty interesting that no one picked up on that muta strategy/technique/magic box earlier though, I mean, while a few people knew about it you would've thought that it would spread like wildfire. Funny how things work sometimes, while a lot of players were whining about being unable to beat thors the information on how to was available on the most popular strategy site for SC2. Whoever said it was impossible for zerg to evolve (strategy wise) to beat a terran? ![]() | ||
Blind86
Australia30 Posts
Re: Zelniq - I would think hunter seeker whilst not killing the mutas, would scare them away. This has its uses too, big 200/200 battle about to start, fire a few seekers and you dont have to worry about mutas for a small time (chain spam seekers lol). I dont think they are useless cause they can't kill, similar to mutas before "magic box" were still good transition cause it gave you map control, often times you can't harass, but it was threatening to move out. TLDR: Got up to your post zelniq, now logging for bed ![]() | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
Jimmeh
United Kingdom908 Posts
On August 22 2010 02:33 Blind86 wrote: Re: Zelniq - I would think hunter seeker whilst not killing the mutas, would scare them away. This has its uses too, big 200/200 battle about to start, fire a few seekers and you dont have to worry about mutas for a small time (chain spam seekers lol). I dont think they are useless cause they can't kill, similar to mutas before "magic box" were still good transition cause it gave you map control, often times you can't harass, but it was threatening to move out. Wouldn't PDD be better use then, if you just want to push them back? At least then you know they just can't come back immediately and deal damage. | ||
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
| ||
| ||