|
On April 30 2010 12:26 dethrawr wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 10:36 Mecha_cl wrote:On April 30 2010 10:34 dethrawr wrote:
Im still not sure what race I'll play, but itll probably be the most OP one (zerg). Will let you know tomorrow :o I know LOTS of people who would disagree with zerg not being the most OP at the moment.. But it does depend on the person i guess If you reread your post, you will see that you said that LOTS of people would agree with me. Because it is true. Infestor now makes building a robobay in PvZ BENEFIT the zerg.
Not that i want to turn this into a balance/PvZ discussion, but i play protoss and i actually like the new infestor neural parasite range. The matchup is more dynamic in fights now other than 1a -> plant forcefields to block his army in -> watch as he gets crushed.
Having robo tech and 2 bases to pump immortal/collosi with no other tech doesn't work any more... But once you get templar archives and get a few HT's, the game battles become a really fun feedback vs neural parasite micro war with lots of back and forth from both armies, and one slip in concentration can well and truely cost either player the game instantly... Which in my opinion is what sc(broodwar and sc2) is all about :D
|
On April 30 2010 10:11 deL wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2010 22:22 Csirac wrote:Maybe you can arrange with him to play it earlier  I would suggest that if you can arrange it. thats a good idea. might play it at like 5pm. that would work good for myself. Drop him a PM and let me know how it goes.
yep all sorted. we both agreed to play at 5pm on the day of the tourney.
|
On April 30 2010 13:07 Ftrunkz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 12:26 dethrawr wrote:On April 30 2010 10:36 Mecha_cl wrote:On April 30 2010 10:34 dethrawr wrote:
Im still not sure what race I'll play, but itll probably be the most OP one (zerg). Will let you know tomorrow :o I know LOTS of people who would disagree with zerg not being the most OP at the moment.. But it does depend on the person i guess If you reread your post, you will see that you said that LOTS of people would agree with me. Because it is true. Infestor now makes building a robobay in PvZ BENEFIT the zerg. Not that i want to turn this into a balance/PvZ discussion, but i play protoss and i actually like the new infestor neural parasite range. The matchup is more dynamic in fights now other than 1a -> plant forcefields to block his army in -> watch as he gets crushed. Having robo tech and 2 bases to pump immortal/collosi with no other tech doesn't work any more... But once you get templar archives and get a few HT's, the game battles become a really fun feedback vs neural parasite micro war with lots of back and forth from both armies, and one slip in concentration can well and truely cost either player the game instantly... Which in my opinion is what sc(broodwar and sc2) is all about :D
good post here pinder.
|
On April 30 2010 13:07 Ftrunkz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 12:26 dethrawr wrote:On April 30 2010 10:36 Mecha_cl wrote:On April 30 2010 10:34 dethrawr wrote:
Im still not sure what race I'll play, but itll probably be the most OP one (zerg). Will let you know tomorrow :o I know LOTS of people who would disagree with zerg not being the most OP at the moment.. But it does depend on the person i guess If you reread your post, you will see that you said that LOTS of people would agree with me. Because it is true. Infestor now makes building a robobay in PvZ BENEFIT the zerg. Not that i want to turn this into a balance/PvZ discussion, but i play protoss and i actually like the new infestor neural parasite range. The matchup is more dynamic in fights now other than 1a -> plant forcefields to block his army in -> watch as he gets crushed. Having robo tech and 2 bases to pump immortal/collosi with no other tech doesn't work any more... But once you get templar archives and get a few HT's, the game battles become a really fun feedback vs neural parasite micro war with lots of back and forth from both armies, and one slip in concentration can well and truely cost either player the game instantly... Which in my opinion is what sc(broodwar and sc2) is all about :D
how is it more balanced/diverse/dynamic now that robotics units are almost unviable, and you are forced to go HT? that makes no sense ;_:
|
On April 30 2010 15:51 dethrawr wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 13:07 Ftrunkz wrote:On April 30 2010 12:26 dethrawr wrote:On April 30 2010 10:36 Mecha_cl wrote:On April 30 2010 10:34 dethrawr wrote:
Im still not sure what race I'll play, but itll probably be the most OP one (zerg). Will let you know tomorrow :o I know LOTS of people who would disagree with zerg not being the most OP at the moment.. But it does depend on the person i guess If you reread your post, you will see that you said that LOTS of people would agree with me. Because it is true. Infestor now makes building a robobay in PvZ BENEFIT the zerg. Not that i want to turn this into a balance/PvZ discussion, but i play protoss and i actually like the new infestor neural parasite range. The matchup is more dynamic in fights now other than 1a -> plant forcefields to block his army in -> watch as he gets crushed. Having robo tech and 2 bases to pump immortal/collosi with no other tech doesn't work any more... But once you get templar archives and get a few HT's, the game battles become a really fun feedback vs neural parasite micro war with lots of back and forth from both armies, and one slip in concentration can well and truely cost either player the game instantly... Which in my opinion is what sc(broodwar and sc2) is all about :D how is it more balanced/diverse/dynamic now that robotics units are almost unviable, and you are forced to go HT? that makes no sense ;_:
Robotics are still viable, just less of a 'why choose anything else?' unit mix.
|
On April 26 2010 17:35 WarChimp wrote:
true true i suppose xD but you never know, I might pull out some some kickass play and own moonglade/flithy/azz/mez :D you never know i might be a rising star like boxer :D
who needs school if youre the second coming of boxer
|
On April 29 2010 18:44 deL wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2010 17:55 haduken wrote:
Put me down
Rillanon
Protoss
VIC
I just preordered today, the beta key better come in on time. You need a second part to your ID, like knuffeltje.aus or pholon.lovesmen Show nested quote +On April 29 2010 17:41 Csirac wrote:
deL: Im going to be 30 mins late for my match vs limble.limble (so ill be ready by 6:30, possible earlier). is this acceptable? if it isnt let me know and ill try to get around it. Maybe you can arrange with him to play it earlier I would suggest that if you can arrange it.
I don't get it, is it a blizzard registration rule or something?
Still waiting for the key...
|
On April 30 2010 17:50 haduken wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2010 18:44 deL wrote:On April 29 2010 17:55 haduken wrote:
Put me down
Rillanon
Protoss
VIC
I just preordered today, the beta key better come in on time. You need a second part to your ID, like knuffeltje.aus or pholon.lovesmen On April 29 2010 17:41 Csirac wrote:
deL: Im going to be 30 mins late for my match vs limble.limble (so ill be ready by 6:30, possible earlier). is this acceptable? if it isnt let me know and ill try to get around it. Maybe you can arrange with him to play it earlier I would suggest that if you can arrange it. I don't get it, is it a blizzard registration rule or something? Still waiting for the key...
When you activate the key in your battle.net account, you log on to battle.net through the SC2 Beta client and log on using that same battle.net name (your email) and password. From there it asks for a character name - I put the seemingly controversial 'knuffeltje' and then it asks for an identifier, the bit after the full stop, so I put 'aus' to give me the ID 'knuffeltje.aus'
|
On April 30 2010 15:51 dethrawr wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 13:07 Ftrunkz wrote:On April 30 2010 12:26 dethrawr wrote:On April 30 2010 10:36 Mecha_cl wrote:On April 30 2010 10:34 dethrawr wrote:
Im still not sure what race I'll play, but itll probably be the most OP one (zerg). Will let you know tomorrow :o I know LOTS of people who would disagree with zerg not being the most OP at the moment.. But it does depend on the person i guess If you reread your post, you will see that you said that LOTS of people would agree with me. Because it is true. Infestor now makes building a robobay in PvZ BENEFIT the zerg. Not that i want to turn this into a balance/PvZ discussion, but i play protoss and i actually like the new infestor neural parasite range. The matchup is more dynamic in fights now other than 1a -> plant forcefields to block his army in -> watch as he gets crushed. Having robo tech and 2 bases to pump immortal/collosi with no other tech doesn't work any more... But once you get templar archives and get a few HT's, the game battles become a really fun feedback vs neural parasite micro war with lots of back and forth from both armies, and one slip in concentration can well and truely cost either player the game instantly... Which in my opinion is what sc(broodwar and sc2) is all about :D how is it more balanced/diverse/dynamic now that robotics units are almost unviable, and you are forced to go HT? that makes no sense ;_:
You are forced to go templar WITH robo tech. Templar tech alone will lose to mass roach hydra. Half my games i get templar just for feedback and the rest of my gas is immortal/collosi/upgrades etc...
Before this, while you weren't force to go pure robo tech, it was pretty much better in every aspect compared to templar tech, so there was really no point transitioning over to templar tech when collosi's attack is just a better version of storm anyway.
Either way i dont think it breaks the matchup, just the old playstyle of 2 base 2 robo doesn't rape the crap out of anything zerg can produce on the ground any more.
|
On April 30 2010 17:55 deL wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 17:50 haduken wrote:On April 29 2010 18:44 deL wrote:On April 29 2010 17:55 haduken wrote:
Put me down
Rillanon
Protoss
VIC
I just preordered today, the beta key better come in on time. You need a second part to your ID, like knuffeltje.aus or pholon.lovesmen On April 29 2010 17:41 Csirac wrote:
deL: Im going to be 30 mins late for my match vs limble.limble (so ill be ready by 6:30, possible earlier). is this acceptable? if it isnt let me know and ill try to get around it. Maybe you can arrange with him to play it earlier I would suggest that if you can arrange it. I don't get it, is it a blizzard registration rule or something? Still waiting for the key... When you activate the key in your battle.net account, you log on to battle.net through the SC2 Beta client and log on using that same battle.net name (your email) and password. From there it asks for a character name - I put the seemingly controversial 'knuffeltje' and then it asks for an identifier, the bit after the full stop, so I put 'aus' to give me the ID 'knuffeltje.aus'
Cool, Cheers.
BTW, how long did it take for people to get their key emailed to them? Ebay advertised next business day and I'm still waiting.,,,
Make it Rillanon.au
VIC
Protoss
|
On April 30 2010 18:09 haduken wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 17:55 deL wrote:On April 30 2010 17:50 haduken wrote:On April 29 2010 18:44 deL wrote:On April 29 2010 17:55 haduken wrote:
Put me down
Rillanon
Protoss
VIC
I just preordered today, the beta key better come in on time. You need a second part to your ID, like knuffeltje.aus or pholon.lovesmen On April 29 2010 17:41 Csirac wrote:
deL: Im going to be 30 mins late for my match vs limble.limble (so ill be ready by 6:30, possible earlier). is this acceptable? if it isnt let me know and ill try to get around it. Maybe you can arrange with him to play it earlier I would suggest that if you can arrange it. I don't get it, is it a blizzard registration rule or something? Still waiting for the key... When you activate the key in your battle.net account, you log on to battle.net through the SC2 Beta client and log on using that same battle.net name (your email) and password. From there it asks for a character name - I put the seemingly controversial 'knuffeltje' and then it asks for an identifier, the bit after the full stop, so I put 'aus' to give me the ID 'knuffeltje.aus' Cool, Cheers. BTW, how long did it take for people to get their key emailed to them? Ebay advertised next business day and I'm still waiting.,,, Make it Rillanon.au VIC Protoss
Ebay? or EB
My EB one was like, right on time when they said it would.
|
BETA KEY CONTEST
Celebrating the launch of Australian commentator TobiWanKenobi's new website, WanStop, there will be a beta key competition available to people watching the stream. Three StarCraft II Beta Keys are up for grabs and all you need to do is listen to the SC2 shoutcasts on Sunday night for the TransTasman SC2 Championship.
What you will be listening for is 4 things which need to be included in your submission of a banner for the WanStop webpage to replace the temporary banner on the site. This banner needs to include all four things that are announced in the shoutcasts.
There are 3 keys to give away so the 3 finalists will be awarded the keys, but only one banner will be chosen as the winner. To submit your entry either post a link in a comment on this thread or use the “contact” page on WanStop to submit your entry.The VOD’s will be posted up here on WanStop as well as on www.Gamestah.com so good luck.
|
I'm keen to join if theres room (reserve)
ecifircas.sua
Random
NSW - Sydney
Question though what does the below mean from the rules?
Racepicking is allowed, though it two mutually exclusive racepickers meet the ‘main’ race will be used – that is the race that features in most of their matchups. If all 3 races are represented by a racepicker a present admin will choose their race.
(posted in other thread in case too)
|
deL - Filthy told me just now that he won't be able to play. Clearly I'm the next featured sign up (THE GUY THAT HAD TLO PLAY ON HIS ACCOUNT LOL).
First reserve is in then?
|
On May 01 2010 04:08 ecifircas wrote:
I'm keen to join if theres room (reserve)
ecifircas.sua
Random
NSW - Sydney
Question though what does the below mean from the rules?
Racepicking is allowed, though it two mutually exclusive racepickers meet the ‘main’ race will be used – that is the race that features in most of their matchups. If all 3 races are represented by a racepicker a present admin will choose their race.
(posted in other thread in case too)
If you pick races for a specific match up and two people who pick races that can't play each other meet either they organise what matchup to play or if they can't agree they both use the race that features most in their matchups.
e.g. someone plays PvZ, PvP and ZvT
other guy playes TvP TvT and PvZ
If they can't decide a matchup to play between themselves then the top guy would have to go with P and the bottom guy would have to be T. Or they could agree to both Random.
|
UPDATED BRACKET WITH NEW IDs
![[image loading]](http://i41.tinypic.com/2uzvwrc.png)
|
Edit:
Lol question answered in the updated bracket -_- Update the bracket in the opening post if its possible.
|
PLEASE NOTE:
dox.unortho will be playing the following matchups:
PvP, TvZ and TvT
If you are a racepicker or your race is listed wrongly let me know now!
|
So if your random you can't race-pick?
|
On May 01 2010 16:49 Z.Kw wrote:
So if your random you can't race-pick?
You have to declare the racepicks now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
