• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:36
CEST 14:36
KST 21:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy2GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding3Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The China Politics Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Streamers Inspire Gamers…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2783 users

[G] Playing Mech in TvZ - No more banelings. - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 11 12 13 Next All
eu.exodus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
South Africa1186 Posts
February 04 2012 18:55 GMT
#21
i hate mech
6 poll is a good skill toi have
Noocta
Profile Joined June 2010
France12578 Posts
February 04 2012 19:15 GMT
#22
On February 05 2012 03:52 cma1681 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2012 01:50 Noocta wrote:
Since you seems like a solid meching player, what do you think of the idea of adding Ravens latter into the game to help Mech vs BLs ?
It's not something we saw a lot, but DemusliM did it against Ret during some practice games, and MorroW did it too. Hunter seeker is actually a very good spell againsts Broodlords, and they offer a nice harassement possibility later into the game where you don't make hellions anymore.

I'm just unsure of how to transition to them. But unlike Ghost, you don't need to have a lot of structure nor a lot of upgrades to make them work.


Getting a raven also helps a lot against corrupter/BL, since PDD absorbs corrupter shots, allowing your vikings time to get some extra hits off.


Well, i'm not talking about ONE raven.
More like a fleet of 10 ravens by lategame for seeker, and PPD to protect them when launching the missiles.
" I'm not gonna fight you. I'm gonna kick your ass ! "
imCookies
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States82 Posts
February 04 2012 19:29 GMT
#23
really informative, i have been finding a way to use mech and these replays may help me achieve that goal. i think also one of the things to take note is that deviation will happen and also that the scouting is so key. i will definitely keep this type of build in my back pocket for me to flesh out for myself.
Milk n Cookies, the snack of pros.
DoctorFunk
Profile Joined September 2011
160 Posts
February 04 2012 19:59 GMT
#24
Although it deviates a bit from the principles of mech, I believe that it is never a bad idea to have your initial rax reactored at some point while securing your natural. I've lost so many thors and tanks before to straight muta, just because they magic boxed the thors, then went to town on the tanks. Mutas can be a huge pain in the midgame. It can never hurt to have a few extra marines. You can stick them in bunkers, bring them with your army, whatever. They're free anyways.
AvengerAzrael
Profile Joined November 2010
Lebanon20 Posts
February 04 2012 20:03 GMT
#25
I was going to point out what DoctorFunk said. The only thing which discourged me from using Mech is that in very high Muta counts and magic boxed, they absolutely wreck Thors. One of the modifications I've been working on is to use Marine/Tank/Thor and a few hellions with attack upgrades only. How effective is this compared to Mech keeping in mind the mass muta count?
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
February 04 2012 20:16 GMT
#26
The only thing I'm going to complain about is calling zerg aggression at 8:45 'cheese'. From a terran, that's just taking the piss. Other than that, it's a well presented guide
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
Saechiis
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Netherlands4989 Posts
February 04 2012 20:23 GMT
#27
High muta count shouldn't be a problem, I build a lot of turrets to asssist my Thors when needed, it prevents them from overkilling so much. As OP mentioned, mass magix box mutalisks can be hard to deal with but it's practically an all-in from Zerg. Zerg will be spending all his gas on mutalisks leaving him no significant follow-up, if he fails to do big damage he WILL die to a +2 mech army.
I think esports is pretty nice.
LemonyTang
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom428 Posts
February 04 2012 20:25 GMT
#28
On February 05 2012 01:00 Mobius_1 wrote:
Wow really useful guide. Thank you so much. I've recently started meching TvT because I felt like it but always felt unsure about TvZ mech because Mutalisks

A feature I'd like to see is a quick breakdown of the map pool and which ones are most suitable for this build and which ones are not good for it? Alternatively what caveats one should be aware of on which maps when playing this style?

Oh and that Zerg crazy wall on Metalopolis has to be one of the greatest pictures in SC2 Strategy.


Thanks for this awesome idea, I'm going to add this to the guide tomorrow I hope.


On February 05 2012 01:15 Jarree wrote:
Awesome guide. However I'm a bit concerned about the lategame without ghosts. I think zerg can outnumber and overpower vikings with corruptors even without infestors (yes, thors help but let's say for the sake of argument that infestors and thors balance each other out). Is the lack of ghosts because you don't have the infrastructure to build them or 0-0 upgrades or just simply you think they are not needed because vikings do the job?

edit: and if someone could specify which replay, if any, has that late game situation i'd be grateful


Thanks for your feedback. Personally I don't switch into ghosts for numerous reasons, some of which you touched on.
A) It can be stressful in a late game scenario and taking the time to build 3 barracks, tech labs and a ghost academy is easy to forget and actually a strange transition mentally to do. Don't forget too that ghosts are actually quite expensive, admittedly in this situation you should be taking your fourth by now but even then, if you're trading armies then investing in ghosts, who aren't that useful versus a ground switch from Zerg, can be risky.
B) 0-0 upgrades are actually a big deal as you say, especially when you're not going to be facing light units so the ghosts themselves will do tiny damage outside of snipe (not that this isn't significant damage)
C) when you have a big enough arc, and siege tanks positioned to hit infestors before they can fungal repeatedly, then you should actually be okay. There's rarely a situation where zerg is going to have such a large army that you can't build enough vikings and thors to combat it, simply due to the 200 supply limit. In the late game we can use mules to lower our scv count and have a larger army for it.
D) I've never actually encountered a scenario where I felt I needed ghosts to beat the zerg army.

If you'd like to see a late game engagement, then this replay has one: http://drop.sc/104256
It's hard to manufacture that kind of late game scenario, but this replay is one of my longer ones and I feel it shows the strength of vikings pretty well. It also shows the importance of leaving tanks behind in a base trade. http://drop.sc/104250


On February 05 2012 01:48 Huggerz wrote:
Hmm I really much prefer starport after 2 factories, having a raven to clear creep constantly with a banshee or hellions is imba and makes burrow a non-issue. Banshees are great in general unless he goes balls out on mutas. I have seen virtually no Zergs (who bother to scout) just die to hellions at 9 minutes but I suppose it can work if they don't wall off much at all. I would nearly always prefer an elevator play or just drop 4 though.

Perhaps you could discuss big late game air transition (still maintaining tanks to kill infestors) - viking, raven, battlecruiser? I don't think there's a stronger way to end the game with mech against Zerg


This is simply a variant, and I think I mentioned in my guide that my build or my style isn't catch all. If you feel comfortable getting an early starport then that's fantastic, I agree that the raven clearing creep is good. I think I mention in the build MMA's variant where he uses banshees to deny the third of zerg - definitely worth trying.

In many of my replays there is evidence of the zerg, maybe not dying, but regularly I kill over 25 drones with the hellion timing attack. It's quite amusing. I'm going to explore a late game air transition over the next week and hopefully I can come up with a section for the guide that I'm happy with and I can agree with. I definitely feel that ravens, and hunter seeker specifically, are going to be used more in the future, you can just look at some recent games by players like MorroW to see their effectiveness.

On February 05 2012 01:50 Noocta wrote:
Since you seems like a solid meching player, what do you think of the idea of adding Ravens latter into the game to help Mech vs BLs ?
It's not something we saw a lot, but DemusliM did it against Ret during some practice games, and MorroW did it too. Hunter seeker is actually a very good spell againsts Broodlords, and they offer a nice harassement possibility later into the game where you don't make hellions anymore.

I'm just unsure of how to transition to them. But unlike Ghost, you don't need to have a lot of structure nor a lot of upgrades to make them work.


As I mentioned above, I'm going to explore this more since it's endorsement by pros is pretty much a "do this". I should mention that they do require tech labbed ports, which is an investment as it means you need more starports than for reactor, and to make ravens really useful you need the energy upgrade and hunter seeker itself. However if you're in a static late game scenario where you are both trying to make the "perfect" composition then I would tentatively say that yes, ravens are an absolute must.

On February 05 2012 01:57 EndOfLine wrote:
Love the guide.

As a zerg player, why did you add to your title: No more banelings?

You mean no more in the mid game, or because you are very good vs the baneling bust?


Thanks for your support. I meant no more banelings are banelings aren't very effective versus a mech army and I often threw games away through bad micro. It's a joke based on the fact that when playing mech you can more or less amove! (joke, joke!!)


On February 05 2012 02:34 EndOfLine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2012 02:31 Saechiis wrote:
What do you guys think of using lategame dropships with Thors to snipe expo's when Zerg's going T3?


I would not do it with thors. Perhaps helions or kill mass drones.

Why not thors?
Because a few gaggle of roaches will kill your thors without any thor support.
Plus, you want to keep your max deathball push as strong as possible.


This is pretty much my answer. It's quite the risk to ferry Thors around in this situation, because the zerg is going to have corruptors to take down your medivac and then a single thor is very vulnerable to being killed without even getting 1 roach. It's much better to just go for the drones with your hellions - especially because hellions are mineral only, and you're limited by your gas.


On February 05 2012 04:59 DoctorFunk wrote:
Although it deviates a bit from the principles of mech, I believe that it is never a bad idea to have your initial rax reactored at some point while securing your natural. I've lost so many thors and tanks before to straight muta, just because they magic boxed the thors, then went to town on the tanks. Mutas can be a huge pain in the midgame. It can never hurt to have a few extra marines. You can stick them in bunkers, bring them with your army, whatever. They're free anyways.


This is just a stylistic choice for you I think, I don't think this is necessary by any means. If you're using my build, or any standard build you should have some thors out by around 9.30-10 minutes. I'm going to do my best to present what I consider to be a reasonable scenario:

In order for Mutas to do significant damage vs your Thors they have to come out early, when you only have two.
For this to happen he has to have skipped units almost completely and have invested his gas into a spire very quickly.
This also means there's almost no chance of a baneling nest or a roach warren, and certainly no roaches already built.
Therefore, as long as you hide your hellion count adequately, you're going to be able to kill 90% of his drones before he can take down your hellions. This means that even if he DOES make upwards of 7 or 8 mutas, you can afford to lose some scvs repairing your thors and come out ahead.

I hope you can agree with my answer, but by all means continue to use marines if that's what you find to work. I just don't feel that it's very useful, it's 300 minerals for four marine and a bunker, which while not that much is still something to consider.


On February 05 2012 05:03 AvengerAzrael wrote:
I was going to point out what DoctorFunk said. The only thing which discourged me from using Mech is that in very high Muta counts and magic boxed, they absolutely wreck Thors. One of the modifications I've been working on is to use Marine/Tank/Thor and a few hellions with attack upgrades only. How effective is this compared to Mech keeping in mind the mass muta count?


For me, 3/3 Thors are simply so good against mutalisks that this is a non-issue.

http://drop.sc/104249 Here is a replay of me going against someone who was playing very well, he does multiple switches between air and ground and I struggle to stabilise. However, as you can see, in the end I simply roll over his bad composition. With enough Thors, especially with upgrades, I don't worry about mutas at all. As a stylistic thing, I don't like to include marines in my army. This is also because of the added cost of getting upgrades and more barracks, I'm unconvinced that it's fully worthwhile when Thors are actually good enough, especially with armour upgrades.

On February 05 2012 05:16 Umpteen wrote:
The only thing I'm going to complain about is calling zerg aggression at 8:45 'cheese'. From a terran, that's just taking the piss. Other than that, it's a well presented guide


Haha, sorry, I didn't even realise I was doing that!

Thanks for all your feedback and I hope my answers satisfy. You can expect updates to the guide in the coming days.
Mvp #1
4Servy
Profile Joined August 2008
Netherlands1542 Posts
February 04 2012 20:32 GMT
#29
spreading your thors (but risky in most other cases) actualy really helps vs mutas so they cant magic over them in 1 go.
MockHamill
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1798 Posts
February 04 2012 20:33 GMT
#30
Good guide but I find that mass roaches makes mech play impossible. Roaches cost so little gas that it is impossible to get enough tanks to counter the roaches mid-game. Try counter 1500 gas worth of roaches with 1500 gas worth of mech. It simply does not work.

Mech works great though against player that do not know that they should go pure roaches or if the Zerg is passive and let you mass up to 150-200 pop.
Aristotle7
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States120 Posts
February 04 2012 20:37 GMT
#31
Regarding Mutas:

Just rush +2 thor attack, and mutas are no longer a problem. Also as you move out, start adding turrets around yourself - it adds detection, gets roaches stuck attacking turrets instead of tanks, and helps a ton versus muta switches, and gives you SCVs to repair your mech at the same time.

Don't forget SCVs are the mech, too!
Master Terran on NA
hyptonic
Profile Joined June 2011
2155 Posts
February 04 2012 20:41 GMT
#32
What do you do vs doom drops?
DaveVAH
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada162 Posts
February 04 2012 20:45 GMT
#33
Just want to point out that upgraded thors, supported by scvs and hellions and your main army can destroy many good numbers of broodlords. you just need to have full control of your sieged tanks so when his support army is about to move in you siege and target fire. and IMMEDIATELY unsiege if his supporting army dies or retreats.

I Generally roll 10 tanks, 12 thors with he rest in hellions and viks with repair support and walk through brood armies.

-Daveroid
Reggae-Troll
Profile Joined September 2010
Finland241 Posts
February 04 2012 20:47 GMT
#34
On February 05 2012 05:41 hyptonic wrote:
What do you do vs doom drops?

Always have turret ring around your base, should take the worst edge off of a doom drop.
Do feed the Troll.
Otarku
Profile Joined November 2011
United States7 Posts
February 04 2012 21:16 GMT
#35
As a former Terran player who made it to Masters on nothing but builds like these, I just want to note a few things that I feel weren't discussed enough in this guide.

First of all, I have no serious quarrel with this build in general. It's not a bad build, but I do believe it's inferior to a lot of other Mech builds. With that said, as someone who has been playing nothing but Mech TvZ for the past year and a half I also believe that Mech in general is extremely inferior to the standard Marine/Tank. Here's why:

Mech builds, especially ones like this, rely heavily on killing a large number of drones during the early-mid game. The fact of the matter is, if you don't kill at least a few drones you're almost guaranteed to lose the game. In order to ensure that you do in fact damage their economy you have to deny any and all scouting. If you deny the scouts, you probably win. But this creates a serious problem when all the Zerg player has to do to figure your build out in its entirety is suicide an overlord into your base. If the overlord sees two or more factories, he knows what's coming, and your hellion attack is not likely to do very much damage, thus losing you the game. The writer of this guide did mention to position marines around your base to deny this. This will kill the overlord, but rarely before it sees everything it wants to know.

I mentioned before that I thought this build was inferior to other Mech builds. I only feel this way because of the massive amount of hellions that are made compared to the 4-6 that I feel are necessary. More hellions makes you more vulnerable. Aside from that the mid-late game for this build and most other Mech builds are identical.

I also mentioned that I feel Mech in general is inferior to more standard Terran play. I would definitely recommend this build to anyone below Masters, but after a certain skill level all Zergs know how to exploit the weaknesses in Mech builds and the success rate for such builds drops significantly. Standard TvZ builds don't have this problem because they have fewer weaknesses to exploit. In other words, while Mech has a hard counter: fast roaches/black box mutas/ect. Standard is generally decent against all build orders. This applies to all races and matchups.

My final point isn't really about how to play Mech, but about Starcraft 2 in general. If you care about winning, Mech is the build for you. But if you care about improving, Mech will not help you at all. Mech is as close to an a-move and win scenario as is possible in SC2. Obviously it's not just a-move and win, but my point is it requires drastically less skill to execute and enforces bad habits that you could be improving on were you to play standard.

That's all I have to say really. All in all, great job on the guide LemonyTang.

tl;dr: Mech is a good build, but it has some very serious weaknesses that make it work less and less as you move up the ladder. Mech makes you win, but it doesn't make you a better player.
Jarree
Profile Joined January 2012
Finland1004 Posts
February 04 2012 21:20 GMT
#36
On February 05 2012 05:25 LemonyTang wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2012 01:15 Jarree wrote:
Awesome guide. However I'm a bit concerned about the lategame without ghosts. I think zerg can outnumber and overpower vikings with corruptors even without infestors (yes, thors help but let's say for the sake of argument that infestors and thors balance each other out). Is the lack of ghosts because you don't have the infrastructure to build them or 0-0 upgrades or just simply you think they are not needed because vikings do the job?

edit: and if someone could specify which replay, if any, has that late game situation i'd be grateful


Thanks for your feedback. Personally I don't switch into ghosts for numerous reasons, some of which you touched on.
A) It can be stressful in a late game scenario and taking the time to build 3 barracks, tech labs and a ghost academy is easy to forget and actually a strange transition mentally to do. Don't forget too that ghosts are actually quite expensive, admittedly in this situation you should be taking your fourth by now but even then, if you're trading armies then investing in ghosts, who aren't that useful versus a ground switch from Zerg, can be risky.
B) 0-0 upgrades are actually a big deal as you say, especially when you're not going to be facing light units so the ghosts themselves will do tiny damage outside of snipe (not that this isn't significant damage)
C) when you have a big enough arc, and siege tanks positioned to hit infestors before they can fungal repeatedly, then you should actually be okay. There's rarely a situation where zerg is going to have such a large army that you can't build enough vikings and thors to combat it, simply due to the 200 supply limit. In the late game we can use mules to lower our scv count and have a larger army for it.
D) I've never actually encountered a scenario where I felt I needed ghosts to beat the zerg army.

If you'd like to see a late game engagement, then this replay has one: http://drop.sc/104256
It's hard to manufacture that kind of late game scenario, but this replay is one of my longer ones and I feel it shows the strength of vikings pretty well.


Thanks for the answer! I personally have A) as my problem, I just thought it was because i'm not good enough . It's so much easier just adding starports and pumping vikings.

I watched your late game replay but it didn't quite answer my questions. Your opponent had zero corruptors supporting his broodlords, only a couple of infestors. Instead he just kept massing 2-1 roaches against your 2-2 tanks and it was a massacre. I have lost with mech against total air switch pure bl/corruptor, with couple of infestors as backup. It just feels really hard to beat without ghosts.

Great guide anyway, well done.
JagerGard
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden135 Posts
February 04 2012 21:23 GMT
#37
+1.
This guide is amazing, my TvZ will now be awesome.
Thank you OP.
SlayerSThorZaIN F I G H T I N G ! | A BIRD IN THE HAND IS WORTH 2 IN THE BUSH!
Crowned
Profile Joined August 2011
United States368 Posts
February 04 2012 21:39 GMT
#38
Nice guide looking forward to trying this. Do you mech in tvt also?
It's cool to love to win, but it's better to hate to lose.
LemonyTang
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom428 Posts
February 04 2012 21:47 GMT
#39
On February 05 2012 06:20 Jarree wrote:
Thanks for the answer! I personally have A) as my problem, I just thought it was because i'm not good enough . It's so much easier just adding starports and pumping vikings.

I watched your late game replay but it didn't quite answer my questions. Your opponent had zero corruptors supporting his broodlords, only a couple of infestors. Instead he just kept massing 2-1 roaches against your 2-2 tanks and it was a massacre. I have lost with mech against total air switch pure bl/corruptor, with couple of infestors as backup. It just feels really hard to beat without ghosts.

Great guide anyway, well done.


Hey there, sorry, I made a mistake. I thought I included this replay: http://drop.sc/104250 - turns out I didn't. I hope this replay will be more helpful in how to play during the late game, as it spends much more time in there than the engagement in replay 1.

On February 05 2012 05:33 MockHamill wrote:
Good guide but I find that mass roaches makes mech play impossible. Roaches cost so little gas that it is impossible to get enough tanks to counter the roaches mid-game. Try counter 1500 gas worth of roaches with 1500 gas worth of mech. It simply does not work.

Mech works great though against player that do not know that they should go pure roaches or if the Zerg is passive and let you mass up to 150-200 pop.


I disagree, tanks can be set up to be so cost effective that you can crush this kind of early aggression. I hope that I'm able to help you prepare your base before you're even under threat by providing some map analysis in the next few days.

On February 05 2012 05:37 Aristotle7 wrote:
Regarding Mutas:

Just rush +2 thor attack, and mutas are no longer a problem. Also as you move out, start adding turrets around yourself - it adds detection, gets roaches stuck attacking turrets instead of tanks, and helps a ton versus muta switches, and gives you SCVs to repair your mech at the same time.

Don't forget SCVs are the mech, too!


This is good advice. While I personally rarely bring scvs with my push, preferring to push faster and giving the zerg less time to set up his flank, it's definitely a choice you can make. Especially when repairing a tanking thor, scvs can make a huge difference. If you've set up your macro orbitals too, then you may as well brings scvs in your push as you no longer need them in your economy.

On February 05 2012 05:41 hyptonic wrote:
What do you do vs doom drops?


As user Reggae-Troll said, turret rings are very important in defending from doom drops. There are two scenarios for a doom drop - an offensive one, where he is dropping while you're in your base, or a base trade one, where he is avoiding fighting your army.

If he is doing an offensive doom drop I simply unsiege 75% of my tanks and bring them to my base, lift my buildings and kill his army without any hassle at all. Once you know where it is, it doesn't do any damage because of the natural funnel of your base. There is a section on this in the guide.

Likewise, in the situation of a desperation base trade I simply ignore it. You can mop it up with the few tanks you leave behind when you push + reinforcements, because in a base trade scenario mech is so cost efficient that you don't have to worry in this situation. Just keep a level head and take out his hatcheries, while allowing him to gain some ground in your base by setting up a defensive siege protecting your mining bases.

On February 05 2012 06:16 Otarku wrote:
As a former Terran player who made it to Masters on nothing but builds like these, I just want to note a few things that I feel weren't discussed enough in this guide.

First of all, I have no serious quarrel with this build in general. It's not a bad build, but I do believe it's inferior to a lot of other Mech builds. With that said, as someone who has been playing nothing but Mech TvZ for the past year and a half I also believe that Mech in general is extremely inferior to the standard Marine/Tank. Here's why:

Mech builds, especially ones like this, rely heavily on killing a large number of drones during the early-mid game. The fact of the matter is, if you don't kill at least a few drones you're almost guaranteed to lose the game. In order to ensure that you do in fact damage their economy you have to deny any and all scouting. If you deny the scouts, you probably win. But this creates a serious problem when all the Zerg player has to do to figure your build out in its entirety is suicide an overlord into your base. If the overlord sees two or more factories, he knows what's coming, and your hellion attack is not likely to do very much damage, thus losing you the game. The writer of this guide did mention to position marines around your base to deny this. This will kill the overlord, but rarely before it sees everything it wants to know.

I mentioned before that I thought this build was inferior to other Mech builds. I only feel this way because of the massive amount of hellions that are made compared to the 4-6 that I feel are necessary. More hellions makes you more vulnerable. Aside from that the mid-late game for this build and most other Mech builds are identical.

I also mentioned that I feel Mech in general is inferior to more standard Terran play. I would definitely recommend this build to anyone below Masters, but after a certain skill level all Zergs know how to exploit the weaknesses in Mech builds and the success rate for such builds drops significantly. Standard TvZ builds don't have this problem because they have fewer weaknesses to exploit. In other words, while Mech has a hard counter: fast roaches/black box mutas/ect. Standard is generally decent against all build orders. This applies to all races and matchups.

My final point isn't really about how to play Mech, but about Starcraft 2 in general. If you care about winning, Mech is the build for you. But if you care about improving, Mech will not help you at all. Mech is as close to an a-move and win scenario as is possible in SC2. Obviously it's not just a-move and win, but my point is it requires drastically less skill to execute and enforces bad habits that you could be improving on were you to play standard.

That's all I have to say really. All in all, great job on the guide LemonyTang.

tl;dr: Mech is a good build, but it has some very serious weaknesses that make it work less and less as you move up the ladder. Mech makes you win, but it doesn't make you a better player.


Thanks for your post. I disagree that my build is inferior because of it's investment in hellions, or that it needs to kill drones to be effective. With mech, you're playing a defensive style, with cost efficient units so this means that even if you're 30 drones down, you're still ok because you aren't on a timer like you are with marine tank. There's rarely a situation where you're overwhelmed when you have the defenders advantage.

Furthermore, the only reason getting such a high hellion count would be so high is in case of a roach based attack - and this is something you should be scouting, and switching out of your plan for. I mention as much in the guide, that you shouldn't be afraid to stop building hellions and get siege tanks out quicker if you feel endangered.

I admit that I'm not a pro, but I am facing GMs and "high" masters with this build and it performs well. Mech is simply a different style of sc2, and I don't think you can say that you're not improving by practicing it. While I agree it requires less micro, I feel that the planning and decision making that goes into mech makes it just as worthwhile to master as playing marine/tank, or any other style like that.
Mvp #1
acrimoneyius
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States983 Posts
February 04 2012 22:21 GMT
#40
On February 05 2012 06:16 Otarku wrote:
As a former Terran player who made it to Masters on nothing but builds like these, I just want to note a few things that I feel weren't discussed enough in this guide.

First of all, I have no serious quarrel with this build in general. It's not a bad build, but I do believe it's inferior to a lot of other Mech builds. With that said, as someone who has been playing nothing but Mech TvZ for the past year and a half I also believe that Mech in general is extremely inferior to the standard Marine/Tank. Here's why:

Mech builds, especially ones like this, rely heavily on killing a large number of drones during the early-mid game. The fact of the matter is, if you don't kill at least a few drones you're almost guaranteed to lose the game. In order to ensure that you do in fact damage their economy you have to deny any and all scouting. If you deny the scouts, you probably win. But this creates a serious problem when all the Zerg player has to do to figure your build out in its entirety is suicide an overlord into your base. If the overlord sees two or more factories, he knows what's coming, and your hellion attack is not likely to do very much damage, thus losing you the game. The writer of this guide did mention to position marines around your base to deny this. This will kill the overlord, but rarely before it sees everything it wants to know.

I mentioned before that I thought this build was inferior to other Mech builds. I only feel this way because of the massive amount of hellions that are made compared to the 4-6 that I feel are necessary. More hellions makes you more vulnerable. Aside from that the mid-late game for this build and most other Mech builds are identical.

I also mentioned that I feel Mech in general is inferior to more standard Terran play. I would definitely recommend this build to anyone below Masters, but after a certain skill level all Zergs know how to exploit the weaknesses in Mech builds and the success rate for such builds drops significantly. Standard TvZ builds don't have this problem because they have fewer weaknesses to exploit. In other words, while Mech has a hard counter: fast roaches/black box mutas/ect. Standard is generally decent against all build orders. This applies to all races and matchups.

My final point isn't really about how to play Mech, but about Starcraft 2 in general. If you care about winning, Mech is the build for you. But if you care about improving, Mech will not help you at all. Mech is as close to an a-move and win scenario as is possible in SC2. Obviously it's not just a-move and win, but my point is it requires drastically less skill to execute and enforces bad habits that you could be improving on were you to play standard.

That's all I have to say really. All in all, great job on the guide LemonyTang.

tl;dr: Mech is a good build, but it has some very serious weaknesses that make it work less and less as you move up the ladder. Mech makes you win, but it doesn't make you a better player.


Really agree with this. Way too many ways to abuse mech compositions.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Team League
11:00
Playoffs Day 2
WardiTV787
ComeBackTV 592
Rex104
3DClanTV 49
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #144
CranKy Ducklings82
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko359
Rex 104
trigger 6
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 52403
Sea 3113
Jaedong 1400
EffOrt 426
Hyuk 414
Mini 373
Shuttle 354
firebathero 331
Last 214
Light 213
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 164
Zeus 148
hero 130
PianO 87
Pusan 84
Shine 61
Shinee 55
[sc1f]eonzerg 41
Hm[arnc] 40
Free 37
HiyA 35
Barracks 29
scan(afreeca) 27
yabsab 19
ToSsGirL 19
Sacsri 18
Movie 17
Sexy 15
GoRush 14
Noble 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Rock 9
Icarus 2
Terrorterran 1
Dota 2
Gorgc6211
Counter-Strike
zeus389
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor50
Other Games
singsing1963
B2W.Neo1029
XaKoH 569
Hui .118
QueenE52
RotterdaM0
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL16729
Other Games
BasetradeTV1221
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
CasterMuse 0
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP51
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1975
• TFBlade1167
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2h 24m
IPSL
3h 24m
Hawk vs TBD
StRyKeR vs TBD
BSL
6h 24m
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 24m
WardiTV Team League
22h 24m
OSC
1d
BSL
1d 6h
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
1d 6h
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
Replay Cast
1d 20h
Wardi Open
1d 21h
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
1d 21h
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs PianO
hero vs Rain
GSL
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Escore
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W2
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.