• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:33
CET 22:33
KST 06:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners8Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon!33$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship6[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win9
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon! Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BW General Discussion [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1682 users

[G] SPeCiaLiST's TvP Special Tactics - Page 3

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
nath
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1788 Posts
December 02 2011 18:45 GMT
#41
I feel like 15 nexus gets good enough econ that even with damage dealt (5-6 probe loss), they will have more than enough units to defend and potentially 5 gates worth of production up when you attack.
Founder of Flow Enterprises, LLC http://flow-enterprises.com/
Avril_Lavigne
Profile Joined April 2010
United States446 Posts
December 03 2011 00:06 GMT
#42
On December 03 2011 03:45 nath wrote:
I feel like 15 nexus gets good enough econ that even with damage dealt (5-6 probe loss), they will have more than enough units to defend and potentially 5 gates worth of production up when you attack.


This is why he does a different build in response to a 15 nexus.
iAmJeffReY
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4262 Posts
December 03 2011 00:15 GMT
#43
On December 03 2011 02:05 statikg wrote:
This is basically exactly iechoics old build but with +2marines in the drop and the addition of alternative plans. The gas steal is also new which might be key.

I actually got 4gated the other day for the first time in like a month, caught me completely off gaurd and exposed my lazy scouting of 1gas = expand.

Gotta get that SCV out before the stalker, go hide it, and double back to check that expo. Like you know you should! We all lose to four gates, just requires a quick rewatch and more cautious play.

As I'm sure you already know lol. Just felt like typing it <3
Unbiased biased terran abuser Jeffrey. Sorry for the rage, friend!
joeschmo
Profile Joined January 2011
United States167 Posts
December 03 2011 02:11 GMT
#44
garbage build, trash plyr who all ins every game, any terran can make up an all in build, trying to make it into a strategy from what you scouted doesn't earn you any more merit whatsoever. God, how can you guys reading this not be pissed beyond words? this is absolute trash, really? on tl forums you post a freakin all in build? no terran who's worth a shit wants to learn an all in build. Go watch Jinro play a Protoss you noobie

User was temp banned for this post.
rsvp
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States2266 Posts
December 03 2011 02:21 GMT
#45
On December 02 2011 17:15 Tazerenix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2011 15:44 coL.rsvp wrote:
This is a very nice 1-1-1 variant. At least for me, the way I defend 1-1-1 is to use as few stalkers as possible, and just go mass zealot with some immo/sentry support. However, the early hellion drop forces more stalkers from the protoss player which makes the all-in that much stronger.

This build is countered in the same way a normal 1-1-1 is countered (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=250379), except the trick is to not over make stalkers and rely on zealot/immo/sentry in the face of hellions. Hellions don't really counter zealots.

Here's a game I just played against this build:

http://drop.sc/67279

From my recent discussion with SEA GM players i've learned that apparently mass blink stalker is actually the best way to deal with the 1-1-1, and even more so with a hellion variant. You can sit there and pick off marines and such and just blink away without taking damage, potentially forcing the pdd in the middle of the map. And even when they plant the pdd down, with 20 or more stalkers you can actually focus it down in 2 shots. Since this push doesn't have any tanks, the amount of damage you take from the marines and hellions will be so small (with good micro) that you can potentially ruin the whole push right in the middle of the map.


I've definitely seen it done successfully, but I wouldn't say it's the "best" way to deal with 1-1-1. Just another option.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
December 03 2011 02:38 GMT
#46
On December 03 2011 01:59 NrGmonk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2011 01:48 kcdc wrote:
On December 03 2011 01:34 avilo wrote:
On December 02 2011 15:44 coL.rsvp wrote:
This is a very nice 1-1-1 variant. At least for me, the way I defend 1-1-1 is to use as few stalkers as possible, and just go mass zealot with some immo/sentry support. However, the early hellion drop forces more stalkers from the protoss player which makes the all-in that much stronger.

This build is countered in the same way a normal 1-1-1 is countered (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=250379), except the trick is to not over make stalkers and rely on zealot/immo/sentry in the face of hellions. Hellions don't really counter zealots.

Here's a game I just played against this build:

http://drop.sc/67279


A protoss player admitting that hellions suck against zealots. Praise the lord almighty, i'm glad a good level protoss finally fessed up about it on the forums, as many forum warriors will randomly come up in mech/hellion threads saying that hellions are good against zealots lmao.

Sorry, just had to comment on that, as it's a misconception that hellions are good against zealots when they actually suck.


Hellions without pre-ignitor in small numbers don't really counter moderate numbers of zealots when both compositions are mixed. In larger numbers and with pre-ignitor, the zealots melt.

For a 10 minute timing attack with mostly marines and banshees, a few hellions don't deter a zealot composition.


Disagree here. Ever since the Bfh nerf, zealots can do pretty well vs hellions in a mech composition. Even goody has said that mech isn't viable anymore.


Whoops. You might be right. I haven't fought large numbers of hellions since the BFH nerf. And that's probably because they don't work anymore.
Kamikiri
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1319 Posts
December 03 2011 02:48 GMT
#47
On December 03 2011 11:11 joeschmo wrote:
garbage build, trash plyr who all ins every game, any terran can make up an all in build, trying to make it into a strategy from what you scouted doesn't earn you any more merit whatsoever. God, how can you guys reading this not be pissed beyond words? this is absolute trash, really? on tl forums you post a freakin all in build? no terran who's worth a shit wants to learn an all in build. Go watch Jinro play a Protoss you noobie

User was temp banned for this post.


Specialist is not a trash player, he is a pretty solid GM terran. This is the strategy forums where people post their strategies, in this case he is posting an all-in build he has come up with. You really shouldn't flame someone for playing the game different from you. That being said when I have played Specialist on the ladder he wasn't an exclusively all-in player.
clever_us
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States329 Posts
December 03 2011 02:53 GMT
#48
SPECIALIST FIIIIGHTINGG! Wish you were still at Emory, buddy- we'd be kicking so much ass in the CSL right now. Def gonna use this when I play random!
glhf <3
Avril_Lavigne
Profile Joined April 2010
United States446 Posts
December 03 2011 02:57 GMT
#49
Okay just one more question. As I was doing this build I've seen some pretty different responses that haven't been mentioned in the thread yet. While doing this build, a protoss goes for like a 2-3 gate robo and then switches to pheonix off of one base. Should I keep turtling and wait for him to expand first and then attack? because i tried to attack regardless if he didn't even expand, would you say that's a mistake?
one-one-one
Profile Joined November 2011
Sweden551 Posts
December 03 2011 09:25 GMT
#50
On December 03 2011 01:34 avilo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2011 15:44 coL.rsvp wrote:
This is a very nice 1-1-1 variant. At least for me, the way I defend 1-1-1 is to use as few stalkers as possible, and just go mass zealot with some immo/sentry support. However, the early hellion drop forces more stalkers from the protoss player which makes the all-in that much stronger.

This build is countered in the same way a normal 1-1-1 is countered (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=250379), except the trick is to not over make stalkers and rely on zealot/immo/sentry in the face of hellions. Hellions don't really counter zealots.

Here's a game I just played against this build:

http://drop.sc/67279


A protoss player admitting that hellions suck against zealots. Praise the lord almighty, i'm glad a good level protoss finally fessed up about it on the forums, as many forum warriors will randomly come up in mech/hellion threads saying that hellions are good against zealots lmao.

Sorry, just had to comment on that, as it's a misconception that hellions are good against zealots when they actually suck.


Yeah!

It is ridiculous how much crap terran players have to take.
Seriously , how hard can it be? Don´t keep nerfing mech when 99% of all terrans have huge problems playing "standard" TvP.

Revert the fucking tank nerf. Won´t change much in TvZ since tanks already overkills lings and banes hard , TvT will lean more towards mech and marine tank will be replaced by marine marauder tank.
Then you open up a solid way to play TvP and thus making the TvP matchup less boring to watch and less stupid to play generating a bigger interest for SC2 as an e-sport resulting in more games sold etc blablabla.

The siege tank should be a ballin' unit , just deal with it!
Blue flame hellions was designed to counter mass light units as zealots , deal with it!
Thors should not have energy for a gimmicky upgrade that was nerfed into oblivion , remove energy bar and the upgrade.
I drop a thor in your base , deal with it!

The SC2 scene lacks high profile terrans that can speak for the majority with great credibility. We need more players like avilo and Jinro that are outspoken by the mess that is TvP.

Blizzard giving in to the protoss mafia on SotG by givning protoss an harass unit in HotS is a reason why we need high profile terrans telling people what is what.
Like protoss ever needed more harass options when their basic supply provider , the pylon allows them to harass in all stages of the game. If that is not enough you can make a warp prism , phoenix or dark templars.
Why not a high templar drop at opponents far away expansions ? ...
Made me wanna vomit

Feels like logical reasoning and discussions in a civilized tone with well-grounded arguments is not the right way to affect game balance.
Whining seems like a better option so far

Keep up the good work avilo!


User was warned for this post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1BFY4R7IIP4#t=1710s
Tazerenix
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia340 Posts
December 03 2011 11:28 GMT
#51
On December 03 2011 18:25 one-one-one wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2011 01:34 avilo wrote:
On December 02 2011 15:44 coL.rsvp wrote:
This is a very nice 1-1-1 variant. At least for me, the way I defend 1-1-1 is to use as few stalkers as possible, and just go mass zealot with some immo/sentry support. However, the early hellion drop forces more stalkers from the protoss player which makes the all-in that much stronger.

This build is countered in the same way a normal 1-1-1 is countered (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=250379), except the trick is to not over make stalkers and rely on zealot/immo/sentry in the face of hellions. Hellions don't really counter zealots.

Here's a game I just played against this build:

http://drop.sc/67279


A protoss player admitting that hellions suck against zealots. Praise the lord almighty, i'm glad a good level protoss finally fessed up about it on the forums, as many forum warriors will randomly come up in mech/hellion threads saying that hellions are good against zealots lmao.

Sorry, just had to comment on that, as it's a misconception that hellions are good against zealots when they actually suck.


Yeah!

It is ridiculous how much crap terran players have to take.
Seriously , how hard can it be? Don´t keep nerfing mech when 99% of all terrans have huge problems playing "standard" TvP.

Revert the fucking tank nerf. Won´t change much in TvZ since tanks already overkills lings and banes hard , TvT will lean more towards mech and marine tank will be replaced by marine marauder tank.
Then you open up a solid way to play TvP and thus making the TvP matchup less boring to watch and less stupid to play generating a bigger interest for SC2 as an e-sport resulting in more games sold etc blablabla.

The siege tank should be a ballin' unit , just deal with it!
Blue flame hellions was designed to counter mass light units as zealots , deal with it!
Thors should not have energy for a gimmicky upgrade that was nerfed into oblivion , remove energy bar and the upgrade.
I drop a thor in your base , deal with it!

The SC2 scene lacks high profile terrans that can speak for the majority with great credibility. We need more players like avilo and Jinro that are outspoken by the mess that is TvP.

Blizzard giving in to the protoss mafia on SotG by givning protoss an harass unit in HotS is a reason why we need high profile terrans telling people what is what.
Like protoss ever needed more harass options when their basic supply provider , the pylon allows them to harass in all stages of the game. If that is not enough you can make a warp prism , phoenix or dark templars.
Why not a high templar drop at opponents far away expansions ? ...
Made me wanna vomit

Feels like logical reasoning and discussions in a civilized tone with well-grounded arguments is not the right way to affect game balance.
Whining seems like a better option so far

Keep up the good work avilo!


What did I just read...

1. Siege tanks were broken, if they did that much damage it would TOTALLY break TvT and TvZ, Mech would be entirely unstoppable in both matchups as Roaches and Marines would melt instantly to tanks. Blue flame hellions do counter zealots, i'm truly sorry that your 8 hellions don't kill 20 zealots, you actually need more than that. The Thor's strike cannon timing attacks were ridiculous, it meant that the thor directly countered the two units designed to counter it, the immortal and colossus.
2. Both phoenix and dark templar are shut down by a single turret and a planetary fortress, making them useless. High templar drops are something that needs to be explored but at the point in the game where they become viable vikings can pretty quickly be made to shutdown any warp prism harass. Also, did you just call pylons overpowered?
Speake
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States494 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-03 11:31:55
December 03 2011 11:31 GMT
#52
On December 03 2011 11:48 Kamikiri wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2011 11:11 joeschmo wrote:
garbage build, trash plyr who all ins every game, any terran can make up an all in build, trying to make it into a strategy from what you scouted doesn't earn you any more merit whatsoever. God, how can you guys reading this not be pissed beyond words? this is absolute trash, really? on tl forums you post a freakin all in build? no terran who's worth a shit wants to learn an all in build. Go watch Jinro play a Protoss you noobie

User was temp banned for this post.


Specialist is not a trash player, he is a pretty solid GM terran. This is the strategy forums where people post their strategies, in this case he is posting an all-in build he has come up with. You really shouldn't flame someone for playing the game different from you. That being said when I have played Specialist on the ladder he wasn't an exclusively all-in player.


He actually is exclusively an all-in player. This guy is famous for just pulling all of his scvs if he gets behind by 5 supply and praying for a win with a random allin. Ive played him plenty of times, enough to know this 100% true
tQ.Speake
CrusaderT2
Profile Joined April 2011
4 Posts
December 03 2011 16:07 GMT
#53
Kudos to Specialist, That build looks really interesting and a big step above blind all-ins for sure.

Just curious, out of few times this build lost, what was the reason behind it??
iAmJeffReY
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4262 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-03 16:28:59
December 03 2011 16:24 GMT
#54
2. Both phoenix and dark templar are shut down by a single turret and a planetary fortress, making them useless. High templar drops are something that needs to be explored but at the point in the game where they become viable vikings can pretty quickly be made to shutdown any warp prism harass. Also, did you just call pylons overpowered?

Funny, you have an innate ability to warp those pesky buggers PAST a turret, into my base, where there isn't detection and continue your DT harass. You can keep them at naturals so I have to scan and then land. Keep them by the minerals. I maynard scvs, and call mules, you kill the mules. ezpz

And I'm with him. I wish my food unit flew, or changed into a detector, or could warp units in to it... I can raise and lower mine!!!! lol

Joking aside. Mech does need tweaks in TvP, that wouldn't change TvT or TvZ which is where the issue lies. TvT mech is almost perfect IMO as it's a circle motion of strats. Bio > mech > bio mech > bio. Perfect in my opinion. Mech in TvZ is very hard to execute but obviously isn't broken or too weak, as top terrans are still winning with it. I think changing tank damage is a joke, as it would completely make tank/anything the go to unit comp. You wouldn't micro to win, you'd position and sit to win. I already personally think mech is a gay play style, but that's because I'm in your face never 200/200 kinda player.

TvP is difficult. I'm personally using bio mech now, but cutting tanks out once archon or chargelot enter the stadium. It's working great. A 100 food ish push at 10:30 with 3-4 tanks, 2 medics, and a bio force with stim shields shells? Yes please. Went collsai? It's okay. My range 13 > range 9. I can safely third, and then go into a bio play with a small wind in my sails kind of feeling. Straight bio requires great control, but it's rewarding in my mind. What's rewarding about it? Bio micro vs protoss micro is night and day in my opinion, don't quote and tell me differently as it's what I think. Studder stepping, splitting, concave to concave drop backs, landing EMPs, dodging forcefields --- it's just awesome. It makes it worth while and fun. Now beating their army, and having 20 supply of fresh 3/0/3 chargelots coming at you is not at all fun...
Unbiased biased terran abuser Jeffrey. Sorry for the rage, friend!
one-one-one
Profile Joined November 2011
Sweden551 Posts
December 03 2011 19:42 GMT
#55
On December 03 2011 20:28 Tazerenix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2011 18:25 one-one-one wrote:
On December 03 2011 01:34 avilo wrote:
On December 02 2011 15:44 coL.rsvp wrote:
This is a very nice 1-1-1 variant. At least for me, the way I defend 1-1-1 is to use as few stalkers as possible, and just go mass zealot with some immo/sentry support. However, the early hellion drop forces more stalkers from the protoss player which makes the all-in that much stronger.

This build is countered in the same way a normal 1-1-1 is countered (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=250379), except the trick is to not over make stalkers and rely on zealot/immo/sentry in the face of hellions. Hellions don't really counter zealots.

Here's a game I just played against this build:

http://drop.sc/67279


A protoss player admitting that hellions suck against zealots. Praise the lord almighty, i'm glad a good level protoss finally fessed up about it on the forums, as many forum warriors will randomly come up in mech/hellion threads saying that hellions are good against zealots lmao.

Sorry, just had to comment on that, as it's a misconception that hellions are good against zealots when they actually suck.


Yeah!

It is ridiculous how much crap terran players have to take.
Seriously , how hard can it be? Don´t keep nerfing mech when 99% of all terrans have huge problems playing "standard" TvP.

Revert the fucking tank nerf. Won´t change much in TvZ since tanks already overkills lings and banes hard , TvT will lean more towards mech and marine tank will be replaced by marine marauder tank.
Then you open up a solid way to play TvP and thus making the TvP matchup less boring to watch and less stupid to play generating a bigger interest for SC2 as an e-sport resulting in more games sold etc blablabla.

The siege tank should be a ballin' unit , just deal with it!
Blue flame hellions was designed to counter mass light units as zealots , deal with it!
Thors should not have energy for a gimmicky upgrade that was nerfed into oblivion , remove energy bar and the upgrade.
I drop a thor in your base , deal with it!

The SC2 scene lacks high profile terrans that can speak for the majority with great credibility. We need more players like avilo and Jinro that are outspoken by the mess that is TvP.

Blizzard giving in to the protoss mafia on SotG by givning protoss an harass unit in HotS is a reason why we need high profile terrans telling people what is what.
Like protoss ever needed more harass options when their basic supply provider , the pylon allows them to harass in all stages of the game. If that is not enough you can make a warp prism , phoenix or dark templars.
Why not a high templar drop at opponents far away expansions ? ...
Made me wanna vomit

Feels like logical reasoning and discussions in a civilized tone with well-grounded arguments is not the right way to affect game balance.
Whining seems like a better option so far

Keep up the good work avilo!


What did I just read...

1. Siege tanks were broken, if they did that much damage it would TOTALLY break TvT and TvZ, Mech would be entirely unstoppable in both matchups as Roaches and Marines would melt instantly to tanks. Blue flame hellions do counter zealots, i'm truly sorry that your 8 hellions don't kill 20 zealots, you actually need more than that. The Thor's strike cannon timing attacks were ridiculous, it meant that the thor directly countered the two units designed to counter it, the immortal and colossus.
2. Both phoenix and dark templar are shut down by a single turret and a planetary fortress, making them useless. High templar drops are something that needs to be explored but at the point in the game where they become viable vikings can pretty quickly be made to shutdown any warp prism harass. Also, did you just call pylons overpowered?


Sorry mods if my previous post drifted away a bit. It is quite common in TvP threads though, since creative strategies like this seem to expose underlying problems in the game.
I have myself done a build very similar to iEchoics 1-1-2 opening which I transformed into an all in version making it almost identical to the build in this post. I have also experience with TvP mech. In both strategies you use hellions and posters claiming ignorant stuff about hellions has to be addressed.

So I will answer to the guy above , but before I will stay on the main topic of this thread:

This build used to work extremely well giving me like an 80% win rate in TvP on diamond level. That was before the 1-1-1 builds became very popular. This build grew in popultarity to the extent that most protosses could identify it and respond to it making it less effective. Phoenix can work quite good vs this build by slowing down your advancement towards your opponents base by forcing the terran player to lay down a PDD mid map. If they expanded they only have to stall until they have enough units and they will win.
The OP is onto something good by noticing that this build can be masked as a traditional 1-1-1 by hiding the second starport and building a fake tech-lab on the factory or something. This opens up a new way to abuse the protoss since they dont know if they have to make zealots/immortals to counter tanks or something else to deal with banshees.
So this build may be revived cos of meta-gaming possibilities.
The phoenix response can be dealt it by doing crap like getting cloak and sniping observers , it then comes down to some silly micro to decide who will come out ahead.

Now to the guy who replied to my first post:
Tanks doing 50 dmg to all armour types would not be better vs roaches. Marines with combat shields would not die to one tank blast. Marines would however take more damage in clumps so when the tank counts go up you would probably have to mix in marauders as you already do today vs mech.
Tank splash would also do more damage to clumped lings , making it even more important for zerg players to spread out their stuff and think twice before engaging tanks.

It is correct that hellions in critical mass absolutely murder zealots even after patch. What has changed is that the number of required hellions has grown. Protoss could even before the patch abuse mech mechanics by just warping in the correct units. In a big engagement you typically loose many hellions and a few tanks and thors. After the patch the time window to punish a terran player for lack of hellions after a big battle has grown. Just mass warp-in zealots!
Another more obvious thing is that more hellions needed means less supply for tanks and thors.

On the thor issue we both seem to agree, so I don´t understand your response. My suggestion was to remove the strike cannon upgrade for the reasons you specified while also removing thor energy.
This , and the fact that you ask yourself: "What did I just read..." , is maybe an indication that you didn´t read properly before responding because nowhere in my post do I say that pylons are OP. I was merely pointing out the great harass abilities protoss players have.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1BFY4R7IIP4#t=1710s
EndOfLineTv
Profile Joined February 2011
United States741 Posts
December 03 2011 21:25 GMT
#56
Specialist is a great player! Listen to his wisdom!

he actually doesn't stop laddering I think.
pingy[wen]
Profile Joined June 2010
United States157 Posts
December 05 2011 15:27 GMT
#57
On December 03 2011 20:31 unSpeake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2011 11:48 Kamikiri wrote:
On December 03 2011 11:11 joeschmo wrote:
garbage build, trash plyr who all ins every game, any terran can make up an all in build, trying to make it into a strategy from what you scouted doesn't earn you any more merit whatsoever. God, how can you guys reading this not be pissed beyond words? this is absolute trash, really? on tl forums you post a freakin all in build? no terran who's worth a shit wants to learn an all in build. Go watch Jinro play a Protoss you noobie

User was temp banned for this post.


Specialist is not a trash player, he is a pretty solid GM terran. This is the strategy forums where people post their strategies, in this case he is posting an all-in build he has come up with. You really shouldn't flame someone for playing the game different from you. That being said when I have played Specialist on the ladder he wasn't an exclusively all-in player.


He actually is exclusively an all-in player. This guy is famous for just pulling all of his scvs if he gets behind by 5 supply and praying for a win with a random allin. Ive played him plenty of times, enough to know this 100% true


he's actually NOT exclusively an all-in player. He is famous for pulling scvs and that may be his playstyle, but he does have winning macro games (against competent pro/semipro players). There are plenty of his replays out there if you dont believe me.
Kruxxen
Profile Joined April 2010
United States149 Posts
December 05 2011 19:16 GMT
#58
After several games this build feels very flimsy to me. Made some mistakes not getting my ravens soon enough, which is extremely pivotal, the difference in engagements without PDD copared to those with it is astounding. I'm going to play with it some more, but it feels like you rely entirely on PDD to win.
pingy[wen]
Profile Joined June 2010
United States157 Posts
December 07 2011 07:17 GMT
#59
http://www.twitch.tv/specialistsc
sephroth
Profile Joined February 2011
United States7 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-07 17:31:52
December 07 2011 17:29 GMT
#60
On December 01 2011 15:31 SpecialistSc wrote:
Intro

8. What you need to be careful of

+ Show Spoiler +

C. Collosus tech – If you spot colossus tech, you simply have to start making Vikings instead of banshees. The attack timing is the same (after expo).




Actually banshee's do more dps than vikings do and this was a build based on the Polt push (except no hellions).
Banshee's also give you an advantage over vikings because you can position them better and if your micro is good enough killing their observer will cripple a toss's army against banshee's giving you an edge over the colossus tech.


The problem with this build is that with hellion production:

a) you have fewer marines which are needed to target fire down any observers.

b) or your push comes later due to less ground units to soak up any damage from the stalkers, etc.

Polt push timing is about the 9 minute mark, where you push when you have 10-15 marines, 1 raven, 3-4 banshee's with cloak. It can be hard countered by any proxy VR and/or pheonix tech and also early blink stalkers.

A FFE is not quite a hard counter but with cannons out it is hard to easily punish your opponent for being greedy. I think if hellions are produced in this build then you need to use your first initial hellions to keep the toss in their base and prevent any aggressive pushes until you can get forces up. Smaller maps would benefit from the hellions than larger maps, and also giving you map control early game preventing any probes from putting forward pylons out.

The problem with hellions in TvP is that they are so weak now. Even against zealots their dps is insignificant and I would much rather have more marines out at the time of a push than hellions.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
LAN Event
18:00
Stellar Fest: Day 1
Zoun vs LamboLIVE!
TriGGeR vs GeraldLIVE!
ComeBackTV 883
UrsaTVCanada640
IndyStarCraft 304
CranKy Ducklings270
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 304
White-Ra 246
UpATreeSC 97
JuggernautJason74
Railgan 60
League of Legends
Trikslyr54
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1163
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu478
Other Games
tarik_tv6967
Grubby4820
Mlord546
fl0m502
shahzam436
B2W.Neo392
ToD137
C9.Mang0107
ZombieGrub40
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL134
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 48
• Dystopia_ 2
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 27
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• imaqtpie2560
• TFBlade1158
Other Games
• Shiphtur246
• tFFMrPink 11
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
5h 27m
CranKy Ducklings
12h 27m
IPSL
20h 27m
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
LAN Event
20h 27m
BSL 21
22h 27m
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
1d 1h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 12h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 14h
IPSL
1d 20h
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
LAN Event
1d 20h
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
1d 22h
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.