[G] IMYongHwa Korean 3 Stalker Robo - Page 2

On February 13 2011 19:25 Dhalphir wrote:
Just as a note for those reading this, the VOD is incorrectly labelled on the site as ZeNEXPuzzle vs IMYongHwa. It is ZeNEXFFMon.

On February 13 2011 20:06 W2 wrote:
this is what I have been doing ever since studying WHite-Ra's PVP, except with 2 stalkers. For the third unit I get out a sentry (chrono'd). Because usually what happens is I manage to snipe his probe, but it gets off a proxy pylon in time. I can't kill the pylon because the stalker+zealot he has delays for long enough that he gets his 4x warp in. So I need a sentry to forcefield in time.

On February 13 2011 20:27 Dhalphir wrote:


You're not meant to keep the stalkers at your base to snipe the pylon that goes down below your ramp. You're meant to send them out into the map as soon as each one is done to try to find the probe thats making the pylon and kill it, preferably before it ever gets one made, but if it does get one done, you can send the other stalkers to kill it. Warpgate won't be done yet at this point for him.

On February 13 2011 23:40 Sleight wrote:
So guess what other MU this makes super nice and easy? PvT! The fast 3 Stalkers are abusive for the same reasons in that MU. Now it obviously needs tweaking but its a safe way to to 2 Gate Robo expand.

This build is a great framework for aggro 2 gate robo's.

On February 13 2011 23:51 hifriend wrote:
You deserve a thousand gold medals for making PvP a bit more bearable.

On February 13 2011 23:53 Dhalphir wrote:


2gate Robo was already the sort of gold standard for playing safely in PvT, nothing really changes here its just a different way of doing it.

On February 14 2011 09:26 Jaeger wrote:
BO is missing a pylon before robo, you build it in all your replays but when I first tried it after just reading the OP it the build seemed supply blocked for an unreasonable length of time because of that and the wording of the robo 3rd gate bullet made it seem intentional.