• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:49
CEST 15:49
KST 22:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)9BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 26231 users

Definitions: Cheese and All-In - Page 4

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Doctorasul
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Romania1145 Posts
May 11 2010 10:23 GMT
#61
Coming up with good definitions is so much harder than nitpicking those we have. However, that which does not kill you makes you stronger so I'm actually helping by being obnoxious!

Cheese

A strategy that relies overwhelmingly or entirely on secrecy. If scouted, the strategy fails and puts the executing player at a severe disadvantage, or right out costs him the game.

Let's think about how different the game would be without fog of war. If both players had vision of the whole map, the game would be almost unrecognisable (worker harrass would be pretty much obsolete, all tactical traps would vanish, etc.) yet only the "secrecy" element has been removed.

Everything that we lose would have to be cheese, going by the definition, because those are all things that noone would bother doing once they are no longer secret. That would mean a majority of what we're doing in game is "cheese" which raises the question what use is the concept then anyway? You might say that those do not amount to a strategy, but in reality they amount to much more than that, namely a style of play.

Consider, why do we want to kill the scouting drone? Is it because once it's dead, we're going to cheese? Or is it because we're going standard most of the time, but we want to keep that a secret because having "cheese" as a remote posiblity in the oponent's mind is useful for us? Going standard in this situation would also be a type of cheese, since we all seem to care a whole lot about it being a secret.

I'm only partly serious but I think explicitly answering these objections or refining the definition would make it better!
"I believe in Spinoza's god who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but not in a god who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings." - Albert Einstein
Snowfield
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
1289 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 11:36:49
May 11 2010 11:34 GMT
#62
Im kinda new to the hhole cheese word (in this context), but to me:

Cheese: What good players blame when they loose.
and
Cheese: Using units people don't use alot.
Cheese: Going air when the opponent has a bunch of Ground to ground units.

I learned this while watching orb and idra play

zatic
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Zurich15325 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 12:52:07
May 11 2010 12:48 GMT
#63
On May 11 2010 19:23 Doctorasul wrote:
Coming up with good definitions is so much harder than nitpicking those we have. However, that which does not kill you makes you stronger so I'm actually helping by being obnoxious!

Show nested quote +
Cheese

A strategy that relies overwhelmingly or entirely on secrecy. If scouted, the strategy fails and puts the executing player at a severe disadvantage, or right out costs him the game.

Let's think about how different the game would be without fog of war. If both players had vision of the whole map, the game would be almost unrecognisable (worker harrass would be pretty much obsolete, all tactical traps would vanish, etc.) yet only the "secrecy" element has been removed.

Everything that we lose would have to be cheese, going by the definition, because those are all things that noone would bother doing once they are no longer secret.

This is nonsense and an invalid reversal conclusion. My definition is

A strategy that relies overwhelmingly or entirely on secrecy. If scouted, the strategy fails and puts the executing player at a severe disadvantage, or right out costs him the game.

and not

Something nobody would do if the map was revealed.

They are not the same.
ModeratorI know Teamliquid is known as a massive building
uberdeluxe
Profile Joined June 2009
Canada306 Posts
May 11 2010 14:28 GMT
#64
I knew all in, but I thought cheese = rush... Good to know!
No mules, no collosi, no PFs, just LOVE!
Takkara
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2503 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 15:11:56
May 11 2010 15:08 GMT
#65
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 11 2010 19:23 Doctorasul wrote:
Coming up with good definitions is so much harder than nitpicking those we have. However, that which does not kill you makes you stronger so I'm actually helping by being obnoxious!

Show nested quote +
Cheese

A strategy that relies overwhelmingly or entirely on secrecy. If scouted, the strategy fails and puts the executing player at a severe disadvantage, or right out costs him the game.

Let's think about how different the game would be without fog of war. If both players had vision of the whole map, the game would be almost unrecognisable (worker harrass would be pretty much obsolete, all tactical traps would vanish, etc.) yet only the "secrecy" element has been removed.

Everything that we lose would have to be cheese, going by the definition, because those are all things that noone would bother doing once they are no longer secret. That would mean a majority of what we're doing in game is "cheese" which raises the question what use is the concept then anyway? You might say that those do not amount to a strategy, but in reality they amount to much more than that, namely a style of play.

Consider, why do we want to kill the scouting drone? Is it because once it's dead, we're going to cheese? Or is it because we're going standard most of the time, but we want to keep that a secret because having "cheese" as a remote posiblity in the oponent's mind is useful for us? Going standard in this situation would also be a type of cheese, since we all seem to care a whole lot about it being a secret.

I'm only partly serious but I think explicitly answering these objections or refining the definition would make it better!


The better response here, is that Cheese is a strategy, while the things you've mentioned are tactics that people would cease to do. The definition is perfectly consistent.

Of course you need to use secrecy in your tactics. Otherwise the game is simple. It's just a game of counters until you hit 200/200, then test who has better micro, and hope neither of you falls asleep and misses something clearly in view.

Also, you kill the scouting drone because the game is a game of imperfect information. It doesn't cause you to lose or even put you at a huge disadvantage to someone if they know your strategy, but it doesn't help you. When they don't know what you're doing, it delays their response. Your strategy doesn't rely on secrecy but it does benefit from it, because before your opponent has scouted your precise build, he has to prepare for all possibilities. Once he knows what you're doing, he only has to prepare for what you're doing. It's totally different from cheese, because your strategy should hopefully be content with being scouted, but not being scouted provides you additional benefits.
Gee gee gee gee baby baby baby
rocketsauce
Profile Joined April 2010
United States28 Posts
May 11 2010 15:34 GMT
#66
On May 06 2010 18:16 acceL.sik wrote:

Yep, cheese goes ALL THE WAY BACK TO WAR3. Rofl, gtfo newb.



Read -> Comprehend -> Post.

I was citing use in WC3 as predating the explanation of its origin provided in Liquipedia. Since WC3 came out in 2002, I'd say that was valid.


I think most people of sufficient intelligence who have been around for any amount of time pick up on the proper definitions. If you see someone misusing terms like "metagame", "cheese", "all in", etc. then you know that either they are pretty new or just dumb.
:)
BlasiuS
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States2405 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 15:40:32
May 11 2010 15:38 GMT
#67
On May 12 2010 00:34 rocketsauce wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2010 18:16 acceL.sik wrote:

Yep, cheese goes ALL THE WAY BACK TO WAR3. Rofl, gtfo newb.



Read -> Comprehend -> Post.

I was citing use in WC3 as predating the explanation of its origin provided in Liquipedia. Since WC3 came out in 2002, I'd say that was valid.


I think most people of sufficient intelligence who have been around for any amount of time pick up on the proper definitions. If you see someone misusing terms like "metagame", "cheese", "all in", etc. then you know that either they are pretty new or just dumb.


I guess you didn't notice his sarcasm, even pointed out in all caps. His point is that "cheese" and its definition has been around since the beginning of starcraft (1998).

It predates both WC3 and liquipedia.
next week on Everybody Loves HypnoToad:
rocketsauce
Profile Joined April 2010
United States28 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 16:06:35
May 11 2010 16:03 GMT
#68
@BlasiuS: No, I understand that was what he was implying, and I don't contest that it was in use during SC1/BW. But that has nothing whatsoever to do with my original point, which was simply that the Liquipedia explanation was off base. All this tedious explanation would be totally unnecessary if people would just put a little more care in before shooting off some childish reply.

As I said in my original post, calling things "cheesy" is common in English, and predates not only SC1 but video games in general, so I don't know why we're even having this little back and forth.

edits: Clarification.
:)
Snowfield
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
1289 Posts
May 11 2010 18:09 GMT
#69
Would anyone say this is a valid description of cheese?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Cheeser&defid=3187913
groms
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada1017 Posts
May 12 2010 20:08 GMT
#70
Thanks a lot for the clarification I was not part of the sc1 scene so I never even heard of these terms used in this way until I started playing/watching sc2.

There seems to be a stigma against any type of cheese or all-in strategy by the pros, but I kind of feel like if a lesser-skilled opponent knows he can't win a normal(macro) game vs a better opponent trying to end the game quickly is often a form of meta-gaming to allow you to have a chance.

Just my feelings.

Thanks again for the info :D
I have a recurring dream that I'm running away from a terran player but the marauders keep slowing me down. - Artosis
Housta
Profile Joined April 2010
United States57 Posts
May 12 2010 20:18 GMT
#71
much needed thread. Thanks!
ymirheim
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden300 Posts
May 12 2010 20:30 GMT
#72
On May 13 2010 05:08 groms wrote:
Thanks a lot for the clarification I was not part of the sc1 scene so I never even heard of these terms used in this way until I started playing/watching sc2.

There seems to be a stigma against any type of cheese or all-in strategy by the pros, but I kind of feel like if a lesser-skilled opponent knows he can't win a normal(macro) game vs a better opponent trying to end the game quickly is often a form of meta-gaming to allow you to have a chance.


Cheese is a viable strategy and something even pro's use, the stigma is more with someone who utilizes cheese on a regular basis for the very reason you just stated. If you cheese because you don't think you can win a macro game then you will never ever learn to play a better macro game because you are not getting any practice.
The only thing you should feel when you shoot someone... is the recoil
RPGabe
Profile Joined January 2010
United States192 Posts
May 12 2010 20:37 GMT
#73
This may be unrelated but I'd love to see some definitions of "Rush" vs. "Push", "Pressure" and what differentiates a "Timing Push" from a regular push or pressure.

Thanks!
ymirheim
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden300 Posts
May 13 2010 04:00 GMT
#74
On May 13 2010 05:37 RPGabe wrote:
This may be unrelated but I'd love to see some definitions of "Rush" vs. "Push", "Pressure" and what differentiates a "Timing Push" from a regular push or pressure.

Thanks!

I don't think there is any clearcut definition of these things and when it comes down to details everyone will have slightly different opinions so anyone will be able to nitpick what I say here but I'll give an overall guideline to the terms you mentioned.

A push is an aggressive move generally involving the majority of your combat units with the intent of securing a specific objective. The objective can be to break a contain, to secure an expansion or vital position for map control, destroying an enemy expansion or to just flat out kill the opponent.
The difference between a push and any other kind of aggressive movement really is that a push is substantial enough that the opponent will be forced to engage with his main army in order to halt you, thus the objective of a push can also be to draw out the enemy army to a for you favorable position.


A timing push is a push intended to take advantage of a temporary situation during which you will some factor giving you a slight edge.
Basically there are three kinds of timing windows:

Unit timing: This is the most common type of timing attacks, they occur when you gain one or several upgrades that suddenly boosts your army strength or when you add a certain unit type or critical mass of a unit type to your army composition.
Examples are a terran bio build that moves out to attack so that the push reaches the enemy at the same time as stim and plus one weapons finishes researching or it could be a push that beings when a certain number of medivacs are added to he bio mix or in TvP when ghosts are added alternatively when a given number of ghosts have enough energy for emp.

Production timing: A timing push that takes place a given time after you have set up an expansion just as the increased production from the expansion kicks in.

Counter timing: A timing push intended to hit just before the opponent gains a timing window for example just as the opponent has expanded and thus invested resources into the expansion, having less units and still not gotten the extra production out of said expansion. Or for example a terran marauder/hellion build that attacks the second the zerg builds a spire in order to beat the impending mutalisk timing window for the zerg.


A rush is pretty much just a very specific type of timing attack where you try to make an attack as fast as possible, either as fast into the game as possible with whatever tier 1 unit type you can assemble a critical mass of first or as fast as possible for a given unit type, again a terran example would be getting banshee's as fast as possible and then instantly attacking.
In general a rush will tech fast to whatever unit is going to be used, sacrificing survivability on the way creating a very devastating counter timing window until the intended rush units have been assembled.


Pressure is aggression or the threat of aggression intended to restrict the opponents play. Harassment is a kind of pressure, as is just moving an army to attack and then pull back. But pressure can also consist of no combat at all but purely the threat of an attack. A zerg player with a force of mutalisks can fly around an opponents base taking shots at workers and buildings, while the opponents army is strong enough to repel the mutas, they pressure the opponent thus preventing him from moving out as if he does move his army to attack the mutalisks will destroy the base.
A terran player with early reapers will, even if he does not actually attack but just move them back and fourth into the enemy base pressure the opponent to keep his units at the mineral line to stop any harass, thus pinning him back and preventing a push.
Pressure is pretty much a luxury for whichever player has the initiative in the game and its utilized to deny the opponent certain plays.
The only thing you should feel when you shoot someone... is the recoil
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
May 13 2010 04:17 GMT
#75
stop talking. you try to validate certain builds by throwing even more names onto them. why do you even have to put a name onto something? is it because if you lose you can just say "oh you fucking cheese sperm-face faggot"
all-in: you bring every unit (workers included.) sort of like in soccer when you bring the goalie out or like hockey. sometimes in TvP i will bring scvs as fodder and shield to the front of my marines for an early all-in. hence the term all-in. you have nothing left. duh.
cheese: fuck this shit. whoever came up with this needs to be shot. originally 4 pool was called a zergling rush. not fucking cheese. i mean come up with a word at least better than cheese... what are we fucking mice or something?
DuncanIdaho
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States465 Posts
May 21 2010 19:45 GMT
#76
To me, cheese is a word that has no true meaning. I simply refer to things as risky or conservative.

When I play zerg and rush, or terran and reaver/hellion rush, or warpgate in units with an early pylon, I don't think of this as cheese, although I'm typically accused of such when it succeeds. Honestly, it's a great way to scout the opponent, and at the same time make him focus on fortifying his position, thus taking the fight to his base rather than mine. It's all part of the game, and a viable strategy.

There are potentially exploits, however, when something that shouldn't work, ie soon to be fixed in the next patch, is used in every game you see. For example, when larvae were growing on a hatchery after canceling a unit, and after the queen already spawned eggs on it. In SC1, when you'd play on a map with one min patch and a terran would fly his cc over it so you can't click on it, that's an exploit.

However, proxy bases, rushes, etc., it's all part of the game, each carrying its own risks and benefits, and those players who cry "cheese!" need to simply get better at countering with a strat of their own.
The spice must flow... Grammar lesson: "than" is used for quantity comparisons, "then" is used for chronological statements. The next forum user who says, "I'd do such and such, THAN I'd do such and such else," is gonna make me cry...
t3tsubo
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada682 Posts
May 21 2010 20:58 GMT
#77
An all-in is not "all in" in the sense that it is a risky strat if your scouting information tells you that it will almost definitely succeed. Case in point, zerg FE with not enough spine crawlers at his nat? 4 gate timing push may be All-in but it is not at all risky and would win you the game barring bad micro on your part.
Shiladie
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Canada1631 Posts
May 21 2010 21:17 GMT
#78
Very good post, this, as well as the liquipedia pages, will be linked time and time again as people yell that a 2-base mid-game hydra push is a cheese...
pyr0ma5ta
Profile Joined May 2010
United States458 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 21:26:01
May 21 2010 21:24 GMT
#79
Cheese is whatever my opponent is doing that makes me lose. If I lose, I got cheesed, because I am clearly better than him.

/rages

No but seriously, how is 14-cc rated as cheese but not all-in? If your opponent sneezes at your 14cc you just plain lose. If it goes up and you don't lose right then and there, you're almost certainly going to win.
"I made you a zergling, but I eated it." - Defiler
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9756 Posts
May 21 2010 21:32 GMT
#80
the only thing i dont like about the idea "not be scouted" is that isn't true conversely for non-cheese. If you straight up let your opponent know you're siege expanding, theres the simple counter of a 12nex.
boomer hands
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill Weekly #213
CranKy Ducklings64
Liquipedia
WardiTV Invitational
11:00
WardiTV June Group D & 1/2C
MaxPax vs Spirit
Krystianer vs SpiritLIVE!
YoungYakov vs MaxPax
WardiTV1054
IndyStarCraft 239
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 239
ProTech95
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 35436
Calm 10463
firebathero 5448
EffOrt 865
Hyuk 843
Stork 442
Mini 387
Larva 340
ZerO 314
Zeus 312
[ Show more ]
actioN 281
Shuttle 256
Light 161
Dewaltoss 124
Rush 122
PianO 90
hero 66
ToSsGirL 64
Barracks 44
sorry 41
[sc1f]eonzerg 28
sas.Sziky 23
sSak 21
HiyA 14
scan(afreeca) 13
IntoTheRainbow 11
Nal_rA 11
SilentControl 9
Noble 8
ajuk12(nOOB) 5
ivOry 3
Dota 2
Gorgc4207
qojqva2472
XcaliburYe318
syndereN253
boxi9872
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2506
byalli245
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0496
Westballz37
Other Games
singsing2485
B2W.Neo530
Fuzer 354
DeMusliM315
crisheroes266
hiko257
elazer186
ArmadaUGS135
XaKoH 121
Liquid`VortiX96
djWHEAT67
KnowMe49
QueenE45
ZerO(Twitch)24
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream7405
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV428
League of Legends
• Nemesis7422
• Jankos2253
Upcoming Events
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
5h 11m
Korean StarCraft League
13h 11m
SOOP
19h 11m
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
20h 11m
WardiTV Invitational
21h 11m
Cheesadelphia
1d 1h
CSO Cup
1d 3h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 4h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
GSL Code S
1d 18h
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 20h
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.