EPT[SC2] A Thorough Examination - Page 4
| Forum Index > News |
|
I3oxerfan
215 Posts
| ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
I thought a while back Blizzard said it would be impossible to rewind replays unless they did a complete overhaul on the engine and coding. Gom/Esports must've pushed them really fucking hard on this one. But that leads me to wonder about the LAN thing. Esports would never let LAN disappear, there must be some crazy LAN 2.0 thing now. btw, nice write up LastRomantic | ||
|
sixghost
United States2096 Posts
On June 29 2009 17:17 Raithed wrote: the thing is, theyve made psi storm soo much weaker than SC's. Did you read the article? Storm does more damage in less time over a larger area. | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On June 29 2009 17:18 CharlieMurphy wrote: What the fuck? I thought a while back Blizzard said it would be impossible to rewind replays unless they did a complete overhaul on the engine and coding. Gom/Esports must've pushed them really fucking hard on this one. But that leads me to wonder about the LAN thing. Esports would never let LAN disappear, there must be some crazy LAN 2.0 thing now. btw, nice write up LastRomantic Remember that it's not really rewind... it's like a "checkpoint" system. | ||
|
I3oxerfan
215 Posts
| ||
|
DreaM)XeRO
Korea (South)4667 Posts
 i cant wait | ||
|
devin
8 Posts
| ||
|
Leord
United Kingdom6 Posts
(source: http://starcraft.incgamers.com/blog/comments/no-lan-in-starcraft-ii-confirmed/) If you dislike this, I suggest signing this petition  http://www.petitiononline.com/LANSC2/petition.html | ||
|
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
HiOT
Sweden1000 Posts
On June 29 2009 17:32 Eiii wrote: I think patching SC2 will be much tougher than patching SC1. Indeed but someone will and that person will get my respect. | ||
|
Aghawa
Italy2 Posts
That's ridicolous - no more lan partys at home ppl! XD Anyways, it's still confirmed that Zergs are the weakest race now in SC2 - they don't do enough dps, don't have an air-air counter (scourge) despite of mutas who, well, don't do enough damage to stop something in time. Zergs are going to see hard time with that protoss teletransport air thingy. That's pretty bad - no groundbreaking nda announcement But still eagering for the game to come | ||
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
Karune agrees too, but I'm not sure Blizzard is aware exactly HOW strong. More details from Zatic if you bug him. | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5785 Posts
On June 29 2009 17:04 Last Romantic wrote: Oh right Hellions... they work, they're practical - honestly it's a firebat weapon on a vulture body - but I honestly feel they're not an adequate replacement for the original vulture. This is where the Napalm Trace comes into play. | ||
|
grax
United States41 Posts
| ||
Bockit
Sydney2287 Posts
On June 29 2009 17:25 Leord wrote: There will not be any LAN play at all on SC2.. (source: http://starcraft.incgamers.com/blog/comments/no-lan-in-starcraft-ii-confirmed/) If you dislike this, I suggest signing this petition http://www.petitiononline.com/LANSC2/petition.html Here's the direct quote from the interview they're sourcing: We got quite different answers about local area networking (LAN), where both Dustin or Sigaty said they were still discussing it, however, Pardo knew immediately: "we don't have any plans to support LAN," he said and clarified "we will not support it." The only multiplayer available will be on Battle.net. | ||
|
ghermination
United States2851 Posts
How did protoss feel early game? Do the collossi really same that powerful/useful? Is the infestor very useful past early game? | ||
|
shimmy
Poland997 Posts
I like a lot of the things Im seeing in the tech trees and though theres surely going to be a ton of balancing issues the game looks fun as hell to play already. | ||
|
omninmo
2349 Posts
LR were you guys not allowed to take in-game screenshots/photos? were they at ? gotta say the game is looking "fun" but also seriously flawed. -starport is prereq for DTs, templar, and Robo support bay? the core used to be the key to any and all tech in BW. that led to so many cool styles and BOs. Now, Toss users have to core, and starport to get HTs? makes no sense. -banelings are the demolition dwarfs from wc3. im not interested in mass suicide ground units. skurgee were amazing because you only made a few of them and really have to micro well to make them effective. massing a bunch of green demolition dwarfs to blow up shit while burrowed.. that is not zerg style. -mutalisks sound like mere caricatures of their former selves and no scouge? an anti-air unit that turns enemy air units into "airborne turrets"? come one man, wtf. sounds like they are making all units with the idea that in battle these units will always be massed and a-moved into each other. -mothership is so fail. why do we need useless units in sc2 browder? -Terran seems so imba and Zerg so weak. -still no inclusion of f2-f4 keys? -its really easy to sit here without having played the game with its sleek new graphics and complain.. but honestly. i can't help but think that except for the starcraft intellectual property involved this game is looking for like warcraft meets C&C | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
great writeup guys! | ||
| ||
