EPT[SC2] A Thorough Examination - Page 15
| Forum Index > News |
|
Mullet_Power
Canada64 Posts
| ||
|
the hamburglar
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
Mullet_Power
Canada64 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:10 the hamburglar wrote: :D No the internet tough guys is someone who feels the need to "brag" about being a moderator at some random forum and how he can avoid IP bans. I think your a little paranoid and should just cool your jets. You aren't getting banned for what your saying, your getting banned because your spamming the tread saying the same thing over and over. We get the point, you want LAN. But constantly posting over and over (to a bunch of people who have no control over the matter) is not only annoying but also pointless waste of your time. | ||
zatic
Zurich15366 Posts
If you want to discuss this come to #teamliquid on quakenet. Frankly, my dear, nobody here gives a damn about how many kids you have. | ||
|
the hamburglar
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
Mullet_Power
Canada64 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:17 the hamburglar wrote: Hahaha. No. I'm "spamming" because some dumbfucks who also happen to be moderators here and supposedly community advocates, are acting as if "Bnet 2.0 features" not yet revealed will compensate for the lack of LAN option. Sorry, connecting to a centralized server requiring you to go online does not compensate for a lack of LAN option. If the mods here had the common sense to even acknowledge that, I may or may not give as much of a shit, but no, we're fed some stupid shit about how Bnet 2.0 will make it all better when anyone that has the slightest bit of networking knowledge realizes it's not the case. I'm not bragging either, just stating that banning me is a waste of time. See this is what I'm talking about. There isn't some conspiracy here where the TL staff are trying to make you drink the Bnet 2.0 Kool-aid. They aren't "feeding" you anything, they are just posting their opinions. Yeah but instead of just saying that banning you is a waste of time, you felt the need to mention all the "great" things you are on the internet. Anyways I'm done talking with you and further derailing this thread, since you seem to be a very unreasonable person. | ||
|
CROrens
Croatia1005 Posts
On June 30 2009 03:03 Alizee- wrote:So with that being said if it has LAN, great, cool. If it doesn't it really is a very minor point that really just the people who don't wanna buy the game are fussing over. It won't affect anything, but piracy really. Blizzard's the one company I won't do that with =x So basically if i wana play SC with my friend over LAN at my place i have to get SC2, all the expansions (which i will) and another copy of everything and be connected... no thanks, here where i live buying 6 games is way too much for a student to handle - may it even be an epic game like SC... not including LAN at all (i still hope it wont happen) is cheap and low coming from Blizz | ||
|
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
On June 30 2009 01:20 omninmo wrote: there is nothing to be done.. that is why they can do it. because even though they are bending you over and entering your ass without grease... you are gonna take it. because its sc2... its SC2. "hell its about time...to rape all the fans, take their money three times, and cut out any potential ESPORTS competition". they learned from iccup and garena (which was ripped off from a chinese server called VS). how do you cut out the competition? cut out LAN. simple. Your hyperbole is ridiculous and so out or proportion to what's going on. No LAN is fine, I hope they have some system in place that replaces it. Real invasive DRM exists on games like Spore. Be glad you're not getting that and be grateful, not a dumb teenage twat with too much time on his hands spreading the "revolutionary word about righteous piracy" on internet forums. | ||
|
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:25 CROrens wrote: So basically if i wana play SC with my friend over LAN at my place i have to get SC2, all the expansions (which i will) and another copy of everything and be connected... no thanks, here where i live buying 6 games is way too much for a student to handle - may it even be an epic game like SC... not including LAN at all (i still hope it wont happen) is cheap and low coming from Blizz What amazes me is that some of you people readily admit that the reason you want LAN is to pirate the game, and then you get upset at Blizzard for removing it because now you'll have to buy copies of the game? Could you be any stupider? On June 30 2009 01:12 omninmo wrote: NO LAN MEANS YOU HAVE TO BUY TO PLAY. PERIOD. no buy, no cd key, no battlenet account, no sc2 4 u LOL exactly what I mean here. The horror of actually paying instead of pirating. Truly, Blizzard is the evil empire itself, they hate FREEDOM! | ||
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
 Still waiting anxiously for beta+release news, instead of just "current build balance issues". But I'll take what I can get ^^ | ||
|
Mullet_Power
Canada64 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:25 CROrens wrote: So basically if i wana play SC with my friend over LAN at my place i have to get SC2, all the expansions (which i will) and another copy of everything and be connected... no thanks, here where i live buying 6 games is way too much for a student to handle - may it even be an epic game like SC... not including LAN at all (i still hope it wont happen) is cheap and low coming from Blizz Why doesn't your friend buy his own game? Where I'm from we don't buy 3 games for cheap ass friends. | ||
|
CROrens
Croatia1005 Posts
On June 30 2009 02:27 theqat wrote: They don't want to "manage" the esports scene. They just want a share of the money. LOL if thats true (and it proabably is) Blizz is one sad sad company... i love them for the epic games they make, but a company that makes millions every month from WoW is capable of making SC2 and all of its expansions completely free without financial losses | ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On June 29 2009 16:16 Last Romantic wrote: They're also not coding in a way to disable the windows key, as it would disqualify them from the Games for Windows tag. this is hilarious | ||
|
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:30 CROrens wrote: LOL if thats true (and it proabably is) Blizz is one sad sad company... i love them for the epic games they make, but a company that makes millions every month from WoW is capable of making SC2 and all of its expansions completely free without financial losses Blizzard isn't a charity to make you happy. If it was EA, they would have milked the Korean scene ages ago for every penny. If anything, Blizzard has been a lot better than the other large gaming companies. | ||
|
Mullet_Power
Canada64 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:30 CROrens wrote: LOL if thats true (and it proabably is) Blizz is one sad sad company... i love them for the epic games they make, but a company that makes millions every month from WoW is capable of making SC2 and all of its expansions completely free without financial losses Key word bolded. Last I checked "companies" were in the business of making money. Also yes you do lose money giving away free games, because they cost money to make. Agreed. But I can't decide if it's stupid because Blizzard feels the need to have the Games for Windows tag, or it's stupid because disabling the windows key disqualifies you from the Games for Windows tag. | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
Ideas
United States8178 Posts
What about the ghost, hows he working now? | ||
|
CROrens
Croatia1005 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:41 Klogon wrote: The latter is much, much more stupid. The former is a business decision while the other is the root of the problem. Microsoft afraid of Mac? :D :D | ||
|
CROrens
Croatia1005 Posts
On June 30 2009 06:31 FieryBalrog wrote: Blizzard isn't a charity to make you happy. If it was EA, they would have milked the Korean scene ages ago for every penny. If anything, Blizzard has been a lot better than the other large gaming companies. Other large gaming companies dont have a monthly income similar to one of a small country... capitalism is a bitch :D | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5472 Posts
On June 30 2009 07:03 CROrens wrote: Other large gaming companies dont have a monthly income of a smaller country... capitalism is a bitch :D Do you honestly think that Blizzard could afford to make SC2 for free based on WoW's income? You should probably take an economics class if you think so.  (Look up the term "overhead" in relation to business ) | ||
| ||
