EPT[SC2] A Thorough Examination - Page 14
| Forum Index > News |
|
Psilver
Canada82 Posts
| ||
|
theqat
United States2856 Posts
On June 30 2009 04:39 Psilver wrote: I didn't read all the pages, but, am I the only one to think that the spine crawler is the most awful building ever? I mean, his "tongue" is so thin in comparison to BW and it doesn't even attack by passing through the ground which make the attack look really ugly and imagine 5 of these attacking a Terran rush. I actually like it a lot  But you know what they say: There's no accounting for taste. | ||
|
Psilver
Canada82 Posts
| ||
|
Captain Peabody
United States3136 Posts
And getting nuked. Good writeup, though. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
| ||
|
Crimson
United States311 Posts
Why not make the game mechanics an option? For example, if you want to play SC2 as SC2 is right now, good for you. But, what about the people that don't want MBS or unlimited unit selection or smart cast, but want a game more similar to BW? Just make an option to choose how you want to play right? I do not understand game programming much at all so I do not even know if this is possible, but it would be a nice addition as the current build of SC2 looks too "user friendly". I am not sure if I explained the idea enough... but I will try to answer any questions you might have for what I mean. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13922 Posts
On June 30 2009 04:46 Captain Peabody wrote: Wow...all the trolls are coming out of the woodwork. And getting nuked. Good writeup, though. nukes are fun did anyone use nukes at all? | ||
|
L0thar
987 Posts
On June 30 2009 04:40 theqat wrote: I actually like it a lot But you know what they say: There's no accounting for taste.Me too. It also actually make sense in all situation unlike BW version, where the tongue could magically apear on different space platform over a huge space gap... | ||
|
theqat
United States2856 Posts
On June 30 2009 05:15 adelarge wrote: Me too. It also actually make sense in all situation unlike BW version, where the tongue could magically apear on different space platform over a huge space gap... I hadn't even thought of it that way, but that's a perfect justification for it | ||
|
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
On June 30 2009 05:15 adelarge wrote: Me too. It also actually make sense in all situation unlike BW version, where the tongue could magically apear on different space platform over a huge space gap... my favorite is when i burrowed a group of zerglings on a transparent floor of glass with nothing but empty space below | ||
|
Psyonic_Reaver
United States4343 Posts
Nukes cost no supply and build very quickly for a very low cost. I expect them to be used somewhat effectively. You still have time to dodge a nuke but to me it seems like they come just a tad faster then in SC1. Happy Nuking! | ||
|
thunk
United States6233 Posts
| ||
|
the hamburglar
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
| ||
|
sely
United States30 Posts
On June 30 2009 05:47 the hamburglar wrote: I have 2 kids which are well provided for Now I can see how fgt azn moderators who aren't old enough to drink alcohol or have grown pubic hair yet are going to be proud to bend over and take it if you think you can get rid of me with your ridiculous IP bans, good luck. I have a feeling you will get tired before I do. Sounds like you are setting a great example for your kids. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
On June 30 2009 05:47 the hamburglar wrote: Let me make this clear: I have 2 kids which are well provided for and will have no problem buying a legit SC2 box to play on Bnet. This isn't the problem. While it doesn't completely surprise me most of the mods here have to hush hush the QQ about no LAN, tell me: how in the hell is bnet 2.0 going to allow LAN play without logging into a centralized server, thus requiring an internet connection? I'm not sure how I have to spell it out, but this does not help any gaming community. Basically, if your internet goes down, or you just don't have a connection where you're situated, or ICS isn't enabled to let you log on bnet, or there's any kind of network problem on your LAN: tough shit, you can't play SC2. Now I can see how fgt azn moderators who aren't old enough to drink alcohol or have grown pubic hair yet are going to be proud to bend over and take it (not targeting anyone particularly) but myself being 20 years old OVER 10 (what 9000?) YEARS AGO and actually enjoying the happy times when developers didn't literally shit on their fanbase, I have a problem with it. Is it that big a deal? God forbid some gamers out there still have some sort of spine (insert spine crawler joke) Lastly, being admin for a political forum that welcomes everything from neonazis to communists (it's quite entertaining), if you think you can get rid of me with your ridiculous IP bans, good luck. I have a feeling you will get tired before I do. You are 20 years old and have 2 kids? Must suck being them. | ||
|
theqat
United States2856 Posts
On June 30 2009 05:56 Integra wrote: You are 20 years old and have 2 kids? Must suck being them. I think he means he's 30 ("[I was 20 10 years ago]"), but if he's 30 and still writes like that he's got worse problems than being 20 and having two kids. | ||
|
Felby
Norway81 Posts
im also pretty positive that the new bnet somehow will just auth you with the server and then you can go through the LAN options, since its super NDA there gotta be a massive bunch options yet to be revealed | ||
|
the hamburglar
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
the hamburglar
United States6 Posts
| ||
| ||
