EPTSQ Leaderboard by Region - Page 5
| Forum Index > News |
|
Autotroph
United Kingdom940 Posts
| ||
|
awesomo0O
Tuvalu59 Posts
On October 29 2011 11:15 K3Nyy wrote: Protoss' SQ is lower because there's really nothing you can sink your money into in between cycles. Terran's SQ should be higher because they can queue units. yea SQ rly doesnt mean much I feel kind of bad for the guy who did all this work. It's interresting but rly noobs should stop thinking of it as something more reliable than game score or apm | ||
|
Shaok
297 Posts
On October 29 2011 14:27 awesomo0O wrote: yea SQ rly doesnt mean much I feel kind of bad for the guy who did all this work. It's interresting but rly noobs should stop thinking of it as something more reliable than game score or apm What? That is the complete opposite of what you are supposed to conclude from the analysis. | ||
|
blobrus
4297 Posts
On October 29 2011 14:27 awesomo0O wrote: yea SQ rly doesnt mean much I feel kind of bad for the guy who did all this work. It's interresting but rly noobs should stop thinking of it as something more reliable than game score or apm I'd say the ability to spend resources is generally of a lot more importance than apm and game score. | ||
|
Proko
United States1022 Posts
| ||
|
S2Lunar
1051 Posts
On October 29 2011 14:27 awesomo0O wrote: yea SQ rly doesnt mean much I feel kind of bad for the guy who did all this work. It's interresting but rly noobs should stop thinking of it as something more reliable than game score or apm If you think how well you you spend your money is less important than game score or apm, you're a fool. | ||
|
mnck
Denmark1518 Posts
On October 29 2011 11:15 K3Nyy wrote: Protoss' SQ is lower because there's really nothing you can sink your money into in between cycles. Terran's SQ should be higher because they can queue units. Yet ToD has one of the best SQ avg. (ranking 5th). I'm pretty sure it was concluded in the original article explaining SQ that there were no differences in SQ within the races. | ||
Heyoka
Katowice25012 Posts
| ||
|
Leeoku
1617 Posts
| ||
|
Render
United States249 Posts
| ||
|
Heyoka
Katowice25012 Posts
On October 29 2011 14:42 Leeoku wrote: can you tell me how u calculated this? im trying to do the same thing for my own replays as a presentation. as of now im only using the avg unspent resources tab in economy breakdown after replay. please pm me It's in his original post that he quotes within the first paragraph. | ||
|
GogoKodo
Canada1785 Posts
| ||
|
yawnoC
United States3704 Posts
Always interesting to read these kinds of stats. | ||
|
McMonty
Canada379 Posts
| ||
|
Stipulation
United States587 Posts
| ||
|
firehand101
Australia3152 Posts
| ||
|
iiGreetings
Canada563 Posts
However, if all these players played eachother for 30 games and the study was conducted it may be different but thats being super picky. regardless really really awesome read thanks alot man | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
DreamScaR
Canada2127 Posts
| ||
|
courtpanda
866 Posts
also, its kind of bad to compare each race to another, since each has different macro mechanics (i.e. larva, warpgates). a terran with unspent resources is a lot worse than a zerg or toss. i can't code that well, but if you used a program like sc2gears or something that analyzes replays, you could get a lot more data a lot quicker. have it calculate the SQ of a player up until the player hits 195-200 supply. that seems like a better indicator of pure macro imo. | ||
| ||
