EPTMaybe seperate coefficient needed for each race since protoss pool money and then mass warp in.
I think some of korea's highest SQ is going to be polt and MVP.
Nic ewriteup! curiosu about the rest of the data
SQ Leaderboard by Region - Page 4
| Forum Index > News |
|
The.Doctor
Canada333 Posts
Maybe seperate coefficient needed for each race since protoss pool money and then mass warp in. I think some of korea's highest SQ is going to be polt and MVP. Nic ewriteup! curiosu about the rest of the data | ||
|
Shaok
297 Posts
On October 29 2011 11:15 K3Nyy wrote: Protoss' SQ is lower because there's really nothing you can sink your money into in between cycles. Terran's SQ should be higher because they can queue units. Exactly what I was thinking. Great analysis and really opens our newbie eyes on how extremely important spending and earning money is. While most people will say that is common sense, you probably/most likely did not understand the extremes. Thank you for the incredible analysis Whatthefat. Interesting results between EU and NA I must say... | ||
|
Dommk
Australia4865 Posts
| ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9037 Posts
| ||
|
rUiNati0n
United States1155 Posts
| ||
|
Oreo7
United States1647 Posts
 . Although I do think it's hard to calculate for toss because of wg mechanic  | ||
pbjsandwich
United States443 Posts
It would be great if this turned out to be a good predictor for tourny results but i think with SC2 this just won't be the case I would bet though that this would be a decent predictor for BW | ||
|
Achilles306
Canada84 Posts
On October 29 2011 12:19 whatthefat wrote: Here's an analysis I did a while ago with respect to game duration for the top 100 players. I didn't find any significant effect of game duration (and results were similar for lower leagues). Thanks! I agree that it doesn't seem to matter. | ||
|
CaptainPlatypus
United States852 Posts
| ||
|
T0fuuu
Australia2275 Posts
| ||
|
Mardil
Mexico4 Posts
Still, congratulations on your analysis, very interesting read! | ||
|
Darth Caedus
United States326 Posts
| ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
| ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
| ||
|
EnderSword
Canada669 Posts
I know from the first post on this subject, you said there seemed to be no statistical difference between races, but like many people here I find it hard to understand why it isn't easier to have better SQ as Terran because of queuing vs having Protoss's warp-in mechanic. I'd definitely be interested in the SQ for All leagues in Korea, since a long standing debate is stuff like if Gold Korea > Platinum America etc... | ||
|
Shinespark
Chile843 Posts
I do hope this topic will be re-spotlighted once the other regions are ready. | ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9934 Posts
| ||
|
CPTBadAss
United States594 Posts
| ||
|
JiYan
United States3668 Posts
On October 29 2011 11:15 K3Nyy wrote: Protoss' SQ is lower because there's really nothing you can sink your money into in between cycles. Terran's SQ should be higher because they can queue units. this. the data will be skewed a little =\ | ||
|
OminouS
Sweden1343 Posts
On October 29 2011 10:50 MonkSEA wrote: I think the warpgate mechanic might actually be hindering Protoss' SQ, but very nice read. I'm pretty surprised at Bombers SQ and Ret's as well. I was thinking this aswell but it's 7am here so I couldn't wrap my head around why that is other than some generic thougths. If someone could explore this are a bit in this thread I would greatly appreciate it. | ||
| ||
