EPTSQ Leaderboard by Region - Page 7
| Forum Index > News |
|
Lohse
Denmark237 Posts
| ||
|
pt
United States813 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
http://www.mediafire.com/?zwcuj0laydh6cqp | ||
Nightmer09
Romania16 Posts
| ||
|
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
| ||
|
Corwintt
Bulgaria85 Posts
| ||
|
Adventurekid
Sweden505 Posts
| ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
On October 29 2011 16:09 Nightmer09 wrote: and ofc, eu>na lmao, euro pride is fucking hilarious. But wow, demuslim coming out ahead of even KR players, thats pretty crazy. I always thought he was a great, but not top tier player. Maybe i was wrong and his results will match his skills soon | ||
|
Keype
Sweden455 Posts
 Good job sir! | ||
|
reneg
United States859 Posts
Every time i think we've hit an end, another study comes out, and shows how much better x person plays. I love it. | ||
|
NeonFox
2373 Posts
| ||
|
ThaZenith
Canada3116 Posts
And I'm glad to see DeMuslim way up there. I've been waiting and waiting to see him in some tournaments, because I know he's awesome. xD | ||
|
Starcraftplaylist
194 Posts
| ||
|
HighlyToxic
France101 Posts
| ||
|
Mystogun
United States392 Posts
I just wish I could remember to keep adding my SQ after every game so that I could try to compare my spending to the spending of pros. My SQ is all over the place though, with a range of like 60-88. This is definitely a good indicator of whether I'm improving my spending though! Thanks for all the time you've put into this. | ||
|
emc
United States3088 Posts
I also wonder how larva effects SQ for zerg. Zerg might have the money to spend but doesn't quite have the larva for it. | ||
|
Namu
United States826 Posts
On October 29 2011 17:18 emc wrote: people keep bringing up protoss SQ but what about zerg? Isn't it interesting that terran is always the highest? I think this may be because zerg maxes out quicker and ends up stacking a lot of minerals/gas and even after remaxing still has problems spending efficiently. Also muta builds eat into the SQ, because like warp gate you sometimes stack up to 1000/1000. I also wonder how larva effects SQ for zerg. Zerg might have the money to spend but doesn't quite have the larva for it. zergs naturally will bank resources a bit more than terran because they tend on mass producing an army or drones on certain cues in the early-mid game. terran on the other hand is constant production of workers/army so it's always bad to bank resources. actually, the major part of terran macro is knowing when to build more production facilities (and constantly producing), while this is not really relevant to zergs. this is pretty interesting. I just calculated sq for a bunch of my games, and the matchup that i'm very confident in actually has the highest sq (88~ average vs 78/76 averages)... and my total average falls in with other data too. | ||
|
ForgottenOne
Romania236 Posts
| ||
|
89andy
Canada192 Posts
| ||
|
TheBomb
237 Posts
I mean I would love for blizzard to make the macro mechanics harder. Mules could last half of what they last now, of course the energy cost cut in half as well, larva inject benefits cut in half, but of course the ability made every 20 seconds and I think protoss are good in that regard. | ||
| ||
