| Forum Index > News |
|
rezoacken
Canada2719 Posts
Each race must have their really strong combos or units, and other races some ways to counter it : AND it must be in an interesting way for countering it (abilities or specific tactics, not just massing it and A-move). Think of it like Chess, Queen is a far overpowered piece but it can be counter, and your opponent has one too ! | ||
|
omninmo
2349 Posts
having HP doesnt really make sense if the FF is made of "energy" | ||
|
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
On April 20 2010 23:20 Plexa wrote: Good article My sentiments exactly ability-wise. The nerf has put many units in a state of limbo ability wise(mothership/infestor) by stripping them of their original awesomeness.  | ||
|
LittLeLives
United States692 Posts
Hope Blizzard is paying attention. | ||
|
Exteray
United States1094 Posts
Sounds like a good idea! | ||
|
Tor
Canada231 Posts
| ||
|
TheMunkey
Canada470 Posts
| ||
|
Pycckuu
Canada77 Posts
Have any of you really read the article or did you get entranced by the nostalgia of BW in its current state? | ||
|
Deleted User 48059
86 Posts
On April 21 2010 08:45 omninmo wrote: forcefield should be emp-able. having HP doesnt really make sense if the FF is made of "energy" While lore-wise your point is perhaps the most valid, there are some concerns that the Ghost's EMP ability is already too much of a 'hard-counter' to many Toss units (Sentry, High Templar, Immortal) that adding further utility to the ability in TvP could be harmful. If the P player has the APM to cast half a dozen perfectly placed force fields before the terran can EMP the sentry, then frankly I say well done to the Protoss user. In the same way, if the T can EMP half the Protoss army before Feedback/Psi Storm is used, then good on them. I can't say I'm particularly happy with the Protoss caster/Ghost dynamic as it stands, but introducing more ways that they counter each other can in my opinion, only be detrimental to the unit relationship. Kev [edited for typos. I need to proofread.] | ||
|
robshredsky
United States8 Posts
| ||
|
zomgzergrush
United States923 Posts
forcefields with HEALTH BARS!! Why won't genius suggestions like this appear in the sc2 forums instead of "adding grappling hooks to units" | ||
|
zTz
United States476 Posts
On April 21 2010 08:27 rezoacken wrote: Well yeah the purpose is to balance RACES and not UNITS; people fail to understand that. Each race must have their really strong combos or units, and other races some ways to counter it : AND it must be in an interesting way for countering it (abilities or specific tactics, not just massing it and A-move). Think of it like Chess, Queen is a far overpowered piece but it can be counter, and your opponent has one too ! good job. You too drone! Guarenteed Blizz developers have some sort of balanced scorecard as a guideline to keep each unit/race counterable by another, then Beta, which sole purpose is to test that scorecard (along with bnet, ladder, and the rest of the fine details that go into the game) and tweak and make adjustments. They are able to look at graphs and charts every morning seeing every statistic one could think of. That along with Beta forums, and community feedback like TL = beautful final product. | ||
|
NightOfTheDead
Lithuania1711 Posts
| ||
|
r0yale
United States51 Posts
| ||
|
NeoScout
United States103 Posts
| ||
|
DrSmoke
United States175 Posts
I support this message. | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
|
Rawn
Australia16 Posts
| ||
|
CaptainPlatypus
United States852 Posts
| ||
|
Melgamesh
United States4 Posts
On April 21 2010 11:42 Rawn wrote: Well said. Any chance you'll cross-post this to the Blizzard forums? I think everyone involved in the SC2 beta needs to read this. Definitely, even people who aren't involved but think it is "taking to long" to balance the game. | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Invitational
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
|
|
|
EPT
