
this looks like a good set up - a tad surprised at no miller though, but i guess he has been replaced by the traitor~
And nice rule on the election. Gj whoever thought of that.
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
![]() this looks like a good set up - a tad surprised at no miller though, but i guess he has been replaced by the traitor~ And nice rule on the election. Gj whoever thought of that. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 16 2009 12:50 LucasWoJ wrote: Ah, mendacious dragon "staedtler" finally printer copy prolific rhapsody of water. Slim. a+ post would read again | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 16 2009 12:55 LucasWoJ wrote: Are we allowed to play the game without ever looking at our role, or would that be against the spirit of the game as well? wouldn't that essentially be the same as playing as a townie? i guess you could pm random night actions in order to guess your role, lol | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 16 2009 14:04 Caller wrote: Oh and one more thing: From my experience last game, I think rather than try and lynch off day one clues, we should use day one clues as a confirmation point for any potential suspects from Day 2 and onwards clues, like I did with 3clipse at the last moment. Yeah I agree. IMO the best course of action is for whoever is elected to lynch an inactive, after some discussion by the town. I think this has been discussed like every game, so we should all know the reasons by now I hope. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 17 2009 01:04 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Show nested quote + On May 16 2009 15:00 L wrote: Okay. So L is going to do some math because that's what L does. So we have 30 total people, 1 traitor, 6 mafia total, 23 town. Mafia essentially have 7 total voting power maximum, so town auto-loses when they're under 6 people. In the worst possible scenario, mafia kill 3 per day + 1 mislynch (lets ignore double lynches b/c i'm lazy). Essentially townie numbers go 23-Current 19-Tomorrow 15-Next day 11-Day 4 7-Day 5 Add in a missed vig hit or missed double lynches and we can be out of the game by day 5. We're essentially obligated to hit correctly on day 2 or 3 or we're in the shitter. We can't fuck around and pretend that day 2-3 are clue gathering days and that we can float until day 4 and suddenly start knocking people out. What does this mean? ACTIVITY. Don't have anything to say? Think of something. If 5 pages go by and you haven't said anything you are fucking the down in the butt. I have a feeling people have been a postin' so ima post this, read and then post s'more. L BRAH, YOU AINT COUNTING IN MEDIC PROTECTION AND VETS. Nor did he count the extra votes from the mayor. Still I would say those factors give town no more than 2 days beyond what L posted. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 16 2009 22:53 Showtime! wrote: Cause and effect my friend! There's a reason behind everything. To the naked eye some of the stuff I do might look sloppy, but I assure you there is a rational explanation for what I do. I was going to make a blog about my posting behaviour between every game so players could get further insight into what I was thinking and how I pulled other players strings. Then I realized it would take far too long unless I kept an up-to-date dairy of every move I made. Make no mistake, in a Mayor role there will be no confusion. As I mentioned before, the last post was with regards to my skills I used from previous games. My strengths far outweigh any weakness I may have. Plus the Pardoner is there for a reason. Heck you even said it yourself. I don't think there's any question that you are a smart player - but so are most of the people in this game. I think Mynock is more worried about your playing style not meshing well with holding office and the responsibilty to the town that comes with it. Not sure how valid a concern that is; if asked to describe your playing style I would probably say "unorthodox." I also have my own personal reservations; are you playing the mole again ![]() Like L said, perhaps the primary benefit of town having a pardoner is simply that the pardoner isn't mafia. We have 1 candidate openly claiming that he wants that position. It's strange, but I don't think it points strongly to being innocent nor guilty. It's safe to bet that at least one of our candidates is red. The candidates thus far: (at least from my naive perspective ![]() Ver: strong clue/behavior analyzer. says he doesn't want to die early (but who does?). Caller: urges us not to bandwagon. good player, are his skills up to par with Ver's? BC: wants to be pardoner, based on his self professed skill in clue analysis. Showtime: cryptic as usual, but certainly above average in terms of playing skill. is always a priority target for the reds, which is noteworthy imo. Mynock: also does not want to die early and has never held office before. policy of 'complete transparency.' Is he good at clue/behavior analyzing? Not sure tbh, but he is usually a voice of reason, probably a good leader. Nemy: doesn't want to die early... clearly there are not enough medics. to note: tension between showtime/mynock, mikeymoo backs mynock. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 17 2009 01:52 LucasWoJ wrote: infundumbilum clever | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
You do bring up a good point though about the ability to bait players, and generally be frustrating for the other side. I wasn't considering that before, but it is certainly important. Personally I am between voting for Ace or Showtime. There's no shortage of good candidates this game, which makes deciding actually kind of harder... | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
I cant handle this kind of pressure ![]() | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 17 2009 05:39 L wrote: Yes there is. Voting in a townie mayor gives us a 25% shot at killing a mafia, and voting in a mafia pardoner sets us back an entire day, which is essentially 3 extra town deaths. Either way, at this point a few people have played their poker and sent tells as to what their roles are. Hm, I did forget the first lynch. But I don't think the mayor should be choosing the lynch completely independently, be he mafia or not. The Day 1 lynch, in my opinion, needs to be agreed upon by the town and then enacted by the mayor. As if it was voted upon. I'm not entirely sure how to work it out. On first thoughts, electing a townie mayor does not guarantee a correct first lynch, but electing a mafia mayor probably guarantees a miss, because he and any mafia will try to sway town opinion from lynching anyone on his side. And maybe I'm wrong, but a mafia mayor sacrificing a mafia on the first lynch seems pretty damn stupid, so I'm ruling that out as a possibility. And I guess you're more insightful than I am, because I currently have no idea who is what. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
Hm. Mafia pardoner only sets us back if we get the first lynch correctly. What was the game where the first lynch was pardoned? I think i'm gonna go back and check that one. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 17 2009 06:03 Caller wrote: that game was Ace's and that pardon was mine, infundibulum. And that was part of a grand convoluted strategy which didn't work b/c mafias had managed to synchronize their hits -_- Ah ok thanks, I couldn't even find it after like 15 mins of looking. It isn't really relevant to here anyway On May 17 2009 06:22 L wrote: Show nested quote + No, Mafia pardoner will always set us back a day and will likely block our first double lynch or our first successful double lynch. Hm. Mafia pardoner only sets us back if we get the first lynch correctly. What was the game where the first lynch was pardoned? I think i'm gonna go back and check that one. If mayor is mafia, he will look at a split town consensus and pick a non-mafia target, or he'll have an active posting mafia member start a line of reasoning towards a non-mafia target and have people switch over to that. Either way, since there's nearly ZERO we can do to proof the choice, he can't be held accountable either because a townie mayor would be making a 1 in 4 shot anyways. If the town/mafia mayor gets/sacrifices a mafia, the proper response would NOT be to assume he's a confirmed town member either way. Yeah, I didn't think that out thoroughly, so I went to go do the dishes and think some more. Mafia pardoner definitely sets us back. I think you are right that he would wait for double lynch, which slows things down a lot. Rather more dangerous than I first thought. Looks hard to hold the mayor/pardoner accountable during the first Day. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 17 2009 08:56 Incognito wrote: Well things just got interesting...what do people have to say about this? On May 17 2009 08:56 Incognito wrote: Well things just got interesting...what do people have to say about this? My initial reaction is nemy is telling the truth. Nobody in the thread really paid much mind to his initial posts, however apparently people have been PMing him. The lack of both controversy and bandwagon votes in his direction are good signs. But then I remind myself that things are not always what they seem. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
In Mafia 2, the mafia reaction to Empyrean claiming DT was basically, "he is confusing the town. playing such a risky move is dangerous, we don't want this kind of guy in office." A lot of innocent people, including Ace, echoed those statements, which made it rather easy to elect randombum to pardoner position. I don't think the reactions will be as blatant in this game, but they are definitely out there already. The problem is things are harder to interpret now, and I'm tired and can't form this sentence the way I want to. ...okay I guess that wasn't so brief. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 02:41 Malongo wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2009 01:12 LucasWoJ wrote: On May 17 2009 17:58 Ace wrote: On May 17 2009 12:43 LucasWoJ wrote: On May 17 2009 11:50 Malongo wrote: On May 17 2009 11:42 HeavOnEarth wrote: hey ver how do we know you're not mafia and this isn't just a ploy to make sure he doesn't get votes; so that you're ensured mayor? Obviously nobody can confirm that. However ver has a really good point here, dts roleclaiming first day are not good for the town. Im inclined to believe Nemy is at least traitor, and if he is actually dt... GTFO very poorly played. Note also that dts dont roleclaim publicly ever. In all mafias ive played only sog made it after he got protection. Okay malongo. Calm down. Last game, mafia feasted off of the town's reckless emotions and kept the town in perpetual chaos. You're doing the exact same thing with your post. Actually his post makes sense though - it sums up exactly why nemy needs to be killed. I'll explain this in my big post coming soon. Notice I never said his post makes no sense. ^_^ I was pointing out that its brevity will not and cannot help the town. A series of consecutive two or three sentence posts, or even shorter ones, go a long way in derailing the thread, and allow an individual to escape suspicion (actually, all of the people who posted the couple-liners), even when they're not mafia (look at the last game as evidence for this). Second, if nemy's a retarded dt who played very poorly and one that has nothing to offer, I don't see the reason to "need to kill him." Ostensibly, mafia could keep him alive, if he were the DT, because he's a guaranteed lynch the next day (unless you mean he should be the first day lynch). Granted, I have not read your "big post" yet (I'm responding as I go), so I don't know the reasoning nor can I think of anything besides "we cannot possibly be sure, so it's a good lynch either way since he could be mafia, traitor, or a stupid townie." - Last thing: You put words in my posts that dont belong there: "need to kill him". I never said that. I think in this part he was replying to Ace, b/c Ace has been saying Nemy needs to be killed. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 03:08 Mynock wrote: We still have about 5-6 (or so) hours before the elections are over, so I'd like to urge everyone to vote. Those of you who have abstained, vote! It benefits Town, since we'll know where you stand. I'd like to encourage you to either vote for me or Ace. The vote tallies are very close this time, so everything will be decided by 1 or 2 voices tops. Watch out for nemY suddenly getting a couple critical votes in the last minutes. Or anyone else for that matter. I will vote, still not sure who I'm picking. Something isn't right and I can feel it. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 04:21 L wrote: Show nested quote + I honestly don't know how to do that. I've never done it in all my posting on TL as far as I know. If you can tell me how i can pull a quote out with the name and time attached I'd be grateful. L when you quote someone could you please leave in who you're quoting with the message? Sometimes you quote from the middle of a paragraph and it's annoying to go back and figure out where it came from. I don't wanna have to do that again if I decide to re-check all your posts. You uh, press the "quote" link on the right hand side at the top of the post. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 04:16 Caller wrote: Seriously you guys, we have like Ace/Mynock/Tricode vs. L/nemy Malongo vs. LucasWoJ what the hell is going on people, stop arguing and let's figure out what the hell we're going to do voting wise and after the election. Ad hominem can wait until later! I don't know man. It would be nice to hear from the future mayor Ver. But a lot of what to do after the election depends on who our pardoner is. What about the first lynch? I still think we should lynch an inactive. The only people who have been one hundred percent inactive, interestingly, are MrBabyHands and Camlito. Fusionsdf and Plexa and infinity21 come close. Other people have posted only a few 1-2 line posts, as Incognito pointed out a while ago. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 05:15 Caller wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2009 05:08 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 18 2009 04:16 Caller wrote: Seriously you guys, we have like Ace/Mynock/Tricode vs. L/nemy Malongo vs. LucasWoJ what the hell is going on people, stop arguing and let's figure out what the hell we're going to do voting wise and after the election. Ad hominem can wait until later! I don't know man. It would be nice to hear from the future mayor Ver. But a lot of what to do after the election depends on who our pardoner is. What about the first lynch? I still think we should lynch an inactive. The only people who have been one hundred percent inactive, interestingly, are MrBabyHands and Camlito. Fusionsdf and Plexa and infinity21 come close. Other people have posted only a few 1-2 line posts, as Incognito pointed out a while ago. From prior experience, both MBH and Camlito tend to post a day or so after the mayoral election, so we may want to let them live until then. I dunno what Plexa is doing, and infinity21 seems not to be paying much attn to the game -_-. I still think that we'd be better off without a nemy mayor/pardoner... I still think not posting at all is weird, no matter who you are. I mean maybe they all have a valid excuse, but we have no way of knowing that... Nemy not being mayor/pardoner makes it a weird situation for the medics.. The fact that he has called out DT means that mafia will try to get him killed, either by convincing us to lynch him or by hitting at night, because a DT is dangerous. I mean i think everyone can understand the medic's gamble, protect Nemy and the mafia might just hit other people, or the opposite could occur. Etc. It also creates a dilemma for the mafia; who do they hit? Killing Nemy with the lynch avoids this, but we'd just be doing the mafia's work for them because they surely want him dead anyway... ugh i need to pick a candidate x_x | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 05:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Infundi, just go with ver hes a safe bet, and if we aren't careful he wont get in period. Yeah i think I may do this. If my current vote count is correct it's Nemy 6 ::Ver 6 :: Mynock 4 :: Ace 4, for the leading candidates. Ver is probably in, but i can help keep him in the mayor spot. Convenient way to dodge the burden of choosing pardoner ![]() | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 07:04 Ace wrote: Go ahead and write the Table of Contents then since you're so interested in posting all of a sudden. In fact you should stop trying to derail the thread about me and focus on how far your body will dangle. Right now you have the most votes. I don't know what the rest of the town thinks, but IMO lynching Nemy first is a bad idea. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 18 2009 11:37 Ace wrote: FFS don't you motherfuckers ever learn? Stop thinking about "what if he's blue" and just fucking READ the thread. This is like Folca part 2. Dude when Folca roleclaimed, he did it with the backup accusation that he had rolechecked someone (you) and that they turned up red. We had to lynch Folca first, because it was the only way to verify that his claim was truthful while also revealing the accused's (your) alignment, i.e. it was the most efficient action. Nemy hasn't made any rolecheck accusations, and has only claimed to be a dt. The only information we could ostensibly gain from lynching Nemy would be: a) whether he was telling the truth or not b) maybe some insight into the position of certain players, now that we have knowledge of Nemy's role and can see how they reacted to his claim. I believe our situation is only surficially similar to Folca v. Ace from Mafia 3. In addition, I don't doubt that the mafia will want to kill Nemy, because leaving a potential DT alive is quite simply dangerous to them. Why do we want to do their work for them? If Nemy stays alive and produces no useful information that we would expect from a detective, then can't we kill him anyway? If he lives to Night 2, will he not probably be rolechecked anyhow? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 19 2009 02:31 mikeymoo wrote: I don't see the need for a medic list, per se. Why play mind games with the mafia when the medics in this game are likely to be active? Pretty much. I think the medic list was mostly a helpful idea to guide newer players. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 19 2009 09:04 infinity21 wrote: ehh it looks like i'm dead already.. in my defense, someone kept nagging me to play so i signed up but i haven't had much time to read everything in this thread to conclude anything so that's why i haven't posted. plus i'm not very experienced at this game so i didn't want to start throwing accusations kind of interesting how everyone thought i was mafia cause i didn't post =/ it's not necessarily that anyone thought you were mafia. it's more the idea that inactive players hurt the town no matter what side they are on, and going after inactives stops the mafia from trying to hide among them. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 19 2009 13:14 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Ie check the 4th feast reference to RoL maybe it would be better to just check to see if it is a clue at all? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 14 2009 16:18 Qatol wrote: Bodyguard - Bodyguards are the protectors of the elected roles. As long as they remain alive the Mayor and Pardoner are both immune to all hits during the night. Bodyguards will not know who each other are, the elected roles will not know who they are, and they will be chosen from towny's after the Mayor chooses who to lynch. For all purposes the bodyguards gain no special abilities. You show up as Towny for all Rolechecks. Emphasis mine. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 19 2009 13:49 Caller wrote: Show nested quote + On May 19 2009 13:47 Ace wrote: On May 19 2009 13:47 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 14 2009 16:18 Qatol wrote: Bodyguard - Bodyguards are the protectors of the elected roles. As long as they remain alive the Mayor and Pardoner are both immune to all hits during the night. Bodyguards will not know who each other are, the elected roles will not know who they are, and they will be chosen from towny's after the Mayor chooses who to lynch. For all purposes the bodyguards gain no special abilities. You show up as Towny for all Rolechecks. Emphasis mine. whats your point? he means to say its really strange that both BGs died. It could be luck. luck is doubtful. but it is possible. But consider, why would Ver or Ace kill off their own bodyguards? It is an act which immediately thrusts suspicion upon the elected officers. Consider the possibility: One of Ver or Ace is in the mafia. BG roles get leaked (I should note at this point that I am not surprised this happened. Maybe a little surprised at Fishball. You know better than that, FB), mafia decides to kill the bodyguards and direct suspicion towards the innocent officer, to convince the town for a nice ol' lynching like back in the olden days. See: Ace's posts, "Ver is mafia." I do not think that's what is really going down here though, just because Ace's posts would be absurdly fucking transparent if that was the mafia plan. I am probably too stupid to figure it out, but will sleep on it and try in the morning anyway. --- Questions that may be impossible or improbable to answer: 1. Who knew the BG roles? Ver, Ace, or both? A third party? 2. Was it dumb luck? 3. If not luck, then what is motivation for the act? Who benefits? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 19 2009 14:54 L wrote: Did you read what he wrote? That's not how the game's rules work. All night actions happen at the exact same time. All of them work. You can't kill a vig in order to prevent his hit, nor can a vig drop the kp of mafia to reduce the amount of kills that happen. Medics can't be killed to remove their protection during that night. To be fair to Vivi, in past games it hasn't always worked this way. For example, in Mafia 3 when we had a hit on NemY, Chuiu didn't let it go through because one of our mafia died in the night lowering our kp. Ace especially was pissed off about this, and I'm sure he remembers. I don't know what Qatol's policy on night actions in this game is. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 19 2009 13:59 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Questions that may be impossible or improbable to answer: 1. Who knew the BG roles? Ver, Ace, or both? A third party? 2. Was it dumb luck? 3. If not luck, then what is motivation for the act? Who benefits? OK. In this post I will operate under the assumption that it was not luck that both bodyguards were hit in the same night. This because such an act is very very unlikely, though the possibility does exist. So it comes that the bodyguards must have been in PM contact with at least one person. Out of the people in this game, here is who I would expect to have good chances of having been in contact with the bodyguards, based on past player circles and current info: LucasWoJ 1. Ver (as he is the mayor) 2. mikeymoo 3. 0cz3c - his brother. 4. Incognito - we know this from PMs posted publicly (alliteration ftw). 5. Scaramanga. 6. Ace (as he is the pardoner) Mikeymoo 1. LucasWoJ 2. BC 3. Camlito 4. Ver or Ace (as explained above) 5. Scaramanga Out of these possibilities we can rule out some quickly. LucasWoJ, if we are to believe Incognito, thought Ver was the traitor. So Lucas roleclaiming to Ver seems unlikely, although it sounds like he did try to PM our mayor. 0cz3c is Lucas' brother, so it's possible he found out Lucas' role. I don't think they usually play like that though, or at least I'll give em the benefit of the doubt. While it's possible that either of them Pm'd Ace, it just doesn't seem likely to me. Mikeymoo, BC, and Camlito seem to be three players who are generally in contact, iirc. Scaramanga somehow always gets around in PMs, so he makes my list. PART THE FIRST: Look at this objectively. Two bodyguards are dead. What is the primary purpose of the bodyguards? To protect the mayor and pardoner from mafia hits. Who is the primary beneficiary of dead bodyguards? The mafia, and, by proxy, the traitor. Case 1: Either Ver or Ace is mafia. (I don't think both are. Because then their internet acting skills would be stellar). BG roles were leaked somehow to either Ver or Ace. It could have been either indirect or direct, and this is important. For example, I think it would be more likely for the BGs to roleclaim to Ver directly rather than Ace directly. However if the information came to Ver or Ace indirectly - through a third party, perhaps one of the many people on my list, then it is about equally likely that either of them knew. There are many ways this could have happened. For example: Lucas and mm are in contact, Lucas tells mm he is bg, mm in contact with another person who he doesn't know is mafia spreads this info. E.g. any one mafia in their contact circle can relay the BG roles to either Ace or Ver (as we are assuming right now that one of them is red). Now with the bodyguards dead, mafia is free to thrust suspicion on the innocent officer. Look at the reaction in the thread: many people are jumping at Ver, but most notably, Ace is. He is actually being really really accusatory right now, displaying a lot of confidence in Ver's guilt. I am kind of unnerved by this, because Ace seems to have no qualms about losing the mayor, and I am not convinced entirely that Ver is mafia or the traitor. Ace is really fucking sure of himself here. I think that is unusual. To note is that Mynock backs him, and argues for lynching Ver. Ace even suggests that Ver killed the bodyguards just to get to Ace. This seems pretty fucking inefficient if you ask me. Ver could, if he wanted, stir up enough anger in the thread to get Ace lynched as long as there was enough support. Is Ace really that valuable to the us that Ver would kill both his bodyguards, exposing himself to suspicion, just to kill Ace on Night 3 even with the risk of Ace being a Veteran or medic protected? It would be retarded. Furthermore, if Ver is mafia, I would expect to see people in the thread arguing against his lynch. There isn't any of this. All of it is in support of lynching Ver, and the votes are too. Does this seem strange to anyone else? If Ace is mafia and Ver is innocent, it should be clear from the thread what his motives are. Case 2: Either Ver or Ace is the traitor This, my friends, is more likely. And more interesting. Requires, if info was passed directly: 1. BG info to be passed to Ver or Ace via Lucas/MM 2. Ver or Ace to have found and contacted the mafia 3. Mafia to have killed the BG's If info passed indirectly: 1. Lucas/MM roleclaim to 3rd party who is red 2. Mafia kill bg's, not knowing whether Ace/Ver is traitor. This scenario is actually rather interesting, and also is possible if both Ver and Ace are somehow innocent. Either way we look at it, this move benefits the traitor and thus the mafia. If Ace is traitor and we lynch Ver today, well then shit just hit the fan. If Ver is traitor, he gets lynched and then Ace gets hit by the mafia the following night, though does not necessarily die. If Ver is the traitor, I'm not sure how mafia would react. I think they could either: a) support to lynch Ver. The town lynching Ver is basically like "take an extra turn" for the mafia, because they don't lose any kp. In addition it takes attention away from people who are actually mafia members. b) protest lynching Ver. Mafia might want to keep him alive because he is the mayor and gets extra votes that can tip the lynches in their favor. Plus, the mayor always carries an aura of influence with his posts. Case 3: Both Ver and Ace are innocent This is definitely possible! All that needed to happen was for the mafia to get the bg roles for us to end up where we are. They really seem to hate each other though, so it's hard to imagine them on the same side. My opinion: possible, but improbable. Kind of like both bodyguards getting killed by blind luck. PART THE SECOND I now turn to the increasingly ignored death of a certain paramedic. On May 19 2009 13:38 Fishball wrote: Saw that long coming ![]() FB said in the thread he had been talking to both Vivi and BC. I really, really, really, doubt that FB roleclaimed, but maybe he gave off a blue impression in his PMs... I think that there is only one person in this entire game that could even possibly pin down Fishball as blue on Day 1 by pure behavior analysis: MrBabyHands. MTF adds clue analysis: On May 18 2009 13:33 MTF wrote: Show nested quote + Qatol turned to see what was happening when a voice spoke from behind him. “You no longer control this town. It is ours now.” Qatol turned to face this new threat, but was unable to locate the speaker. Suddenly, Qatol saw a blur as his assailant leapt at him, planting a knife in Qatol's chest. LTT's attacker came over and helped push Qatol into the water with the others. All of the above indicates that the attacker is possibly small. He is not seen by Qatol when he turns around to find who was talking, the attacker leaps to strike Qatol's chest, and may have needed whoever attacked LTT's help in pushing the body into the water. These are only Day 1 clues. But I like MTF's connections. It's just something to consider here. I am not yet convinced at all that MBH is mafia. It would be nice to see his opinion on the recent events, however. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 19 2009 20:36 Mynock wrote: Also, something else, the long Night, Qatol waiting for hits? Ver was waiting for the two BGs to roleclaim to him (and I agree with Ace here, I doubt they even READ the rules, and knew they were unknown to the elects), after which he put the kills on them. This is why I think hes more likely Mafia than Traitor. I want to note here that I think Nemy is the one Qatol was waiting for.Nemy appeared in the thread very soon before the night post, saying that he just got back and wanted to know what he should use his clue check on. A bit after that, Qatol posted the night writeup. Ver waiting for his bg's to roleclaim is a ridiculous assumption; how could he know if his bodyguards ever planned on telling him? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 20 2009 07:22 HeavOnEarth wrote: dont lynch ace, don't double lynch ! ...well i just had to put it out there ![]() why not? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On May 20 2009 07:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote: However, I say we ignore ace/ver alltogether today (one will die at night regardless), and kill showtime based on this. "unnoticed until one of them screamed and charged at LucasWoJ. mikeymoo fled from the scuffle as the attacker pulled out a syringe and slammed it into LucasWoJ's right eye. mikeymoo was gone by the time LucasWoJ was fully injected, but he could still hear the brutality even as he fled. The assailant bellowed again and started slamming the now empty syringe into LucasWoJ's face repeatedly until his face caved in and the only sounds left were guttural yells, the squishy impacts, and the sound of blood splatter." Google, Showtime, and it brings you to http://www.sho.com/site/index.html One of the main images is of a nurse with a syringe, then an image of ufc in there as well. One person directly links to the syringe and to a horrible beating, seems to me like a closed case. this is definitely solid though it seems almost too easy. also there's nothing really to link to the fact that the mafia doesn't say anything. he just screams and yells like a wild animal. I guess you could connect that to UFC haha. i also love how nobody seems to read my posts | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 20 2009 05:05 GMT
#1096
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 20 2009 20:52 GMT
#1183
Who is the mysterious man in the shadows, pulling the strings? :tinfoil hat: | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 20 2009 21:30 GMT
#1187
On May 21 2009 06:00 Caller wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2009 05:52 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: What if Ace Ver and L are all innocent? Who is the mysterious man in the shadows, pulling the strings? :tinfoil hat: muhahahahah you shall soon all fall under the influence of... THE PUPPET MASTER!!! ![]() ![]() lmao I am seriously stumped though... just like the mayoral elections. People are hatin' on each other and I don't want to be the guy that helps get the wrong person lynched. Time is running out.. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 00:12 GMT
#1195
On May 21 2009 07:56 MTF wrote: - This isn't really a late bandwagon. In fact, I'm more fearful of the one I feel is approaching. Namely, the one that comes right after Ver posts a novel in a few hours, just before the vote closes. Yeah, Ver's absence is unusual. It's possible he's been really, busy; he did mention defending his honors thesis or something like that. But he hasn't even popped in to just leave a remark since right after the day post | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 00:43 GMT
#1198
On May 21 2009 09:31 Bockit wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2009 09:12 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 21 2009 07:56 MTF wrote: - This isn't really a late bandwagon. In fact, I'm more fearful of the one I feel is approaching. Namely, the one that comes right after Ver posts a novel in a few hours, just before the vote closes. Yeah, Ver's absence is unusual. It's possible he's been really, busy; he did mention defending his honors thesis or something like that. But he hasn't even popped in to just leave a remark since right after the day post These are exactly the same stunts Ver pulled last game, don't fall for them! He might legitimately have an honours thesis to defend, I'm not going to make a call on that. What I am going to make a call on is that he promised activity in his electoral platform, I'll even quote him. Show nested quote + I don't have anything to say about accountability because I'll make it glaringly obvious that I'm on the town's side. Because being mafia takes so much time I only make the minimum number of posts; when I'm town it's the exact opposite. Read that again, look at his posting habits (both sparsity and content) and then try to tell me his absence is merely unusual ![]() Yeah I know. Things do come up unexpectedly in real life, which is why I hesitate to call his absence more than a little suspicious. I think Ver is well aware that being this absent is obvious and people will call it out, like we are. If he was mafia and didn't want to die, wouldn't he have taken more initiative in being active? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 01:05 GMT
#1204
On May 21 2009 09:54 Bockit wrote: That's the argument I'm expecting him to take if he is mafia. It's the only thing he can really do to try and save himself. Right. You also need to ask though, why would Ver so blatantly promise to be active and then just disappear? Again, something like that is going to be picked up on (and it was). I don't think Ver would make a statement like that if he knew he wasn't going to be around to post. But as you said, he can just use that excuse if he comes back, whether he was feigning inactivity or genuinely gone. And i don't think that really tells us if he was mafia or innocent, because he could be a) mafia and actually gone b) mafia and faking inactive c) innocent and actually gone I don't think any innocent person would fake inactivity. But then this raises another question: how woul Ver act if he is the traitor? Blargh | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 01:07 GMT
#1206
On May 21 2009 09:59 Bockit wrote: My point is, the argument by no means establishes innocence because it's the most obvious position to take to try and prove ones innocence. And since it's essentially unprovable unless you know the person outside of the game, it's easy to lie about. Yeah this is basically what I was trying to say, in so many words. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 02:24 GMT
#1270
On May 21 2009 11:15 Ver wrote: b) Or should the vigilante hit me? If you're actually a veteran why would we waste the vig hit on you? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 02:28 GMT
#1273
On May 21 2009 11:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2009 11:24 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 21 2009 11:15 Ver wrote: b) Or should the vigilante hit me? If you're actually a veteran why would we waste the vig hit on you? It proves his role, means the town sees that he is infact a blue and rallies behind him And then he has only 1 night life left, our vig hit is gone, and it's easier for the mafia to kill him. And it means the medic pretty much has to protect Ver, no? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:00 GMT
#1378
"destructive influence on the game." I wonder what he means by that... i would laugh very hard if Ver flips traitor from all this | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:01 GMT
#1381
On May 21 2009 13:00 dreamflower wrote: All right, fine. I'm finally going to roleclaim, because I'm tired of hearing people suggesting that I should be lynched one second and then coming up with plans involving the vigi hit the next. It's been amusing, but also incredibly stressful, and I feel I could be doing not only the town but also myself some good by doing this. I'm the one vigilante in this game. This is why I've been quieter than usual this game, though I doubt it would necessarily have been noticeable for most. It's why I've avoided the spotlight and tried to post only when I had something truly substantial to share or when I wanted to defend myself so that I could carry out my role. Ver did correctly guess my color, but not its exact, shall we say, flavor. But then, there are twice as many medics and detectives as there are vigilantes in this game, after all. Now, why should you believe me? Well, it would be highly risky for Mafia to ever roleclaim vigilante, even in ordinary circumstances when there are more than one. In this game, when there's only one vigilante, it becomes even more dangerous, even for the godfather. They can't run the risk of having their clues repeat, as the vigilante has only one hit and which clues show up in the Day posts aren't under their control. It's true that Mafia can kill their own members this round, but I don't think they'd want to chance that, with only six members this game. So, I'd really like to see if Mafia tries to roleclaim vigilante as well, as I'm the legitimate vigilante and they, well, would just make themselves targets. asdf i don't think you needed to do this at all | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:08 GMT
#1390
On May 21 2009 13:02 L wrote: Dreamflower. You will vig hit whomever is not killed tonight. If you don't, I am going to bring this town straight down on your ass tomorrow as planned. You will do this because roleclaiming will have you 100% killed, so its really not an issue either way. If there is an extra hit tonight which corresponds with you, done. Problem solved. If not we proceed with tomorrow's double hit. What if Ace gets lynched, so she vigi's Ver, who happened to not be bullshitting about being a vet? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:09 GMT
#1392
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:19 GMT
#1412
On May 21 2009 13:12 L wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2009 13:08 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 21 2009 13:02 L wrote: Dreamflower. You will vig hit whomever is not killed tonight. If you don't, I am going to bring this town straight down on your ass tomorrow as planned. You will do this because roleclaiming will have you 100% killed, so its really not an issue either way. If there is an extra hit tonight which corresponds with you, done. Problem solved. If not we proceed with tomorrow's double hit. What if Ace gets lynched, so she vigi's Ver, who happened to not be bullshitting about being a vet? Even if both are blue, we cant' confirm innocence unless Ver flips red on kill. Either both bullshit about the hit, which is likely because they're both going to die day 3 anyways, or Ver dies to a clue linking to dream and she's proven correct. Still working out the rest of the details, thanks for your input here. I think requesting modkill points to being innocent. Reasoning: it lets us know his alignment without wasting a town kill. Also if he's going to be inactive again, it would be better to get rid of himself so the town isn't arguing about like we did all Day | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:27 GMT
#1425
On May 21 2009 13:21 MTF wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2009 13:19 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 21 2009 13:12 L wrote: On May 21 2009 13:08 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 21 2009 13:02 L wrote: Dreamflower. You will vig hit whomever is not killed tonight. If you don't, I am going to bring this town straight down on your ass tomorrow as planned. You will do this because roleclaiming will have you 100% killed, so its really not an issue either way. If there is an extra hit tonight which corresponds with you, done. Problem solved. If not we proceed with tomorrow's double hit. What if Ace gets lynched, so she vigi's Ver, who happened to not be bullshitting about being a vet? Even if both are blue, we cant' confirm innocence unless Ver flips red on kill. Either both bullshit about the hit, which is likely because they're both going to die day 3 anyways, or Ver dies to a clue linking to dream and she's proven correct. Still working out the rest of the details, thanks for your input here. I think requesting modkill points to being innocent. Reasoning: it lets us know his alignment without wasting a town kill. Also if he's going to be inactive again, it would be better to get rid of himself so the town isn't arguing about like we did all Day Asking if possible =/= requesting. Lots of flawed logic being used by all of you last minute voters. I'm under the impression that he is going to be modkilled no matter what... maybe I misread something? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:29 GMT
#1433
I don't know if this is a good idea. But it seems everyone is as confused as I am right now: From: Ver Subject: Re: you hit the mark Date: 5/21/09 12:49 To prove my innocence without the town wasting a kill and because I might be gone the next two days. ----------------------------------------- Original Message: hah yeah except I was semi-joking and according to you Ace is the traitor... why do you want to be modkilled? ----------------------------------------- Original Message: Show nested quote + What if Ace Ver and L are all innocent? Who is the mysterious man in the shadows, pulling the strings? :tinfoil hat: This is true Nice eye. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:37 GMT
#1446
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 04:50 GMT
#1471
On May 21 2009 13:48 Ver wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2009 13:48 Caller wrote: On May 21 2009 13:47 Qatol wrote: On May 21 2009 13:47 L wrote: On May 21 2009 13:45 Ver wrote: LOL. That's just sad. Ok I'm gonna modkill myself. Any final requests? I'll stay on and take them before I go. Finally I can be done and take a break from mafia (I'm sitting out next game too I'm sick of it). Release all of your PMs. They'll be fairly useful. To: Qatol. When will Ver die? When he asks for the modkill........... he just did? No I haven't. I said I will but if people want info I'll give it. tell me if you were leading me on | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 21 2009 05:13 GMT
#1483
My voting record also sucks. This I admit. If you read my posts it's pretty obvious what my alignment is. Wait to see what Ver flips before making accusations like this. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 22 2009 05:56 GMT
#1646
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:05 GMT
#1852
On May 24 2009 14:04 Ace wrote: fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck now I have to go play another game of DOTA. i wish i could play games but my fan is busted, so here i sit f5'ng :\ | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:17 GMT
#1863
On May 24 2009 14:14 Ace wrote: lolololololololol :7 | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:18 GMT
#1865
On May 24 2009 14:17 LTT wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2009 14:16 Caller wrote: On May 24 2009 14:16 Ace wrote: I just realized this is the second game in a row Caller got me killed. Third game overall cuz he failed as a bodyguard in Mafia 2. :/ naw that was your failure to check lenwe /me whistles those chatlogs were the fucking best | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:21 GMT
#1872
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:40 GMT
#1914
![]() | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:42 GMT
#1918
On May 24 2009 14:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Issue being with my analysis of showtime was i brought it up once day 2, t hen dropped it completely. after that in my huge bs post, i think i linked mbh and scamp, but vivi was just ugh, clue raped beyond belief mbh clues were pretty obvious as well. just nobody really picked up on it after Day 1 (he killed mikeymoo in Day 2 i believe) | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:45 GMT
#1928
On May 24 2009 14:43 Qatol wrote: MBH did not kill day 1 oh shit then. i thought it was him cause the mafia needed help throwing the body into the water, which implied he was small. also, that he leapt up to strike the knfe into the chest. lead me to think he was a short guy = mrbabyhands. who was it then? | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 05:50 GMT
#1936
On May 24 2009 14:46 LTT wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2009 14:45 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: On May 24 2009 14:43 Qatol wrote: MBH did not kill day 1 oh shit then. i thought it was him cause the mafia needed help throwing the body into the water, which implied he was small. also, that he leapt up to strike the knfe into the chest. lead me to think he was a short guy = mrbabyhands. who was it then? MBH was a normal sized person with tiny baby hands and the mind of a baby. the mental image this creates is wonderful hahah | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
May 24 2009 06:16 GMT
#1961
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Rain ![]() Bisu ![]() Sea ![]() Shuttle ![]() Jaedong ![]() Horang2 ![]() BeSt ![]() Larva ![]() JulyZerg ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games B2W.Neo1621 Beastyqt829 mouzStarbuck458 DeMusliM430 XBOCT358 crisheroes350 ArmadaUGS257 hiko95 KnowMe77 Liquid`VortiX73 QueenE39 ZerO(Twitch)16 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • LUISG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • Kozan • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • intothetv ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP Dota 2 League of Legends |
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
GSL Code S
Cure vs sOs
Reynor vs Solar
OSC
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Maru vs TriGGeR
Rogue vs NightMare
The PondCast
Replay Cast
OSC
Online Event
[ Show More ] CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
Chat StarLeague
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Chat StarLeague
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
|
|