/coach?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
/coach? ![]() | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Still bitter | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 18 2014 05:05 Promethelax wrote: Seriously townies: it has never been a detriment to town to have more posts* *some exceptions apply LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL Can't believe I missed this. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 20 2014 22:20 Lord Tolkien wrote: /motion to replace the replacement with one of the empty slots, and replace the empty slot with dogecoins. On March 20 2014 23:26 Balla24 wrote: Robik will be allowed to fill one of the empty slots if the game does not fill by Sunday. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
![]() | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 25 2014 11:35 geript wrote: Show nested quote + On March 25 2014 11:04 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Kill Robik off first. He's not a real newbie. Considering how the last newbie game with a non-newbie playing in it went, I'd strongly suggest this strategy ![]() Wait what? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 04:11 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 25 2014 13:34 Lord Tolkien wrote: On March 25 2014 11:56 Cavalinho wrote: Worst mafia player on TL here. lies, that would be me ill fite you if you say otherwise Nope, that me. Stop arguing about this. You're all good. If there's one trashcan in the 4 of us, it's me. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Sqrt is town. He's talking to himself. It's very nonchalant. I like it. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 08:40 OnceKing wrote: Ok, let's talk policy. Let's policy lynch lurkers. This is not to say that I think all lurkers are mafia or all mafia lurkers, but instead that lurking is pushing a mafia agenda and not only will you more likely find mafia in a list of players pushing a mafia agenda but also forcing everyone to talk drives the mafia into the open. What do you guys think? wtf is this shit? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 09:01 Valenius wrote: Can you expand on that a little bit OK, just so i've got it clear? Are you talking policy lynch inactives? They'll be hit by a modkill. Are you talking policy lynch lurkers regardless of any other factors? What if 7/9 of us were set on a certain player as being mafia, would you still try to push the policy lynch? Are you talking about policy lynch lurkers when we have no other reads? I agree with this one. Sleep for me anyway, see you guys tomorrow. I like this post a lot. Valenius is both interrogating OK and giving answers simultaneously about what reads like genuine beliefs. Town lean. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 12:15 Cavalinho wrote: Robik are you town? On March 26 2014 12:05 IAmRobik wrote: The town hero has arrived You, sir, lack reading comprehension. Of course I'm town. I don't get rolled mafia on TL. It's the greatest feeling ever. Being scum sucks, and I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
What are your thoughts on sqrt, OK and Valenius? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Back to the topic at hand, why didn't you give a read on the other two and deflect onto a pointless question about why I directed the question AT YOU. If I knew where you stood on people, if you expressed those opinions in the thread, I wouldn't have to ask you, now would I? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
I guess what I'm saying is "do, don't say." And yeah, I think you're scummy for saying that and not doing it. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:09 Pixalated wrote: If I'm missing something please explain why you think that someone bringing something up to get town to actually discuss something instead of talking fluff = scum. And why asking dumb questions = town. Because there's a way that I perceive town approaching a situation or scenario and a way mafia would. I think that valenius's post was in a manner that town would phrase it. Thus a town read on him. OK just posted a generalized statement about lynching UTRs. While the strategy is sound, it's more of a town play to just vote on someone who hasn't posted a lot or someone that hasn't posted thus FORCING them to come and be active. Having said that, I'm sick and tired of talking about the semantics of it. I want to hear people's reads. I want people to put pressure on others. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:22 OnceKing wrote: If that's the case, why did you insist that I answer first? You could have answered my question and then asked your question again, as I did. Robik gave three very quick reads off of only a few posts. Let's break it down: sqrt - jokes and one liners during RVS. Lots of 'em. Made no posts afterwards, yet. Mysteriously Robik's got a town read off of that. Valenius - qualification of what I mean when I talk about policy. Robik town reads it, slightly. me - brings game out of RVS and now we're actually talking about things. Robik thinks I'm scummy. ##VOTE: IAmRobik Want to explain this, Robik? You seem to think you know an awful lot. I give reads off of minute things I pick up. I don't hold back my reads. I'll clear someone for the most minuscule detail. That's what I do. If that's your reason for voting me that's idiotic. How about you actually give some reads instead of contributing some random nonsense. kthxbye | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
In what world does a mafia come into the game and start talking to himself for 10 posts? Mafia has all the reason in the world to sit back and not do shit and contribute when something is happening and then push some random town who is on the chopping blocks. I don't give a damn if it was 10 posts of filler about how he's doing today and how his HS run was going. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
UTR = under the radar = lurking | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:49 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 26 2014 13:45 IAmRobik wrote: I respectfully disagree with what you are saying Eden. Clearing people for my perceived notion of town vs mafia play is not terrible -- it's how I play the game. Then the way you play the game is terrible. None of your reads make any logical sense and frankly look manufactured. That's fine that you feel that way. My style isn't for everyone. That doesn't mean that I'm wrong and that doesn't mean that I'm bad. I've probably played more games of mafia than almost anyone here (in this game and most of the players on this site)...in the process I've picked up on small intricacies in the game and I'm able to clear people for things that other people don't notice. You don't have to like it, but that's how I play. None of that makes me mafia. In fact, it makes me more likely to be town. As mafia, I wouldn't want to put myself in a position where I've cleared people and then have to fucking backtrack and retract and vote on people who I said were town. Anyway. I'm town, thus you're voting for a townie right now. You should prolly unvote if you're town and want to win the game. (For what it's worth, I think you're town. Even though your conclusion is wrong, your thoughts are very logical.) | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 14:13 Eden1892 wrote: Okay, Robik, that's all well and good that you normally look at insignificant details in absence of more plausible explanations. My vote isn't (necessarily) going to stay on you for the reads; early game does depend on throwing shit out and seeing whether or not it sticks, after all. We have time to see what you do from here. I'm a little willing to accept the argument that you're putting yourself out there a lot and making yourself commit to positions that would be a little awkward to retract as mafia, but I'll need to see more to determine how valid that argument is. What's sticking out is your "Do it instead of say it" mentality toward OK. I completely agree with it. The problem is (a) OnceKing is doing it, by trying to convince people to accept his attitude toward lurkers he's creating an environment that will allow him to push the lurker lynch once it comes up should it come up; and (b) you're not taking your own advice, asking people to pressure others and telling people to do instead of say and then not voting your scum read. It's also strange to me that you say my thoughts are logical but my conclusion is wrong. That can only be true if I'm missing a crucial piece of information that would change the logic of my thoughts and lead me to the right conclusion. Obviously to an extent I am since I don't have your alignment, but assuming you are town, there should be a town explanation for the discrepancy between "do don't say" and not voting the scumread. What is it? 1) I disagree with your assessment that OK is doing and not just saying. You could make the same claim that he's not practicing what he's preaching because he's not voting a quiet person and he's voting one of the most vocal people in the game. 2) It's going to be difficult for you to just trust me on this, but I don't always throw out my vote on someone who I have a scumread on, so if you want, go read foundations. I called out Joey for stuff that wasn't all that significant to begin with and the read kept growing and growing and then I was the last person to vote on him d1 (a vote that failed because two other townies swtiched to the other wagon at the last second). I like to get my thoughts out there and explain them, which is exactly what I've been doing. Me not placing a vote 40 hours before end of day doesn't mean dick. There's a ton of other stuff that can happen between now and then. 3) The crucial piece of information that you're missing is that you've never played with me before. Thus it's logical that you would draw these wrong conclusions about my play because you don't know what a town or mafia game from me looks like. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 14:26 Eden1892 wrote: I think you're misunderstanding OK's policy. "Preferentially lynch lurkers" means "lynch a lurker in absence of other considerations." In economics we use the phrase ceteris paribus -- all else the same -- meaning that all other variables equal you lynch a lurker. Essentially if you and I were the wagons, I had like 4 posts the whole game and you had, Iunno, 400 posts, and OK felt we were equally scum (or at least that the differences were inconsequential), he would kill me over you. There's nowhere to put his vote right now to satisfy this because we don't have multiple scum players of variable activity levels. It's fine that you don't vote your scum read right off the bat, it's just weird to me that you criticize OK for not voting an inactive when you've just acknowledged there are extenuating circumstances to the very principle you're using to criticize him. And I'm not talking about meta arguments here; that's just moving the issue back a step. The question isn't "do you do this as town?" it's "why do you do this as town?" Talk to me a little bit about the rationale behind your approach to the game; I'm feeling better here but I want to get in your head a little more before I pull my vote. Based off of the 2 newbie games that I've played, the mafia were definitely people that posted only a couple times in the days. I assume that is where OK's "policy" is coming from. Thus, I don't feel ceteris paribus really holds any weight. Regardless: my stance is that while I'm actively trying to pressure people and clear people, he's talking about the mechanics of what he'd like to do and not actually doing it. I didn't read what he said as him "trying to get people on board." I don't think that voting someone is as indicative of trying to get someone lynched as putting forth a case -- which is what I feel I did. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I need to reread and reconsider. It was my initial impression. I like that he's been asking people for their opinions of the whole situation, that reads townie, but I don't like that he hasn't really made his opinions felt up to this point. As for getting in my head and explaining why I do what I do. I do it because I believe it. If I read someone as town, even off of something minor, then I'm going to vocalize it. I'm going to do the same thing if I think something is scummy. Me voting or not voting doesn't indicate anything. I'm pushing. I'm giving reads. That's what I'm doing. Sometimes I'll make a play and say something I don't believe in to gauge reaction and see if someone sheeps something for poor reasoning (like I did in the first newbie game I played here on n1ko), but most of the time, everything that I write will be 100% genuine. Up to this point, I stand by everything that I have written. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Analysis of RJ vs LT Both come into the thread after either a long absence or no posts at all. RJ picks people and analyzes them in several posts. These post flow naturally and feel like they follow some sort of logical progression. The same cannot be said for LT who comes in after an absence and makes one "long" posts that was more summary + meta than discussion of what's going on this game. On the other hand, he does take a stand on a lot of people, and generally his take is that a lot of people are town. This is pretty townie, especially since he makes it a point to call people town that some people don't even have opinions on. Meh, I don't know if that's natural flow though. I'll reread and reassess. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 20:31 Lord Tolkien wrote: Show nested quote + - Reads on Valenius and Pixalated. ...how? Valenius asked some good questions to develop OnceKing's policy, but that's all. Certainly a good start but not nearly enough to declare him "super town" or "cleared." Especially in light of the fact that he said Pixalated is neutral-to-scummy... I have Pixalated as neutral-to-town if anything, but to be honest they've done virtually the same thing here (not post much, make solid contributions where they did). There's a lack of explanation for either read, which on its own doesn't say much, but... ZzZ. I knew I should've tried posting that part some other time. Or maybe I should've approached it with more subtlety (see: any subtlety at all). Was trying to scumbait with it when questioning Cavalinho and sqrt. Was trying to see if they would piggyback off of it. Went back and deleted those sections specifically to try. My true reads: Valenius leans town at best. I'm hesitant to call him anything at this stage of the game, when his only post is at best asking for a PAINFULLY obvious clarification on a policy. Or in other words, in line with what everyone else has said. Pixelated is leaning town. He's had more posts and has given reads on sqrt and Valenius, but the main crux of their points have been similar to what OK and others in the thread have said (not much to be said this early into the game, however). He was however the first to defend OK's post (outside of OK), and rightly so. If we're continuing with the Cavalinho lynch, it is...unlikely for them to simultaneously bandwagon on a possible lynch and defend the person in question. Show nested quote + - His position on Cavalinho is inconsistently soft wrt the rest of his list. Notice the "almost" above -- the one big exception is the guy that I personally think is obviously scum. He does some lip service to the idea (e.g. "these things should mark him clear scum"), but then handwaves every point he raises for Cavalinho on a shaky meta argument (e.g. "mark him as clear scum, but... might just be his playstyle). He says Cavalinho is "maybe the most scummiest read he has"*, but then declares sqrt his "probable" lynch target today. There's a lot of waffling on Cavalinho that isn't present with the others. (PREVIEW EDIT: Even concedes the case is strong, but still has sqrt as his top suspect. p l s) This is again going off of my experience with Cavalinho in LII, though the more you prod, the more I think you may be right about me softballing Cavalinho. I may be trying to discern too much off meta, and am letting how LII Day 1 went color my view of the game and his (pretty scummy) actions too much. Show nested quote + - His rationale for sqrt is weak. Of a handful of inactives so far he's singling out one post of sqrt's (the "I've never drawn mafia" post) as the thing that's so disconcerting to him? Already zeroed in on sqrt being a scum lurker and wants to lynch him over aforesaid "maybe most scummiest read"*? That's just strange to me because nothing that sqrt has done has been alignment-indicative yet. As I EXPLICITLY note, it was posted AFTER the serious posting began, and AFTER IAmRobik's wtf on OK. The timestamp is key: if it were before that, and even OK's post, whatever. idgaf because that was part of the joke phase. That's what I find the most disconcerting of his posting, versus Valenius (whose post at least addressed something serious). Show nested quote + - Preview edit point: That last question is such a softball! Ideal to ask your fake scum read and your scum buddy, terrible as town. Why wouldn't he ask about the things Cavalinho and sqrt are doing that makes them suspicious to him? My main issue with sqrt again is the timing of his post and decision to start lurking at that juncture, which makes me far more leery of him over Valenius. Look at the time stamps: 3.5 hours between OK's post and Valenius's question and his sleep post, 4 minutes between Robik's wtf post and his highlighted post, and 11 minutes between the post I highlighted and his sleep post. Certainly there's time to post...something serious? When we had clearly moved past the jokes votes? Putting him among my top scum reads is/was a means to pressure him into posting something of value and see if he posts anything that makes me pursue that line of inquiry. Similarly, the main thing which Cavalinho isn't doing is giving anything of substance in his posts. This is also why I was posting a full reads list, to see if there was any piggybacking going on. The fuck? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 20:33 Pixalated wrote: What. If you are scumbaiting why are you revealing your trap before they even have the chance to fall for it? woah...to clarify, this is what I meant when I wrote "the fuck" regarding LT's post...i responded before I even finished reading the rest of LT's post | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 01:44 sqrtofneg1 wrote: + Show Spoiler + Okay, going down the filter list. OnceKing brings up policy. I kind of disagree with bringing it up so early, but I think it was a town mindset that he did it. I read town. Eden is clearly town. Val hasn't been doing much, other than questioning the lurker policy, (kind of like me) so no read on him. LT clears Val in this post: On March 26 2014 19:13 Lord Tolkien wrote: I still need to read the LIII mafia game thoroughly. However. OnceKing sounds town as all fk. I was originally suspicious of his initial "serious" post due to OK's early Day 1 behavior versus early Day 1 LII newbie mafia game and was going to comment on it, but I re-read the old thread and reversed my initial opinion on it (originally thought it was inconsistent, but I reread his case on Amiko and it didn't mention the lurker lynch policy). He's been pushing town towards active discussion since then, asking for reads, and generally steering conversation towards positive goals, so he's establishing himself as town thus far. IAmRobik also feels town to me, though I still question why he feels OK's post is out of place given the context (unless it was scumbait, that was my first thought). The post is still useful pressure and discussion for town, though, and there is no reason for scum to be so forward, so early on in the day, especially with the possible game-states (no godfather game-state). And his posts subsequent read fairly town. Valenius is super town in my eyes, he's cleared for me. Pixelated is neutral or slightly scummy to me. Eden feels even more town for me. He's actively pushing the Cavalinho case and scumhunting aggressively in Day 1, while being the most active contributor to the thread thus far. Clearest town poster in my mind, as he's giving reasoned arguments here. Cavalinho sounds...well, aggressive in all his posts. And he's OMGUSing without presenting a case, period. But given his past game behavior, he also does this when he's town so I'm not sure if my scrumread on him is wrong. Like, this is almost a repeat of LII Day 1 in terms of the Cavalinho lynch progression, however without any substance from him. I'm leaving him as possible scum atm tho I'm confused by it. Maybe the most scummiest read I have, even his past town play aside. Like and should mark him as clear scum, but...might just be his playstyle. Show nested quote + I also happen to think his OMGUS vote is him trying to look innocent because he's aware of his meta (not the post beforehand he noted that Robik townread him in a previous game because he OMGUS'd then), but that can go either way. What's telling is that he fails to develop his vote, he just puts it down and insists it'll be me or him today. That's dumb and not what a town player should be doing. This is actually a strong analysis of what I was trying to say. You know what, Cavalinho isn't angry and pissed off enough to have the righteous indignation like his LII newbie game, nor still tries to contribute. Or hell, contribute an actual case for his OMGUSing. sqrtofneg1 has thus far been fairly disconcerting to me. I indulged him with the Hearthstone convo, and I think that's irrelevant to the thread thus far. It was a fair shot at getting something going, if inflating his filter/post. After the first actual serious post to pop up Day 1 (the OK policy lynch), he posted this and didn't respond to the looming topic at hand, then had a sleep post. Like, its non-contributive lurking at best. There was definitely things available to comment on at the time of his sleep post. Hell, by the time of that post, IAmRobik had already made his wtf post about OnceKing's lynch policy post. It piggybacks off IAmRobik's joke posts, but he at least follows up with substance after there's clearly something to respond to. He still has time to become an active contributor, but seems to be a scum lurker to me. Probably my primary lynch target today because I'm still fking confused by the signals given off by Cavalinho's playstyle and posting patterns. Show nested quote + On March 26 2014 13:31 IAmRobik wrote: RE: Sqrt In what world does a mafia come into the game and start talking to himself for 10 posts? Mafia has all the reason in the world to sit back and not do shit and contribute when something is happening and then push some random town who is on the chopping blocks. I don't give a damn if it was 10 posts of filler about how he's doing today and how his HS run was going. The exact same reason you were pushing on OK for: because it's good to make the appearance of contribution. idgaf about the HS posts too much, but the fact he continued the joke posting and made a sleep post before contributing anything useful makes me unhappy. Quick point to RolandJarvis before the plunge, that was a continued joke post. I was jokingly referencing the LII newbie game where I was OMGUSing OK hard for focusing on me Day 1 (mostly for some inconsistencies in his case). Posted that and the correction right as OK was posting the policy lynch post (note the policy lynch post being nestled between that post and the edit), which is the first serious post of the game, which should have been a clue. I'm overall happy with your contribution, however, and I would recommend you read the LII newbie game, since quite a few of the players here were in that game (and should give you a general idea of our playstyles as town (I think all of us present played as town that game), so you can get a feel for us. You voiced the concern about OK only voicing his read on IAmRobik, but his playstyle is (at least, going off his LII and stated gameplay) to only give his strongest reads. So this isn't inconsistent or scummy for me, just how he plays. Just like how Cavalinho still confuses the fk out of me. Or you might have and the mistaken use of punctuation in the post confused you. Overall, I'm quite happy with the way this thread activity has been. no ded gaem Also, my sleep schedule is fked up, so I may be responding at odd times such as this. Even though he hasn't done anything. Why would he do that? But wait, there's more. His next post is this: On March 26 2014 20:31 Lord Tolkien wrote: Show nested quote + - Reads on Valenius and Pixalated. ...how? Valenius asked some good questions to develop OnceKing's policy, but that's all. Certainly a good start but not nearly enough to declare him "super town" or "cleared." Especially in light of the fact that he said Pixalated is neutral-to-scummy... I have Pixalated as neutral-to-town if anything, but to be honest they've done virtually the same thing here (not post much, make solid contributions where they did). There's a lack of explanation for either read, which on its own doesn't say much, but... ZzZ. I knew I should've tried posting that part some other time. Or maybe I should've approached it with more subtlety (see: any subtlety at all). Was trying to scumbait with it when questioning Cavalinho and sqrt. Was trying to see if they would piggyback off of it. Went back and deleted those sections specifically to try. My true reads: Valenius leans town at best. I'm hesitant to call him anything at this stage of the game, when his only post is at best asking for a PAINFULLY obvious clarification on a policy. Or in other words, in line with what everyone else has said. Pixelated is leaning town. He's had more posts and has given reads on sqrt and Valenius, but the main crux of their points have been similar to what OK and others in the thread have said (not much to be said this early into the game, however). He was however the first to defend OK's post (outside of OK), and rightly so. If we're continuing with the Cavalinho lynch, it is...unlikely for them to simultaneously bandwagon on a possible lynch and defend the person in question. Show nested quote + - His position on Cavalinho is inconsistently soft wrt the rest of his list. Notice the "almost" above -- the one big exception is the guy that I personally think is obviously scum. He does some lip service to the idea (e.g. "these things should mark him clear scum"), but then handwaves every point he raises for Cavalinho on a shaky meta argument (e.g. "mark him as clear scum, but... might just be his playstyle). He says Cavalinho is "maybe the most scummiest read he has"*, but then declares sqrt his "probable" lynch target today. There's a lot of waffling on Cavalinho that isn't present with the others. (PREVIEW EDIT: Even concedes the case is strong, but still has sqrt as his top suspect. p l s) This is again going off of my experience with Cavalinho in LII, though the more you prod, the more I think you may be right about me softballing Cavalinho. I may be trying to discern too much off meta, and am letting how LII Day 1 went color my view of the game and his (pretty scummy) actions too much. Show nested quote + - His rationale for sqrt is weak. Of a handful of inactives so far he's singling out one post of sqrt's (the "I've never drawn mafia" post) as the thing that's so disconcerting to him? Already zeroed in on sqrt being a scum lurker and wants to lynch him over aforesaid "maybe most scummiest read"*? That's just strange to me because nothing that sqrt has done has been alignment-indicative yet. As I EXPLICITLY note, it was posted AFTER the serious posting began, and AFTER IAmRobik's wtf on OK. The timestamp is key: if it were before that, and even OK's post, whatever. idgaf because that was part of the joke phase. That's what I find the most disconcerting of his posting, versus Valenius (whose post at least addressed something serious). Show nested quote + - Preview edit point: That last question is such a softball! Ideal to ask your fake scum read and your scum buddy, terrible as town. Why wouldn't he ask about the things Cavalinho and sqrt are doing that makes them suspicious to him? My main issue with sqrt again is the timing of his post and decision to start lurking at that juncture, which makes me far more leery of him over Valenius. Look at the time stamps: 3.5 hours between OK's post and Valenius's question and his sleep post, 4 minutes between Robik's wtf post and his highlighted post, and 11 minutes between the post I highlighted and his sleep post. Certainly there's time to post...something serious? When we had clearly moved past the jokes votes? Putting him among my top scum reads is/was a means to pressure him into posting something of value and see if he posts anything that makes me pursue that line of inquiry. Similarly, the main thing which Cavalinho isn't doing is giving anything of substance in his posts. This is also why I was posting a full reads list, to see if there was any piggybacking going on. He demotes Val to leaning town. Maybe he now realizes that he was too obvious in pushing Val for town. If he's mafia, Val's also mafia. + Show Spoiler + He also makes a scumtrap that's horribly planned out. Top mafia in my eyes. Robik's playing aggressive, as he normally does. He's been pressuring pretty much everybody, as a town should do. The one thing that I don't like is that he got a town read on my on joke posts before the game. that's strange. I read town. Pixalated is probably town. He's trying to logically put together the picture, and he's a bit quiet. He's suspicious of the right guys, he's cleared the right guys. I say town, with blue role. The blue role is because he's quiet. Cav seems mafia, with the same reasons as Robik and Eden. RJ is town, good reads, good logic. So it's either Cav + someone who I misread, or LT and Val. I disagree with this assessment. I think that he demotes Val to "leaning town" to give himself an "out" in case he needs to vote for Val later. Thus if LT is in fact mafia, I think that Val is more likely town. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 02:36 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 27 2014 02:32 IAmRobik wrote: On March 27 2014 01:44 sqrtofneg1 wrote: + Show Spoiler + Okay, going down the filter list. OnceKing brings up policy. I kind of disagree with bringing it up so early, but I think it was a town mindset that he did it. I read town. Eden is clearly town. Val hasn't been doing much, other than questioning the lurker policy, (kind of like me) so no read on him. LT clears Val in this post: On March 26 2014 19:13 Lord Tolkien wrote: I still need to read the LIII mafia game thoroughly. However. OnceKing sounds town as all fk. I was originally suspicious of his initial "serious" post due to OK's early Day 1 behavior versus early Day 1 LII newbie mafia game and was going to comment on it, but I re-read the old thread and reversed my initial opinion on it (originally thought it was inconsistent, but I reread his case on Amiko and it didn't mention the lurker lynch policy). He's been pushing town towards active discussion since then, asking for reads, and generally steering conversation towards positive goals, so he's establishing himself as town thus far. IAmRobik also feels town to me, though I still question why he feels OK's post is out of place given the context (unless it was scumbait, that was my first thought). The post is still useful pressure and discussion for town, though, and there is no reason for scum to be so forward, so early on in the day, especially with the possible game-states (no godfather game-state). And his posts subsequent read fairly town. Valenius is super town in my eyes, he's cleared for me. Pixelated is neutral or slightly scummy to me. Eden feels even more town for me. He's actively pushing the Cavalinho case and scumhunting aggressively in Day 1, while being the most active contributor to the thread thus far. Clearest town poster in my mind, as he's giving reasoned arguments here. Cavalinho sounds...well, aggressive in all his posts. And he's OMGUSing without presenting a case, period. But given his past game behavior, he also does this when he's town so I'm not sure if my scrumread on him is wrong. Like, this is almost a repeat of LII Day 1 in terms of the Cavalinho lynch progression, however without any substance from him. I'm leaving him as possible scum atm tho I'm confused by it. Maybe the most scummiest read I have, even his past town play aside. Like and should mark him as clear scum, but...might just be his playstyle. Show nested quote + I also happen to think his OMGUS vote is him trying to look innocent because he's aware of his meta (not the post beforehand he noted that Robik townread him in a previous game because he OMGUS'd then), but that can go either way. What's telling is that he fails to develop his vote, he just puts it down and insists it'll be me or him today. That's dumb and not what a town player should be doing. This is actually a strong analysis of what I was trying to say. You know what, Cavalinho isn't angry and pissed off enough to have the righteous indignation like his LII newbie game, nor still tries to contribute. Or hell, contribute an actual case for his OMGUSing. sqrtofneg1 has thus far been fairly disconcerting to me. I indulged him with the Hearthstone convo, and I think that's irrelevant to the thread thus far. It was a fair shot at getting something going, if inflating his filter/post. After the first actual serious post to pop up Day 1 (the OK policy lynch), he posted this and didn't respond to the looming topic at hand, then had a sleep post. Like, its non-contributive lurking at best. There was definitely things available to comment on at the time of his sleep post. Hell, by the time of that post, IAmRobik had already made his wtf post about OnceKing's lynch policy post. It piggybacks off IAmRobik's joke posts, but he at least follows up with substance after there's clearly something to respond to. He still has time to become an active contributor, but seems to be a scum lurker to me. Probably my primary lynch target today because I'm still fking confused by the signals given off by Cavalinho's playstyle and posting patterns. Show nested quote + On March 26 2014 13:31 IAmRobik wrote: RE: Sqrt In what world does a mafia come into the game and start talking to himself for 10 posts? Mafia has all the reason in the world to sit back and not do shit and contribute when something is happening and then push some random town who is on the chopping blocks. I don't give a damn if it was 10 posts of filler about how he's doing today and how his HS run was going. The exact same reason you were pushing on OK for: because it's good to make the appearance of contribution. idgaf about the HS posts too much, but the fact he continued the joke posting and made a sleep post before contributing anything useful makes me unhappy. Quick point to RolandJarvis before the plunge, that was a continued joke post. I was jokingly referencing the LII newbie game where I was OMGUSing OK hard for focusing on me Day 1 (mostly for some inconsistencies in his case). Posted that and the correction right as OK was posting the policy lynch post (note the policy lynch post being nestled between that post and the edit), which is the first serious post of the game, which should have been a clue. I'm overall happy with your contribution, however, and I would recommend you read the LII newbie game, since quite a few of the players here were in that game (and should give you a general idea of our playstyles as town (I think all of us present played as town that game), so you can get a feel for us. You voiced the concern about OK only voicing his read on IAmRobik, but his playstyle is (at least, going off his LII and stated gameplay) to only give his strongest reads. So this isn't inconsistent or scummy for me, just how he plays. Just like how Cavalinho still confuses the fk out of me. Or you might have and the mistaken use of punctuation in the post confused you. Overall, I'm quite happy with the way this thread activity has been. no ded gaem Also, my sleep schedule is fked up, so I may be responding at odd times such as this. Even though he hasn't done anything. Why would he do that? But wait, there's more. His next post is this: On March 26 2014 20:31 Lord Tolkien wrote: Show nested quote + - Reads on Valenius and Pixalated. ...how? Valenius asked some good questions to develop OnceKing's policy, but that's all. Certainly a good start but not nearly enough to declare him "super town" or "cleared." Especially in light of the fact that he said Pixalated is neutral-to-scummy... I have Pixalated as neutral-to-town if anything, but to be honest they've done virtually the same thing here (not post much, make solid contributions where they did). There's a lack of explanation for either read, which on its own doesn't say much, but... ZzZ. I knew I should've tried posting that part some other time. Or maybe I should've approached it with more subtlety (see: any subtlety at all). Was trying to scumbait with it when questioning Cavalinho and sqrt. Was trying to see if they would piggyback off of it. Went back and deleted those sections specifically to try. My true reads: Valenius leans town at best. I'm hesitant to call him anything at this stage of the game, when his only post is at best asking for a PAINFULLY obvious clarification on a policy. Or in other words, in line with what everyone else has said. Pixelated is leaning town. He's had more posts and has given reads on sqrt and Valenius, but the main crux of their points have been similar to what OK and others in the thread have said (not much to be said this early into the game, however). He was however the first to defend OK's post (outside of OK), and rightly so. If we're continuing with the Cavalinho lynch, it is...unlikely for them to simultaneously bandwagon on a possible lynch and defend the person in question. Show nested quote + - His position on Cavalinho is inconsistently soft wrt the rest of his list. Notice the "almost" above -- the one big exception is the guy that I personally think is obviously scum. He does some lip service to the idea (e.g. "these things should mark him clear scum"), but then handwaves every point he raises for Cavalinho on a shaky meta argument (e.g. "mark him as clear scum, but... might just be his playstyle). He says Cavalinho is "maybe the most scummiest read he has"*, but then declares sqrt his "probable" lynch target today. There's a lot of waffling on Cavalinho that isn't present with the others. (PREVIEW EDIT: Even concedes the case is strong, but still has sqrt as his top suspect. p l s) This is again going off of my experience with Cavalinho in LII, though the more you prod, the more I think you may be right about me softballing Cavalinho. I may be trying to discern too much off meta, and am letting how LII Day 1 went color my view of the game and his (pretty scummy) actions too much. Show nested quote + - His rationale for sqrt is weak. Of a handful of inactives so far he's singling out one post of sqrt's (the "I've never drawn mafia" post) as the thing that's so disconcerting to him? Already zeroed in on sqrt being a scum lurker and wants to lynch him over aforesaid "maybe most scummiest read"*? That's just strange to me because nothing that sqrt has done has been alignment-indicative yet. As I EXPLICITLY note, it was posted AFTER the serious posting began, and AFTER IAmRobik's wtf on OK. The timestamp is key: if it were before that, and even OK's post, whatever. idgaf because that was part of the joke phase. That's what I find the most disconcerting of his posting, versus Valenius (whose post at least addressed something serious). Show nested quote + - Preview edit point: That last question is such a softball! Ideal to ask your fake scum read and your scum buddy, terrible as town. Why wouldn't he ask about the things Cavalinho and sqrt are doing that makes them suspicious to him? My main issue with sqrt again is the timing of his post and decision to start lurking at that juncture, which makes me far more leery of him over Valenius. Look at the time stamps: 3.5 hours between OK's post and Valenius's question and his sleep post, 4 minutes between Robik's wtf post and his highlighted post, and 11 minutes between the post I highlighted and his sleep post. Certainly there's time to post...something serious? When we had clearly moved past the jokes votes? Putting him among my top scum reads is/was a means to pressure him into posting something of value and see if he posts anything that makes me pursue that line of inquiry. Similarly, the main thing which Cavalinho isn't doing is giving anything of substance in his posts. This is also why I was posting a full reads list, to see if there was any piggybacking going on. He demotes Val to leaning town. Maybe he now realizes that he was too obvious in pushing Val for town. If he's mafia, Val's also mafia. + Show Spoiler + He also makes a scumtrap that's horribly planned out. Top mafia in my eyes. Robik's playing aggressive, as he normally does. He's been pressuring pretty much everybody, as a town should do. The one thing that I don't like is that he got a town read on my on joke posts before the game. that's strange. I read town. Pixalated is probably town. He's trying to logically put together the picture, and he's a bit quiet. He's suspicious of the right guys, he's cleared the right guys. I say town, with blue role. The blue role is because he's quiet. Cav seems mafia, with the same reasons as Robik and Eden. RJ is town, good reads, good logic. So it's either Cav + someone who I misread, or LT and Val. I disagree with this assessment. I think that he demotes Val to "leaning town" to give himself an "out" in case he needs to vote for Val later. Thus if LT is in fact mafia, I think that Val is more likely town. Hmm, but why would he call Val as town in the first place? I mean... he has to townread people as either alignment. I'm not him. I don't know why he makes the reads/plays he makes. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 02:50 Valenius wrote: ##Unvote doesn't make much sense to keep that vote on considering we've progressed past Hearthstone talk. speaking of which...I just wanna get home and play HS. This stupid "work" thing keeps getting in the way of my fun! | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 03:14 Cavalinho wrote: Here are the few reads that I've managed to gather thus far: You can get my Eden read from above. If LT is town, then Eden is almost certainly mafia due to the way he pushes information and pounces an anything he perceives as weakness. It looks like he's more concerned with finding loopholes in reasoning rather than finding the mindset behind the moves players are making. While this can be construed as scumhunting, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is just because he looks busy. I'll admit, my own play has started somewhat sloppily and I think that his push was warranted...for a time. It looks like he's more concerned with making himself right rather than finding the right answer. There's also the point that he's actually started skimming my posts and then ignoring what I'm saying. This can be a mistake, but considering the way he so aggressively goes after certain information (and then ignoring what he finds) doesn't lead me to believe so. That being said, the points Eden brings up against LT make a whole lot of sense. LT's read on me is bosh. He says I'm practically confirmed mafia because I wanted someone to clarify something before I answered their question...What is that? Is that even a thing? I don't think that Val has really done enough to warrant being cleared as town, either. (Though Robik has done the same, and I generally think Robik comes up with pretty solid reads.) LT is scummy, and not just because he thinks I'm scum (which, considering the way this thread is going, is really saying something). OnceKing is pretty clear town to me. I thought he had a strong town game before, and I think he has one now. Policy lynch weirdness aside, it's clear that he made those posts with a town agenda in mind and that he's done plenty to keep us occupied in trying to solve the game's mystery. His questioning is solid and his logic is pretty easy to follow. I like it. Sqrt leans town for similar reasons. He doesn't thrust himself into the spotlight like OK does, but it seems like he's pretty focused on finding the right kinds of information. I don't think I have any real reasons to suspect him of anything right now. Pixelated is slightly town. I've already put together why the initial case against me was derp, but all he has said was "I don't think that's good enough." That's...not a good answer. At all. It's like he's just set on it (which is silly for a town player, because nobody has perfect information except mafia) and not particularly willing to backtrack on anything. Despite this, he's actively looking for information and stuff. Valenius is null, in case I didn't already make that particularly clear from my earlier reads. I don't think he has done a whole lot yet and looking through his filter leads me to believe that he's either genuinely AWOL or he's trying to lay low. Time will tell. Robik is town. Another player thrusting themselves into the spotlight, giving reads and generally doing shit that generally gets done in games. Is confirmed best player. Roland is null. I want to wait more before giving a read on him, because I already know I'm the kind of guy that likes to OMGUS and I feel like if I gave one now that it would be influenced by my confrontational mindset. (Though his read on Robik is actually kinda funny in the sense that, yeah, mafia probably wouldn't do that.) I want to elaborate more, but some people haven't even gotten to a two page filter yet. More information, specifically from LT, would be great right now. If Eden and LT are never mafia together and Eden's case on LT is good, then why don't you come to the conclusion that Eden is town? What am I missing? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 04:46 OnceKing wrote: Show nested quote + On March 27 2014 04:42 Eden1892 wrote: On March 27 2014 03:21 OnceKing wrote: I need LT to respond to Eden's five points, then. I don't and won't presume to speak for him and my estimation that he made an honest mistake might be biased from LII. Valenius seems to have an idea, though. So Valenius, I'd like you to respond to Eden's points too, as well as give your thoughts on Cav/Eden! Who is your partner and why is it Lord Tolkein? You're my partner because you're Lord Tolkien! This is a really weird interaction and I don't know what to make of it. Eden says he thinks OK is town or at least leaning town for his lynch all lurkers thing. Now he's asking who his partner is. I'm sure I'm just missing something here, but I'd love an explanation. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
1) I think that most people who have read the game so far have you (and kinda sorta Roland) as town. The fact that he's unwilling to put you on that list shows me that he's at least contemplating other scenarios -- I personally have started to get nervous regarding you. It's not enough for me to not call you town, but I am just nervous. It was this from Cavalinho: Eden is almost certainly mafia due to the way he pushes information and pounces an anything he perceives as weakness It does kinda feel like you're jumping on everything that could be perceived as scummy. I think you've been kinda reluctant to call people town, and have sorta backed your way into it. It's easier as mafia to just call everyone mafia than to call everyone town. It honestly could just be your style of pressuring people and then coming up with a conclusion based on their answers, but yeah. IDK. You're almost certainly town. I'm probably just paranoid. 2) The whole tone of his post just reads townie to me. While I might not agree with all of his conclusions, it seems that he's trying to solve the game and he's trying to find reasons to think certain people are town and certain people are scummy and he's really easy to follow...his post flows well. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 06:22 OnceKing wrote: whoa. Now there's an interesting vote count, but what's more interesting to me is the people who haven't voted yet. Valenius - you haven't casted a vote yet. Why are you not voting for Cavalinho? Robik - you've been one of the most vocal players today and yet you haven't put your name down anywhere. If you were to choose someone by yourself to get lynched right now, who would it be? LT cause I don't like him and i still don't trust you as far as I can spit (which is part of the reason I put out that statement about not liking how many people were pushing on Cavalinho). Like, I don't know what type of hardon Eden has for you but all I see is you asking questions and giving no opinions of your own. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 06:55 sqrtofneg1 wrote: The neutral read was from before he did his reads, and after he posted his reads, I didn't change my read because the reads really wasn't anything new. can you english | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 22:39 RolandJarvis wrote: There were some posts saying... hey that's too many votes on Cavalinho! nobody is defending Cavalinho! ...therefore Cavalinho is probably town. I strongly, strongly disagree with this logic. Another contrast with his previous game is Cavalinho had defenders on day 1 of the previous game and has no defenders this game. theDragoon (a mafia) had a strong town read on Cavalinho. When a town is wagoned it's so hard for at least one mafia to resist defending them. They get credibility from being right that they can spend later. "Don't catch a falling knife" I want you to imagine you are a mafia this game and Cavalinho is your partner. Eden and Roland are gunning for Cavalinho. They make substantial cases. They have lots of people calling them town. Cavalinho has a good chance of being lynched. You are going to defend Cavalinho? Really? Like say you think his posts make him town? I don't believe that*. If you are mafia and Cavalinho is your partner you can't defend him. Certainly not when he was the only wagon. * Not that it's physically impossible for that to happen, just that it's very improbable and the assumption of the posts I'm arguing against is that mafia would most likely defend their partner when he's a runaway day 1 wagon. I feel like I may be to blame for the quick push away from Cavalinho as I inserted that seed of doubt regarding the quick formation of that wagon and the lack of opposition to it. I think that the trio of Cavalinho, LT and OK contain both mafia, although OKs post are growing on me as the game has progressed (specifically his last post where he outlines why he thinks Valenius is mafia -- a sentiment I disagree with). Also, everyone calling for me to vote. Chill out. We still have 8hrs in the day. I'm not sure what me voting now versus later will achieve. As long as we are lynching between Cav and LT, I'm happy throwing my vote down on either one of them by the end of the day. Let's just make sure that AT LEAST one of them is a wagon for today. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
This makes me think that pixalated will be bringing up how he perceives people would play based off of the previous newbie game. Will keep reading his filter and see if he brings any of this up: On March 25 2014 15:58 Pixalated wrote: Sup guys, first game here. I did read through a couple of games though (including the previous newbie which some of you played in!) so I should (hopefully) know what I'm doing haha Pixalated makes a reasonable point here, but he doesn't really take a stance on OK. He's very wishy washy with his "conclusion": On March 26 2014 13:02 Pixalated wrote: I don't see any problem with onceking talking about policy. The thread before he came in was all empty and fluff with people talking about hearthstone and whatnot. He pushed the conversation to something that has some relevance to the game. Sure, talking about policy is a good way for scum to 'contribute' without actually doing much, but it's still better than talking about hearthstone. I guess I can see how Pixalated would perceive Valenius's post this way, but as I explained, it had to do with the way that he approached OK's lynch all lurkers sentiments. Maybe I was just tunnely regarding OK earlier which was what made me think that this post was towny. But Valenius makes a long post later which I found town, so I'm cool with him anyway: On March 26 2014 13:08 Pixalated wrote: I also don't see why you think Val is town just because he asked onceking to clarify his shit. It was a pretty useless question, it's easy to understand what onceking wanted to achieve with that post - create the atmosphere that no one can lurk and has to post. But instead all he does is make a rather long post asking about potential situations blabla... When I think that it's pretty clear - if we have a solid read we lynch it, if not we lynch a lurker. Seems like he's trying to be helpful without actually being helpful. I like that he takes a stance on me here. It's perfectly fine for him to not like me, especially if he thinks that OK is leading town in the right direction...having said that, it's kinda weird too, because he said earlier that it's easy to look like you're contributing without actually contributing if you're talkinga bout policy...so maybe he doesn't exactly agree with OK? idk: On March 26 2014 13:47 Pixalated wrote: I don't like how he cleared both sqrt and val. Already explained why I don't feel that Val's questions make him town, and sqrt posting random stuff doesn't mean much. What this means about his alignment I'm not sure. Could be mafia trying to get cred by claiming that people are townie and having 'right' reads when they flip. Pixalated definitely taking stances on people. If LT is mafia, pixalated is almost certainly town for this post: On March 26 2014 20:23 Pixalated wrote: Hey Tolkien, how is Val 'super town in my eyes, he's cleared for me.' He has posted like one post that isn't fluff, and you clear him based off just that? Is that because everyone here is reading him as town for some reason? (I don't see why but okay) I agree with Eden's post about him. Furthermore from what I remember from reading his previous game (the one he mentioned) he was ALOT more active as compared to this. I will go take a peek at his filter there in abit. @Tolkien Why am I neutral/slightly scummy? Elaborate please. Cavalinho doesn't look too good as well. This is really weird for me. Pixalated casually mentions a scum read on Cavalinho a couple posts earlier, but his main focus is LT. He then makes another 2 posts that have somethign to do with LT and then boom, he votes for Cavalinho, sheeping Eden: On March 26 2014 20:41 Pixalated wrote: By the way ##Vote: Cavalinho I agree with Eden's post here + Show Spoiler + OK town, so Cavalinho is either terrible at reading comprehension or trying to distort what I'm saying. Let's review. Again it's not that he said OnceKing's start was weird, it's that he didn't do anything to figure out why it was weird or tell us how it was weird. He asked OK why OK made a post about policy lynching lurkers, OK said it was to get the town out of RVS. That's not weird. Cavalinho didn't bother to respond to him and then kept repeating himself about how weird it was. No explanation as to why or how that's weird, no attempt to develop OK's response, nothing. His questions didn't have any apparent direction or purpose to them. He asked OK why OK made the post, OK gave a good answer aaaand... Cavalinho drops it like a hot potato. No follow up? Nothing? Why are we supposed to be convinced that OK is weird or scum or whatever when you're just asking questions to ask them and not developing any insights from them? He asserts that he was asking questions because he didn't understand what was going on, but you'll notice that he doesn't acknowledge OK's answer at all. Instead he starts playing reactively, answering OK's questions and then dropping the line of discussion. That's not what people do when they're trying to understand what's going on. He vaguely talks around the issue right before I prodded him, saying that he thinks OK's start was still weird, but that he "[doesn't] have any real reason to think [OK] is mafia" because of his "last accusatory post" (what post is this?) and he "seems townie, getting information and generally being one of those obvious town players" (this doesn't actually say anything about why he doesn't think OK is mafia; we know that he wouldn't think that because he thinks OK seems town, why does he?) I also happen to think his OMGUS vote is him trying to look innocent because he's aware of his meta (not the post beforehand he noted that Robik townread him in a previous game because he OMGUS'd then), but that can go either way. What's telling is that he fails to develop his vote, he just puts it down and insists it'll be me or him today. That's dumb and not what a town player should be doing. Cavalinho is my best read for mafia right now. So, I think he's letting LT off the hook really quickly here. Nothing that LT said has really answered Pixalated's questions, and if it has, it's as if Pixalated just takes his word for it at face value. I retract my earlier statement that they can't be mafia together. On March 26 2014 21:53 Pixalated wrote: Still prefer a Cav lynch. I can see what LT means by me posting that on sqrt can constitute as a null read. In fact it matches since his next line is how my points were similar to those already in the thread, and my original point was indeed something that wasn't exactly fresh (Onceking said the same thing) whilst sqrt being a little suspicious (what I said later) wasn't mentioned by anyone else if I recall correctly. The trap thing is still really bad though, and I agree its really suspicious on how fast he revealed it with only me and you pushing him for it so far. Still it sort of makes sense as town to cut his losses on a bad decision, since I believe it would probably have flowed into cav and sqrt simply ignoring his question, and they wouldn't sheep someone under fire. Still a really bad trap of course, but I can sort of see this as really bad town play. I like your point about the time gap between the 'bait' and 'trap' though, and I think thats my biggest gripe with the entire trap thing. I think he agured the point that I brought up about the contradiction I pointed out pretty well, makes sense. Cav on the other hand hasn't done much to redeem himself, and I would like to see more from him. (specifically a GOOD explanation on why he found OK's initial post weird) I expect him to follow up on this. Will see if he does (same goes for bringing up the previous newbie game, which I haven't seen him do yet) On March 27 2014 01:19 Pixalated wrote: I need to sleep so ill be going off. I want to see val and sqrt post more. It has been 18 hours and they haven't done anything of note. Val promised to post something earlier, so I expect to see something when I wake up. I guess it's a bit hypocritical of me to bring this up, but from everything Pixalated is writing it seems that LT is his biggest scum read (his personal biggest scum read, not the one he sheeped off of Eden), but he refuses to vote him: On March 27 2014 09:37 Pixalated wrote: Show nested quote + - The slip in the followup post. I never said anything about whether this is the right or wrong day. Looks to me like lies are piling up on top of lies here. Why are you dodging answering this? Context: this is point 5 of eden's agurement. Here's your answer to it: Show nested quote + 5) You just made a case about my second post being 20 minutes following up my first post. sqrt had 3 and 1/2 hours since VALENIUS posted his question to OK, and 15 minutes to Robik's WTF to OK's post, and had time to make a joke post referencing Robik joking about never being mafia on TL. Perhaps it's just me, but I really dislike that. Conclusions: Pixalated might be scum here. He kinda takes stances on people, but he keeps flipping back and forth. It seems throughout the day that LT is his biggest scum read, but he ends up just sheeping Eden regarding Cav. He keeps pressuring LT but never ends up voting him. Another thing that he does, is make statements like "valeniusa nd sqrt need to post more" and "i read the previous game, but he does nothing with those. He doesn't pressure valenius or sqrt to post more, he doesn't call them out for it again, even though they posted a bit after I guess. But like, I'd expect something along the lines of "hey, so and so posted more, and I guess I like what he's said so I'm gonna lean town on him" or something like that, but he doesn't do it. He also doesn't make inferences from the previous game, which I'd assume he's make if he read it. This makes me think that at times he's just posting for the sake of posting. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 01:37 Eden1892 wrote: Hey Robik, tell me why you haven't voted yet and one significant point of discussion regarding your top two suspects (Cavalinho, Lord Tolkien) that you feel you contributed to the day. I was planning on hammering the shit out of whoever I thought was more mafia at the end of the day if the wagons were close because I trust me to have the hammer than anyone else. As for what I've brought to the table with Cava and LT...well...that doesn't really matter. I actually don't know if I've brought up any new content regarding them, I'd have to reread my posts. What I do know is that I have a pretty large town circle, and I'm happy lynching outside of it, and those two are DEFINITELY outside of it. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 01:49 Cavalinho wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 01:44 IAmRobik wrote: On March 28 2014 01:37 Eden1892 wrote: Hey Robik, tell me why you haven't voted yet and one significant point of discussion regarding your top two suspects (Cavalinho, Lord Tolkien) that you feel you contributed to the day. I was planning on hammering the shit out of whoever I thought was more mafia at the end of the day if the wagons were close because I trust me to have the hammer than anyone else. As for what I've brought to the table with Cava and LT...well...that doesn't really matter. I actually don't know if I've brought up any new content regarding them, I'd have to reread my posts. What I do know is that I have a pretty large town circle, and I'm happy lynching outside of it, and those two are DEFINITELY outside of it. And I'm outside of your town circle because...? 1) You were very reluctant to answer my questions early in the thread. I wanted you to take a stance and you were unwilling to do so. 2) While it's flattering to have someone just agree with me nonstop, I think that you could have been just sheeping the shit out of me. You know that people are going to follow me and thus if OK is town, it's easy for you to just hop on early cause i'm pretty much confirmed GOAT. 3) After I said the thing about there being a lot of votes on you, there was a really really quick and dramatic shift away from you and it was almost as unnerving to me as the original amount of people who DID vote on you. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 01:52 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Here's what I think is really strange. I haven't been posting much, I haven't been acting towny, and yet Robik and Eden have a town read on me. Eden says it's because his scumreads have been after me, but Robik's town read on me is because of early game joke posts. That's strange. I consider people who don't think I'm scum pretty scummy right now. I'm always willing to reevaluate, but when I give out my town reads, I don't give them out willy nilly and I will stand by them as long as I can. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
In Foundations, I gave a town read on ggtemplar for saying "the killing has become the killed." Templar started looking super scummy and I forgot about that statement he made and I was coming around to the idea he could be scum and then all of a sudden, I remembered that I cleared him for the one small phrase that probably doesn't mean anything to anyone else, but to me, that was something that mafia just doesn't have it in them to say, so I offered to cut off my pinky toe if he was mafia....we didn't lynch him that day, even though the vote was close...game ended...he was town. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 02:09 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 02:08 IAmRobik wrote: On March 28 2014 01:52 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Here's what I think is really strange. I haven't been posting much, I haven't been acting towny, and yet Robik and Eden have a town read on me. Eden says it's because his scumreads have been after me, but Robik's town read on me is because of early game joke posts. That's strange. I consider people who don't think I'm scum pretty scummy right now. I'm always willing to reevaluate, but when I give out my town reads, I don't give them out willy nilly and I will stand by them as long as I can. Reevaluate me now, plz. This is stupid. I'm not going to go out of my way to call someone scummy if I think they are town. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 02:04 IAmRobik wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 01:49 Cavalinho wrote: On March 28 2014 01:44 IAmRobik wrote: On March 28 2014 01:37 Eden1892 wrote: Hey Robik, tell me why you haven't voted yet and one significant point of discussion regarding your top two suspects (Cavalinho, Lord Tolkien) that you feel you contributed to the day. I was planning on hammering the shit out of whoever I thought was more mafia at the end of the day if the wagons were close because I trust me to have the hammer than anyone else. As for what I've brought to the table with Cava and LT...well...that doesn't really matter. I actually don't know if I've brought up any new content regarding them, I'd have to reread my posts. What I do know is that I have a pretty large town circle, and I'm happy lynching outside of it, and those two are DEFINITELY outside of it. And I'm outside of your town circle because...? 1) You were very reluctant to answer my questions early in the thread. I wanted you to take a stance and you were unwilling to do so. 2) While it's flattering to have someone just agree with me nonstop, I think that you could have been just sheeping the shit out of me. You know that people are going to follow me and thus if OK is town, it's easy for you to just hop on early cause i'm pretty much confirmed GOAT. 3) After I said the thing about there being a lot of votes on you, there was a really really quick and dramatic shift away from you and it was almost as unnerving to me as the original amount of people who DID vote on you. Hopefully this answers some of your questions. I'll try to answer the rest. You seem to be missing A LOT of things that are happening. Maybe you wanna hold off on this convo until you're back home from class? Cause repeating myself isn't really productive. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 02:34 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 27 2014 23:01 IAmRobik wrote: I think that the trio of Cavalinho, LT and OK contain both mafia, although OKs post are growing on me as the game has progressed (specifically his last post where he outlines why he thinks Valenius is mafia -- a sentiment I disagree with). As long as we are lynching between Cav and LT, I'm happy throwing my vote down on either one of them by the end of the day. Let's just make sure that AT LEAST one of them is a wagon for today. Okay, so obviously this is outdated since you have Pixalated as one scum. Let's assume you drop OnceKing from the list here (you seem to be softening on him). Now you've got one of Cavalinho or Lord Tolkien as the other scum. But! Earlier you said: Show nested quote + On March 27 2014 00:53 IAmRobik wrote: The number of people suspicious of (myself included), and voting for, cavalinho is a bit unnerving. I do agree that he's been the scummiest, but I've yet to see someone defend him (other than maybe LT). IDK. I'm getting the heebie jeebies from this. 1) Do you think Cavalinho is town or scum? 2) If you think Cavalinho is scum, what do you make of the fact that no one was contesting his lynch? 3) If you think Cavalinho is town, then according to your first quote from above, you should think the scum team is Lord Tolkien and Pixalated. If so: (a) How do you rationalize the fact that Pixalated had the correct reaction to Lord Tolkien's trap and subsequent pressure on LT? (b) Why are you by yourself on an outlier when your other scum read is one vote behind your town read? Sigh. I'm such a fucking pushover. 1) scum 2) after i said something about that, there was a HUGE push against him. I think I might have set a trigger for everyone to abandon ship. 3) assuming that cava is town: a) while pixalated's reaction was good -- I myself had the same reaction -- he still ended up following you onto Cava and he has since backtracked off of LT b) I assure you that I will make my vote count. I do think that pixalated is scummy based off of the case that I posted earlier. If people want to follow me on him, that would be fucking great cause he's my best scum read at the moment. If people disagree and it comes down to two others, I will make the proper adjustment in my vote. I don't see why I need to squash a mafia read on someone just because there are two other wagons with 4+ hours left in the day. My goal is to lynch mafia. I didn't remember anything pixalated did this game, so I went back and read his filter and drew the conclusion that he was mafia from it. Thus my vote. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 02:40 Eden1892 wrote: No, that actually doesn't answer my questions at all. Actually it did answer questions 1 and 2, but you clearly are focused on class and not this game, or you just don't give a fuck about reading what I wrote. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 02:40 Eden1892 wrote: No, that actually doesn't answer my questions at all. I guess this is what it feels like to be Cavalinho in a discussion with you. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 02:51 Eden1892 wrote: That was a better series of answers than I expected. Followup: Why would Pixalated follow me onto his scum partner? Also, side question, this one is less pressing but it's sticking out so I figure I'll ask anyway. Why are you so pushy with other people but so soft with me? You almost seem scared of me. Not really GOAT behavior imo. I don't know. Maybe they're not partners together. Maybe it's LT and Pixalated. Maybe it's Cava and LT. I'm not sure what the right answer is to the scum pairing. I definitely can see disconnects with certain people not being mafia together, but I don't want to bring that up yet because it's still d1 and making those types of assessments this early is dangerous. I don't think I'm really pushy with anyone. If you think I'm aggressive towards certain people it's because I want to put pressure on them. I don't think I need to put any pressure on you. I think you are town and I think you're playing well. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 02:52 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 02:44 IAmRobik wrote: On March 28 2014 02:40 Eden1892 wrote: No, that actually doesn't answer my questions at all. Actually it did answer questions 1 and 2, but you clearly are focused on class and not this game, or you just don't give a fuck about reading what I wrote. No, I just wanted hard answers, not soft ones. Yes, I could imply reasonably well what your positions on 1) and 2) were from that sequence. No, I'm not going to do your homework for you. IT WAS THE FUCKING PREVIOUS PAGE. I am not forcing you to go through hundreds of posts of research. I had legitimately JUST answered how I felt about cava and two of the questions you asked were getting me to reiterate myself. How am I supposed to feel? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 03:06 Eden1892 wrote: Additionally, do I have this right as far as your reads go to this point? scum: Cavalinho, Pixalated maybe scum: Lord Tolkien town: all else I know OnceKing might be off-base; you were fine with me moving him to your town pile in my questions but that might have been for sake of discussion. I think the rest is correct based off of reading your filter. Yeah...I'm on the fence leaning scummy with OK. There have been +s for him, moreso of late, but there were a lot of minuses as well. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Also, I hate how quiet the thread got all of a sudden. What happened? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 03:31 OnceKing wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 03:11 RolandJarvis wrote: On March 27 2014 04:46 Valenius wrote: I'll get onto Eden/Roland in a bit, but posting this for now. Quick totem pole. top doesn't mean i think he's confirmed scum, just highest on my list as it stands. Sqrt Cavalinho Pixelated Lord Tolkien OnceKing Robik Idk where roland / eden fit into that yet. By the time Valenius wrote this everybody had cleared eden. I think if he was scum making up reads he'd just join the party calling eden town. But if he's town and hasn't done the iso yet he can't. I'm not feeling a Valenius vote today. Actually I disagree. The list is basically a fancy way to avoid saying what he thinks of Eden and you. Not to mention that he said he'd get back to Eden and he didn't. Where the fuck did you come from? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
##vote LT | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 05:17 Eden1892 wrote: Scum team is Cavalinho and Robik. Cavalinho because he hasn't been scumhunting all game and because he never really addressed the case I built against him back earlier in the day. Case is obvious and has been elaborated on at length, no worries here. Robik because he came in and knocked the Cavalinho lynch off-course, and I later got him to admit Cavalinho was scummier than his target Pixalated (which was a weak target to settle on anyway), but now he's voting for Tolkien who he has as less scummy than Cavalinho. Their interaction at the beginning that I harassed Cavalinho over makes more sense now that I have Robik as the other scum; they were both fishing for an easy case against OnceKing and Cavalinho just followed Robik's lead. I've also been getting a really weird feeling about how Robik comes in acting like this badass at mafia, but whenever he talks to me he's just a monstrous pussy afraid to challenge me. Only makes sense if he's mafia and knows he can't afford to fuck with me. If Cavalinho flips scum then kill Robik tomorrow for sure. If he doesn't then I'll reassess but I'm really confident now in both of them being the scumteam. I ain't gonna sit here and do exactly what you tell me to do. I have my own thoughts and I think that LT is a perfectly good counterwagon to Cavalinho...waymoreso than Val or sqrt. I also came to the realization (as you pointed out) that calavinho and pixalated are not mafia together, but both can be mafia with LT. So go suck a dick, or be a good little sheep and follow me onto LT | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
I can make up the same bullshit about you leading the charge against LT and then seeing that it was getting derailed so you quickly fucking hopped onto another easy fucking wagon. Like fuck that shit. I think all 3 are scummy. I've said it plenty of times. I think that LT can be mafia with both Cav and pix. Can and pix can't be maf together. Best % chance to lynch maf is to lynch LT. QE MOTHA FUCKING D | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 05:43 Eden1892 wrote: zzz I don't care about whether you bm or not, it's not about that. (Although I wish you would, and could without getting warned, because I think it'd be fucking hilarious.) You've been not-a-douche to everyone, that's not the point. Your attitude toward me during the game has definitely been a lot more deferential than it has to the other players. There's a difference between "not bm" and "being deferential." You're scared of challenging me because I put the press on you early and it shows. Town!Robik wouldn't be afraid to challenge me. Why do you give a shit about me getting on an easy wagon if you're sure that wagon is scum? You know there's no way in hell that Cavalinho and I are the scumteam. THE WHOLE POINT IS THAT YOUR CASE ON ME IS FUCKING TERRIBLE AND YOU NEED TO STOP. I DIDN'T DERAIL SHIT. I MADE A CASE AGAINST PIXAL...EVERYONE IS FUCKING OVERLOOKING IT. THAT'S STUPID. I THINK CAVA IS MAF. I DON'T LIKE THE OTHER TWO TOP WAGONS, SO I VOTED ANOTHER TOP WAGON WHICH WAS LT. I ALSO THINK THAT IT MAKES SENSE FOR HIM TO BE MAFIA WITH EITHER ONE OF CAVA AND PIXAL WHICH MAKES LT A FUCKING AMAZING LYNCH FOR TODAY. I already explained why I haven't gone on you like I went onto other people. I didn't do that with Roland either cause I think Roland is town. He's also fairly vocal. I also didn't do that to sqrt, who isn't as vocal but also listed me as scummy. You're just noticing this because it's something that is about you. You're not basing this off of how I react to everyone who has done the same thing. This is fucking pointless though cause I fucking think you're town. So can you fucking stop. I'm town. Having these shitty, far out theories about my play is not fucking beneficial. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
/s? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 06:11 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 06:06 IAmRobik wrote: I refuse to talk about this claim other than that we're not lynching him. It should be blatantly obvious why talking about the claim is really fucking bad. ...no? We're lynching Cavalinho. That's plain fact looking at the votes right now. The only wrong answer here is refusing to answer. Or you change onto LT and we don't lynch a cop claim and let it resolve itself. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
I know I'm gonna look like absolute fucking shit if he flips mafia, but I don't really give a fuck. This is beyond fucking terrible. I guess there's no fucking point to withhold why you don't lynch a cop claim. 1) if mafia don't kill him and he's real, then he gets checks. 2) if he's mafia and he doesn't die at some point we'll figure out that he's mafia 3) if he's cop and mafia kill him then we don't fucking waste a lynch. That's what I fucking meant by it will resolve itself. Also, there an offchance for a counter claim and we would have even more information. Anyway. this is bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad. I almost want to policy lynch Eden for this shit and like seriously. Eden. Go back to whatever shithole mafia site you came from cause you don't deserve to ever play another game with me again. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Hope I fucking get n1'd again. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 07:15 Eden1892 wrote: As for reads I'm sticking with Robik as mafia, the behavioral tells at the end here look really bad. The complete 180 from "you're good town Eden" to "fuck you you don't deserve the privilege of playing with me ever again you useless shit" because I decided I didn't believe him cannot possibly be town. I draw no new information from his protection of the parity cop for the same reason we had to lynch Cavalinho to confirm his claim -- the parity cop claim can't work itself out in a game with nine people, so the mafia has no reason to fear it, and has strong incentive to come out in defense of the claimant. I could equally argue, on this particular point, that Robik is town and made the correct read on Cavalinho, or that Robik is mafia trying to get town credit for making the ostensibly "correct" play in protecting a PR claim. So in absence of that I'm returning to my previous behavioral analysis. I think he's mafia. This clears Tolkien and Pixalated to me because there's no reason why mafia!Robik would push mafia!Tolkien or mafia!Pixalated over town!Cavalinho that hard, imo. I'm also pretty confident about OnceKing and Jarvis being town. The final mafia there would be sqrt or Valenius, and my bet would be Valenius simply because I don't think mafia!Robik would just town clear sqrt for nothing *and* that sqrt would call it out and demand he revise his read. Are you actually mafia? Like you're legitimately twisting things around to fit whatever agenda you're trying to push with regards to me. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 07:30 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 07:27 IAmRobik wrote: On March 28 2014 07:15 Eden1892 wrote: As for reads I'm sticking with Robik as mafia, the behavioral tells at the end here look really bad. The complete 180 from "you're good town Eden" to "fuck you you don't deserve the privilege of playing with me ever again you useless shit" because I decided I didn't believe him cannot possibly be town. I draw no new information from his protection of the parity cop for the same reason we had to lynch Cavalinho to confirm his claim -- the parity cop claim can't work itself out in a game with nine people, so the mafia has no reason to fear it, and has strong incentive to come out in defense of the claimant. I could equally argue, on this particular point, that Robik is town and made the correct read on Cavalinho, or that Robik is mafia trying to get town credit for making the ostensibly "correct" play in protecting a PR claim. So in absence of that I'm returning to my previous behavioral analysis. I think he's mafia. This clears Tolkien and Pixalated to me because there's no reason why mafia!Robik would push mafia!Tolkien or mafia!Pixalated over town!Cavalinho that hard, imo. I'm also pretty confident about OnceKing and Jarvis being town. The final mafia there would be sqrt or Valenius, and my bet would be Valenius simply because I don't think mafia!Robik would just town clear sqrt for nothing *and* that sqrt would call it out and demand he revise his read. Are you actually mafia? Like you're legitimately twisting things around to fit whatever agenda you're trying to push with regards to me. Explain to me how going from Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 02:53 IAmRobik wrote: I think you are town and I think you're playing well. to Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 06:59 IAmRobik wrote: Anyway. this is bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad. I almost want to policy lynch Eden for this shit and like seriously. Eden. Go back to whatever shithole mafia site you came from cause you don't deserve to ever play another game with me again. because I started disagreeing with you is at all town behavior. If that's not what you're referencing, then explain how I'm twisting anything around, because that's the only part that's remotely contentious about what I said. I said your actions re: the cop claimant are null and they aren't a factor in my read, so there's no twisting of that set of actions going on, and everything else is derivative from my scumread on you. This is 100% inaccurate. The majority of your premise for me being mafia is that I was defending my partner. Clearly that's not the fucking case as Cavalinho wasn't mafia. It's also not the case because I DIDN'T FUCKING DEFEND CAVALINHO UNTIL HE FUCKING CLAIMED COP. I don't care what game your playing or what fucking world you live in, but you don't fucking lynch a cop claim in that spot. You were town in my eyes when you weren't fucking blatantly lying and shoving false truths down people's throats, but now it's readily apparent that you are just trying to push your own agenda, which clearly involved killing someone who claimed cop. I expressed that I didn't know whether he was or not, but that wasn't up for fucking discussion and that we should look elsewhere on that offchance that he was. Hey look, you're a fucking trashcan and because you had clout you got the cop lynched with your fucking stupid questioning of people and your not so sublte jibs at his validity. I don't see why in fucks name you would play the game the way you're playing it at this point if you're town. THAT'S why my attitude changed regarding you. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 07:32 Eden1892 wrote: More telling is the fact that five people voted to kill cop claimant Cavalinho. Of those five, Robik has singled me out for it, and in the process did a complete 180. The correlation here, of course, is that I'm the only player of the five that's scumreading him. It's obvious what's really motivating him here. He's mafia, and caught, and doing everything he can to discredit me. LOL. I CAME AFTER YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE TALKING FUCKING NONSENSE AND BECAUSE YOU WERE THE ONE WHO PUSHED THE HARDEST TO GET CAVALINHO LYNCHED AND NOW YOU'RE TRYING TO PUSH YOUR OWN FUCKING AGENDA WITH REGARDS TO ME. YOU KEEP ALTERING YOUR REASONING FOR WHY I'M MAFIA AND YOU'RE DOING IT TO PUSH A MISLYNCH ON ME. FUCK THAT SHIT. THAT DOESN'T FUCKING FLY IN MY HOUSE! | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 28 2014 23:31 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2014 23:08 IAmRobik wrote: I'm not gonna sit here and argue with people. Night posting is fucking dumb. The rule should be taken out of the game as it only benefits mafia and that's all I'm gonna say for the rest of this cycle...I've already said more than I wanted to last night because I was heated as fuck You should at least state your suspicions in case you're nightkilled. Because the next day you're stuck with the same "WIFOM" that you were bitching about with regards to the cop. You give mafia a chance to make a more informed decision. I don't like it. Not one bit. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 29 2014 01:09 Lord Tolkien wrote: I can only post close to the deadline because of legitimate time constraints tonight, But to Robik and Valenius: Show nested quote + There’s general discussion that people should avoid talking about their reads to avoid directing Mafia’s night kill. This is wrong. Night is the best time to analyze the lynch and the events of the previous day, because after the kill, everyone is going to be focused on the night kill and the previous day will be drowned out. AKA LII Newbie Mafia writeup we all should have read. The correct play is TO be talking about it. Just because someone wrote that doesn't mean I have to agree with it. My first coach told me I'm terrible and that my reads suck. As for Eden talking about night talk being the same as day talk...that's 100% incorrect. Night talk is different because your reads are now adjusted based off of the day flip. Prime example: Eden makes the case at the end of the day: If cava flips mafia, then rob most likely mafia, otherwise rob prolly town. Then if I'm mafia, I can be like, hmmmm, maybe let's keep eden around since he thinks that I'm town based off of the flip, and then eden doesn't die with his thought that i'm actually mafia, as he expressed at the beginning of night phase and instead he comes out gunning for me unexpectedly. And that, my friends, is why night talking is different from day talking. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 29 2014 01:30 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 29 2014 01:23 IAmRobik wrote:As for Eden talking about night talk being the same as day talk...that's 100% incorrect. Night talk is different because your reads are now adjusted based off of the day flip. Prime example: Eden makes the case at the end of the day: If cava flips mafia, then rob most likely mafia, otherwise rob prolly town. Then if I'm mafia, I can be like, hmmmm, maybe let's keep eden around since he thinks that I'm town based off of the flip, and then eden doesn't die with his thought that i'm actually mafia, as he expressed at the beginning of night phase and instead he comes out gunning for me unexpectedly. And that, my friends, is why night talking is different from day talking. This is completely backwards; the optimal thing in that situation would be for you to shoot me, so I die after having said you're town. If I withheld my change of heart on you then my death would send the direct opposite message from what I wanted to send. I don't know what fucking meta level you play on, but if there is someone that is supporting me and I'm mafia, I have full incentive to keep them alive, ESPECIALLY when there's no cop left. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 29 2014 01:43 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 29 2014 01:41 IAmRobik wrote: Man, we could barely use the 48hrs we are allotted for d1. An extra 24hrs of night time is stupid. I'd rather night end after like 8-10 hours and give us another 48hrs with more information to work off of. Well, that's not an option (though I definitely sympathize). Care to help me use the time we do have, even if you think it's stupid that we have it? I'll say this: I disagree with OK's assessment of LT late vote on Cava looking good because why would mafia want to draw attention to themselves. I disagree because if LT is mafia, and he's one of the other wagons, he has to make sure that he's not lynched based off of a late vote-switch based off of the claim. Thus it makes sense for him to make sure that the lead wagon is as far ahead as possible. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 29 2014 01:48 Eden1892 wrote: Okay, that's a good observation. I agree with you in this case; I typically like that heuristic but you're right, there's an overriding incentive for LT to have moved his vote if he's mafia. How much could I get you to tell me about sqrt before the day ends? I still don't follow your townread on him. I'm willing to reevaluate everyone. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
##vote pixalated | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 31 2014 05:17 RolandJarvis wrote: Show nested quote + On March 31 2014 05:14 IAmRobik wrote: Yo ive been out for friends bdays. Im on my phone. Pixalated still mafia. LT prolly mafia for his late jump and the derailment of his wagon was weird. Havent read anything but the first 2-5 posts of the day ##vote pixalated I can't wait for you to catch up. ##unvote: IAmRobik ##vote: Pixalated I dont have to catch up. Iv3 been preaching this since d1. Y'all are idiots for not followijg me. Im getting drunk though so ill talk to yall a tad at night when im at work tomorrow unless you retards decide to CFD me | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Ooookay, so Pixalated wasn't mafia. That sucks. He was scummy as fuck for all the reasons I pointed out on d1. We're in a really shitty spot now as tomorrow is lylo. We MUST lynch correctly. At this point, a lot will depend on the night kill. I presume based off of my inactivity during the weekend, and how wrong I was about pixalated, I'll probably be left alive as a likely mislynch candidate. I guess I have no one to blame for that but myself. It's obvious that my reads this game have no been top notch. I'm gonna have to do some serious soul searching to try to figure out who the 2 mafia are. I don't wanna post too many things, but there are certain individuals who don't look like they're mafia to me, and certain individuals who do look like mafia but don't really make sense as a group. I think everone should read their top 2 suspects and try to determine if those people can be a mafia pair (i did this, and realized that the two I'm thinking are probably not together) | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 31 2014 21:30 RolandJarvis wrote: It still amazes me that neither Robik nor sqrt tried to interact with me at all when they returned yesterday. I was the lead wagon much of the day and that goes away and they have absolutely nothing to say about it. I was gunning for Robik and he didn't even acknowledge that. I talked about sqrt on both sides, he ignored it. But he was around after the reveal? I don't get it. Do you read the thread or do you just post this nonsense? You said "i don't have time for you to catch up" when I clearly had no plan on catching up yesterday. I was out drinking all of saturday and then we woke up and went to brunch of sunday. We came back to my friend's apartment and I was lying on the couch drinking a Racer 5 and watching Wolf of Wall St when I realized that I hadn't posted and that it was imperative for me to do so. So I did to not get modkilled so that we have a chance to win. I had _NO_ idea that you were "gunning for me" | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 00:21 RolandJarvis wrote: To answer your point, it's not the showing up drunk at EOD that's a problem. It's that you made it all the way to EOD without having voted. You just waited until the lynch was decided and made a safe vote. Again. Just like day 1. You see yourself as a leader. This is not the behavior of a town leader and that only leaves one team for ya. 1) you're being a hypocrite cause you didn't vote until EOD either 2) I wasn't around until EOD ... hell. I wasn't even around AT EOD. I was in the thread for less than 5 minutes. I was on my phone. I wasn't reading anything. I just voted who I wanted to vote. I didn't even know what the wagons were and I didn't even stick around to see who was lynched. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 03:12 RolandJarvis wrote: Show nested quote + On April 01 2014 00:26 IAmRobik wrote: On April 01 2014 00:21 RolandJarvis wrote: To answer your point, it's not the showing up drunk at EOD that's a problem. It's that you made it all the way to EOD without having voted. You just waited until the lynch was decided and made a safe vote. Again. Just like day 1. You see yourself as a leader. This is not the behavior of a town leader and that only leaves one team for ya. 1) you're being a hypocrite cause you didn't vote until EOD either 2) I wasn't around until EOD ... hell. I wasn't even around AT EOD. I was in the thread for less than 5 minutes. I was on my phone. I wasn't reading anything. I just voted who I wanted to vote. I didn't even know what the wagons were and I didn't even stick around to see who was lynched. 1) Nope. For one I read the thread (took no time) and gave opinions on most players while the lynch was actually being decided. More importantly though, I haven't put myself out there as an expert and a leader. I am just a guy trying out mafia at team liquid. If I don't like it I just disappear. I could not have less ego invested in this game. You care about your rep here. But you don't care who gets lynched. That is the contradiction that gives you away. 2) You are making my case for me. You had no idea who was being lynched day 2 and you didn't care. You have no responsibility for anything that happened. I understand and agree with you. We disagree about what that means. At some point you are going to have to take a stand on players, starting with me. Which way will you go? I'm pretty sure that I took a stance on everyone in this game. Not sure why you are making false statements about my play and expressing them as 100% facts. I don't care how long it took you to read or catch up. I didn't have time to read or catch up whatsoever this weekend. So I didn't. I voted the person who I thought was the scummiest throughout the game. I had ZERO clue who the wagons were and if there was a push on me, there have been no way for me to stop it. All I knew was that I had to post and I had to vote for the person who I thought was the scummiest. If you're saying that my having a life outside of this game expresses that I don't care a) about this game b) who got lynched, those are both incorrect statements. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
![]() Oh wait. I'm alive!!! List from most town to most scum: Me Val OK sqrt LT ##vote: LT | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 07:23 Valenius wrote: To clarify, I'd like a yes/no from each player, so that i'm not left guessing halfway through tomorrow. Given that people who I would consider the "obvious" kills are dead, I'd guess not | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 07:27 Valenius wrote: Show nested quote + On April 01 2014 07:25 IAmRobik wrote: On April 01 2014 07:23 Valenius wrote: To clarify, I'd like a yes/no from each player, so that i'm not left guessing halfway through tomorrow. Given that people who I would consider the "obvious" kills are dead, I'd guess not Just for clarity, that's a no from you? I'm not doctor either, for the record. That's a negative batman | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 07:43 Valenius wrote: Once / LT - I'd prefer a speedy response from you if possible. It should be early evening for you guys right? Also, if you're doubting why i'm asking, Robik, you can back me up that it's the right play, right? If you're doing what I think you're doing, then I approve. Otherwise, I'm kinda nervous about the implications. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 09:24 sqrtofneg1 wrote: I'm here now. I was roleblocked. I am doctor. I believe you. Will revisit reads. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 09:52 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 01 2014 09:49 Valenius wrote: I'll take another look in the morning, but my initial impressions are that you're lying out of your ass. Tolkien, i still want a yes/no as to whether you're doctor. I understand where you're coming from. Because I'm the only one who's ever been roleblocked, there's no evidence other than my word that it is setup A. Which means that even if everyone else says they're not doctor, it doesn't automatically make me doctor. But you guys will have to believe me. I thought you were blue from Day 1. If I were mafia, you'd be in the fucking ground. I'll try to find the post which really made me think it. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 27 2014 01:44 sqrtofneg1 wrote: + Show Spoiler + Okay, going down the filter list. OnceKing brings up policy. I kind of disagree with bringing it up so early, but I think it was a town mindset that he did it. I read town. Eden is clearly town. Val hasn't been doing much, other than questioning the lurker policy, (kind of like me) so no read on him. LT clears Val in this post: On March 26 2014 19:13 Lord Tolkien wrote: I still need to read the LIII mafia game thoroughly. However. OnceKing sounds town as all fk. I was originally suspicious of his initial "serious" post due to OK's early Day 1 behavior versus early Day 1 LII newbie mafia game and was going to comment on it, but I re-read the old thread and reversed my initial opinion on it (originally thought it was inconsistent, but I reread his case on Amiko and it didn't mention the lurker lynch policy). He's been pushing town towards active discussion since then, asking for reads, and generally steering conversation towards positive goals, so he's establishing himself as town thus far. IAmRobik also feels town to me, though I still question why he feels OK's post is out of place given the context (unless it was scumbait, that was my first thought). The post is still useful pressure and discussion for town, though, and there is no reason for scum to be so forward, so early on in the day, especially with the possible game-states (no godfather game-state). And his posts subsequent read fairly town. Valenius is super town in my eyes, he's cleared for me. Pixelated is neutral or slightly scummy to me. Eden feels even more town for me. He's actively pushing the Cavalinho case and scumhunting aggressively in Day 1, while being the most active contributor to the thread thus far. Clearest town poster in my mind, as he's giving reasoned arguments here. Cavalinho sounds...well, aggressive in all his posts. And he's OMGUSing without presenting a case, period. But given his past game behavior, he also does this when he's town so I'm not sure if my scrumread on him is wrong. Like, this is almost a repeat of LII Day 1 in terms of the Cavalinho lynch progression, however without any substance from him. I'm leaving him as possible scum atm tho I'm confused by it. Maybe the most scummiest read I have, even his past town play aside. Like and should mark him as clear scum, but...might just be his playstyle. Show nested quote + I also happen to think his OMGUS vote is him trying to look innocent because he's aware of his meta (not the post beforehand he noted that Robik townread him in a previous game because he OMGUS'd then), but that can go either way. What's telling is that he fails to develop his vote, he just puts it down and insists it'll be me or him today. That's dumb and not what a town player should be doing. This is actually a strong analysis of what I was trying to say. You know what, Cavalinho isn't angry and pissed off enough to have the righteous indignation like his LII newbie game, nor still tries to contribute. Or hell, contribute an actual case for his OMGUSing. sqrtofneg1 has thus far been fairly disconcerting to me. I indulged him with the Hearthstone convo, and I think that's irrelevant to the thread thus far. It was a fair shot at getting something going, if inflating his filter/post. After the first actual serious post to pop up Day 1 (the OK policy lynch), he posted this and didn't respond to the looming topic at hand, then had a sleep post. Like, its non-contributive lurking at best. There was definitely things available to comment on at the time of his sleep post. Hell, by the time of that post, IAmRobik had already made his wtf post about OnceKing's lynch policy post. It piggybacks off IAmRobik's joke posts, but he at least follows up with substance after there's clearly something to respond to. He still has time to become an active contributor, but seems to be a scum lurker to me. Probably my primary lynch target today because I'm still fking confused by the signals given off by Cavalinho's playstyle and posting patterns. Show nested quote + On March 26 2014 13:31 IAmRobik wrote: RE: Sqrt In what world does a mafia come into the game and start talking to himself for 10 posts? Mafia has all the reason in the world to sit back and not do shit and contribute when something is happening and then push some random town who is on the chopping blocks. I don't give a damn if it was 10 posts of filler about how he's doing today and how his HS run was going. The exact same reason you were pushing on OK for: because it's good to make the appearance of contribution. idgaf about the HS posts too much, but the fact he continued the joke posting and made a sleep post before contributing anything useful makes me unhappy. Quick point to RolandJarvis before the plunge, that was a continued joke post. I was jokingly referencing the LII newbie game where I was OMGUSing OK hard for focusing on me Day 1 (mostly for some inconsistencies in his case). Posted that and the correction right as OK was posting the policy lynch post (note the policy lynch post being nestled between that post and the edit), which is the first serious post of the game, which should have been a clue. I'm overall happy with your contribution, however, and I would recommend you read the LII newbie game, since quite a few of the players here were in that game (and should give you a general idea of our playstyles as town (I think all of us present played as town that game), so you can get a feel for us. You voiced the concern about OK only voicing his read on IAmRobik, but his playstyle is (at least, going off his LII and stated gameplay) to only give his strongest reads. So this isn't inconsistent or scummy for me, just how he plays. Just like how Cavalinho still confuses the fk out of me. Or you might have and the mistaken use of punctuation in the post confused you. Overall, I'm quite happy with the way this thread activity has been. no ded gaem Also, my sleep schedule is fked up, so I may be responding at odd times such as this. Even though he hasn't done anything. Why would he do that? But wait, there's more. His next post is this: On March 26 2014 20:31 Lord Tolkien wrote: Show nested quote + - Reads on Valenius and Pixalated. ...how? Valenius asked some good questions to develop OnceKing's policy, but that's all. Certainly a good start but not nearly enough to declare him "super town" or "cleared." Especially in light of the fact that he said Pixalated is neutral-to-scummy... I have Pixalated as neutral-to-town if anything, but to be honest they've done virtually the same thing here (not post much, make solid contributions where they did). There's a lack of explanation for either read, which on its own doesn't say much, but... ZzZ. I knew I should've tried posting that part some other time. Or maybe I should've approached it with more subtlety (see: any subtlety at all). Was trying to scumbait with it when questioning Cavalinho and sqrt. Was trying to see if they would piggyback off of it. Went back and deleted those sections specifically to try. My true reads: Valenius leans town at best. I'm hesitant to call him anything at this stage of the game, when his only post is at best asking for a PAINFULLY obvious clarification on a policy. Or in other words, in line with what everyone else has said. Pixelated is leaning town. He's had more posts and has given reads on sqrt and Valenius, but the main crux of their points have been similar to what OK and others in the thread have said (not much to be said this early into the game, however). He was however the first to defend OK's post (outside of OK), and rightly so. If we're continuing with the Cavalinho lynch, it is...unlikely for them to simultaneously bandwagon on a possible lynch and defend the person in question. Show nested quote + - His position on Cavalinho is inconsistently soft wrt the rest of his list. Notice the "almost" above -- the one big exception is the guy that I personally think is obviously scum. He does some lip service to the idea (e.g. "these things should mark him clear scum"), but then handwaves every point he raises for Cavalinho on a shaky meta argument (e.g. "mark him as clear scum, but... might just be his playstyle). He says Cavalinho is "maybe the most scummiest read he has"*, but then declares sqrt his "probable" lynch target today. There's a lot of waffling on Cavalinho that isn't present with the others. (PREVIEW EDIT: Even concedes the case is strong, but still has sqrt as his top suspect. p l s) This is again going off of my experience with Cavalinho in LII, though the more you prod, the more I think you may be right about me softballing Cavalinho. I may be trying to discern too much off meta, and am letting how LII Day 1 went color my view of the game and his (pretty scummy) actions too much. Show nested quote + - His rationale for sqrt is weak. Of a handful of inactives so far he's singling out one post of sqrt's (the "I've never drawn mafia" post) as the thing that's so disconcerting to him? Already zeroed in on sqrt being a scum lurker and wants to lynch him over aforesaid "maybe most scummiest read"*? That's just strange to me because nothing that sqrt has done has been alignment-indicative yet. As I EXPLICITLY note, it was posted AFTER the serious posting began, and AFTER IAmRobik's wtf on OK. The timestamp is key: if it were before that, and even OK's post, whatever. idgaf because that was part of the joke phase. That's what I find the most disconcerting of his posting, versus Valenius (whose post at least addressed something serious). Show nested quote + - Preview edit point: That last question is such a softball! Ideal to ask your fake scum read and your scum buddy, terrible as town. Why wouldn't he ask about the things Cavalinho and sqrt are doing that makes them suspicious to him? My main issue with sqrt again is the timing of his post and decision to start lurking at that juncture, which makes me far more leery of him over Valenius. Look at the time stamps: 3.5 hours between OK's post and Valenius's question and his sleep post, 4 minutes between Robik's wtf post and his highlighted post, and 11 minutes between the post I highlighted and his sleep post. Certainly there's time to post...something serious? When we had clearly moved past the jokes votes? Putting him among my top scum reads is/was a means to pressure him into posting something of value and see if he posts anything that makes me pursue that line of inquiry. Similarly, the main thing which Cavalinho isn't doing is giving anything of substance in his posts. This is also why I was posting a full reads list, to see if there was any piggybacking going on. He demotes Val to leaning town. Maybe he now realizes that he was too obvious in pushing Val for town. If he's mafia, Val's also mafia. He also makes a scumtrap that's horribly planned out. Top mafia in my eyes. Robik's playing aggressive, as he normally does. He's been pressuring pretty much everybody, as a town should do. The one thing that I don't like is that he got a town read on my on joke posts before the game. that's strange. I read town. Pixalated is probably town. He's trying to logically put together the picture, and he's a bit quiet. He's suspicious of the right guys, he's cleared the right guys. I say town, with blue role. The blue role is because he's quiet. + Show Spoiler + Cav seems mafia, with the same reasons as Robik and Eden. RJ is town, good reads, good logic. So it's either Cav + someone who I misread, or LT and Val. As soon as you said that, I thought you were blue. The only reason I made the post saying that I'm willing to reevaluate anyone is so that mafia wouldn't be suspicious of you | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
1) Don't POE me 2) It's not even right 3) I obv doubt myself when my top scum read turns out to be town Here's an example from Heavyweight Champ game where I was town (link below for reference): On March 27 2014 23:54 IAmRobik wrote: the end of 42-43 marv/hf interactions reads so fake and so forced it's almost making me reconsider the whole fucking game. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/446774-world-heavyweight-championship-mafia-ii?page=47#921 Just cause I doubt myself doesn't make me scum. Doubting myself is natural cause I'm town and I need to reevaluate things as new information is brought forward. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 01 2014 07:43 Valenius wrote: Once / LT - I'd prefer a speedy response from you if possible. It should be early evening for you guys right? Also, if you're doubting why i'm asking, Robik, you can back me up that it's the right play, right? On April 01 2014 07:45 IAmRobik wrote: If you're doing what I think you're doing, then I approve. Otherwise, I'm kinda nervous about the implications. For the record, I forgot that I thought that sqrt was blue, and I thought you were trying to trap someone and bait out a fake medic claim (and that you were going to claim medic) | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Starts off the day joking about HS with sqrt. That's fine. Votes sqrt jokingly Votes OK for some reason claiming "my renewed ok scum sense is tingling" but then agrees with OK regarding lynching lurkers Now this is where it gets interesting: Gives his list of reads along with "trying to make a play" His reads are: "OK sounds town as all fk" -- even though he just said that his scum senses are telling him that OK is maf I am town, but apparently my motives are suspicious "Valenius is super town in my eyes, he's cleared for me" -- this is "justified" by the "play" "Pixelated is neutral or slightly scummy to me" -- this is also part of the "play" "Eden feels even more town for me" -- apparently this is for pushing Cavalinho and being a clear posted. I'd be pretty happy with Eden too if he was pushing an agenda that gets town lynched and I were mafia BUT in the very next explanation of Cavalinho he doesn't even call Cava mafia "Cavalinho sounds...well, aggressive in all his posts" We know that Cavalinho is town, which is probably why LT was so reluctant to build a real case against him. It's always important to leave yourself options when you're mafia so that you don't look scummy when you have to flip, in case all of town finds someone townie. "Sqrt has thus far been fairly disconcerting to me" -- once again, he seems to want to call him scum, but is afraid to actually do it. Before Sqrt's claim (which, again, I forgot that I had read him blue), my thought this past night was the LT and sqrt are together based off of their d1 interactions. Says some stuff at RJ but not about RJ. That was another possible connection I saw, but now RJ is dead. So, pretty much, LT is unwilling to take any strong stance on anyone being mafia. This is 1000000000% a mafia characteristic. I will keep reading his posts, but yeah. Just laying it out for all of you kids so you can just sheep me to victory. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
LT analysis continued: He finally takes a stance on two "top scum reads," Cava and sqrt, and leaves out valenius, the person he's using to "try to make a play" After that he reveals his plan. Let's analyze this real quick His first long post with reads comes at 6:13. His next post without valenius in his scum read is at 6:40 and then he admits to lying...sorry, to making the "play" at 7:31. LT claims that he "Was trying to scumbait with it when questioning Cavalinho and sqrt." but that doesn't align with the timeline of events, because the only people who responded within the period between 6:13 and 7:31 are Eden and Pixalated. His "play" is just a blatant cover up of his lies. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 02 2014 00:51 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 01 2014 17:03 Valenius wrote: As it stands now. ##Vote: sqrtofneg1 Sqrt, why did you try and save robik last night? Because he seemed like the most logical kill, plus I couldn't save RJ cause I already saved him. I had OK as my night save for most of the time, and then I switched last hour because Robik has a town reputation, and because he hasn't tunneled me, and if mafia kill him, everyone would mislynch me the next day for an easy win. It kinda sucks that you saved me. That means that mafia will just kill me tonight and then tomorrow they're going to shed doubt on why you're still alive or some bullshit. Cause once we kill LT today, I'll be confirmed town and they will be scared shitless (and rightfully so) that I'm going to figure out at f3 which of the other two are mafia. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
You're not fucking me, are you sqrt? Don't fuck me bro! | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 02 2014 03:48 Lord Tolkien wrote: Ok yeah. NOW I definitely think Rovik is scum. That analysis is holy s-. GUYS. I CAUGHT ONE. Explanation: Read the sentence "that analysis is holy shit." This sentence does not make logical sense. He could say "That analysis is shit" or "holy shit that analysis sucks", but the way it's phrased means that he was thinking of saying one thing and then wrote another thing and then adjusted it but forgot to fully adjust it. I don't know how to explain this concept to all of you, but trust me on this. Anytime a sentence sounds out of place and awkward it's because mafia had to revise it but then fucked up while revising it. BOOMSHAKALAKA. Oh, and he also just called it "holy shit" without actually substantiating why my argument is bad. He can't do that because he's mafia and he can't refute the case | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 02 2014 05:47 Valenius wrote: OK or LT, do either of you want me to post further on those 4 scenarios? I'm lazy and don't want to go through quoting. I just want to play diablo and go to bed. I'll put it up tomorrow evening if that's okay. With the way you are addressing OK and LT, you've pretty much committed to me and sqrt being town. If you're town, that's really really fucking bad because I know I'm town and I"m pretty damn sure that sqrt is town to. He even said he's not fucking me. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 02 2014 06:06 Valenius wrote: Show nested quote + On April 02 2014 06:00 IAmRobik wrote: On April 02 2014 05:47 Valenius wrote: OK or LT, do either of you want me to post further on those 4 scenarios? I'm lazy and don't want to go through quoting. I just want to play diablo and go to bed. I'll put it up tomorrow evening if that's okay. With the way you are addressing OK and LT, you've pretty much committed to me and sqrt being town. If you're town, that's really really fucking bad because I know I'm town and I"m pretty damn sure that sqrt is town to. He even said he's not fucking me. Oh shit, he did didn't he. Well, I must be wrong then. Stop being sarcastic. Stop being near sighted. If you are town, I implore you to reevaluate. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 02 2014 23:09 IAmRobik wrote: I don't know where everyone is, but I don't see how we're ever going to win this game if you don't change your opinions on sqrt and me. Tell me what you need me to do to prove to you that I'm town and I"ll do it. Guess not. I'll just add another fucking tick to the loss column | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 02:32 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Fine, lynch me, I give up. GG Mafia win. Fuck that attitude dude! We can still get LT lynched and have the game continue. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 02:45 Valenius wrote: It's on anyone who voted wrong from the start, don't let it get you down. Just join the next game and win, ezpz. Most of all, it's a loss: In the long-run who cares? DAFUQ. Did you just admit that you know this is a mislynch?!?!? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 02:51 Valenius wrote: Show nested quote + On April 03 2014 02:49 IAmRobik wrote: On April 03 2014 02:45 Valenius wrote: It's on anyone who voted wrong from the start, don't let it get you down. Just join the next game and win, ezpz. Most of all, it's a loss: In the long-run who cares? DAFUQ. Did you just admit that you know this is a mislynch?!?!? No, stop clutching at straws. I'm pretty sure that was the biggest fucking slip of all time. Val/LT final answer | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 04:21 Valenius wrote: + 24hours + 48hours Is that how long you're going to celebrate your scum victory? | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
![]() | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 07:05 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On April 03 2014 07:05 OnceKing wrote: On April 03 2014 07:03 Eden1892 wrote: C'mon guys Robik was obvious. OnceKing I thought was kinda easy to see too but I can understand missing him. GG scumteam thanks for shooting me N1 NOT mad ![]() let's keep it constructive, guys. Eden was shot because he was doing a good job of having reads and leading town; he was a good shot. If you get shot n1 as a townie, it's typically because scum is afraid you'll catch them. Getting shot is a sign of respect. Can confirm. Same goes for RJ. We thought that sqrt would end up being a mislynch, so even though I read him as blue at the beginning of d1, we decided to keep him alive and keep RB'ing him instead of NK'ing him. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 07:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I think the Day 1 lynch was by far the worst. A cop claim on D1 should never get lynched. Let scum sort it out. D2 was understandable, and D3 as well other than the fact that Robik didn't flip his shit despite his candidate not getting lynched should ring some bells. I was actually planning on flipping shit and trying to convince valenius to swap, but then I realized I'd rather mislynch a cop AND a medic...it just looks nicer on the stat sheet ![]() | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Also, if you read scum qt, I was very very close to claiming medic on n2 because I knew that sqrt would have to claim that day. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 08:30 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On April 03 2014 08:25 IAmRobik wrote: I was VERY VERY close to saying "I am town.................APRIL FOOLS" on April fools day and just let OK try to win it on his own to try to make the game more interesting, but decided against it. Also, if you read scum qt, I was very very close to claiming medic on n2 because I knew that sqrt would have to claim that day. If you claimed medic on N2 you would've been dead because you didn't give sqrt's rb claim any attention. Balla told me you were planning on claiming to be rbed both nights ![]() It's not a bad play to try to out the medic. If he's mafia and says he was RB'd but I was actually RB'd, I don't think I would want to draw attention to that because it would make me seem like a PR, maybe? IDK. Maybe I'm crazy Yeah...saying I was RB'd both nights would ahve been so funny. I wonder if people would ahve even noticed. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 03 2014 08:47 RolandJarvis wrote: At the risk of the world revolving around me, I'm going to talk about my NK for a second. I believe at the time of my death 0 town were clearing me, 1 was ready to murder me through the screen, 1 had upgraded me to mere dislike, and 1 didn't have much to say about me. Then I died. Who besides me was surprised by that? What was the state of my reads? Well, I had LT and Valenius as lock clear. I had robik as lock scum. I said I would thunderdome him. I made cases. I said "if you (robik) are town the game is already over because I'm never not voting you". Consider the implications of that. If scum believe me (and why wouldn't they?), and if robik is town, all they have to do is kill somebody who isn't me or robik and they have a guaranteed victory. That's pretty attractive. There's no wifom there where they did it to setup robik, all they need is my vote on a town and they can snipe a win. I take a very straightforward view of night kills, both making them and interpreting them. When I'm scum I kill the threats. I believe it's much better to argue with a corpse who can't vote than to have a live player harassing me. When I'm town and when there's a surprise night kill, I want to know the reason. Killing a player who is universally cleared might mean nothing. Killing a player who is on the suspect list --- I want to know what he was thinking. The nk is validating his reads. Not sure if you read the scum QT, but I had 0 influence on the night kills. I knew I was acting scummy and I didn't think I would be alive much longer, so OK took the reigns to do whatever he thought would make his like easier. I would have certainly left you alive and did thunderdome against you. I like challenges. | ||
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On April 06 2014 06:38 gonzaw wrote: hi guys nice game (for scum). lol at blue lynches. Feedback on the spreadsheet is appreciated. I cba to post polls and shit though. Also Balla, dunno if it matters but the obs qt and stuff got a little fucked up in the "General" tab (since the General tab was not updated when you changed versions). You can fix it manually and add the obs/scum qt manually if you want I didn't use it at all. Not sure I ever will. I'm sure you worked hard on it and whatnot, but I just don't see the point of it. If you could explain how it would help me play the game, maybe I would be more inclined to use it. EDIT: I may have asked yo uthis already, but I'm drunk, so I'm just ognna go ahead and ask again. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g7367 Grubby6050 ScreaM2547 fl0m1582 FrodaN1476 Beastyqt1129 ceh9409 B2W.Neo409 Sick134 Livibee127 C9.Mang0111 ArmadaUGS102 Trikslyr85 Mew2King80 SteadfastSC62 EmSc Tv ![]() ZombieGrub17 rubinoeu6 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • MindelVK StarCraft: Brood War![]() • StrangeGG ![]() • Hupsaiya ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
Epic.LAN
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] SOOP
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
|
|