Hogwarts Mafia

On October 07 2013 21:36 Palmar wrote:


Bitch please, only the cold-intelligent analytical ones.

The self-righteous hotheads end up somewhere else entirely ^^

On October 10 2013 07:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm surprised to see syllo in a game that explicitly states that balance is not guaranteed.

On October 16 2013 09:39 Foolishness wrote:

I have 3 smurfs in this game: You-Know-Who, Mattchew, and Storrzerg.

On October 17 2013 10:38 yamato77 wrote:

that if it was Rayn I would lynch him on the spot?

On October 17 2013 10:48 Grackaroni wrote:

Get Out.

On October 17 2013 08:07 Grackaroni wrote:

I don't know how many scum are in my house either lol.

On October 17 2013 10:51 yamato77 wrote:
matt, what do you think about Moc?

On October 17 2013 10:54 Grackaroni wrote:

wat.

On October 17 2013 23:51 Pandain wrote:


Keeping mine on Mattchew because I actually have reasons but am interested to see three votes on Vayne

On October 17 2013 23:31 syllogism wrote:
Did you post on the QT last night Palmar?

On October 17 2013 12:01 StorrZerg wrote:


why just them?
I don't know this group that well so if someone could explain their history that would be cool

On October 17 2013 16:15 syllogism wrote:

How do you propose I do that? This post seems strange in that you imply that you have read the thread because you know we haven't been trying to do that in-thread, but if you have done that, you should also know that Palmar hasn't even posted. What was the point of that post?

On October 17 2013 15:57 yamato77 wrote:
I will say about Matt, it seems odd to me that he instantly seems to trust me this game when I believe he thought I was mafia last game on D1 for absolutely no reason. I expect town Matt to be very suspicious of other people; it seems out of place for him to have such friendly interaction with me.

On October 17 2013 17:45 Mocsta wrote:


On Yamato: Im at loggerheads. Im pissed he suggested I was scum earlier and am somewhat dismayed by his lack of aura/presence when entering the thread. However, I like his pick-up on Mattchew as I felt the same way.

On October 17 2013 18:22 EchelonTee wrote:
Thoughts on raynpelikonoshi, Mattchew?

On October 18 2013 05:56 Grackaroni wrote:
I'm feeling a syllo palmar scum team right now. Lets kill those guys.

On October 18 2013 11:03 EchelonTee wrote:

Why has no one commented on my Onegu case? He's gone completely black since posting 3 weakass posts and hasn't even responded to me. Screams scum much more than anyone else at this point; putting my vote on him.

Will make deeper analysis when I'm back.

##Vote: Onegu

On October 18 2013 12:15 Pandain wrote:
Mattchew:

1. When do you plan to start contributing more?

2. What differentiates your town play from scum play?

3. Who are your town reads?

4. Is there anyone you find suspicious now, even if you're not sure.

You stated that Mocsta would've made the "correct" play to claim SAM as town, but then you ask if it's policy to lynch any such SAMS indicating a desire to or at least acceptance of. What would be your stance on the issue.

On October 18 2013 12:15 Pandain wrote:

You stated that Mocsta would've made the "correct" play to claim SAM as town, but then you ask if it's policy to lynch any such SAMS indicating a desire to or at least acceptance of. What would be your stance on the issue.

On October 18 2013 13:06 Pandain wrote:




Do you mean this?




What I get from this is that you don't see the connection. If it was correct in your opinion to claim SAM as town, then why would you ask if its standard policy to lynch him if Mocsta made a possible town move.

On October 18 2013 13:25 Holyflare wrote:
Mattchew, you say stutters is a townread for you? He's posted almost nothing. What makes you say towny?

On October 18 2013 14:03 Mocsta wrote:

Okie Dokie.

So you respond on one item; why abstain on the other(s).

On October 18 2013 14:04 Mocsta wrote:
MattChew,

while you are at it.

Will you lynch Zaragon?

Why/Why Not?

On October 18 2013 18:36 LastArgument wrote:


This is not a great post. The reasoning was meh, because either mafia or town Palmar could make exactly the same posts as Palmar made.

Irrationally defending someone who doesn't deserve to be defended isn't a towntell.

On October 18 2013 21:10 LastArgument wrote:
Matt, can you explain to me why any of the points in your case can't be applied to a new town player?

On October 18 2013 21:17 LastArgument wrote:


Well, it's one you need to find a way to answer if you want anyone to be convinced of your case.

On October 18 2013 21:17 supersoft wrote:




???

that's what you call suspicious? Do you even try?

On October 18 2013 21:36 supersoft wrote:
Now look at sn0_man. He starts lurking when a discussion starts. When toad and I entered the thread, he disappeared. But he wasn't gone! When storr mentioned him during the skanjab discussion, he delurks and attacks skanjab a little and hides again.

How do you judge this behaviour?

On October 19 2013 01:47 Skanjab1s wrote:
"hey guys please dont vote for me, or vote for other lynch candidate, even though I have said that I dont think he is scum, also I dont feel like finding scum so can one of you do it pls? thxxxbbz" - Sn0_Man2013

On October 19 2013 02:57 I-be-Pro wrote:
okay I figured this shit out. Palmar is mafia and he's angry at everyone because he's indeed doing the right thing because Mocsta is mafia as well and they had it planned all along. But Palmar expected to get less flak so he's mad while knowing his target is mafia.

My gut is always right on these things.

On October 19 2013 03:33 Cephiro wrote:


1500% useless? Yeah, I try to post once and all I do is get shit for not having posted a thousand times. Not like your one-liners are any better. Motivates me a fuckton when there were several others doing jack shit, but if I don't have the time to post every 5 minutes I'm scum. That's the worst meta shit ever.

At the moment I'm sorry to the hosts but I really don't give a flying fuck about trying to defend myself against random bs. I haven't read all the new pages yet but I assume it's some more "his post looks constructed or similar to noir, must be scum" bs.

I wish it wasn't against the spirit of the game but I really feel like signing up for every game possible, posting only once a day as town until you guys realize that's not "metagaming".

On October 20 2013 03:13 yamato77 wrote:

Catching up, but I wanted to note this post.

Matt, this is sketchy as fuck. No reason to think Storr is mafia IMO, and for this to basically be your only scum read of the game... I am disappoint.

On October 20 2013 03:28 LastArgument wrote:


I'm curious whether this post constitutes you playing better than Noir, which was your stated goal earlier in this game? It feels quite apathetic.

In Noir one of your early mafia-reads was correct (Stutters), was it not? You seem a bit less emotionally invested this game.

I do have a couple of reasons to think you may be town, but I'm not very confident in them.

On October 20 2013 04:50 Onegu wrote:



Why is ET and hopeless blank? You write "nothing" on others but those two are blank... Since I have scum reads on you and ET at this point I find this interesting.

On October 20 2013 06:43 VayneAuthority wrote:
also dissappoint that the contest winner was a copy/paste from the internet, must be a bunch of redditers judging

On October 20 2013 07:02 Blazinghand wrote:


um yeah that only counts if Syllo actually has good reads

hint: probably not

On October 20 2013 07:25 Blazinghand wrote:
yeah not having read the thread at all I think I can comfortably vote mocsta unless he's also an innocent townie somehow

##vote mocsta

seriously though i'm gonna read thread now

On October 20 2013 07:50 syllogism wrote:

I didn't say that, I simply suggested that he couldn't know LA played "very strong" town game unless he knows alignments of every player in the game. It's possible that he thought LA was just very towny and therefore player a strong game, but I find that less likely than the alternative. Still, no point discussing this any further.

On October 17 2013 23:21 LastArgument wrote:

Here's my issue with this. And there are two.

Firstly, you've said this as town before:

You've also said this as town:

Your attitude doesn't seem to tally with how you view the game when you play town.

##Vote: Hopeless1der

On October 20 2013 12:11 Hopeless1der wrote:
storr town for asking random questions, and pandain's "scumread" on him
matt town for showing storr why he's likely confirmed town. also pandain's scumread
holyflare town for, you know, actually hunting scum and generally making sense.
grack...doesnt seem like scum? his playful attitude hasnt changed since daypost.

On October 20 2013 12:32 Hopeless1der wrote:
...so much for loyalty
##Unvote
##Vote: Holyflare
By process of elimination

On October 20 2013 12:51 VayneAuthority wrote:


the real difference is there not a currently residing confirmed scum in my house...and I heavily agree with hopeless' analysis. Leaving you and holy. Holy looks better by far so there you have it.

On October 21 2013 07:09 raynpelikonoshi wrote:

Yeah but I don't see it.

Page 1 of Mattchew filter is nothingness, somewhere he has a scumread on somebody because that person typed "lol" at the end if his sentence and that made him scummy because he was insecure because Mattchew texted girls like that when he is insecure or something.

Page 2/3 there is still pretty much nothing that makes him town, he defends himself a bit but that's it. Then there is Pandain voting for him because Pandain has "reasons" and then there him quoting EchelonTee on the Onegu case saying that ET is wrong.

Page 4 has the excelcopy of his reads:
Pandain: Green
Lonemeow: Nothing
EchelonTee:

That's quite strange if you look at Stutters you see that Mattchew has him for town because 2 lines of text in which he defends Palmar. Like why the fuck is that green? And Mattchew had Stutters green as soon as that happened, why wouldn't it be 2 scummers defending each other? Mattchew had Palmar as SCUM for the ENTIRE FUCKING GAME. He was one of the 3 pioneers of the Palmar wagon.

Then there was the whole Mattchew wagon catching steam for 4 whole minutes. 4 minutes. Because Cephiro decided that Mattchew wasn't his preferred lynch even though he was whining and bitching that his reads in his 1 post were so valuable... But then Cephiro decided that when it seemed that Mattchew wagon was going to surpass the Palmar wagon to vote for Palmar who was NOT a scumread for Cephiro....


Yeah, I don't like Mattchew at all.

On October 22 2013 00:43 Onegu wrote:



I really doubt storr is scum but saying my vote is wasted at this point is dumb when he isnt giveing reasons in thread why matt is town.

On October 22 2013 00:53 raynpelikonoshi wrote:

You are killing me.
How? Because you knew 2 hours in N1 that he was the housecop?
How would you prevent the rest of your QT to spill that in the thread? It would be the same effect, 1 scum in Hufflepuff.
If only you knew, how would you prevent Storr from telling the thread you knew in the quiet period?
Also, were you masoned from the start of N1? or did Storr claim in the QT? I missed that.

On October 22 2013 03:05 Chairman Ray wrote:
Hey I just read my role pm. I'm at work atm, so won't be able to read 100+ pages of stuff. I think I can get all caught up tonight though. In the meantime, I'll just throw up a null vote.

##vote: no lynch

glhf!

On October 22 2013 03:56 Blazinghand wrote:
Reading through stutters' filter, it seems he's posting just enough not to get modkilled. I'm comfortable lynching him. Since we have a lot of space after the N1 actions, it's reasonable to use a lynch or two to clear out chaff.

##unvote
##vote sutters695



hopeless situation will resolve itself though, right?

On October 22 2013 04:02 Blazinghand wrote:


how won't it? either he delivers, and we don't lynch him, or he doesn't, and we do. in the meantime we can pursue other leads, it's not even like we're wasting time.

On October 18 2013 03:22 Stutters695 wrote:
Last time I played with Palmar was YANMM or LX or some big game where he argued really strongly in favor of policy lynching a claimed SAM in similar circumstances as town.

I'd like to see him contribute more, but as of now, I think his frustration is genuine.

On October 22 2013 04:20 Blazinghand wrote:
If we lynch into hufflepuff it shouldn't be hopeless1 since we will know what's up with him one way or another soon enough

On October 22 2013 04:23 Blazinghand wrote:
syllo can confirm that he has pot

On October 22 2013 04:30 Hopeless1der wrote:

it doesnt. Matt has the right of this, controlling my abilities doesn't prove anything towards my alignment. However, I can't lie about what each ability does or who I'm using it on. That information is going to be public. Town is making my decisions so you can't expect my powers to benefit scum, even if you think I am scum. Is that a completely unreasonable compromise to you Matt?


@Ceph's insistent "There was no daypost message"
There won't be one. Syllo will (should) get a PM.

On October 22 2013 04:30 syllogism wrote:
The "if target dies they live another 24 hours" potion is a really bad claim if he is mafia as we have means of killing people (would lynch count?). On the other hand, there is no way mafia actually has a potion with that effect.

On October 22 2013 04:34 syllogism wrote:

Because this is not how you design roles. I will keep that in mind if you host a themed game, however.

On October 22 2013 04:38 Chairman Ray wrote:
If we're gonna be lynching into Hufflepuff tomorrow, I would go after anyone who tries to preserve the others. I think that the scum in Hufflepuff would try to push the vote onto people outside the house, because for every Hufflepuff that dies, town gets closer to the scum. Given that town is ahead, it's against scum wincon to lynch both Hufflepuff town and scum. Hufflepuff town however, would be totally up for lynching inhouse, as long as they aren't the one being lynched. To them, they know they are town, so from their perspective, there is 1/4 mafia or 2/4 mafia, and that's pretty good, better than lynching outside the house. I don't have a lot of time left anymore before I get lynched, so I can't really dive into all their filters and get a good read, so I'm just putting this here.

On October 22 2013 04:42 Hopeless1der wrote:

...uhhh why? You dont want to chance me making syllo invulnerable?

On October 22 2013 04:43 Stutters695 wrote:
Since we are not lynching, I'm following syllo and my vote is on Ray.

On October 22 2013 04:47 syllogism wrote:
I don't want to deal with a guy who is going to available for 1 hour a day. Why even replace in if you don't have time?

On October 22 2013 05:00 Chairman Ray wrote:


I said it in the replacement thread. I dunno if me replacing in is better than no replacement at all though. I'm just trying my best for the one hour I'm in this game though ^^

On October 22 2013 05:41 Hopeless1der wrote:
I didn't get a coin. Unless his goal was to get powered up in order to gain his NK ability I don't see how killing me helps his cause, whatever the hell it is, or why he had to aquire more lovers.

On October 22 2013 05:47 Skanjab1s wrote:


The closeness of the lynch points more to CRay scum. It is pointless as scum to try last minute switch the lynch off of one townie and onto another.

On October 22 2013 09:04 Blazinghand wrote:


If you can convince me that saving you over syllo won't get me auto lynched tomorrow then sure. If I were in no danger of getting lynched, I'd suggest a strategy where I flip a coin and save between you and syllo, thereby discouraging scum from shooting either of you. That being said, it's probably best for me to just save syllo who is almost certainly getting shot if I don't, and also avert a mislynch.

On October 23 2013 06:43 Blazinghand wrote:
so there's currently one hufflescum and one grffinscum

On October 23 2013 06:43 Blazinghand wrote:
wait if you forgot about the number of paragraphs how did he know which house you checked and what you got?

On October 23 2013 06:44 Mattchew wrote:

I told him end of day 2 i was for sure checking ravenclaw and my first post was 1 line