|
Must sleep is one i Jain the ranks of the fools to whom Onegu referenced
|
On July 18 2013 02:25 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
@Alakaslam
I'm very eager to hear your thoughts on my answers to Onegu's case.
I like them, you did quite well. But that isn't why I voted you.
Meta meta! Thou art a bombastically assured individual this game, not the hurricane I know. Then again I have changed some as well.
Of course, at this point I am solo voting you, why do this in majority? So see the thread. I had already liked a Gotard lynch before.
|
On July 18 2013 03:08 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2013 03:04 Onegu wrote:On July 18 2013 01:11 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 17 2013 20:28 Onegu wrote:On July 13 2013 13:02 Nightcat99 wrote:
Ya I got nothing to say about the timing of my respond, I was taking the train so I had time to respond, and now I am In the hotel bit thet got a lot of alcohol so if I start posting nonsense, I blame the alcohol.
I will be honest that I don't have a read on super yet, it just feels like he might be busy like me and today is the first day so I will need to find some time to reread everything when I am home.
I however feel that the beginning of the ame is not a time for witch hurt but a time to establish your innocent, because there is only 3 scum and 10 iinnocent, if we are able to find 4 innocent to work together, we shall not be able to lose.
Btw, if there is any grammar or spelling error in my post, I apologize in advance, it's really hard to type o. The phone. I know this is conspiracy crazy but if hurricane and nightcat were scum together, here is the start of the tribunal.On July 15 2013 08:50 Nightcat99 wrote:
lol hzflank my vote is not suspicious because they dont need my vote for a switch. regardless who i vote they still have 3 people to lynch either kirby or super, my vote is just away to prove my innocents and that i am mobile and active now. Votes in no way are a way to prove innocense. On July 15 2013 09:29 Nightcat99 wrote:and the game got really hectic, i will be honest that i really wanted to switch out of jrkirby ont he last few minutes because his last minute insight is very sounded and seems very townie. Ok, Gotard is an excellent lynch target tomorrow. I think chrom should only be lynched after a scum is found, but maybe checked by cop.
I have less of a feeling about koshi, umasi, super.
Xzavier is decent, but not the best lynch.
Chrom and super should be lynched together should one of them be scum by flip or cop check.
That's the best I got, GG guys. and also since hes a proven townie now , we shall really look into his reads. I didnt want to vote the townie, guys Im innocent. On July 16 2013 09:06 Nightcat99 wrote:
just curious if none of you guys on the tribunal die , does that make me less suspicious? Again this post is really just like please dont look at me no matter what happens. On July 16 2013 11:52 Nightcat99 wrote:
Well since i feel like i am on the chopping block i will do what i can.
First off all, stim's blow up can just be a big play since he was on the chopping block, even with his claim does make him a townie by any means.
cloud posted almost nothing , if cloud continuing playing i would have put him as a lurking scum because he posted no opinion of his own but he got replaced so.....
i am still leaning that gotard is scum because of his snarky comment on every other post, it seem like he recheck his post and put those in in case there is future slip ups.
super can still be scum , nothing has change in the last 24 hour i dont know why a mislynch turn into a town - town read.
i was totally expecting either hurricane or umasi to die and didnt know see rainbow going, so even through i had strong feeling that these two were town, now i am not so sure, but if i have to pick it will be hurricane that is the scummier of the two, because hes the one that started the first day tribunal and that is a silly idea even to me. but i really have nothing .
P.S. i will keep reading and this game is hard i am getting a headache.
Talking about lurking scum because he didnt post at all. I thought you talked about makeing a group of four people to control the lynch. On July 17 2013 09:58 Nightcat99 wrote:On July 17 2013 09:45 hzflank wrote:
Thanks Nightcat. I agree with your points on Gotard and with most of your reasoning (timing of your vote, etc).
Out of interest, what do you think of Onegu? My opinion on Onegu is that he got way too much credit for stims blowup and VT claim, its like he walks into the game with a townie tag on his head and every one just accepted that. As far as i am concern, since we dont know the reason stim left, the blowup could still be a big scum play cause he feels that hes in danger. On July 15 2013 15:57 Onegu wrote:
Scumteam
Hurricane
Koshi
Rainbow/gotard
I am really confidant in my hurricane read btw, he made sure he led the council and could make sure we never got off a town/town bandwagon. Alot of his posts just seem like he wants town cred, unlike last game. This is the only post i have foound on Onegu for scum reads, every thing else is just commenting on other peoples post and giving an opinion or saying if they are good or bad, Onegu made alot of post but not alot of reads. So i would like to ask for your new scum reads now because those picks are obviously outdated and atleast 50% incorrect. That is what scum hunting is... Alot of I am sorry in his filter also. That was nightcat volunteering to sheep the Tribunal. We controlled his vote, but in no way did I trust him to be Town. All he proved is that his vote was mobile (which gave me reads on whether it was a town-town lynch if we can flip Nightcat red). Nope you are wrong here his post is on page 20, the tribual being started by you was page 41. Oh, sorry. I thought that was the quote of him sheeping us after the formation (reading comprehension yay). The point stands that he was never a part of the Tribunal, and was just sheeping his vote around at our request. He was never a strong enough town read for me to trust him as such and (as xzavier pointed out) the Tribunal was most effective when limited to 3 people.
Look, the tribunal is 100% an invitation for Svengali. Neither strong scum tell nor ideal town play, that is exactly why it works so well for scum- the people who realize this will have three targets while usually it is the gf heading it or just a member while other scum follow it without joining. Then if you start lynching tribunal it is still playing right into their hands.
Just stop, don't do it anymore and quit talking about it, unless you are CERTAIN you know which members of it are scum and it is just peripheral reasoning to your case. Starting such a thing is usually a town idea I think, it is like a gift to scum that they must receive properly.
|
On July 18 2013 03:13 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2013 03:09 Alakaslam wrote:On July 18 2013 02:25 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
@Alakaslam
I'm very eager to hear your thoughts on my answers to Onegu's case. I like them, you did quite well. But that isn't why I voted you. Meta meta! Thou art a bombastically assured individual this game, not the hurricane I know*. Then again I have changed some as well. Of course, at this point I am solo voting you**, why do this in majority***? So see the thread. I had already liked a Gotard lynch before****. *: Using meta**: Misrepreseting facts (see: lying)***: WIFOM****: Unwillingness to vote Gotard despite scum readNot a good look, slambro.
You are doing much of what you accuse me of in here by doing this
Not good look
Rofl
|
On July 18 2013 03:17 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
For the record, someone like Alakaslam is exactly who I was trying to draw out by deferring my defense for so long.
Meta again, you & Onegu switch places now
I don't give a crap about don't use meta it is all I'm remotely good at
|
On July 18 2013 03:22 Onegu wrote:
I swear if you mention Svengali again I am lynching you.
Dooooooo ittttttttttttttt
I don't know what else to call it, puppetmastering?
|
Ebwop 2 of my posts up
In other words why not Hzflank? He voted you too and was the only other one who then switched his vote, causing me to be solo
|
On July 18 2013 03:25 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2013 03:23 Alakaslam wrote:On July 18 2013 03:17 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
For the record, someone like Alakaslam is exactly who I was trying to draw out by deferring my defense for so long. Meta again, you & Onegu switch places now I don't give a crap about don't use meta it is all I'm remotely good at You think you're good at using meta? By your logic, if I do ANYTHING differently this game from last game, I am scum. Is this correct?
No. If your entire style and aims are. Which is the case.
|
By the way no, I am not so proud of my mafia career. I think I can try to use meta, and fail at all else.
|
On July 18 2013 03:27 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2013 03:26 Alakaslam wrote:
Ebwop 2 of my posts up
In other words why not Hzflank? He voted you too and was the only other one who then switched his vote, causing me to be solo His vote on me was a play. He practically had to spell it out for me (by requesting I go back and read a specific page-set with a clear head). He was fake-supporting Onegu's pressure so scum wouldn't feel exposed when they tried to hop on. hz even says that Onegu's case is weak in another post.
I am the only scum in the game!
I AM THE TRIUNE POKéMON!
(Cross between Alakazam, Kingler, and Machamp)
|
On July 18 2013 03:31 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2013 03:27 Alakaslam wrote:On July 18 2013 03:25 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 18 2013 03:23 Alakaslam wrote:On July 18 2013 03:17 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
For the record, someone like Alakaslam is exactly who I was trying to draw out by deferring my defense for so long. Meta again, you & Onegu switch places now I don't give a crap about don't use meta it is all I'm remotely good at You think you're good at using meta? By your logic, if I do ANYTHING differently this game from last game, I am scum. Is this correct? No. If your entire style and aims are. Which is the case. I'll play along. What's different this time compared to last time? Quote posts and be specific. I don't care about your 'gut reads' because scum can claim gut reads just as easily as town.
This will take some Time and be a fairly Long post, plus my phone may drop it on me multiple times.
Basically you are far more bombastic and willing to cherry pick town mistakes rather than point out town mistakes and build town.
People can see your interactions with me for one but I have changed a lot so... I am developing a style now that sux but isn't as bad as when I try to be fully legit. So gimme whole day or is that gist enough?
|
On July 18 2013 03:33 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
And there goes the ninja voteswap. Alakaslam is panicking now.
That happened as soon as I finished the point where I said stop talking about the tribunal because SVENGALI
if I was panicked I'd not say that
ONEGU COME TUNNEL
:D
|
On July 18 2013 03:36 Ange777 wrote:VOTE COUNT:
Superfluous (1): Umasi, Xzavier
Hurricane Sponge (1): hzflank, Alakaslam, Onegu
Gotard (5): Chromatically, Hurricane Sponge, Umasi, hzflank, Alakaslam
Not voting (3): Nightcat99, Gotard, Superfluous
Currently no-one is set to be lynched.
Deadline is in ~5,5 hours. With 10 alive it takes 6 votes to lynch!
Voting is mandatory. Only votes in the voting thread will be counted! The voting thread can be found here.
Ohhhh...
That is why I was lying, I forgot Onegu.
|
In other words I must try. I will get a few, but try makin a case from your phone sometime, multiple quotes phone posting is an art.
|
On July 16 2013 10:32 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2013 10:06 Onegu wrote:Galactic Win Condition - Galactics win when they control the lynch or nothing can prevent that from happening. Scum has 1 KP. It is delivered factionally and cannot be roleblocked. Scum, with the exception of the Godfather, return Red to DT checks. What were you saying alakaslam? WHERE WAS THIS I THOUGHT I HAD 10/10 VISION OR SOMETHING I FAIL THE OP
Oh, I found something.
Wouldn't scum know better?
But I digress, need to find posts where you tear people up and never build someone except a specific couple people
|
On July 18 2013 03:39 Xzavier wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2013 03:38 Alakaslam wrote:
In other words I must try. I will get a few, but try makin a case from your phone sometime, multiple quotes phone posting is an art. i still have y et to learn how to copy+paste on my phone so yeah. xD
Real quick are you using an iPhone? It is really easy on iPhone. It's the holding 3 quotes in a paste while finding other quotes without the phone dropping it all when you switch tabs.
|
On July 16 2013 01:53 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 23:46 Nightcat99 wrote:
I just woke up but i have a question i been thinking about.
Regardless that there is a mislynch, do you think the scum will kill one of the tribunal tonight to ensure that theres less voting power tonight, and if none of them die tonight does that make a the tribunal suspicious? For the record, the Tribunal is not a persistent entity. It was formed based on the flexible votes for the Day. Tomorrow, if it is necessary, it will be composed of an entirely new set of people (which may or may not include me). The group is valuable because it has vote mobility. It was necessary because Town needed to ensure a lynch.
See stuff like this?
NOT SCUMMY. I don't think it should continue, for reasons stated earlier, but this is why ONEGU thinks you are scum. I get null out of it. It is not as wise as you make it seem, but it is not scum tell either as those don't exist.
Phone finally left that alone.
|
On July 13 2013 08:57 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 08:54 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 08:42 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we?
Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? Correct. I would not have posted this particular post as scum. On July 13 2013 08:46 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 13 2013 08:43 Rainbows wrote:On July 13 2013 08:41 Umasi wrote:On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we?
Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote:On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote:
I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though.
This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy. I certainly wouldn't post that if I were scum, it is nothing but a good thing for town. Why WOULD he want to post that as scum? to look town. Scum love to spew general pro town thingsvto get ez town cred.. This is correct. In general, these sorts of posts should result in a null read in a veteran game. But Early Day 1, when it's generally assumed nothing interesting is happening, seemed like a good time to get PSA's out of the way for a newbie crowd. The info is valuable, but it should not get me town cred. It's more important to me that there's a town consensus on the actual content of the post, not my alignment. (Plenty of time for that later.) You obviously think that your post was pro town, right? That's why you shouldn't have posted it as scum. But then you say that you shouldn't get town cred from it, indicating that you don't think it's pro town. ? Pro town in a newbie game, yes. Probably wouldn't have posted it in a Veteran game unless I really felt the Day 1 conversation stagnating early. I think all my posts are pro-town. Otherwise, why would I post them? (That should apply to everyone but those with a severe inferiority complex.) see this, and last game you saw that immediately, this game I am not part of the scum team so... Onegu style takes advantage of the fact
|
On July 18 2013 03:58 Hurricane Sponge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2013 03:54 Alakaslam wrote:On July 13 2013 08:57 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 13 2013 08:54 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 08:42 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we?
Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? Correct. I would not have posted this particular post as scum. On July 13 2013 08:46 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 13 2013 08:43 Rainbows wrote:On July 13 2013 08:41 Umasi wrote:On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we?
Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote:On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote:
I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though.
This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy. I certainly wouldn't post that if I were scum, it is nothing but a good thing for town. Why WOULD he want to post that as scum? to look town. Scum love to spew general pro town thingsvto get ez town cred.. This is correct. In general, these sorts of posts should result in a null read in a veteran game. But Early Day 1, when it's generally assumed nothing interesting is happening, seemed like a good time to get PSA's out of the way for a newbie crowd. The info is valuable, but it should not get me town cred. It's more important to me that there's a town consensus on the actual content of the post, not my alignment. (Plenty of time for that later.) You obviously think that your post was pro town, right? That's why you shouldn't have posted it as scum. But then you say that you shouldn't get town cred from it, indicating that you don't think it's pro town. ? Pro town in a newbie game, yes. Probably wouldn't have posted it in a Veteran game unless I really felt the Day 1 conversation stagnating early. I think all my posts are pro-town. Otherwise, why would I post them? (That should apply to everyone but those with a severe inferiority complex.) see this, and last game you saw that immediately, this game I am not part of the scum team so... Onegu style takes advantage of the fact What does this mean? 1.) What did I see immediately? My inferiority complex 2.) What is 'Onegu style'. Prey on town mistakes for towncred and mislynch power 3.) What is it that 'Onegu style' takes advantage of? Unsure and unskilled players (my inferiority complex/beliefs) IOW let me try and find stuff looking thru filter right now as this is actually a scummy move by me
|
On July 18 2013 04:12 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
@Alakaslam
What do you think of Superfluous?
Town ish but why is he gone.
Let me look you up or I will wind up not answering you
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
