|
On January 22 2013 03:18 mkfuba07 wrote: Caught up :D
I'm for an austin, FT, or gonzaw mayor (and sheriff). I think my vote will be switching over to FT though. Austin is the only one of them that I've played with before, so I felt more comfortable with him. However, I've agreed with everything FT's said, and I think he would be the best sheriff atm. I'm ignoring the fact that he's smurfing because I typically don't work on meta anyway, and I think he's a good player based on everything I've seen from him. I feel similarly about gonzaw (minus the smurfing bit), but FT feels like more of a constant to me (if that makes sense), which I think I value in a mayor.
As for who I think we should lynch today, I believe a prplhz lynch is best. I'm a bit troubled because iirc I always find prplhz scummy early, but every time I read one of FT's posts about him I'm re-convinced.
I'm going to try to start dealing with specifics instead of the generics I've been using to this point, since I feel like I finally have some kind of handle on the game XD @palmar (FT) I want to kill this dude instead what do you say?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 22 2013 03:24 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:02 FiveTouch wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On January 22 2013 02:51 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 02:42 FiveTouch wrote: austin, why did you fail to address the point that Oatsmaster didn't even look into the case on prplhz or comment on it, saying that he was against any mayor who wanted to lynch a lurker, and then further ended up voting for you because he liked that you were killing this particular lurker? If this is a real question, then it's because I didn't address every point that every player brought up about some guy, because I'm human, etc. If it's not a real question, knock it off. I'd like to believe I'm not for killing stutters for "lurking," but because of the actual posts he has. When I look at the posts you're talking about, I don't get full-on inconsistency from them, or at least what you're seeing. Show nested quote +On January 21 2013 12:35 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok 5touch, I was wrong and you were right, I just feel that JX wasent scum off those 2 posts. HOWEVER, his disappearance since then is not good for him being town. I dont want to vote for a mayor that advocates lurker lynching because it removes the responsibility that the mayor has to justify his lynches. I want the mayor to not be fucking retarded and actually takes some responsibility for his actions.
What you are seeing in the second post: Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 01:25 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok with Austin's reappearance, I am inclined to vote for him as mayor. Why? Because I feel that he has put in more effort into finding scum than 5touch and that he is willing to be transparent and all the things various people have said that the mayor be. He also stood up to lurky sandro early about JX when he couldve ignored the incident. That is one of the reasons I have a town tell on him. I also agree with his lynch target now that I read his reasoning and Stutter's filter. Stutter's posted 4 posts and just disappeared, I feel that as a town player, his start wouldve been continued through the thread but it was not to be which makes me think that he is putting up a front of activity at the start to allay all suspicions then lurking his way through the rest of the game. Vote: Austinmcc Right? That's what you're really taking issue with? That he identifies Stutter as a lurker, says he is going to lurk all game? However, his first post is that he doesn't want a mayor whose policy is to lynch lurkers, because he wants an accountable mayor. That is actually WEIRD to me because I haven't seen a single mayor candidate who says "Let's lynch a lurker." Everyone seems to have actual reasons for voting the folks they want to vote, or hasn't given a specific candidate, afaik. So...that's just a funky statement given that, in my mind, there is no mayoral candidate with the platform that Oats is against a mayoral candidate having. That aside, I don't see the second post as fully inconsistent with the first. If you pull out different phrases, it matches up. Show nested quote +Ok with Austin's reappearance, I am inclined to vote for him as mayor. Why? Because I feel that he has put in more effort into finding scum than 5touch and that he is willing to be transparent and all the things various people have said that the mayor be. He also stood up to lurky sandro early about JX when he couldve ignored the incident. That is one of the reasons I have a town tell on him. I also agree with his lynch target now that I read his reasoning and Stutter's filter. He seems to have reasons to vote me besides my choice of lynch. While that may be playing a part, he at least identifies a couple things that I have done/said. When he references me and stutter, he says that he agrees with my lynch target after reading my reasoning. My reasoning is not "stutter is lurking kill stutter." So to me, that goes find with the first post. I'm not advocating lurker lynching at all, I've advocating stutter-lynching. He at least has paid lip-service to the idea that I have reasoning behind that advocacy. You're so fluffy, you post a lot but tend to manage to miss the main highlights. 1) Oats doesn't want to have a mayor who wants to lynch lurkers 2) Oats does not comment on prplhz at all 3) Oats likes your Stutters lynch, at least in part because "...he has 4 posts...then [he's going to] lurk his way through the game" Why is Oats not commenting on prplhz at all? Why is he liking the lurking aspect of the Stutters case when being completely against it for the mayor? Why did Oats attack me repeatedly and tarnish my motives, and then say "I bleed town"? Yeah yeah, I'm fluffy. And you ask lots of rhetorical questions, or questions aimed at the wrong party. Oats does not comment on prplhz, that's true. Nobody but oats can tell you why. I read what you have as (1) and (3) here differently than you do, but again, only Oats knows what's happening in Oatsbrain. I find point (1) odd, that post odd, because he seems to be giving this generic "I don't want a mayor who is just going to lynch a lurker" thought, when NO mayoral candidate wanted to do that. That thought, vocalizing it out of nowhere in the middle of a post, IS weird. But I find his later bit liking a stutters lynch to be in harmony with the earlier post, because it's NOT a lurker lynch. I'm not proposing lynching stutters because he's lurking, so I don't see why supporting me would run afoul of not wanting to elect a mayor who wants to lurker lynch.
I'm not arguing that you're simply lynching a lurker, the thing is that his main summary for *him* agreeing with your read is the lurking aspect.
I ask rhetorical questions to bring you around to a different way of thinking.
Frankly your assuredness that Stutters is mafia, combined with the fact you dismiss the prplhz wagon for nebulous reasons, is bizarre to say the least:
On January 22 2013 01:41 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 01:35 FiveTouch wrote:On January 22 2013 01:04 austinmcc wrote:On January 22 2013 00:44 FiveTouch wrote: austin, scumteams don't tell someone to stop posting when they're potentially in trouble. Especially they don't tell them that once the guy said he's catching up on the thread, that he shouldn't post again. So, I generally agree with this. I'll back off pushing that point. I've seen frustrated scumteams when one member who's semi-inactive gets suspicion on him early, but you're right, the general mood in QT then is to try and get the guy to be more active. Unsure if the amount of pressure that stutters has gotten this game really amounts to much though, so I'd like to try and get some focus back on him. Really one of the only defensive comments that I can remember is Bugs saying he's often scummy as town. I'm not satisfied with that, and I still don't like stutters play, even if you take out the thought that others might be telling him to keep his head down. Do you think that without that point stutters looks fine? Just looks like an inactive dude?
As to your lynch candidates, I don't like the contradiction part of the case on prplhz. Yes, he said he didn't like policy lynches and now ran on lynching chezinu. But I don't think all contradictions are scummy, and I don't think contradictory quotes from months ago in a different game + quotes from this game are particularly strong. Both the policy lynch quotes AND the early bullshit at the start of a game quotes span different games and a couple months. There's more merit to the second than the first, people say all sorts of bullshit about policy lynches, but actively saying you're against dumb/flashy entrances to get the game moving and then saying you often do that...is more troubling. In some ways, you reconcile the second contradiction with your own filter-diving of prplhz, though. You grabbed a lot of flashy entrances, or peculiar entrances to threads, and they were from scum games. It's pretty clear that his play does not match up with his statement that he doesn't like starting games off in a certain way to get discussion going, or at least you seem to be saying that with your above post. You think only scum prplhz starts off that way and town prplhz actually practices what he previously preached? Or do you think prplhz's comment about not liking bullshit at the start of the game is bullshit itself? austin, I agree Stutters doesn't look good, and agree with what you said, apart from what I highlighted already. My issue with a Stutters lynch is that it's very similar to prplhz (bad entrance, bad followup), except prplhz has done more and worse than Stutters, so he's a better lynch. In the town games I looked at from prplhz, I did not find one instance of him entering in a 'trolly' way, as opposed to the multitude of scumgames provided. This is why I have asked prplhz to provide me with an example - I don't think it exists. I guess I'm just used to seeing prplhz get lynched early on, and most of the games I've been involved in they've been mislynches. Rock Band, looney lynching, are the ones that come to mind for town prplhz getting pressured off the bat but flipping town. I know that I've read or obsed a few games in which the same thing happened with him as mafia though, can't remember names but he claimed cop D1 in some mini and lived for a while/til endgame. I'm looking at him and stutters more, but maybe I'm just overly wary of early prplhz lynches because I keep seeing wagons get built on him that can't be derailed, whether by scum or town.
Effectively prplhz gets attacked early when he's both town and scum, so you're wary of lynching into him?
Given you were so keen to look into Stutters' meta, can you find a town prplhz game where he entered the game in a similar fashion to this one? (as opposed to the mafia games I referenced).
The arguments against prplhz are simply far stronger than the stringy case you have on Stutters.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 22 2013 03:30 sandroba wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:18 mkfuba07 wrote: Caught up :D
I'm for an austin, FT, or gonzaw mayor (and sheriff). I think my vote will be switching over to FT though. Austin is the only one of them that I've played with before, so I felt more comfortable with him. However, I've agreed with everything FT's said, and I think he would be the best sheriff atm. I'm ignoring the fact that he's smurfing because I typically don't work on meta anyway, and I think he's a good player based on everything I've seen from him. I feel similarly about gonzaw (minus the smurfing bit), but FT feels like more of a constant to me (if that makes sense), which I think I value in a mayor.
As for who I think we should lynch today, I believe a prplhz lynch is best. I'm a bit troubled because iirc I always find prplhz scummy early, but every time I read one of FT's posts about him I'm re-convinced.
I'm going to try to start dealing with specifics instead of the generics I've been using to this point, since I feel like I finally have some kind of handle on the game XD @palmar (FT) I want to kill this dude instead what do you say?
I understand where you're coming from, but this horrible indecisiveness marks all of his town play.
|
On January 22 2013 03:22 DearestSnot wrote: austin if you are so concerned about stutters for his play THIS GAME (regardless of however naive I think your opinion of meta is) why are you not on Clarity's ass or on sandro for the exact same reasons? Mainly because neither of them have made the posts that stutters has? Like...I take issue with what stutters has posted. Unless they've been logging into his account and posting for him, I attribute stutters's filter to him alone.
As far as any similarities they have with his posting.
For sandro, within game, because he's had SOME contribution that stutters hasn't (again, for me in particular, he had the JX read that I disagreed with, followed up when I asked him a question, pointed out that I was wrong, etc.). Then for all the other reasons that Gonzaw dislikes/you might expect. I'm one of those people who generally fights a vet lynch on D1. I couldn't see the push for a Foolishness lynch in D1 of magical world swapping. I couldn't see the logic behind marv being on Palmar's case D1 in rock band. I am just generally against lynching vets on D1, to a fault. So I wouldn't be on sandro's ass even if people were building legitimate cases on him. I also don't think I've seen anything beyond mild suspicion directed sandro's way. Nobody seems to really be coming out and saying SANDRO IS SCUM AND WE SHOULD LYNCH HIM OVER ALL OTHERS. Just mentioning that he's absent/lazy/not contributing and maybe he's scum or maybe should be lynched, but without really pushing.
For clarity, because I haven't been looking at him as much. I found stutters scummy, I haven't unfound stutters scummy. Haven't dealt with clarity much. Lots of tiny posts, little questions. Doesn't look great. I don't buy into unfulfilled promises being a surefire scumtell, I'm NOT relying on those for stutters, but yes, clarity does promise action and not deliver.
Heck, the most interesting thing to me in clarity's filer is:On January 20 2013 13:30 Clarity_nl wrote: I would like whomever is in the lead to become mayor at any given time to act like they are a dayvig and get people going with the threat (and follow-up) of shooting them. just a funky little unique thought, in a post where he actively votes himself for mayor. It's not really anything to base a read off of, but it's the only curious thing in his filter for me.
|
Apparently I am still voting gonzaw according to that voting post kurumi did, which is wrong. Anyways unvoted and voted myself :3
Don't make chez sheriff pretty pls.
|
On January 22 2013 03:30 sandroba wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:18 mkfuba07 wrote: Caught up :D
I'm for an austin, FT, or gonzaw mayor (and sheriff). I think my vote will be switching over to FT though. Austin is the only one of them that I've played with before, so I felt more comfortable with him. However, I've agreed with everything FT's said, and I think he would be the best sheriff atm. I'm ignoring the fact that he's smurfing because I typically don't work on meta anyway, and I think he's a good player based on everything I've seen from him. I feel similarly about gonzaw (minus the smurfing bit), but FT feels like more of a constant to me (if that makes sense), which I think I value in a mayor.
As for who I think we should lynch today, I believe a prplhz lynch is best. I'm a bit troubled because iirc I always find prplhz scummy early, but every time I read one of FT's posts about him I'm re-convinced.
I'm going to try to start dealing with specifics instead of the generics I've been using to this point, since I feel like I finally have some kind of handle on the game XD @palmar (FT) I want to kill this dude instead what do you say?
hey biatch.
Wanna do some back and forth?
|
11589 Posts
Sandroba I want to know why you think FT is Palmar and what you think that means about his intentions with his play so far today.
|
11589 Posts
On January 22 2013 03:33 Toadesstern wrote: ##unvote ##vote Toadesstern
On January 22 2013 03:36 Vivax wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: Toadesstern
I have never seen two town players buddy so hard day 1.
You two are either masons or scumbuddies. I have no reason to believe that you are masoned, so I think you're just scum.
|
and we're back to this again.
|
Well I was reading in order, didn't see Austin's more recent posts.
1) I get accused of that every game. Falls back to the I suck d1 stuff. Up to you if you believe it, but it happened in YANMM and Whose Line.
2) Weird if you're experienced maybe, but to me I wasn't sure how often a mayor mislynch happens because the first posts in that matter made it seem like an eventuality rather than a possibility. My thinking was that people probably have discussed this in past games and it still resulted in a mayor mislynch. Thus I was asking if using the mayor to force reads out of someone hard to read makes sense. I felt Toad answered it well in the ensuing discussion so I felt no.need to follow it up.
3) You said in the previous post I quoted that I keep the thread informed and come back with actual thoughts. That's true sometimes, but I don't always see something to immediately follow up on. This happened in pretty much every game I play. Again people have attacked me for this.
4)I have a detailed post on this in YANMM but I believe that full disclosure (unless there is some gambit like Proms in the same game) is the best course of action. So when you ask me something and I say "yes, but" you're going to hear why I did it. You may think the reason for a particular instance may be scummy but over the course of the game it will show a clear town mindset and show how I reasoned whatever conclusion I come to.
|
On January 22 2013 03:32 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:24 austinmcc wrote:On January 22 2013 03:02 FiveTouch wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On January 22 2013 02:51 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 02:42 FiveTouch wrote: austin, why did you fail to address the point that Oatsmaster didn't even look into the case on prplhz or comment on it, saying that he was against any mayor who wanted to lynch a lurker, and then further ended up voting for you because he liked that you were killing this particular lurker? If this is a real question, then it's because I didn't address every point that every player brought up about some guy, because I'm human, etc. If it's not a real question, knock it off. I'd like to believe I'm not for killing stutters for "lurking," but because of the actual posts he has. When I look at the posts you're talking about, I don't get full-on inconsistency from them, or at least what you're seeing. Show nested quote +On January 21 2013 12:35 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok 5touch, I was wrong and you were right, I just feel that JX wasent scum off those 2 posts. HOWEVER, his disappearance since then is not good for him being town. I dont want to vote for a mayor that advocates lurker lynching because it removes the responsibility that the mayor has to justify his lynches. I want the mayor to not be fucking retarded and actually takes some responsibility for his actions.
What you are seeing in the second post: Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 01:25 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok with Austin's reappearance, I am inclined to vote for him as mayor. Why? Because I feel that he has put in more effort into finding scum than 5touch and that he is willing to be transparent and all the things various people have said that the mayor be. He also stood up to lurky sandro early about JX when he couldve ignored the incident. That is one of the reasons I have a town tell on him. I also agree with his lynch target now that I read his reasoning and Stutter's filter. Stutter's posted 4 posts and just disappeared, I feel that as a town player, his start wouldve been continued through the thread but it was not to be which makes me think that he is putting up a front of activity at the start to allay all suspicions then lurking his way through the rest of the game. Vote: Austinmcc Right? That's what you're really taking issue with? That he identifies Stutter as a lurker, says he is going to lurk all game? However, his first post is that he doesn't want a mayor whose policy is to lynch lurkers, because he wants an accountable mayor. That is actually WEIRD to me because I haven't seen a single mayor candidate who says "Let's lynch a lurker." Everyone seems to have actual reasons for voting the folks they want to vote, or hasn't given a specific candidate, afaik. So...that's just a funky statement given that, in my mind, there is no mayoral candidate with the platform that Oats is against a mayoral candidate having. That aside, I don't see the second post as fully inconsistent with the first. If you pull out different phrases, it matches up. Show nested quote +Ok with Austin's reappearance, I am inclined to vote for him as mayor. Why? Because I feel that he has put in more effort into finding scum than 5touch and that he is willing to be transparent and all the things various people have said that the mayor be. He also stood up to lurky sandro early about JX when he couldve ignored the incident. That is one of the reasons I have a town tell on him. I also agree with his lynch target now that I read his reasoning and Stutter's filter. He seems to have reasons to vote me besides my choice of lynch. While that may be playing a part, he at least identifies a couple things that I have done/said. When he references me and stutter, he says that he agrees with my lynch target after reading my reasoning. My reasoning is not "stutter is lurking kill stutter." So to me, that goes find with the first post. I'm not advocating lurker lynching at all, I've advocating stutter-lynching. He at least has paid lip-service to the idea that I have reasoning behind that advocacy. You're so fluffy, you post a lot but tend to manage to miss the main highlights. 1) Oats doesn't want to have a mayor who wants to lynch lurkers 2) Oats does not comment on prplhz at all 3) Oats likes your Stutters lynch, at least in part because "...he has 4 posts...then [he's going to] lurk his way through the game" Why is Oats not commenting on prplhz at all? Why is he liking the lurking aspect of the Stutters case when being completely against it for the mayor? Why did Oats attack me repeatedly and tarnish my motives, and then say "I bleed town"? Yeah yeah, I'm fluffy. And you ask lots of rhetorical questions, or questions aimed at the wrong party. Oats does not comment on prplhz, that's true. Nobody but oats can tell you why. I read what you have as (1) and (3) here differently than you do, but again, only Oats knows what's happening in Oatsbrain. I find point (1) odd, that post odd, because he seems to be giving this generic "I don't want a mayor who is just going to lynch a lurker" thought, when NO mayoral candidate wanted to do that. That thought, vocalizing it out of nowhere in the middle of a post, IS weird. But I find his later bit liking a stutters lynch to be in harmony with the earlier post, because it's NOT a lurker lynch. I'm not proposing lynching stutters because he's lurking, so I don't see why supporting me would run afoul of not wanting to elect a mayor who wants to lurker lynch. I'm not arguing that you're simply lynching a lurker, the thing is that his main summary for *him* agreeing with your read is the lurking aspect. I ask rhetorical questions to bring you around to a different way of thinking. Frankly your assuredness that Stutters is mafia, combined with the fact you dismiss the prplhz wagon for nebulous reasons, is bizarre to say the least: Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 01:41 austinmcc wrote:On January 22 2013 01:35 FiveTouch wrote:On January 22 2013 01:04 austinmcc wrote:On January 22 2013 00:44 FiveTouch wrote: austin, scumteams don't tell someone to stop posting when they're potentially in trouble. Especially they don't tell them that once the guy said he's catching up on the thread, that he shouldn't post again. So, I generally agree with this. I'll back off pushing that point. I've seen frustrated scumteams when one member who's semi-inactive gets suspicion on him early, but you're right, the general mood in QT then is to try and get the guy to be more active. Unsure if the amount of pressure that stutters has gotten this game really amounts to much though, so I'd like to try and get some focus back on him. Really one of the only defensive comments that I can remember is Bugs saying he's often scummy as town. I'm not satisfied with that, and I still don't like stutters play, even if you take out the thought that others might be telling him to keep his head down. Do you think that without that point stutters looks fine? Just looks like an inactive dude?
As to your lynch candidates, I don't like the contradiction part of the case on prplhz. Yes, he said he didn't like policy lynches and now ran on lynching chezinu. But I don't think all contradictions are scummy, and I don't think contradictory quotes from months ago in a different game + quotes from this game are particularly strong. Both the policy lynch quotes AND the early bullshit at the start of a game quotes span different games and a couple months. There's more merit to the second than the first, people say all sorts of bullshit about policy lynches, but actively saying you're against dumb/flashy entrances to get the game moving and then saying you often do that...is more troubling. In some ways, you reconcile the second contradiction with your own filter-diving of prplhz, though. You grabbed a lot of flashy entrances, or peculiar entrances to threads, and they were from scum games. It's pretty clear that his play does not match up with his statement that he doesn't like starting games off in a certain way to get discussion going, or at least you seem to be saying that with your above post. You think only scum prplhz starts off that way and town prplhz actually practices what he previously preached? Or do you think prplhz's comment about not liking bullshit at the start of the game is bullshit itself? austin, I agree Stutters doesn't look good, and agree with what you said, apart from what I highlighted already. My issue with a Stutters lynch is that it's very similar to prplhz (bad entrance, bad followup), except prplhz has done more and worse than Stutters, so he's a better lynch. In the town games I looked at from prplhz, I did not find one instance of him entering in a 'trolly' way, as opposed to the multitude of scumgames provided. This is why I have asked prplhz to provide me with an example - I don't think it exists. I guess I'm just used to seeing prplhz get lynched early on, and most of the games I've been involved in they've been mislynches. Rock Band, looney lynching, are the ones that come to mind for town prplhz getting pressured off the bat but flipping town. I know that I've read or obsed a few games in which the same thing happened with him as mafia though, can't remember names but he claimed cop D1 in some mini and lived for a while/til endgame. I'm looking at him and stutters more, but maybe I'm just overly wary of early prplhz lynches because I keep seeing wagons get built on him that can't be derailed, whether by scum or town. Effectively prplhz gets attacked early when he's both town and scum, so you're wary of lynching into him? Given you were so keen to look into Stutters' meta, can you find a town prplhz game where he entered the game in a similar fashion to this one? (as opposed to the mafia games I referenced). The arguments against prplhz are simply far stronger than the stringy case you have on Stutters. He at least pays lip service to the fact that he likes my "reasoning" on stutters. We can't really say anything beyond going back and forth about this. Is he the towniest guy in here? No. Did I complain about your post in which you imply that I'm a bad mayor or a possibly scummy mayor because oats is voting for me? No. (Although that's a pretty bullshit post, imo). For now, stutters is still scummy to me, scummier than oats, of whom I don't really know what to make.
OH MAN. NUMBER ONE REASON TO VOTE ME. "OF WHOM I DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT TO MAKE." DO YOU WANT ALL YOUR MAYORAL POSTS TO SOUND MAYORAL? BAM!
Looking through the couple recent town games that prplhz played in, not really. He was relatively splashy in rock band. 2nd real post of the game was him saying:On September 18 2012 06:07 prplhz wrote: hey guys
please no unnecessary bullshit it's perfectly possible to play the game without that and it only serves to make the game harder to read
there are a couple of people around i have no idea who is, can anybody explain to me who mkfuba07 is?
Followed by the third real post of the game, + Show Spoiler +On September 18 2012 06:08 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 06:07 Mementoss wrote: I think day one should be discussing what da bands name is gunna be name my band . Not the same, but still splashy/creative to some extent. I also know BH made an entire case on prplhz that was ALMOST believable just based off his entrance post - + Show Spoiler +On September 18 2012 06:48 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 06:07 prplhz wrote: there are a couple of people around i have no idea who is, can anybody explain to me who mkfuba07 is? You only ask this question or similar when you roll scum. Scum games where you asked the question:GSL Open: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=365925&user=126438You open this game with Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 05:48 prplhz wrote: hello
everybody should write something then i'll read it tomorrow evening and tell you who is scum
also can anybody explain to me who ange777 is?
thanks DF Mini: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=358346&user=126438You wait quite a bit after the game start to open up with this: Show nested quote +On August 08 2012 05:38 prplhz wrote: Hey didn't read thread yet can anybody tell me who is scum? The scum game in which you don't ask this question, you aggressively push a Policy Lynch of MrZ because he's a terrible player: Movie Star: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=346522&user=126438And you open the attack like this: Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 07:38 prplhz wrote: I always do stuff. If you didn't notice, before I died I pointed out the last two scum. Everybody was just lynching me because of something someone else did which sucked out my motivation but I still read thread and filters.
How exactly is zentor in a game that he /outed? What these openers all have in common is that they generate discussion and let you make accusations without backing them up, doing analysis, or generating associative tells. Obviously it's not perfect, since you caught some heat for it in Movie star, but you deflected the heat rather expertly in my opinion. Now, admittedly, the link between this openings seems tenuous at first glance. But the difference between how you open as scum and how you open as town is like night and day-- I've hosted and co-hosted enough games with you in it to tell the difference (yes, that's an appeal to authority, but it's a legitimate appeal). Obviously, I want people to evaluate the evidence for themselves, so I'm gonna point out some Town games where you could have asked this question or similar, but quite notably did not, because you actually do the work yourself as Town. In fact, you never ask the question as town. Notably, you don't ask the question in the following games that had smurfs or people you hadn't played with before. Town games, in which you don't ask the question:Mad Men Mini: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&user=126438In this game, you roll town, and here's your opening post: Show nested quote +On August 03 2012 10:34 prplhz wrote: And we're off.
This is a 23 player game and I will not be able to handle it if there is a 130 page spamfest between a couple of people before night1. Seriously, condense your god damn posting. That said, there's also a couple of new/newer people on the list. You guys remember to post your thoughts and stuff on the game. No one here bites. Show nested quote +On August 03 2012 10:43 prplhz wrote: Last time you did whatever you also had some alignment (presumably). Should we read anything into this? (The answer is: maybe, but probably not)
This is my first normal size game in a while 'cause I have a hard time simply reading 300 pages, especially if it's all dumb spam. I don't want this to happen this game. I understand and tolerate that some players have a style that requires them to post more than others but please don't get into yelling contests 'cause we can all agree that those are bad for town. Really bad for town. Do I need to remind you of VisceraEyes vs marvellosity in Normal Mini Mafia II? This is a real town post. Yeah, you get lynched D1 but you start off with not just some general platitudes about posting, you actually encourage the players you don't know to post. You don't ask inane questions. You're fearless, and aren't afraid to vote first (link) and ratchet up the pressure afterwards (link) which may not be the best strat, but is definitely townie. You are bullheaded with your reads and aggressive. You don't prod first then vote, you vote then prod. All this in a game in which admittedly there are people you don't know at all. It's what a townie would do. In iGrok's Mini http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=341558&user=126438 you had to replace in, and this was your opening post: Show nested quote +On June 16 2012 02:37 prplhz wrote: Hey
After Liar Game I decided never to join another invite game. I simply feel outclassed because I'm simply outclassed. But then you guys needed a replacement and chaoser already had a 2 page filter and it was [M][N] so I thought what the hell. This means that I'm just going to post whatever I feel like and if some (or all) of it is dumb then you can just kiss my derriere.
chaoser had a 2 page filter and he was vanilla townie. If you look hard enough then you should be able to see that. It's going to take a while before I can get a 2 page filter and expecting me to appear hyper townie on day1 (well, my day1) is pretty silly.
Think we're at night 2 so I should have a good 48 hours to read the thread and form some reads. Expect anything more from me and you're going to be disappointed. If you really feel that chaoser was scum then I can only tell you to read his filter again or be wrong. Obviously some of this was necessitated by replacing in for a lurking townie N1. But what's your followup? How does a town prplhz charge into a difficult game? Why, he votes first (link) and provides evidence and support later (link) (link) (link)
This covers just about everything going back through July, with one notable exception: You rolled scum in Normal Mini II and proceeded to play a highly worthless scumgame http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349058&user=126438 consisting mostly of votes and one-liners. I hope we'd lynch you for anything like this, but this is the one game that doesn't fit into this meta-analysis of your play this game, so I thought I'd bring it up. Scum prplhz doesn't ALWAYS ask inane questions / take baseless positions-- once, he voted randomly and only posted one-liners. Still, I think the evidence is clear: prplhz as scum likes to ask dumb questions and take stances that don't reveal any scumhunting, and prplhz as town is aggressive with his vote and follows it up with questioning, rather than carefully prodding first. Town prplhz is fearless and not afraid to die to prove his point. He's not cautious. He's also not present this game. This is scum prplhz. Scum prplhz does vague prodding like he has in this game (link) and unhelpful questioning (his entire filter lol)Also, from a purely analytical perspective, this isn't what a townie does. As a townie, yes, you ask questions, but you ask questions that are reasonable and that force people to respond in ways that reveal their scumminess. When you ask someone a question, you do it to pressure them and to get information. You do it for the town. Town prplhz would NOT ask this question: Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 06:07 prplhz wrote: hey guys
please no unnecessary bullshit it's perfectly possible to play the game without that and it only serves to make the game harder to read
there are a couple of people around i have no idea who is, can anybody explain to me who mkfuba07 is? Because Town ANYBODY would not ask that question. Numerous people answered it instantly (and also noted that prplhz already knew the answer himself) and it looked, at first, like it was a discussion-generator. It's not. Randomly regurgitating what games someone has replaced into isn't discussion. Prplhz isn't discussing things. He's just slapping shit in the thread and hoping we let him skate by. He's husslin us. No more husslin. ##vote: prplhzcome at me bro
Perhaps it's just that. I almost got caught up in "Look at prplhz's first post this game guys, he always posts like this when scum" before. And it was just a bullshit get discussion started case, despite looking decent, and prplhz DID end up getting mislynched D1. Not directly because of that case, but it certainly put him in the public eye, and his responses to that stupid case were a lot of what did him in.
Sure, it's nebulous/bizarre. But it is what it is. I just don't like the prplhz lynch today.
|
11589 Posts
On January 22 2013 03:45 Toadesstern wrote: and we're back to this again. You guys are making it too fucking obvious for me to ignore.
|
On January 22 2013 03:34 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:30 sandroba wrote:On January 22 2013 03:18 mkfuba07 wrote: Caught up :D
I'm for an austin, FT, or gonzaw mayor (and sheriff). I think my vote will be switching over to FT though. Austin is the only one of them that I've played with before, so I felt more comfortable with him. However, I've agreed with everything FT's said, and I think he would be the best sheriff atm. I'm ignoring the fact that he's smurfing because I typically don't work on meta anyway, and I think he's a good player based on everything I've seen from him. I feel similarly about gonzaw (minus the smurfing bit), but FT feels like more of a constant to me (if that makes sense), which I think I value in a mayor.
As for who I think we should lynch today, I believe a prplhz lynch is best. I'm a bit troubled because iirc I always find prplhz scummy early, but every time I read one of FT's posts about him I'm re-convinced.
I'm going to try to start dealing with specifics instead of the generics I've been using to this point, since I feel like I finally have some kind of handle on the game XD @palmar (FT) I want to kill this dude instead what do you say? I understand where you're coming from, but this horrible indecisiveness marks all of his town play. Read his previous post @debears and tell me it doesn't look extremelly fake.
|
On January 22 2013 03:41 yamato77 wrote: Sandroba I want to know why you think FT is Palmar and what you think that means about his intentions with his play so far today. His post on you was pretty palmarish. I think he means well, but I'm actually not so sure about prpl. A lot of his posts seem genuine to me.
|
On January 22 2013 03:48 yamato77 wrote:You guys are making it too fucking obvious for me to ignore. Well I have no control over his actions
|
11589 Posts
On January 22 2013 03:51 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:48 yamato77 wrote:On January 22 2013 03:45 Toadesstern wrote: and we're back to this again. You guys are making it too fucking obvious for me to ignore. Well I have no control over his actions One of you is almost certainly scum, and I'm inclined to believe you both are.
|
On January 22 2013 03:37 DearestSnot wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:30 sandroba wrote:On January 22 2013 03:18 mkfuba07 wrote: Caught up :D
I'm for an austin, FT, or gonzaw mayor (and sheriff). I think my vote will be switching over to FT though. Austin is the only one of them that I've played with before, so I felt more comfortable with him. However, I've agreed with everything FT's said, and I think he would be the best sheriff atm. I'm ignoring the fact that he's smurfing because I typically don't work on meta anyway, and I think he's a good player based on everything I've seen from him. I feel similarly about gonzaw (minus the smurfing bit), but FT feels like more of a constant to me (if that makes sense), which I think I value in a mayor.
As for who I think we should lynch today, I believe a prplhz lynch is best. I'm a bit troubled because iirc I always find prplhz scummy early, but every time I read one of FT's posts about him I'm re-convinced.
I'm going to try to start dealing with specifics instead of the generics I've been using to this point, since I feel like I finally have some kind of handle on the game XD @palmar (FT) I want to kill this dude instead what do you say? hey biatch. Wanna do some back and forth? Sure, i was buying some smoke but now i'm here. you may start sharing your thoughts on fuba.
|
On January 22 2013 03:53 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:51 Toadesstern wrote:On January 22 2013 03:48 yamato77 wrote:On January 22 2013 03:45 Toadesstern wrote: and we're back to this again. You guys are making it too fucking obvious for me to ignore. Well I have no control over his actions One of you is almost certainly scum, and I'm inclined to believe you both are. I am inclined to believe Vivax isn't. I know I am not.
|
11589 Posts
On January 22 2013 03:51 sandroba wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 03:41 yamato77 wrote: Sandroba I want to know why you think FT is Palmar and what you think that means about his intentions with his play so far today. His post on you was pretty palmarish. I think he means well, but I'm actually not so sure about prpl. A lot of his posts seem genuine to me. I agree with the sentiments expressed here.
What bugs me is the idea that if this is Palmar, and he is indeed smurfing, I am inclined to believe he would do so with the express intention of making a power play (as he's doing now) as mafia. Obviously he made the decision before he got his role PM, but nonetheless it is a paranoia that I am subject to.
On another note, I am leaving for work, and I won't be back until after the deadline. I'm voting for myself because I want to be sheriff, and I don't see any reason not to put me in that position. No one that isn't mafia thinks I'm suspicious at all. I believe I can do well with JK powers, as my ability to ascertain good town reads on veteran players is actually better than I let on.
|
|
|
|
|