• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:39
CEST 08:39
KST 15:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy2Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)5BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3 [ASL19] Grand Finals
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Who’s Getting the Effortless-Chic Look Just Right?
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27687 users

Chrono Trigger Mafia - Page 19

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 Next All
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 07 2012 00:13 GMT
#6708
Oh poo I was roleblocked, but forgot to send in a night action anywho. This your doing Syllo?
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 07 2012 00:43 GMT
#6716
Holy geezus. I was pretty convinced you were 3rd party tbh.

Doesn't seem like there is any way that Chrono is a fake-claim either.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 07 2012 08:24 GMT
#6763
So this lynch could reasonably come down to Phagga, Austin, Hopeless, or Adam. I don't think I missed anyone, so here are my thoughts on the group:



Hopeless

Pretty sure he's not scum. His reactions towards cases against him have been really townie overall. He also seems more engaged in this game than I've ever seen him.

Also, him shooting me for 222 makes him town in my eyes. Scum don't want to shoot potential mislynch targets - they want to waste lynches on them. His shot on me doesn't make too much sense strategically from a scum perspective.



Adam

His meta overall is pretty lurky, though he seems to be even more lurky and disinterested in his scum games. This game, he's been fairly engaged, and I tend to agree with a lot of what he's been saying. I think he's town.



Phagga

He hasn't done very much, but my gut just says town here for some reason. He very calmly and collectedly defended himself against my cases on him, and him speculating that SnB could flip third party seemed very odd from a scum perspective (it didn't read as fake either). I still think he's possibly scum, but I find it more likely that austin will flip red.



Austinmcc/Z-Boson

There are a couple of factors against him atm:
1) The shield on me N1 and the unaccounted 75 damage on myself. I'm hesitant to draw too much from this (still unflipped scum abilities after all), but it is certainly one thing to consider. Also, I'll ask the mods to confirm my damage PM from N2.
2) Austin being fixated on lynching Acro. This strikes me as pretty scummy - it reads like he's trying to push forward a 3rd party lynch rather than scumhunting.
3) Z-Bo's seemingly weak logic for reads (such as his SnB case).
4) Soft defending risk.nuke

However, there are some significant points in his favor
1) It's pretty much confirmed that Austin healed Z-Boson.
2) His claim seems pretty believable flavor and power-wise.

I don't think the points in his favor are enough to save him at this point. It's very plausible that scum have a healer, and the claim could well be fake. There's more against him than the other options, and I'll vote him until he shows me otherwise.

##Vote Austinmcc

a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 07 2012 08:26 GMT
#6764
@ Phagga

What's your current stance on GK?
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 07 2012 08:40 GMT
#6768
On December 07 2012 17:35 Oatsmaster wrote:
I claim the 75 on phagga


Wait wut? Since when do you have a 75 damage ability? What are all your abilities?
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 07 2012 21:07 GMT
#6808
On December 08 2012 06:03 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2012 21:49 Acrofales wrote:

GK - was in the tent, all scum tried to get him killed (except risk)




could you please elaborate on that? i don't see anything in Toads or Sandros filter that they tried to kill GK, and your spreadsheet does not point to this either.


Toad and Sandro no, but both VE and SnB tried pretty hard to kill him. Seems sufficient enough to label GK as town.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 03:05 GMT
#6853
##Unvote
##Vote Phagga


Austin convinced me
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 08:20 GMT
#6860
Votecount please =)
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 20:15 GMT
#6909
That "scum want to summon Lavos early" line kinda shows me that austin is not thinking like scum. He's not thinking about a seemingly obvious scum objective.

I really think we should be lynching Phagga today. Austin's case is pretty good, and my readthrough of Phagga's play in recent days is somewhat alarming. Phagga's contributions as of late are a town case on Hopeless and very questionable tunneling of GoodKarma (whom he now thinks is town). That's basically it - he's been very reluctant to give scumreads or even scumhunt for that matter.

The closest thing to scumhunting in his filter in recent days is the following:
On December 08 2012 19:40 phagga wrote:
since I have obviously been doing a bad job of putting all my relevant thoughts into the thread, let's try this differently.

I got a bunch of people where I am pretty sure that they are town or playing in towns interest so far (Acro). Here are the ones that are left over:

- Goodkarma
- Hopeless1der
- Austinmcc
- Adam
- Hapa (From all listed here, he is the least probably scum)

Now, the point is, if GK is not scum (which I am slowly starting to think because of his night actions and behaviour around them, as well as the convo in the tent), then who else is? Hapa probably not, on Hope I just made an update that shows that I doubt he is scum. That leaves Adam and Austin. These are therefore the guys I am concentrating on next, so you will get more what I think of them before the deadline.


Phagga seems to be playing the delay game. He hasn't posted anything on Austin/Adam, and his play is yet again following a pattern of getting ready to plop down a last-minute non-controversial vote on a candidate when the lynch is almost decided.

Also, his town cases conflicts with his earlier in-game stance on scumhunting/townhunting:
On November 21 2012 16:54 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2012 16:35 goodkarma wrote:
On November 21 2012 16:12 phagga wrote:
I like Sandroba's plan, his logic is sound. However, I find it dangerous to derive a town read from it, nothing is stopping scum to put up this plan to get themselfes elected.

Why is everyone asking for town reads? I understand that the mechanics are working differently, but everyone just spreading their townreads like the flu will only make it easier for scum to decide who to shoot at night. People like Keirathi and me who have no desire in being elected D1 should not be giving out any townreads, instead we can actually scum hunt in the traditional way and establish ourselfes as town this way. I even think that most candidates should not be throwing out their town reads unless they seem to be a serious candidate (meaning several people have voiced interest in voting that person).



The reason we're not doing traditional scumhunting is because we don't have the power to lynch scum. Our time is best used determining who is most likely town, as we're (hopefully) voting for townies as party leader.

I've touched on this a few times. Hopefully this is the last time clarification is needed. This game isn't about scumhunting. Rather, it revolves around townhunting.


Ok, looks like I need to clarify myself.

Townhunting is stupid. Do you know why? Because scum can fake it to no end, since they know who is not scum. Talking about who is townie makes it much easier for scum to blend in, which then makes it much harder for town to choose the right people for their teams. Yes, there may be multiple factions in this game. Still, if we force scum to scumhunt they are more likely to trip as if they can just give their townreads out. So, no, I disagree that this game revolves around townhunting. We find out who is townie by scumhunting, not by townhunting.


Things aren't adding up. His play so far has been the definition of blending in. It's the scummiest thing in the thread atm, and Phagga should be held accountable for it.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 20:27 GMT
#6913
Well Phagga, I want you to scumhunt. Making town cases on players whom will never be lynched today is not scum-hunting.

You still don't have a concrete scumread 3 hours before the deadline, and it's quite disturbing.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 20:49 GMT
#6916
@ Phagga

To elaborate:

This will be the 4th (5th?) lynch cycle where you beat around the bush and post very irrelevant content until the very end of the cycle. Then at the end of the cycle, you neatly package together a non-controversial vote on someone. If this was once or twice, I wouldn't think much of it. However this is a pattern.

Day 1 (Party vote):
You support kita because you "liked one of his posts" then sheep the vote on Syllo at the very end of the day.

Day 2 (Lynch vote):
You call CaveJohnson scum for very little rationale, make a "case" on GoodKarma, then end up sheeping the vote on Sandro at the end of the day.

Day 3-5
(Bunch of non-controversial votes on party-leaders/lynching Toad, material doesn't apply to my suspicions.)

Day 6 (Lynch):
You spend the entire day tunneling GoodKarma. This is the only aberration from your pattern, but tunneling a candidate who had no chance in hell of getting lynched isn't being useful by any measure.
On December 03 2012 17:18 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2012 17:00 risk.nuke wrote:
##Vote strongandbig

Hapas first ability sound like bogus. The second sound like scum.


That post sounds like scum. you have posted almost nothing in the last 72 hours, and all you do is trying to judge a player on is claimed abilities. Hapa has posted a lot in the last few hours, why don't you comment on that?

You attack risk for calling me scum. This is seemingly a strong accusation, but you are very wishy-washy on him the next day.

Day 7 (Lynch):
Wishy-washy on risk, you still think that GK is the scummiest candidate, build a town-case on Hopeless, then you vote risk at the very end of the day.

[h]
Today (Lynch):
Now we're following the exact same pattern. You've voiced your opinions that GK is town and that one of Adam and Austin is scum. Yet we haven't heard anything resembling analysis on either player. We're now 2.5 hours before the deadline, and once again you're setting up for an inconsequential last-minute vote.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 20:57 GMT
#6918
@ Phagga (cont.)

Over the last 3-4 cycles, the only things you have posted of substance are:
a) Defending yourself against my initial case
b) An aggressive tunnel of GK (that went waaaaaaay too far)

That's it. The only other things that you could possibly label as "analysis" are...

...A bunch of super wishy-washy reads on Austin and risk
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922&currentpage=302#6031

... a town case on hopeless long after everyone thinks Hopeless is town:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922&currentpage=333#6655
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 21:13 GMT
#6923
I suppose the larger point to all of this is: when faced pressure today, who has been more pro-town? Austin or Phagga?

Austin has offered us some very solid analysis and has been very open to defending to himself and replying to our accusations.

Phagga... has done... what has he done? He's defended himself against austin's case (and now my case)... and that's basically it. The only thing resembling scumhunting in his filter for this cycle is this list of players:
On December 08 2012 19:40 phagga wrote:
since I have obviously been doing a bad job of putting all my relevant thoughts into the thread, let's try this differently.

I got a bunch of people where I am pretty sure that they are town or playing in towns interest so far (Acro). Here are the ones that are left over:

- Goodkarma
- Hopeless1der
- Austinmcc
- Adam
- Hapa (From all listed here, he is the least probably scum)

Now, the point is, if GK is not scum (which I am slowly starting to think because of his night actions and behaviour around them, as well as the convo in the tent), then who else is? Hapa probably not, on Hope I just made an update that shows that I doubt he is scum. That leaves Adam and Austin. These are therefore the guys I am concentrating on next, so you will get more what I think of them before the deadline.


Apparently he wants to call this "scum-hunting," but I don't buy it at all. No analysis, no nothing.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 21:19 GMT
#6926
On December 09 2012 06:16 syllogism wrote:
What is the solid analysis austin has offered us? All I can see is him talking about people who even mafia probably thought are third parties (drazerk/acro) and a lot of role speculation? I can't particularly fault him for latter, but his defense is completely different from the spirited one he gave in Paranoia mafia.


His giant case on phagga
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922&currentpage=343#6852

Also, the nature of the accusations against him this game are far different than last game. He's being forced to answer for Z-Bo's night actions, which are really impossible for him to talk about.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 21:27 GMT
#6929
On December 09 2012 06:16 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2012 05:49 Hapahauli wrote:
@ Phagga

To elaborate:

This will be the 4th (5th?) lynch cycle where you beat around the bush and post very irrelevant content until the very end of the cycle. Then at the end of the cycle, you neatly package together a non-controversial vote on someone. If this was once or twice, I wouldn't think much of it. However this is a pattern.

Day 1 (Party vote):
You support kita because you "liked one of his posts" then sheep the vote on Syllo at the very end of the day.

Day 2 (Lynch vote):
You call CaveJohnson scum for very little rationale, make a "case" on GoodKarma, then end up sheeping the vote on Sandro at the end of the day.

Day 3-5
(Bunch of non-controversial votes on party-leaders/lynching Toad, material doesn't apply to my suspicions.)

Day 6 (Lynch):
You spend the entire day tunneling GoodKarma. This is the only aberration from your pattern, but tunneling a candidate who had no chance in hell of getting lynched isn't being useful by any measure.
On December 03 2012 17:18 phagga wrote:
On December 03 2012 17:00 risk.nuke wrote:
##Vote strongandbig

Hapas first ability sound like bogus. The second sound like scum.


That post sounds like scum. you have posted almost nothing in the last 72 hours, and all you do is trying to judge a player on is claimed abilities. Hapa has posted a lot in the last few hours, why don't you comment on that?

You attack risk for calling me scum. This is seemingly a strong accusation, but you are very wishy-washy on him the next day.

Day 7 (Lynch):
Wishy-washy on risk, you still think that GK is the scummiest candidate, build a town-case on Hopeless, then you vote risk at the very end of the day.

[h]
Today (Lynch):
Now we're following the exact same pattern. You've voiced your opinions that GK is town and that one of Adam and Austin is scum. Yet we haven't heard anything resembling analysis on either player. We're now 2.5 hours before the deadline, and once again you're setting up for an inconsequential last-minute vote.


You say I only make non-controversial votes, but when i vote GK on D6 alone you say it's not usefull to vote on a candidate who does not get lynched, so what now? You are full of confirmation bias, you don't even realise how you are contradicting yourself in your reasoning (again).

Also, I've explained why my vote on Sandro was late (weekend), but you ignore it. I also explained why I switched my vote off kita (he got inactive and was not answering my question). Risk promised a case and a defense, which never came, which was why I was waiting.


Again, 1 or 2 last-minute inconsequential votes = no big deal. However, we're on our 4th now, and that's a problem.

As for the GK vote, I'm not contradicting myself. The GK vote wasn't "uncontroversial." There was still some suspicion on GK, and he would have been a possible (yet unlikely) lynch candidate if it wasn't for SnB getting outed through night actions. Point is that the GK stuff on that day is pretty null. You're not sticking your neck out by any means here.

Lastly with risk, I thought I laid it out pretty clear. You call one of his posts very scummy, then seemingly forgot about it and took very wishy-washy opinions on risk for the next day. You even called him slightly-town at one point.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 21:30 GMT
#6930
On December 09 2012 06:24 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2012 06:19 Hapahauli wrote:
On December 09 2012 06:16 syllogism wrote:
What is the solid analysis austin has offered us? All I can see is him talking about people who even mafia probably thought are third parties (drazerk/acro) and a lot of role speculation? I can't particularly fault him for latter, but his defense is completely different from the spirited one he gave in Paranoia mafia.


His giant case on phagga
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922&currentpage=343#6852

Also, the nature of the accusations against him this game are far different than last game. He's being forced to answer for Z-Bo's night actions, which are really impossible for him to talk about.


You are aware that he is rehashing a lot of your points in his case, right?


I think that's fair. However he's still done much more than you have so far.

On December 09 2012 06:25 syllogism wrote:
That doesn't read like a real case to me and it's conveniently about the only person who we can possibly lynch over him. Does he truly think think that "vote limping" on mafia is indicative of someone being mafia in this game considering mafia bussed sandroba, there was a red check on toad (and s&b basically) and risk wasn't even playing? What reasoning should he have contributed exactly? Were other, town aligned people "guilty" of this too (the answer is yes).


Well I read into it differently Syllo.

Also, the issue of "vote limping" isn't as simple as you make it sound. 4 times Phagga has offered irrelevancies throughout the day, only to "limp" on the vote at the last minute. It screams mafia blending-in to me.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 21:58 GMT
#6942
On December 09 2012 06:50 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2012 06:30 Hapahauli wrote:
On December 09 2012 06:24 phagga wrote:
On December 09 2012 06:19 Hapahauli wrote:
On December 09 2012 06:16 syllogism wrote:
What is the solid analysis austin has offered us? All I can see is him talking about people who even mafia probably thought are third parties (drazerk/acro) and a lot of role speculation? I can't particularly fault him for latter, but his defense is completely different from the spirited one he gave in Paranoia mafia.


His giant case on phagga
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922&currentpage=343#6852

Also, the nature of the accusations against him this game are far different than last game. He's being forced to answer for Z-Bo's night actions, which are really impossible for him to talk about.


You are aware that he is rehashing a lot of your points in his case, right?


I think that's fair. However he's still done much more than you have so far.


Two things: The reason why I vote austin is BECAUSE after working through hopes and Adams filter, I feel they are town. That may come late, but whatever. This practically only leaves austin as possible scum. If you don't like how I got to that conclusion, bad luck. It helped me nailing down the person I think is scum, this is why I played this way.

Second, Austins case has no single new accusation in it. It has all been there. How can you come and say this is more than I have done when all he has done is rehashing points others brought up? I really don't see it.


Because it's more what you've done. How can you say you've done more than him?

And there's still the fact that you've offered no analysis on Austin or Adam. I don't care what you have "claimed" to do behind the scenes, because that's completely unverifiable, and I don't believe you at all. The only scumread you've ever offered analysis on the entire game is GoodKarma. That's it.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 22:46 GMT
#6969
Well Phagga, you have 15 minutes to convince us you're town. You've apparently read through Adam's and Austin's filter - give us the rundown of your thoughts if you're town.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 22:52 GMT
#6974
On December 09 2012 07:49 syllogism wrote:
And where did that extra 75 damage on keirathi come from, since he had a 75 damage shield on him too?


Who knows? Unflipped scum perhaps. There are so many hidden factors here between whatever-the-fuck Drazerk was doing, as well as possible factional scum KP.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
December 08 2012 22:55 GMT
#6976
Well if night actions made perfect sense, you would have been dead long ago.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
TBD vs ArTLIVE!
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
uThermal 2v2 Circuit: May
Liquipedia
OSC
21:00
Mid Season Playoffs
ArT vs ReBellioN
HonMonO vs Ziomek
Shameless vs LunaSea
MilkiCow vs GgMaChine
Moja vs HiGhDrA
Jumy vs TBD
Demi vs NightPhoenix
Solar vs Cham
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 265
Livibee 147
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 1558
Leta 323
TY 226
JulyZerg 128
ToSsGirL 95
Nal_rA 77
Shine 37
GoRush 18
soO 18
Yoon 10
[ Show more ]
ivOry 2
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1593
Other Games
summit1g7776
C9.Mang01502
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4623
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 51
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH315
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt567
• HappyZerGling137
Other Games
• Scarra1605
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
4h 21m
HiGhDrA vs Nicoract
MaNa vs HiGhDrA
HiGhDrA vs Reynor
Nicoract vs Reynor
MaNa vs Nicoract
MaNa vs Reynor
MaxPax vs Spirit
Krystianer vs Spirit
OSC
6h 21m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
12h 21m
Korean StarCraft League
20h 21m
SOOP
1d 2h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 3h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 4h
Cheesadelphia
1d 8h
CSO Cup
1d 10h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 11h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
[ Show More ]
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.