• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:18
CEST 16:18
KST 23:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)12Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week2Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025) Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ bonjwa.tv: my AI project that translates BW videos StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - LB Round 4 & 5 [ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - WB Finals & LBR3 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Pro Gamers Cope with Str…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 35023 users

Newbie Mini Mafia XXXI - Page 4

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 28 2012 11:45 GMT
#684
Well I did post a rather large case on Yamato right before night ended and it has only gotten responses from Yamato himself (he basically just dismisses it, but that it to be expected since it is against him) and Jacob who thinks it brings up valid points. Anyone else have an opinion on it?:

+ Show Spoiler +
On November 28 2012 07:35 Kickstart wrote:
Right so as promised I did some digging into the Munk-E lynch because I felt there would be something there that would help us get some reads on people. After looking at it I have come to the conclusion that

Yamato77 is SCUM

Now before I get into making my own case I want to show what Munk-E had to say during Day 1 and particularly near lynch time, because at this point in time the only person who we know for 100% is town is Munk-E., so we automatically know that his posts were genuine and had town motivation. Now I will grant that just because Munk-E was town does not necessarily make his reads correct, but I think the fact that he is the only confirmed town at this point gives his reads some extra weight that we cannot yet give to anyone else.

Munk-E's strongest read was on Yamato, here are his posts:

+ Show Spoiler +
On November 27 2012 05:51 Munk-E wrote:
Right now, I feel Yamato is our best bet.

Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 23:10 yamato77 wrote:
It seems like most people that have posted opinions about me that are negative have done so while quoting or referencing the earliest part of my posts, so I guess I'll explain my thought process behind them. Early on, it became apparent to me, as I believe it did to Oats, that literally everyone was either not online at all or not posting intentionally. Most of my posts were in response to other people. If you'll notice, one of them was in response to CC asking me what I thought of him. I said

On November 25 2012 14:53 yamato77 wrote:
I don't really care for your topics of discussion, but that's about it.


Perhaps I should have explained then, but I meant that I didn't like the way he entered the thread. His little questionnaire was really, really pointless. It seemed to me at the time something that a mafia player might do to appear to be "starting discussion" without putting anything of real value in the thread.

Thus, I limited my posting intentionally as to not really do anything except react to other people and try to get them to give information. Aqua was willing; I asked him his thoughts on me and Cheesecake and he gave them, without any questions. It was then that Cheesecake asked me my opinion of him, and I gave the aforementioned answer. Then he asked me what I thought the discussion should be about, and I told him, I thought us (Aqua and I) talking about whether he was acting suspicious was fine. I called out Oats for calling him scum, which I was not ready to do without more solid evidence, and have not done so yet.

My next post received a lot of heat. I posted my ill-timed opinion of Mr. Cheesecake. I was being honest. Nothing looked like worthwhile contribution up to that point, to me. It still doesn't. He says he has contributed, but I don't see anything except a poor read on Helos he backed away from, continually attacking me for voicing my opinion of him, and defending himself. He has posted no other reads on anyone else. I keep saying these same things and they are still true.

I want to know what people think of me because I don't want to be surprised by more votes on me like I was with SDM's. I didn't like his voting of me because I didn't think people would honestly give a scum read on me based on my posting up to that point. I suppose I was wrong, which is why I've since become much more forthcoming with my thoughts and motivations.

As far as reads on other people. Kickstarter's sheer aggression when defending Cheesecake against Oats is astounding. He uses vulgar language more than once and seems wholly preoccupied with Oats' vote being on CC. He doesn't even care if other people think Oats is scum necessarily, so why did he vote for him? The play doesn't really make sense because all he did was cause a whole lot of uproar over a play that no one else saw as scummy. If anything, THAT seems like a scum play.

That being said, Oats is definitely not a town read. None of his posting is particularly forthcoming about his actual motivation. His vote on CC, while initially seeming like a pressure vote, hasn't been justified properly.

SDM and Aqua are probably town. They have posted the most real content up to this point and their arguments have been clearly motivated.

Helo is a less troll version of Oats. None of his play is backed with clear motivation, but it is not inherently scummy either.

If Jacob misspells my name one more time I will lynch him. In seriousness, I think he has posted a lot of fluff and rehashed arguments. I am interested in who he reads as blue, though. I have a blue read too.

Munk-E is seriously lackluster. I would vote for him over CC if I made a choice right now. I don't like CC's play but I don't like how little Munk has contributed and how long he has lurked.

So to rank my reads from scummiest to least it would go:

Munk-E
Cheesecake
Kickstarter

(area of ambiguity)

Jacob
Helo
Oats

(/end area of ambiguity)

SDM
Aqua
Me



He seems to be against me, CC and kickstarter. I understand his reasoning behind being suspicious of me (despite my opinion of being suspicious of lurkers), however he never made an argument against CC, despite promising to.

Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 15:56 yamato77 wrote:
I'll make my case against CC when I get home. My early game posts were obviously bad play. I get that now. Since then I think I'm quickly improving. I keep asking because it does no good to be town and get lynched day one for playing like scum.

That being said, I completely understand SDM's vote to me, but I have not changed my opinion on CC.


In fact, the only one I see who has made a real case against CC is SDM, and that case was based off of how he played in previous games. I feel basing a scum read on how he played before is really dumb, because he could easily change his style, and in that post he also said that he probably intentionally did that. This just creates a massive WIFOM situation, and thus to me, invalidates the point.

This post was also posted in the middle of a minor Kickstarter bandwagon. And while he did make a small case against kickstarter, it was nothing really substantial, and somewhat contradictive.

Show nested quote +
The play doesn't really make sense because all he did was cause a whole lot of uproar over a play that no one else saw as scummy. If anything, THAT seems like a scum play.

That being said, Oats is definitely not a town read.


(Also as a side note, I saw that play as scummy, as I explained before.)
This may be to distance himself from oats, who I feel still isn't in the clear, but his entire case on kickstarter was because he went after oats so aggressively, therefore, going and saying he might be scum is contradictory to his entire case.

What I noticed most about his only posts that were more than a few lines were hardcore about defending his image. (above and below)

Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 06:55 yamato77 wrote:
On November 26 2012 06:33 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Yes, SDM, I know you pointed this out, but I have to say something.

On November 26 2012 05:34 yamato77 wrote:
Mr. Cheesecake is playing without contributing. He's written a lot, but most of it is absolutely useless to a town looking for scum. His policy discussion and talk about other mafia games he's played doesn't help hunt for other players, it seems like more of a defense for himself. Then he calls out two players, myself and Helo, trying to draw attention away from himself. None of this reads town to me, at all.


I really do NOT like this kind of post from Yamato.

First, he is completely hypocritical because he hasn't contributed two cents to the thread. Secondly, he is answering a question that isn't addressed to him. He randomly pops up when I'm being pressured to cast aspersions on me. Where was he before this? What is his motivation or making such a cavalier, random post?

He is entitled to his opinion, but his convenient timing and content reads inherently scummy to me.


My motivation is to give my read on someone who is playing suspiciously since his first post.

Where was I before that? Asleep.

A bunch of your argument to me is simply fallacy. Me being hypocritical (whether true or not) has nothing to do with your contributions to the thread. My timing and content is scummy? Of course I want to voice my opinion on someone who is being cast into the spotlight. What am I supposed to do? Ignore it?

You didn't even answer my accusations, you just spun around and attacked me.

At least SDM's post against mine had some quality.

On November 26 2012 06:03 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:
I don't like this reaction. Sure, you can argue he hasn't contributed much, but at least he's been somewhat enganged in the thread unlike a lot of others.

Aside from that, the reason he talked about his old games was because I asked him, him answering is appreciated. Him calling out you and Helo can easily have town motivations. Obviously town wants to call out what he considers suspicious bahaviour.

You end up saying nothing reads town, but the more important question is: does it read scum, and why?

Other than that your one-liners are really not contributing much and kind of stay-under-the-radar like.

FOS Yamato


I don't think my posting at the beginning should be taken as alignment indicative. It was prodding, mostly.

I'm on the fence about Mr. Cheesecake. His posting is still mostly defending himself, and attacking two players who posted early, me and Helo. That kind of behavior doesn't really indicate alignment, but if he keeps coming after me with posts that don't even address my concerns about him, I'm going to vote for him.

Most of what I've posted so far has been to get a reaction, and it has worked. How people answer questions and accusations are definitely tells.


Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 12:38 yamato77 wrote:
SDM's vote on me is based on information from a single post basically, which does not bode well for my opinion of him. Honestly if I am your top scumread because of a bunch of one-liners and a post where I give my negative opinion on someone you read as scum, you are doing something wrong.

CC's vote on me looks like scum trying to deflect attention onto a player receiving negative heat. Also, it would eliminate someone he sees as a threat, if he was scum, in that I haven't liked his play since the start of the game.

I'm tempted to vote Cheesecake with you, if your vote is actually serious. However, if I get lynched today, I would 100% go after CC and SDM tomorrow because of the way they have parked their votes on me.



Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 07:26 yamato77 wrote:
You want my opinion on Oats? He is probably just a bored townie early on because him giving some silly read is just to spark discussion on something. As he keeps going on, a lot of his posting is in reaction to you and accusations against him, which is entirely logical given that until you guys FoS'd me, that was the only discussion. Nothing there reads either way, in particular.

SDM's post was "a little jab"? Dude voted for you. If I'm interested in his reasons, which I was, and I have my own reasons, which I did, I would voice them. Again, am I supposed to just stay silent and let you lynch me for saying nothing?

I definitely said I didn't like your topics of discussion in my first few posts. They are fluff, which I don't care for. I didn't react to them because that is adding to the fluff. If that is how people think we should start threads, I disagree. It doesn't provide any information at all. What Oats did was more productive, in my opinion, but hardly alignment indicative.

Also, I'm definitely interested to see if SDM still thinks my play is scummy after these two posts. And how about the rest of you lurkers? Do I look scummy to you?

Yes Yamato, yes you do

Now I shouldn't need to tell you why I'm suspicious of someone who's only real content is making cases for why he's innocent.


He also voted for me after both helo and SDM, but i'll let it slide because I was at the top of suscpicion list.

Nonetheless, he seems most concerned about defending himself, and explaining his actions, and that certainly seems more scummy than anyone else so far to me, and while I wish I had longer to decide, he certainly looks the worst to me, so therefore ##Vote: yamato77


(p.s. before anyone says it, I didn't just make this post because he was voting for me, I understand that's just pressure.)

and
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 27 2012 11:26 Munk-E wrote:
Alright,i hate having to defend myself, but i guess it's necessary so you don't waste a vote. No one has made a real case against me. The only real argument against me that everyone claims is that I'm lurking, and that i voted to save myself. As for the lurking, the point of accusing lurkers is to get them to talk. In theory, the more they say the easier they are to read, of they're mafia, they might say too much and give a tell. This point is null though, because it brings suspicion to lurkers. Besides, you got what you want from me, I'm talking more. As for the voting solely to save myself, it's not true. Yamato still is the scummiest player here, doing minimal scum hunting and over reacting every time someone accuses him of something. Someone accused me of being sheepish, because i said i wasn't 100% sure. I guess that was a wrong thing to say, even though that's how the game works. You never are positive about a role unless you are detective, which wouldn't work because it's day one, or mafia. You just go with your best guess.




The point is there isn't a case against me, just a band wagon. Honestly, there are so many of you that voted for me with no or minimal justification, especially those who only recently jumped on the bandwagon.



Now to sum up Munk-E's points against Yamato (but you should still read the posts I quoted because I think Munk-E actually did a good job in making his case, and again knowing that Munk-E was town makes his rather well thought out case against Yamato even more compelling) he accuses Yamato of content less posting, not making any scum reads himself while getting on others for doing the same thing, and of only defending himself. All of these charges are true and they hold up all through Yamato's filter. Now I cant copy and paste his entire filter but I encourage you to go look at it and you will see that Yamato has the largest filter of anyone in the game (about 5 pages), but it entirely composed of, one liners, summation posts (just a summary of events thus far), defense of himself, and bad/easy cases (his only real cases have been against cheese, both times they are bad and use points that have already been made by someone else). Now that is a huge pattern of posting - he has had more posts than anyone else and with the longest filter he has managed to offer nearly nothing in the way of looking for scum.

Now all this so far is bad for Yamato and on its own would make a good case against him and is good enough reason to vote for him because it is all very scummy. But looking at the Munk-E lynch I found something even more damning. I looked at the progression of votes that went onto Munk-E and tried to see which ones were suspicious. The first vote on Munk-E is from HeloKnight and the second is from SDM. Now Helo is the first to make a move on Munk-E and does it because Munk-E is lurking and the only post Munk-E did make was a sheep onto Oats - both valid points at the time. Now SDMs vote onto Munk-E is for lurking aswell, but at least SDM is hesitant with the vote, but still gives solid reasons for it other than the ones Helo gave and doesn't seem to be jumping onto a Munk-E wagon. Then Yamato throws his vote on Munk-E with this post:

Show nested quote +
On November 27 2012 00:39 yamato77 wrote:
##Vote: Munk-E

If he posts anything useful at all in the few hours I am sleeping after this post, I will change it, because I really don't like lynching people just because they lurk. However, right now, I have to place a vote just in case I oversleep drastically and he really is the best candidate.

CC and kick still on my scumdar. Jacob, Helo, and Oats are not far from it, either.


This is suspicious for a few reasons. First he tries to hedge himself by saying that this isn't his final choice, he is just making it and will change it because he doesn't like lynching lurkers. Well the vote never changes - Yamato says he doesn't like lynching lurkers (which is his only charge against Munk-E in this post) but in the same post says Munk-E is the best candidate (when his only beef is his lurking) and again he just leaves the vote on the lurker. This is someone trying to jump on a wagon without drawing attention to themselves if I've ever seen it. He says "oh this really isn't a great vote and I will change it" but makes the vote anyways and never changes it. It is even worse given that he says he has two other scumreads, because if his only problem with Munk-E was his lurking then why would he jump onto that easy wagon instead of trying to push his actual reads?

Here is another post from Yamato when he was under a bit of pressure:

Show nested quote +
On November 27 2012 07:19 yamato77 wrote:
Seriously pressure CC to do anything besides tunnel one player. That's all he's done today and tomorrow he may have no plan, if he is scum.

Jacob, equally, has contributed nothing of real value. If he's off playing a video game like he claims (terrible cop-out), then perhaps you guys need to pressure him into making reads that aren't complete fluff like posting a whole paragraph deciphering if I slept the right amount of time in his opinion. His vote on me seems contrived, as does Munk-E's, because neither one cast serious suspicion on me before placing their vote.

MUNK-E IS SCUM. He has lurked the whole game for no good reason. His two serious posts are mostly content-less reasons to sheep his vote on a player already under heat. I see absolutely zero town motivation in his actions at this point. If I get lynched, your day 2 should be DESTROYING him for how terrible he is playing.


Again we have the typical accusing others of tunneling and sheeping and all that while not providing much himself, but the interesting thing here is the last paragraph because it just reaffirms what I have been saying. Yamato only brings up two points against Munk-E here, one is that he is lurking and the other is that Munk-E's two posts are content-less cheeping onto players. Well the first is just his excuse for leaving his vote on Munk-E, everyone was already saying Munk-E was lurking so this is just a safe statement - nothing new here. But the second statement is a blatant lie. Look at Munk-E's post on Yamato that I spoilered above and ask yourself if that is a content-less sheeping post. I don't think it is, it is a well reasoned post and all his criticisms of Yamato are valid even up until now, and we know now that Munk-E was town and this leads me to believe that he was being genuine - this was not a sheep.

So there is my case on Yamato. I do need to go to class now but I wanted to post this case before night actions because I won't be back until afterwards and wanted to contribute incase I get NKd. So right now Yamato has been promoted to my top scum read followed by Oats.

Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 28 2012 11:51 GMT
#687
Yeah I didn't really expect it to get read until after night time but shit, its been day2 awhile now and no one said much :[
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 28 2012 12:04 GMT
#691
Oats did that a lot to my posts directed at him, without ever answering any of them so whatever.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 28 2012 12:11 GMT
#694
He made a lot of those one-liner retarded comments whenever I made a post against him but he never actually talked about any of the points I made.
On November 25 2012 21:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
lol
OMGUS vote me :D
glad you still are a newbie :D
Welcome to the thread by the way

On November 25 2012 22:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
OH YES FINALLY, you say why my behaviour is scummy. :D
My explanation is that his first 2 posts seem off. What do you want? Cheesecake posted less than 10 posts, how can you garner any evidence from that?

On November 25 2012 23:26 Oatsmaster wrote:
LOL kickstart learning from the vets huh.
there are like 4 pages of content, I challenge you to find a case out of that.
A proper case that has scum reasons for certain posts.
ok about cheesecake
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2012 11:06 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Greetings gentlemen!

A few questions to spark ye olde town discussion:

1) How many games have you played on TL?
2) Where do you stand on lurker lynching D1?
3) Pie or Cheesecake?

For me:

1) this is my third, one game as mafia one as VT
2) Lynching a lurker d1 is good to me if no viable scum read presents itself. Also, we have no vig to take care of pesky lurkers otherwise.
3) Pie. Jk jk.


This post looks like he is being light-hearted, especially with the Pie and Cheesecake question.
I feel that it is an act, the post looks VERY deliberate in being casual.

Show nested quote +
On November 25 2012 11:55 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On November 25 2012 11:33 Oatsmaster wrote:
I think that accurate day 1 reads are difficult to make due to the low sample size and if we lynch the lurkers, everyone has to contribute which will help in making more accurate reads.


Pretty obvious statement if you ask me. We just need to possess the confidence to scumhunt effectively. There is a 48 hour window between now and lynch time, so there is no reason anyone should be lurking. If we have to lynch a lurker, meh, but I'd much rather have this "small sample size" inflated within D1 so we aren't forced down the coin flip road.

Anyone else around?


Then here, a reason for people to be lurking is because we havent called them out. He basically says, I will lynch a lurker/anybody. Which is good reason to hop onto any bandwagon that is benefical for scum. Like lynching an inactive town/active but bad town
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 28 2012 14:53 GMT
#720
I'll take that as confirmation from marv. Good times.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 28 2012 15:00 GMT
#724
lol
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 28 2012 16:22 GMT
#733
Well I said at the end of my large case that my top reads are Yamato and Oats. Oats should be obvious coming from me since I have been hard core railing on him since the start even when everyone was like "stfu kick we don't want to hear anymore from you about Oats" and then I did vote Yamato day1 and provided that case against him during night phase. I would say right now Yamato is a stronger scum read to me, but I think that is just because I built that case on him most recently so he is just in the forefront of my mind, but I would be ok with an Oats or Yamato lynch at this point - that is unless they do something to change my mind like do some real scum hunting for once (at this point you have had PLENTY of time to provide a real case and most of the people who I view as seriously trying to help town have done so already).
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 04:31 GMT
#752
Don't think this really needs too much justification but I will give a bit anyways. Bad play since beginning, suspicious and scummy. After numerous requests to shape up from many people he is still unable to and is still sheeping his vote around while making no real cases on anyone (I am sorry but some crap case that you yourself are the first to dismiss shortly after you make it don't count).

You have had ample opportunity to change my mind by scum hunting and posting a decent case on anyone. Since you refuse to do so and your most recent posts are just more evidence that you refuse to do so I am putting my vote on you. You still have time to scum hunt and start playing the game - I suggest you do so.

##vote: Oatsmaster
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 04:52 GMT
#754
Stop feeling sorry for yourself and start scum hunting, you've been asked to for days now. And no you ARE "guilty" of playing scummy because you have not provided anything at all, proving your "innocence" is as easy as scum hunting at an acceptable level, which is what everyone has been asking you to from the beginning.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 05:47 GMT
#761
I can read just fine. The fact that making cases is hard is not a good reason for you not to have to make any. They are hard to make for everyone, yet several people have put the time, energy, effort, and analysis needed into making them. You continue to feel sorry for yourself and make one sentence meaningless posts instead of actually making a case.

But anyways I am going to sleep now, I advise (for the nth time now) that if you are town you make a decent case or provide some in depth scum reads - anything of substance, if you are scum just continue doing what you have been doing all game.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 12:56 GMT
#797
The conversation right now is completely unproductive and frankly is aggravating me.

@Oats
Man come on what are you doing, if you are town (which seems unlikely at this point) then you CAN NOT CONTINUE POSTING THE WAY YOU HAVE BEEN. Why do you just continue right along posting the same exact useless 3 line posts with 7 word sentences. Come on dude you are just making this frustrating now.

@Yamato
First of all, my quoting Munk-E's read on you is not my entire case, and your blatant lie to assert this is neither true or relevant as a defense. It is a point against you in my case though, but I make many points against you. If you want to actually defend yourself against my case, read it and respond to the points; don't look at the fact that I quote Munk-E at the very beginning and then try and tell everyone that that is my case, because anyone who actually reads it will then see you are lying.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 14:29 GMT
#808
he didnt do ##vote
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 14:32 GMT
#811
I see no problem with that being his punishment ^^
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 14:37 GMT
#815
It is ok, I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions you come to. For example him asking the mods that question does not make him scum, it could make him a blue. I still think he is scummy but my case is better (im my own biased opinion )
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 14:39 GMT
#817
Then do something to change that. I have made a case on Yamato as well as you but people seem to think you are scummier, it is up to you to change their perception of you, not up to us to change how we view you just because you ask us to - you have to do something that warrants us changing our minds.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 14:46 GMT
#819
##unvote
I really hate you right now. This doesn't mean you are off the hook but now I have to reevaluate because lynching claimed blues is fucking stupid at this point - almost as dumb as claiming blue without trying to argue your way out of it with 12+ hours to go.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 15:22 GMT
#829
Iunno SDM that is a bit risky, but I admit I am fucking horrible at this sort of game setup speculation so I am going to have a hard time following anyone on their reasoning on these things. The way I see this though, is that Oats just painted a target on his head. If he is in fact Dr as he claims he is, scum are probably going to want to get rid of him immediately.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 15:49 GMT
#857
God this is so bad on so many levels, we are moving from one shit discussion onto another shit discussion about whether we should lynch a claimed blue. I don't know - I am at a loss, I don't think Oats helps town AT ALL with this claim, all he does is save himself - but I don't feel comfortable lynching someone who claims they are blue. This is fucked.
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 15:50 GMT
#862
I agree 100% with yamato that this claim is fucking up town pretty bad because Oats basically forced us to divert the entire thread discussion to whether or not his claim is fake or real, but I'm not sure I agree with your conclusion yamato that we lynch him anyways - what if his claim is true? ;/
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
November 29 2012 15:52 GMT
#865
It shouldnt if you are blue - you should play like town. I think that is his point - that you have not played like town at all.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Road to EWC
14:00
Global Qualifier - Day 2
Lemon vs HeRoMaRinELIVE!
Astrea vs GuMiho
goblin vs TBD
Ryung vs TBD
ewc_black1239
ComeBackTV 659
WardiTV345
CranKy Ducklings288
Rex161
BRAT_OK 75
3DClanTV 53
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .210
Rex 161
ProTech80
BRAT_OK 75
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 64420
Calm 7657
Rain 4266
firebathero 1198
EffOrt 534
BeSt 517
Mini 354
Light 135
ZerO 130
Hyun 109
[ Show more ]
Last 83
Rush 58
Barracks 31
scan(afreeca) 18
SilentControl 8
Bale 5
Terrorterran 5
ivOry 3
Dota 2
Gorgc6678
qojqva1779
Counter-Strike
allub272
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0359
Mew2King86
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor559
Other Games
singsing2535
B2W.Neo1332
Dendi800
DeMusliM776
XBOCT315
crisheroes243
KnowMe164
ArmadaUGS107
ZerO(Twitch)15
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream20710
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream8157
Other Games
gamesdonequick704
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 3
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV191
League of Legends
• Nemesis12655
• Stunt407
Upcoming Events
BSL: ProLeague
3h 42m
UltrA vs Sziky
Dewalt vs MadiNho
Replay Cast
1d 19h
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
BSL: ProLeague
6 days
SOOP
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

NPSL Lushan
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.