|
Excellent. Fortuitous it is that I have to waste a couple of letters to get to my real post. Golly gee willikers, I can't believe I forgot the wonderful words of w. Huh. I am almost there. Just a bit more. Keep on going cross, you got it. Leap for joy because I have arrived at my true post!
Mute, I no longer am. Now, to answer a puzzling query. O Hopeless, did you not read my wonderful poem closely? Perhaps if you did, you would have found the answer you seek; I even explained its meaning in the paragraph below it. QED, my post was not, but to satisfy your question, I shall clarify.
Really all I said was that if you don't vote in the voting thread along with your vote, you are hiding information from us and that is anti-town. Since brood did not know the rules about voting during a timeout, he voted in there after his timeout was up. Therefore, I see no reason to punish him for a joke vote on me that turned out to be weird because he did not know the specific rules of this game. Until I read his explanation I thought like you that it was scummy, but then I realized that he had town's best interests at heart by writing his vote "in stone" (come on, my poem wasn't that difficult to decipher) in the voting thread.
|
Wonderful. Xfire almost forgot w again.
You missed that he (Chezinu) already claimed VT + Show Spoiler + On October 31 2012 23:04 Chezinu wrote: I am innocent along with 4 performers. Just follow along with me. Knocking out 4 performs, 3 red ones, and 1 host leaves 3 audience members. Let's subtract me and that's 2 audience members.
|
Just to clarify, Hopeless, I did claim; but did I do that to take the heat off of blues, or am I actually a blue trying to claim VT to sneak under the radar (really over the radar with the way I've been posting)? Keep on guessing because I might not have even read my role PM myself. Lol. Maybe I should do that. Novel idea I had, to play without checking my role PM. Oh the possibilities!
|
Pooh to you, blazing. Queue's are meant to be stood in, as are rules meant to be followed. Rule breaking that is purposeful goes against the spirit of the game. Since you called my post a terrible abomination, I will try to make my posts more readable, but I also ask that you play WLIIA mafia and not just mafia. That is why I joined this game, because playing WLIIA while playing mafia seemed awesome!
|
Xfire has now checked his role PM, so his win condition is clear to him. You will no longer see that from me because I guess I do have the possibility of playing against my role PM. Zorry for that, strong.
|
And to answer Hopeless who brought up a good point on brood. Brood's motives were veiled in the beginning and not revealed until pressured; that is true. Continuing information I still need before I place my vote on him.
|
Your idea to put letters in front of your sentences is a nice idea gonzaw, but I don't like it; it's too inelegant. Zing, I just realized that you got ninja'd and put those letters in front, so you didn't lose your post; nice save (too bad you misplaced the F). And I do believe you make good points on Keirathi. By his posting, he has revealed very little. Cutting to the chase, I like Keirathi as scum more than anyone else at the moment. Doh, I won't vote for him yet until he has had a chance to prove himself, but if i don't like his contribution when he comes back, I'll vote for him barring any other obvious scummy behavior.
Eh, this WLIIA mafia. Fluff n stuff with this alphabet thing is the name of the game. Hurray, I will try to keep my fluffy sentences to a minimum, but I will use them to ninja proof my posts because I like that solution better than gonzaw's.
|
I also want clarification from Djagu because if anything that's seems like a way worse way to enter the thread when compared to brood's joke vote on me.
Just realized I forgot the letter g in my last post...
|
Gonzaw, do you agree with blazing's analysis of adam's meta?
On November 01 2012 04:44 Blazinghand wrote:I've been back and posting. Gonzaw. Basically, Adam typically opens up with big paragraphs and direct Q/A (see any of his games for examples of this). However, in games like TL Mafia LI when he rolls scum, he also opens up with big pieces of analysis, and more importantly, he hides behind questioning other players. In NMM III, he jumps in (as a replacement, admittedly), with accusations and direct confrontation against SS. How is the italicized portion any different from the bold portion? Is not direct Q&A the same as questioning other players, and big paragraphs the same as big pieces of analysis. Judge for yourself and respond, please. Keeping this post in mind as well as his complete lack of trying to play the alphabet game, BH has now registered on my scumdar.
|
Lame, BH, if you tried to play the alphabet game, I could have just gotten your response, but you have to be that dude who is too cool to play those dumb kiddy games. Maybe you can now see the importance of trying to post according to the game of the day.
|
I apologize if I have somehow offended you Blazing, but there is no need to insult both my reading comprehension and writing style. This is a WLIIA mafia game. Have you seen the actual show? It is very silly and hilarious. Sorry that you aren't finding my posts to be like that.
Now, I read your case and looked at Adam's posts and don't see much of a difference metawise. The first quote is from your town example game, Arkham City, and the second is the scum example game, TL Mafia LI. In both he is a bit abrasive. As town he says things are useless, counterproductive, retarded, etc. As scum he calls out Fourface for being sarcastic and tells him to stop it. + Show Spoiler +On February 06 2012 21:45 Adam4167 wrote: All this setup piffle is useless and counterproductive. Both sides can post filler about the setup. Let power roles make their own judgement calls, let the night actions unfold as they do, and spend your time doing something that will actually lead to scum kills, like prodding people or reading filters. In the spirit of that:
Kurumi, you soft-defend Schworz twice in a single post, also indicate that vigi's should avoid him and the rest of your post is basic setup waffle. I don't remember you being this wishy-washy in TL50 either, with statements like 'I find it funny that...' and 'I just ponder', you sure come off that way now. What are you playing at?
Tobberoth, you say you're considering a vote on Kenpachi, yet you want to wait until 'discussion comes up later in the day'. This comes off as quite passive and almost like you're waiting for a bandwagon to pickup speed before you seal the deal. Why not just vote him now if you find him suspicious, as you claim, then move it later as more information presents itself?
Ico, policy lynches are retarded... just no.
Jaybrundage, I know you haven't even posted yet, but we've never been the same team. Don't see why this game would be any different. Have my vote!
##Vote: jaybrundage + Show Spoiler +On April 09 2012 00:12 Adam4167 wrote:Risen, I don't agree with what you are saying in regards to EchelonTee. You are voting him based on semantics over whether calling someone suspicious is an accusation. I think your case is paper thin and the fact that it gathered additional votes is concerning. Fourface, posting cases riddled with sarcasm is not helpful at all. It clouds the point you are trying to make and makes reading your posts more difficult then necessary. Stop it. Show nested quote +On April 08 2012 23:41 Tunkeg wrote:And I am in. Besides a very nonsaying back and forth between ET and Risen this day have thus far been very uneventful. Not even the usual LAL discussions have been started, and no crazy gamebreaking strategies have been suggested. No real subject have been offered for discussion so I will give you my own: How do you guys feel about a no lynch on day 1? What are your thoughts on random lynches? I want to avoid a no lynch on day 1, because we want information and we want to know who vote who and why from the get go. As for a random lynch I am against a totally random lynch, but for a random lynch in the way we lynch the one who is the worst player. And objectively speaking this is jackal58. At least this is the case for games started and finished in 2012 thus far. He is 1-7 in win loss with 1 draw. In my walkhrough of the games in 2012 (Kaller game and the resistance games not included) he is dead last with Jitsu and myself following behind. + Show Spoiler +So you guys want to go random lynch on jackal's ass? Tunkeg, in this post you mention the 'back and forth' between ET and Risen yet you don't comment on either's alignment or your thoughts on their dispute. What are your thoughts on both of them? Lynching Jackal over him having a poor performance this year is ridiculous. We are not here to lynch bad players, only scum. He might have been slightly more harsh as town, but that is only one example and essentially that is all your case boils down to. I don't have the time to do an in depth study of Adam's tone in every game he ever played, and even then I think that your meta reasoning is tenuous at best.
Look I didn't care one bit at trying to make this post fit into the alphabet game, Blazing. This won't happen again because I actually want to play to the spirit of this game.
I just hope we can get along and start with a clean state.
P.S. I just saw this beauty by Mementoss
On November 01 2012 06:08 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2012 11:38 Blazinghand wrote: Love to. My reason is that at this point in the thread he is the scummiest. "No way," you say, "he hasn't posted yet!" Often, that is reason enough. Proof of his scumminess is that he is a general liability.
Quack is the sound ducks make. Really though I'm gonna change my vote to Adam there's no way that post is town. Seriously if he was reforming posts he'd reform his post into that post instead of making a complaining post. Trying to get cred when he deserves none. Untie! Going to gym, fuck the rules. Only got 5 minutes but would like to comment on a few things. The above is your case against Adam right? I don't consider it the strongest case, as you above seem pretty confident in it, but the fact that he hasn't been back to contribute is pretty un easing. leaning scummy on him right now. I half agree to what you say about crossfire too blazinghand. His posts were unreadable thats for sure. I had to re-read several paragraphs 3 times before I even understood what the point was, and then it didn't even deliverable the point well -_-. This is more likely xfire posting as town because he was being ridiculous, but I also think there is a possibility he started posting these long unreadable fluffy statements, so that maybe someone else would follow his ridiculous posting style and muck up the town completely. Thats scum intereference. Also, he actually looks to the non-reader, that he is contributing more than most, when really, hes more interested in literary skills and looking town, than actually finding scum. ATM I would be happy to vote either Xfire or BKE, (which I stated earlier why I thought his fake joke stuff seemed scummy, while his purposely?? getting restrictions wasn't liekly scummy), could go for Adam too, but I would rather wait for him to come into the thread again before doing that. Gunna lay down a vote Xfire atm. Need to re-read the thread and consider all the options, I have been either asleep or at work for this whole thread thus far. ##Vote Crossfire
Yeah, so you see me as more likely town, so you vote for me? -_- ??????? That's not scummy at all...
|
On November 01 2012 08:00 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2012 06:20 Crossfire99 wrote: Yeah, so you see me as more likely town, so you vote for me? -_- ??????? That's not scummy at all... -obviously didnt read all of my post, and a pretty defensive reaction over 2 votes this early imo Haha, don't make me laugh, mementoss; I read your post and now I guess I need to explain it to you.
On November 01 2012 06:08 Mementoss wrote: I half agree to what you say about crossfire too blazinghand. His posts were unreadable thats for sure. I had to re-read several paragraphs 3 times before I even understood what the point was, and then it didn't even deliverable the point well -_-. I agree I could have explained myself better; I got carried away in the beginning of this game and will try to do better going forward.
This is more likely xfire posting as town because he was being ridiculous, Judging right here that even with all that crap I wrote which was confusing and weird, you think that is is more likely that I am town. Let me explain what "more likely" means. "More likely" means that given two options, one has a better chance of being true when compared to the other. Now you already stated that it is more likely that I am town, but now you need to say what the other option is, (the option that has a worse chance of being true).
but I also think there is a possibility he started posting these long unreadable fluffy statements, so that maybe someone else would follow his ridiculous posting style and muck up the town completely. Thats scum intereference. Also, he actually looks to the non-reader, that he is contributing more than most, when really, hes more interested in literary skills and looking town, than actually finding scum. Oh, here you explain what that option with the worse chance of being true is; the option in which I am scum.
Gunna lay down a vote Xfire atm. Need to re-read the thread and consider all the options, I have been either asleep or at work for this whole thread thus far.
##Vote Crossfire Proved I just did why your vote doesn't line up with your thought. Questioning my alignment is good. Revealing that you think it is more probable that I am town than scum and then voting for me is bad reasoning for a vote.
So I hope I explained that well enough to your likening, mementoss.
On November 01 2012 08:00 Mementoss wrote:U BH, I said, I can see where your coming from how it seems townie, but I was ultimately voting him because I could also see where he could be doing it as scum - looking like contributing, - acknoledges moost of it was fluff when called out, -but why post fluff pirposely if you are town - as I said in my post, I need to re-read the thread and it isn't a strong scum read by any means - if your looking for people not reading the thread, look no further - Show nested quote +On November 01 2012 06:20 Crossfire99 wrote: Yeah, so you see me as more likely town, so you vote for me? -_- ??????? That's not scummy at all... -obviously didnt read all of my post, and a pretty defensive reaction over 2 votes this early imo Then when you go to defend yourself, you say you're voting me because you could see me doing what i did as scum but its not a strong read. Uh huh, yeah you kinda already said that and I kinda already said why it's crazy using your words of "more likely xfire posting as town." Voting for me while thinking I'm more likely town than scum is scummy.
|
Whatever, I've been ninja'd...
|
On November 01 2012 12:11 Hopeless1der wrote: Lol, I'll take a timeout too I guess Don't take one. I'm the one that screwed up not you.
|
Zero time I have, so I have to make this quick. All I got right now is that mementoss is still scummy. Bad case on keirathi plus the fact that he ignored my case on him and just gave a little throwaway line about how that post doesn't help determine my alignment. Can't really say what's going on with Brood right now because it seems like he is having a lot of brain farts this game, which makes reading him very confusing. Does that mean he is scum or town? Eh, I'm not sure right now. For realz, though, mementoss is scum and you should be voting for him, too.
##Vote: Mementoss
|
On November 02 2012 07:32 Hopeless1der wrote: For tomorrow's minigame, I suggest "Race to lynch Crossfire!". Game involves voting ASAP and then afk'ing until the lynch. Have a great time guys, and remember, the points don't matter. Ah, why do I deserve such wrath? Be chill Hopeless and take a bath. Cool your jets and you shall see, Dat you shouldn't be mad at me.
Ev'ryone the time to vote is at hand, For we should out Mem as one of the band. Good to know that at least some think on their own. Here is why Mem's case on Keir deserves a moan. + Show Spoiler +On November 02 2012 08:26 Adam4167 wrote:Back with my thoughts on Mementoss' Keirathi case: Mementoss you say that Keirathi does not care if he is to be lynched, yet that is not indicative of alignment and I would wager entirely untrue as either alignment has a vested interest in not being lynched. Canned peaches - Accusing Keirathi of being wishy-washy by using the term 'weird' is just plain hypocritical, as you yourself did the exact thing here: Show nested quote +On November 01 2012 08:08 Mementoss wrote:V On October 30 2012 00:25 Djagulingu wrote: No!!! I missed a game with Chezinu in it. On October 30 2012 00:25 Djagulingu wrote: /replacement On November 01 2012 03:17 Djagulingu wrote: So did we start or we're just fucking around? To be honest, I don't give a fuck Uhh ##Vote: Chezinu We should vote for chezinu because every single time there is a storm in the US and Chezinu is playing a game of mafia, he's always a scumbag. -does anyone see a weird disconnect here between pre game and in game - excited to play the game/to play with chezinu and then comes out with that opener saying I dont give a fuck - I dont understand this sudden change in mindset, not indicative of alignment as of yet, but just really weird contrast imo. Dogs are awesome - Granted I don't like Keirathi's laziness - something I already touched on when I was conversing with him - but this is the only part of your case that actually resonates with me. Eventually, I find your case to be mostly padded and does not do a good job of illustrating why Keirathi is scum and only scum, hence I think you're faking it.
If you are wond'ring why I still write in rhyme, Just know I do it to have fun one last time. Keep on writing in poetry I shall not. Later will I leave one last post in case I rot.
|
On November 02 2012 22:12 strongandbig wrote: another topic for discussion tonight: what the fuck do we do with Chezinu? He totally ignored both the serious and silly questions in my post to him, I'm really not sure what to do to get him more involved in the game so we can actually maybe try to get a read on him
Does chezinu normally play like this? I have never played with him before and don't know what to think. If you could compare him to Drazerk to give me an idea that would help because we both played with him in Aperture 2. Thanks.
|
Yeah so I'm exhausted if you know what I mean. I was here like 2 hours before the deadline and then TL went down unlike something that had no problems staying up. I mean I waited I as long as I could which was like an hour, but I couldn't wait any longer and had to release my thoughts and then peace. Unfortunately TL was still down, so my thoughts never made it to your eyes...
Anyways, good job with the gonzaw kill, vig. Now on to the next topic of today's lynch. Yeah, I still want to lynch Mementoss. See my earlier case plus Adam's elaboration of why his case on keirathi was bad. It is interesting to note that the only two people to vote for keirathi yesterday were gonzaw and mementoss, but keir got no traction cause he was all slippery when wet.
Ok. I need to beat it. See you sometime later.
##Vote: Mementoss
|
On November 05 2012 01:46 strongandbig wrote:Now, some of my own thoughts: - I was reading through Crossfire's filter to think about asking him a question, but I found some stuff in there that I very much don't like. For one thing, there's the overall fluffiness or what people have been calling his "poetry" - I think it was perfectly possible to play within the minigame restriction while still making total sense and expressing ideas in a clear and concise manner. Show nested quote + My meta is completely destroyed because this game makes it much too fun to post all these sentences with ascending acrostic alphabetic beginnings. No, I say look at one's posts in this game to determine alignment. I don't like this comment. Why should you be worried about staying in your "meta" - for one thing, you have like 200 posts, so how much meta can there be? For another thing I would expect anyone doing a meta read to take into account the unique circumstances of this game. It's weird that you call attention to and excuse a difference from an imagined "meta". Then from earlier in his filter there's Show nested quote + Really, what I was trying to say before I was so rudely interrupted was just that this posting restriction is making me feel like gonzaw with all these posts I'm making, and I can see the appeal of playing like this.
- more being all like "guys i'ma post so much!" - but his filter is really not very long. (You know what else of his isn't very long?) Like, there was no need to draw everyone's attention to the fact that he was posting a lot unless he's worried that people would accuse him of not posting enough. then later on there's this: Show nested quote + Ah, a wild Chezinu appears! Before it gets too long I must catch up to post my thoughts. Chezinu, if I include myself along with you, audience members now number two.
Doubtful am I that claiming will be useful because those evil musicians will just pretend to be one of us. Eventually we will see everyone's colors bright as can be. For all that is required is some meditative thought once all have played in this little alphabet game.
This is a really weird thing to do. In the exact same breath, tell someone their plan is bad, and also go along with it. That said, this may well have been an optimal scum response to Chezinu's plan - we all agreed that scum would have to claim VT, but by doing it early he fits in and his claim gets cred if people follow Chezinu's plan, while simultaneously he comes out against it so he's on the right side of popular opinion if everyone else says "wtf chezinu your plan is scummy and terrible". (scummy and terrible - just like "the game" right?) ( + Show Spoiler +in case you didn't get it the first time (check my filter) "the game" is what Chezinu calls his penis. ) Finally, there's one less significant thing that I still want to call attention to. (well, less significant than the rest of my case. Still more significant than crossfire's success with the opposite gender.) Show nested quote +On November 01 2012 01:37 Crossfire99 wrote: Just to clarify, Hopeless, I did claim; but did I do that to take the heat off of blues, or am I actually a blue trying to claim VT to sneak under the radar (really over the radar with the way I've been posting)? Keep on guessing because I might not have even read my role PM myself. Lol. Maybe I should do that. Novel idea I had, to play without checking my role PM. Oh the possibilities! Show nested quote +On November 01 2012 01:50 Crossfire99 wrote: Xfire has now checked his role PM, so his win condition is clear to him. You will no longer see that from me because I guess I do have the possibility of playing against my role PM. Zorry for that, strong. The interesting thing here is that in the first post, he "proposed" the idea that in the future he might play without reading his role PM (which, by the way, is a really weird thing to write a post about in the first place - more fluff, I guess?) but then after I yell at him about it, he claims that he just checked his role PM for the first time. I don't believe for a second that he actually played that far into the game without checking his role PM, but why would he phrase his response to me like that? I think it's because he was trying to be super-conciliatory after I yelled at him; he probably guessed that saying "okay I checked it" was the most direct way to get me off his back, when he should have said "I didn't try that this game, in the future I will not play like that." Again, this last point is less significant, but it is a discrepancy and I think there is a scum motivation for it. The main counterpoint to this case, that I can see, is (if Mementoss flips scum) the fact that crossfire voted for Mementoss yesterday. However, I'm not convinced that means very much. Don't forget, Gonzaw made sure that Mementoss wouldn't be lynched yesterday with his weird voting behavior. I could totally see a scum team tripping itself up like that if two of the players voted early (or committed early to voting, in Gonzaw's case) for their teammate, and then had to backpedal furiously when it turned out that he might actually get lynched. Anyway, this is only relevant if Mementoss flips scum.
You're right that I got carried away with alphabet game. I think if you look at my posts later in the day, I tried to word stuff better once blazing pointed out that I was being retarded about it.
I made the meta point because adam jumped on brood early in the game because of meta and it seemed to be a focus early on. Also, if you would believe it, someone in my 3rd newbie game made a meta analysis on me based on my 2 previous newbie games lol. I pointed that out myself because I feel meta was going to be less useful as a tool this game due to the games that would occur each day and I used myself as example of how I am playing completely differently than I ever did previously. Also, if you would believe it, this is the most I've posted day 1 in any of my games. And I've been blue, green, red, and black before.
Also about all those posts dealing with claiming. I never "proposed" that I play without checking my role PM for future games. I "proposed" that I had played without checking my role pm up until that point this game. The reason why I apologized to you strong was because when you told me Drazerk tried that once and you really hated that because you have a good possibility of playing against your win condition, I realized I never ever want any part of my game to resemble anything that Drazerk does. That scared me.
Also, I'll answer your last point now because I'm pretty confident that Mementoss is scum. So you're not going to give me any credit for my case on Mementoss? I'm pretty sure I was the first one to bring up Mementoss's scummy behavior. Adam then elaborated on it. That's why I voted for him.
|
On November 05 2012 06:22 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 06:16 Crossfire99 wrote:On November 05 2012 01:46 strongandbig wrote:Now, some of my own thoughts: - I was reading through Crossfire's filter to think about asking him a question, but I found some stuff in there that I very much don't like. For one thing, there's the overall fluffiness or what people have been calling his "poetry" - I think it was perfectly possible to play within the minigame restriction while still making total sense and expressing ideas in a clear and concise manner. My meta is completely destroyed because this game makes it much too fun to post all these sentences with ascending acrostic alphabetic beginnings. No, I say look at one's posts in this game to determine alignment. I don't like this comment. Why should you be worried about staying in your "meta" - for one thing, you have like 200 posts, so how much meta can there be? For another thing I would expect anyone doing a meta read to take into account the unique circumstances of this game. It's weird that you call attention to and excuse a difference from an imagined "meta". Then from earlier in his filter there's Really, what I was trying to say before I was so rudely interrupted was just that this posting restriction is making me feel like gonzaw with all these posts I'm making, and I can see the appeal of playing like this.
- more being all like "guys i'ma post so much!" - but his filter is really not very long. (You know what else of his isn't very long?) Like, there was no need to draw everyone's attention to the fact that he was posting a lot unless he's worried that people would accuse him of not posting enough. then later on there's this: Ah, a wild Chezinu appears! Before it gets too long I must catch up to post my thoughts. Chezinu, if I include myself along with you, audience members now number two.
Doubtful am I that claiming will be useful because those evil musicians will just pretend to be one of us. Eventually we will see everyone's colors bright as can be. For all that is required is some meditative thought once all have played in this little alphabet game.
This is a really weird thing to do. In the exact same breath, tell someone their plan is bad, and also go along with it. That said, this may well have been an optimal scum response to Chezinu's plan - we all agreed that scum would have to claim VT, but by doing it early he fits in and his claim gets cred if people follow Chezinu's plan, while simultaneously he comes out against it so he's on the right side of popular opinion if everyone else says "wtf chezinu your plan is scummy and terrible". (scummy and terrible - just like "the game" right?) ( + Show Spoiler +in case you didn't get it the first time (check my filter) "the game" is what Chezinu calls his penis. ) Finally, there's one less significant thing that I still want to call attention to. (well, less significant than the rest of my case. Still more significant than crossfire's success with the opposite gender.) On November 01 2012 01:37 Crossfire99 wrote: Just to clarify, Hopeless, I did claim; but did I do that to take the heat off of blues, or am I actually a blue trying to claim VT to sneak under the radar (really over the radar with the way I've been posting)? Keep on guessing because I might not have even read my role PM myself. Lol. Maybe I should do that. Novel idea I had, to play without checking my role PM. Oh the possibilities! On November 01 2012 01:50 Crossfire99 wrote: Xfire has now checked his role PM, so his win condition is clear to him. You will no longer see that from me because I guess I do have the possibility of playing against my role PM. Zorry for that, strong. The interesting thing here is that in the first post, he "proposed" the idea that in the future he might play without reading his role PM (which, by the way, is a really weird thing to write a post about in the first place - more fluff, I guess?) but then after I yell at him about it, he claims that he just checked his role PM for the first time. I don't believe for a second that he actually played that far into the game without checking his role PM, but why would he phrase his response to me like that? I think it's because he was trying to be super-conciliatory after I yelled at him; he probably guessed that saying "okay I checked it" was the most direct way to get me off his back, when he should have said "I didn't try that this game, in the future I will not play like that." Again, this last point is less significant, but it is a discrepancy and I think there is a scum motivation for it. The main counterpoint to this case, that I can see, is (if Mementoss flips scum) the fact that crossfire voted for Mementoss yesterday. However, I'm not convinced that means very much. Don't forget, Gonzaw made sure that Mementoss wouldn't be lynched yesterday with his weird voting behavior. I could totally see a scum team tripping itself up like that if two of the players voted early (or committed early to voting, in Gonzaw's case) for their teammate, and then had to backpedal furiously when it turned out that he might actually get lynched. Anyway, this is only relevant if Mementoss flips scum. You're right that I got carried away with alphabet game. I think if you look at my posts later in the day, I tried to word stuff better once blazing pointed out that I was being retarded about it. I made the meta point because adam jumped on brood early in the game because of meta and it seemed to be a focus early on. Also, if you would believe it, someone in my 3rd newbie game made a meta analysis on me based on my 2 previous newbie games lol. I pointed that out myself because I feel meta was going to be less useful as a tool this game due to the games that would occur each day and I used myself as example of how I am playing completely differently than I ever did previously. Also, if you would believe it, this is the most I've posted day 1 in any of my games. And I've been blue, green, red, and black before. Also about all those posts dealing with claiming. I never "proposed" that I play without checking my role PM for future games. I "proposed" that I had played without checking my role pm up until that point this game. The reason why I apologized to you strong was because when you told me Drazerk tried that once and you really hated that because you have a good possibility of playing against your win condition, I realized I never ever want any part of my game to resemble anything that Drazerk does. That scared me. Also, I'll answer your last point now because I'm pretty confident that Mementoss is scum. So you're not going to give me any credit for my case on Mementoss? I'm pretty sure I was the first one to bring up Mementoss's scummy behavior. Adam then elaborated on it. That's why I voted for him. + Show Spoiler [If you know what I mean] + Mementoss, there's no need to be a wanker. I know what you are: + Show Spoiler [If you know what I mean] +
|
|
|
|