Newbie Mini Mafia XXVI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Will we know WHICH of the roles are in play or could it be any number of any of those roles? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 01 2012 12:58 Blazinghand wrote: Roles look standard and simple to me There are ELEVEN roles. IRL mafia games I played there are only 3 roles. Also 3 of the roles make cops totally unreliable... Cop is basically a useless role. For all the cop knows, all 3 mafias could be godfathers, and all the townies could be millers. He doesn't know what roles are in play or how many, therefore any information he gets is totally unreliable. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 01 2012 16:59 drazak wrote: er, as far as I know there can only be one each of each unique role, so only 2 possible wrong cop checks. In addition, likely the mods won't screw us too bad, and will probably have a decent amount of roles, not all 11. Nope. There can be as many of each role as mods want. I mean I kind of see its purpose because it makes it harder to win with roles and forces the town to root out scum in the thread, like what thrawn said. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Last game everyone was like we NEED to lynch someone, and we ended up lynching WeeTee, an innocent! I love all my townies and I don't want to kill any. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 02 2012 15:19 KillingTime wrote: Good Morning All, (and Glhf). It has been a bit of a wait but it's nice to be getting started. I don't think no-lynch is a good idea - at the very least a lynch discussion generates some substantive posts that can be analysed later. Without a lynch discussion we will have a tougher time D2, because policy/activity/setup chatter is pretty much a Null read.And ofc, we are aiming to hit scum... okok I get it... about a thousand people explain to me why my idea is bad. Mafia thinks to themselves, "hmm here is something obvious I can post about that wont make me look suspicious." | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 02 2012 15:39 JacobStrangelove wrote: Erm one thing I will ask though is how do you quote and keep the name of the person you are quoting? Such as "On September 02 2012 15:19 KillingTime wrote:" Didn't you already do it here? On September 02 2012 12:48 JacobStrangelove wrote: To lynch or not to lynch that is the question! But lynching does give information which is something that is normally lacking in the first day. If we didn't lynch then the second day would be much like the first (confusion etc..) But I was watching last game so I know what you mean. Besides the town with bad arguments or the ones that don't post normally get lynched first (or the ones that panic which is understandable) so it's not like we lose a really valuable analyst if we lynch first day. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 02 2012 16:24 thrawn2112 wrote: Your point? Are you saying that you are suspicious of KillingTime's post? 3 =/= 1,000,000 and how can you not expect at least that many people to respond to your no-lynch idea especially considering there's nothing else to talk about except lurker policy? I'd hoped that you'd taken a lesson from XXV and eased off from making inflammatory and impulsive posts. There is a big difference between lurker policy and my question. My question had an obvious answer everyone agrees on (including me now). Lurker policy is actually something that is relevant because not everyone agrees on it. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Post is really empty. If no one else comes along in 36ish hours I would be down with lynching him. Really premature vote, I know but I'm going to sleep for like 15 hours so it's going to be a while. On September 02 2012 17:53 Kreb wrote: About D1 lynching, from what I've guessed so far its indeed a good idea to lynch lurkers. Then he uses 3 sentences to explain why lurkers are bad even though they are not necessarily mafia, a completely obvious idea. So his whole lurker policy is "it's a good idea to lynch lurkers." I have news for you kreb, a total lurker will be modkilled since you have to post at least once a day. The most lurkerish person we have to deal with is 1 post a day. Speaking of 1 post a day, Gonna have a look through some peoples posting histories later on when we get closer to the deadline and more people has posted to see if theres any chance to find hte slightest read on who could be a scum. You do realize the deadline is very far? A day is 48 hours not 24. Damn guys town is fine. In 30 hours Kreb is going to check SOME filters for a CHANCE to find the SLIGHTEST read. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 02 2012 18:29 thrawn2112 wrote: Oh and ##FOS Hank Hill. 3 people were already at Strickland Propane and Hank being late to work, or even being the 4th person to show up is not at all in line with Hank's moral character. Dude are you in love with King of the Hill or what? This is your 4th reference to it and second post with nothing more than a reference. Stop clogging your filter because I'm going to have to read it a lot since I already kind of suspect you. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 02 2012 19:08 thrawn2112 wrote: Do you suspect me because of the references or is there another reason? I'm automatically extra suspicious of you because I think it would be very easy for mafia to hide behind your careful, intellectual playstyle. On another note, we are still awaiting first posts from WeeTee, Kville, and Stutters695. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
We have some serious lurker issues this game. Kville is about as lurker as you can get. @WeeTee and drazak, thanks guys for that killer analysis about why a no lynch d1 is a bad idea. I already heard it like 3 or 4 times but you two saying the same exact thing really brought it home. Then we have Cubu, who may not be the lurkerest lurker, but to me is the most suspicious. I don't think enough attention has been paid to this post, in which Cubu gives us a lecture on probability: On September 03 2012 00:37 Cubu wrote: I was thinking, what if the mafias are staying quiet to avoid attention to themselves. Maybe, those lurkers are infact the mafia and are trying to just let the others kill each other. There are 12 people playing and 4 mafias (or was it 3?). The fact of the matter is that we have no clues in the first day. So no matter how much we think about it, its all random. Lets kill A, no lets kill B, makes no difference in terms of probability. Of course the chance is in favour of the mafia, because they are the minority. 3/12 = 25% in a random choice. That is 25% chance of randomly lynching the mafia on the first day, which means 75% chance of lynching the townie. I'm thinking the mafia is just waiting for people to accuse each other while they stay silent, away from the accusations, away from the townies attention. So overall, there is 25% chance of someone being mafia, but if we are not thinking about all 12 to kill (i.e a discussion involving severall loudmouths accusing and defending each other while the mafia are quietly taking their time) it isn't really 25% but infact 0. 1 I don't buy that he doesn't know how many mafia there are. Especially since he uses 3 in all his subsequent equations. 2 Whenever someone starts talking about the math I get suspicious. It's a way to write a lot without revealing anything but the universal laws of nature. 3 Admittedly his last sentence does seem kind of town. I think his take home point is that we shouldn't all accuse each other and let mafia lurk. But that is not really what's going on so far. There has been slight suspicion of non lurkers, but most of the attention has been directed towards accusing the lurkers and trying to get them to defend themselves. I think a mafia Cubu may be using this reasoning as a way to appear like he is contributing. So far I think he is our best lynch, even though we have bigger lurkers. ##vote Cubu And yeah grandma thrawn I put it in the voting thread too. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 03 2012 08:44 thrawn2112 wrote: Do you have any scum reads on the active players? Right now I'm looking at jacob: Jacob, sonic, and killing are like a triumvirate of nullness. I don't have a good feel for any of them and can't distinguish one from another in my head. They accuse each other, which seems funny to me because they all act alike. But yeah null reads on those three until I get to know them better. And Cubu responded.. On September 03 2012 11:44 Cubu wrote: guys, before you lynch me, how about we go on with the plan of lynching the lurkers? You may have posted a few times but you have contributed nothing, which makes you a lurker. The only person who is a bigger lurker is kville. We are waiting on a post from him later which he promised and we will see what that looks like. lol @WeeTee On September 03 2012 09:05 WeeTee wrote: anddd kush and thrawn are here! If you guys were a scum team I'd facepalm We would make an epic scumteam. inb4 WeeTee is third scum and his statement was a reverse psychology mindfuck. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I want to lynch cubu as my first choice, which is why he currently has my vote. Other people I would be comfortable with lynching at this point are drazak or kville. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Even if they aren't mafia they are solid policy lynches. Now the question is which one. Kville is the bigger lurker, but I think there is a higher possibility for cubu to actually be mafia. Honestly cubu probably isn't mafia either, just because I think mafia would put more effort into their posts. Lynching one of these guys is better than lynching someone who is active though. So my vote is still on cubu. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I prefer more directed single accusations than lightly accusing a bunch of people at once. If a bunch of people really put the heat on someone and threaten him with a lynch, then shit starts to come out. But if you accuse someone with a few sentences, along with the 5 other people you are accusing, then the accused doesn't even really have to respond. Casting your net to wide is the metaphor. Yes list making gives you a lot of insight into what people are thinking, but this is a double edged sword. If I have a slight suspicion of someone, I don't necessarily want to let them know that because that will only make them more careful. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 03 2012 19:46 thrawn2112 wrote: + Show Spoiler + Voting for drazak. His first and 2nd post came within 2 hours after the game started, so we know that he was here reading the thread at that time and knew that the game had started. His next post comes a little over 12 hours after his 2nd at which point there has been plenty of discussion but all drazak talks about is lynch policy. The post where he finally gives reads comes in almost a day and a half after the game started. Why would it take anyone that long to give a read? And in that post which gives the most insight into his throught process, all he does is list each player and write a couple short sentences about each. What I said earlier about lists: On September 03 2012 05:39 thrawn2112 wrote:I'm not going to hold it against any of you that make them unless that's the extent of your contribution to the thread. In summary: He lurks throughout the entire game and only shares reads near the end of D1. Those reads are short and insubstantial and are not intended to spark further conversation. He never questions anyone or makes direct accusations. He's trying to blend in. The problem I see is that there are a lot of other people with posts equally as insubstantial or worse. At least drazak has given reasons for his inactivity and there is the promise of more activity in the future. Assume drazak and kville and cubu are town. Which townie would you rather have day 2? For me that's hands down drazak, because he has contributed way more than those other two. It will be easier to determine later if he is scum because he has content to analyze. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 03 2012 19:32 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: No need to limit ourselves this early. Like I said before there are other decent option and we don't want too many to feel safe this early. If scum feel safe they're more likely to stay away from the thread and we gain no info. I think you make a good point sonic, except this isn't really early. Lynch happens in less than 14 hours, and there's no way everyone is going to be around right before lynch time. I know I'm probably going to be sleeping. The reason I want people to say who they are going to vote for is because I really don't want a no lynch. I brought up the idea of a no lynch possibility, but that's because in the last game I was in we had no real lurkers. In this game there are a lot of people who deserve to be lynched. So, for instance, I would change my vote to drazak in a second to prevent a no lynch even though I think he is not our best option. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Let me just say that was a very nice catch on kville getting replaced. Very sharp. We certainly shouldn't vote for him now. Drazak and Cuba should change their votes. I think the replacement issue makes him just a null read. So the drazak didn't work out for you? Now you aim your sights at Stutters. Stutters over Cuba makes ZERO sense to me. He is not the ideal townie, but if you compare his filter to Cuba's, the difference is night and day. As town Stutters appears to be much more helpful, writing in depth and coherently. You are right he has offered no scum read yet. However he still has 8 hours and as he explained he is not a very active poster. On the other hand look at cuba's "scum read." It's more like a defense: you can't lynch him for lurking because kville is lurking way harder. And then he also accuses drazak...hmm that's interesting..but I'll get to that next post. On September 03 2012 14:01 Cubu wrote: I'm kind of suspicious of drazak. He says his gonna post in a few hours but its been alot of hours since then and he hasn't posted. And why talk about the no-lynch? You can't no-lynch. There is nothing to discuss about it. And isn't it strange that of all the days, it's the first day of mafia that his dad happens to be moving out. Seems like a false excuse to me. Anyway his scumread of drazak is based on calling him out for lurker policy fluff, which is the same reason I suspected cuba in the first place. So his "scrumread," which apparently proves his innocence in your mind, is hypocritical, unfocused, and lacking of content. When you first accused drazak right after I accused cuba, you said On September 03 2012 08:44 thrawn2112 wrote: In regards to your vote... I think cubu is a good pick, but I'm also considering drazak for the same reasons I'm assuming you selected cubu. You weren't even mentioning stutters as a candidate back then, and nothing regarding him has changed. You said cuba was a good pick, so what happened?? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Worst case scenario:he flips green No big deal, we lynched the worst townie (barring WeeTee whose behavior fits his meta like a glove, and kville who is being replaced). From his posts it's clear he has no intention of contributing more than he is already, which is nothing. Plus that would give thrawn some serious town points in my book, since he refuses to vote for him. Thrawn is good for town atmosphere and very active. It would be quite useful to our scumhunt if we could trust thrawn. Best case scenario: he is mafia If Cuba is mafia, I think there is a very high chance that thrawn is also mafia. In which case we will know 2 mafia first day and basically win the game. People who are specifically against lynching cuba: cuba, thrawn. People who have voted for or accused drazak: cuba, thrawn. Twice now thrawn has attempted to redirect the lynch vote away from cuba onto somebody else. Thrawn says he won't vote for cuba because unlike stutters, cuba has participated in the scumhunt. By scumhunt you mean his failed attempt to bandwagon drazak with you? We need three more votes on cuba. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 04 2012 03:13 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: This is a really bad defense on his part. His posts doesn't make any sense. He suspects scum to have a plan of lurking, while being a lurker himself, and he doesn't know if there's 3 or 4 scum in the game. But the thing is, when looking at his posting history, he has to be on some weird ass level for him to be scum. Let's apply occram's razor, newbie scum don't level. As I said before, lurking scum usually tends to make their few posts rational (see: stutters). He comes across more as a confused townie to me. You are wrong to think that scum behavior is always this balance of good and bad townie. Everyone plays mafia differently. And I think you are also wrong to assume that for Cubu to be scum, he would have to be doing some high level mindgames. He's just new and not a good player. If he is town like you say he is, then he is bad, bad town. Wouldn't it also make sense then that as mafia he would be just as bad? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 04 2012 04:16 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: + Show Spoiler + On September 04 2012 03:30 kushm4sta wrote: You are wrong to think that scum behavior is always this balance of good and bad townie. Everyone plays mafia differently. And I think you are also wrong to assume that for Cubu to be scum, he would have to be doing some high level mindgames. He's just new and not a good player. If he is town like you say he is, then he is bad, bad town. Wouldn't it also make sense then that as mafia he would be just as bad? Bad townie acts differently to bad scum. I agree that an inexperienced scum who ends up in a sticky situation will react badly. However, inexperienced scum tends to be much more careful with what they say and thus are less likely to get into the sticky situation in the first place. On September 03 2012 00:25 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: - An inexperienced townie tends to often act spazzy because he knows he's townie and somehow underestimates the power of the imperfect information in this game. Once his spazzy actions leads to a bandwagon he becomes aware of how difficult it actually is to convince others of his innocence and stop the wagon. - An inexperienced scum on the other hand is afraid of attention because he realizes the danger of a bandwagon. Since he has close to full information he feels guilty from the get go and wants to stay out of sticky situations. (this post was written in regards to your weird voting in the beginning of the thread, but the same applies for Cubu's behaviour) The first real post that he wrote with all the probability strikes me as an attempt at carefulness. Keep in mind: 1 This is his first mafia game. 2 He never puts effort into any of his posts, at least not on tl. I think it makes sense that his defense is bad, just because can't be bothered to write something good, mafia or not. Sonic I urge you to change your vote. Step into the shoes of a total noob shitty poster who doesn't feel like writing anything long. He just did this game for the shits and giggles not to try hard. Also consider the benefits of a cuba lynch, even if he is not mafia. Worst poster in town gone. Thrawn gets major town points. Now most importantly consider the benefits if he is scum. We know almost for sure that thrawn is red. Our read of stutters will only benefit from more time, since he actually posts and there will be more to evaluate. Our read of cuba will stay the same, since he has never shown even the intention of making any cases. Vote cuba! | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 03 2012 00:37 Cubu wrote: + Show Spoiler + I was thinking, what if the mafias are staying quiet to avoid attention to themselves. Maybe, those lurkers are infact the mafia and are trying to just let the others kill each other. There are 12 people playing and 4 mafias (or was it 3?). The fact of the matter is that we have no clues in the first day. So no matter how much we think about it, its all random. Lets kill A, no lets kill B, makes no difference in terms of probability. Of course the chance is in favour of the mafia, because they are the minority. 3/12 = 25% in a random choice. That is 25% chance of randomly lynching the mafia on the first day, which means 75% chance of lynching the townie. I'm thinking the mafia is just waiting for people to accuse each other while they stay silent, away from the accusations, away from the townies attention. So overall, there is 25% chance of someone being mafia, but if we are not thinking about all 12 to kill (i.e a discussion involving severall loudmouths accusing and defending each other while the mafia are quietly taking their time) it isn't really 25% but infact 0. To me this is the hardest cuba tried on a post and it is the epitome of overcarefulness. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Hi! Can you please explain what is going on with you? Do you not want to play anymore? In that case ask for a replacement. Are you mafia? Are you trolling? This game has so many lurkers... it really makes it hard for town. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 04 2012 09:01 thrawn2112 wrote: That line of questioning is a waste of time, I was asking those same questions while he was in thread and he didn't answer and just kept trolling or whatever it is he's doing. Don't know what to make of it. The only two options I see for him are being mafia or being town and intentionally playing poorly. I'm really at a loss at what do with this guy... one thing is certain, we will waste much time d2 trying to decide. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 04 2012 10:32 thrawn2112 wrote: With that ole playboy gone the alley's gonna feel empty for a while I tell you what........................yep kreb Cubu kushm4sta, Kreb, JacobStrangelove, Xatalos, Stutters695, drazak, KillingTime, WeeTee Stutters695 Sonic Death Monkey, thrawn2112 WeeTee kville drazak I'm gonna be looking closely at the people who voted for cubu, with special emphasis on their motives and explanations for doing so. I dont know dude... he seemed like such a better lynch than everyone else to me. Hi new guy! | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Regarding Kville: I think he is a town troll. Hopefully we have a vigi that can kill him. If we don't have a solid suspect for day 2, I'm fine with a lynch on him, just as a pure policy lynch. I would rather lynch him than someone active who we don't have a really good case against. I will be back in a few hours with a post focusing on the more active people for a change. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I have some suspicions about you that I would like you address. I know you are pretty inactive though so I hope you can get to them. You are more experienced than most of us with three games already played. So my big question is why aren't you scumhunting? You have 5 posts let's look at them. On September 02 2012 19:08 Xatalos wrote: + Show Spoiler + There are a couple of posts that caught my attention. On September 02 2012 10:18 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Alright fellow townies, one post before I go to bed, it's 3am over here. Make sure to read the maffia guide thread if you haven't, it's really good. Try to make concise posts and think 'em through before posting, the last thing we need is added confusion. We also need transparency, so try to contribute with at least one post per game day where you clearly explain your reasoning behind your most solid reads. If everyone does this, the mobsters will have to too. And blue roles, with great power comes great responsibility, so please don't do stupid shit just because you can :p Finally, keep in mind: if you're a vanilla townie, death by NK is a great honor and the best possible outcome for the group as a whole. Goodnight and see ya tomorrow. This post is extremely fluffy, even for the first post of the thread. Just look at the bolded part: there's nothing of value in all that. No opinions, no reasoning, no stances on anything... Nothing. Everything in this post screams classic Mafia pseudo-active "posting for the sake of posting". Then there's this: On September 02 2012 16:58 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Not only is a no-lynch bad, it's impossible. Read the rules. Also, yeah, lynching active d1 posters is usually bad, especially in newbie games. Townies are usually a lot more comfortable with their role. Ime this leads the townies to post more and also say more stupid stuff. The town latches on to someone who said something stupid and we have a mislynch. On the other hand mobsters are more careful with what they say because they don't want to slip up and get noticed. I'm mostly suspicious of semi-active posters who post nothing but fluff. The bolded part here is something I agree with, but on the other hand, it fits Sonic Death Monkey himself quite well... His filter seems like the most semi-active and fluffy at the moment. Sonic Death Monkey, do you see anyone more suspicious than yourself (by your own standards) right now? If so, who and why? On September 02 2012 17:53 Kreb wrote: First: GLHF everyone! Morning everyone, this thread got started nicely overnight it seems. About D1 lynching, from what I've guessed so far its indeed a good idea to lynch lurkers. Obviously the chance of getting a scum right on the first day is limited, but generally it keeps the discussion going. You're also not necessarily sacrificing someone important if you're lynching an inactive townie either. Overall it seems like the best of all the options. Gonna have a look through some peoples posting histories later on when we get closer to the deadline and more people has posted to see if theres any chance to find hte slightest read on who could be a scum. (Im gonna have to get used to not editing posts too :p Im way too used doing that!) This is another way of saying "I'm going to wait for a bandwagon to form and then jump on it close to the deadline". Things like that set my Mafia alarms ringing immediately - especially since the rest of that post is just extremely wishy-washy and fluffy non-content... Kreb, if you want to convince me you're not Mafia, then who do you think is Mafia and why? On September 02 2012 12:24 kushm4sta wrote: Are people ok with NOT lynching anyone first night or is this generally thought of as bad play? Because honestly it seems impossible to have a good idea of who is mafia by then. Last game everyone was like we NEED to lynch someone, and we ended up lynching WeeTee, an innocent! I love all my townies and I don't want to kill any. At first I thought kushm4sta looked suspicious, but in the end, I really doubt Mafia would go on such a rampage of careless posts - they would much rather hide and wait for good opportunities. Then there's this post that he just posted: On September 02 2012 18:45 kushm4sta wrote: ##vote kreb Post is really empty. If no one else comes along in 36ish hours I would be down with lynching him. Really premature vote, I know but I'm going to sleep for like 15 hours so it's going to be a while. Then he uses 3 sentences to explain why lurkers are bad even though they are not necessarily mafia, a completely obvious idea. So his whole lurker policy is "it's a good idea to lynch lurkers." I have news for you kreb, a total lurker will be modkilled since you have to post at least once a day. The most lurkerish person we have to deal with is 1 post a day. Speaking of 1 post a day, You do realize the deadline is very far? A day is 48 hours not 24. Damn guys town is fine. In 30 hours Kreb is going to check SOME filters for a CHANCE to find the SLIGHTEST read. A very proactive post with good reasoning. kushm4sta is looking strongly town to me at the moment. You quote sonic, bolded his entire post and accuse him of being fluffy. You want him to tell you who he thinks is mafia and why. Well why don't you follow your own advice? Then you basically repeat my argument against krebs, and again use the phrase if you want to convince me you're not Mafia, then who do you think is Mafia and why? Then you call my post a very proactive post with good reasoning . Well if you like posts like that, ie making cases against people, then why don't you do it yourself?Also I disagree. My post kind of sucked. Second post! On September 02 2012 22:00 Xatalos wrote: + Show Spoiler + On September 02 2012 21:07 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Since this is a newbie game I think the basics needs to be pointed out asap before we move on. We just need to keep calm and make well thought-out posts, that way it'll be much more difficult for the scum to kick up shitstorms over nothing to get the town distracted. I've followed a few newbie games and the first couple of days the townies are usually too busy throwing around random accusations and lynching other townies to get any productive work going. Fair enough. I think that description fits basically anyone within the first 10-20 post of the thread though. Once the discussion gets going, like it's starting to now, we'll see which posters are ducking and which ones are actually contributing. As for your question, I think it's easier to find people standing out as likely townies at this point. In my experience, people engaging in discussions and poo-flinging early game are less likely to be scum. For this reason, I'll give some townie points to kush and thrawn. Thrawn also seems to be a productive and solid contributor. It'll be hard for him to keep up with that if he's really scum, so some extra townie points for him. When it comes to scum, I'm really suspicious of people who just pop in to make a fluffy post and then disappear. For now, Kreb and KillingTime seems to fit that bill. It's good to see some content from you (I agree with your point about thrawn2112), but the bolded part here is just... weak. Okay, Kreb and KillingTime have done basically nothing so far. But the same applies to Cubu, WeeTee and drazak. Why do you think Kreb and KillingTime are scummy but players like Cubu, WeeTee or drazak are not? Show some reasoning, not just a basic statement. (As a sidenote, the above mentioned lurkers + Kville should really start posting some more, or it's going to be much more difficult to identify the Mafia lurkers.) The bolded part of sonic's post is "just...weak." Well to me calling something just...weak is pretty weak in itself. Why do you think Kreb and KillingTime are scummy but players like Cubu, WeeTee or drazak are not? Show some reasoning, not just a basic statement. Again you are urging people to scumhunt, yet you are not. Next post you ride my dick some more, calling me town, saying that my read on kreb is strong. Ok then without even giving an argument you bandwagon on cubu. Third person to join the kush lynch wagon btw. Third is a suspicious number. On September 04 2012 00:05 Xatalos wrote: + Show Spoiler + I find it hard to believe that kville would actually be Mafia. Most of the time Mafia are semi-lurkers with fluffy and careful posts, but kville has done literally nothing so far. It's an extreme risk for Mafia, especially since the overall atmosphere is so anti-lurker. We would lose nothing of value by lynching him, but more likely we'd just hit town and proceed to Day 2 with no new information. I also don't think drazak is Mafia. The typical reaction for pressured Mafia is to get angry, aggressive or desperate, but in my eyes, he has tried to be genuinely helpful - giving away a lot of unnecessary information in case he actually was Mafia. The somewhat frustrated tone in his posts also points more to town than Mafia. Sonic Death Monkey and Kreb looked pretty suspicious based on their first (really fluffy) posts, but their later posts have been much better. I'm willing to wait and see some more from them before I can make a judgement. The ones I'm willing to lynch right now are Cubu, WeeTee and Stutters695. Cubu has posted only fluff, a slight suspicion of drazak and several suggestions to lynch a lurker. All very easy and careful things to say - things that Mafia would like to say in order to blend in and avoid unnecessary attention. WeeTee's first post is pure fluff and the next one is pretty wishy-washy and non-committing. The filter of Stutters695 is full of fluff and non-committing stances. I'm in bit of a hurry already, so I'm going to vote for Cubu. I might be able to come back online a bit later, but not anymore closer to the deadline :/ ##Vote Cubu Why do you vote for cubu? Well your reasoning, in full, is here: Cubu has posted only fluff, a slight suspicion of drazak and several suggestions to lynch a lurker. All very easy and careful things to say - things that Mafia would like to say in order to blend in and avoid unnecessary attention And that's pretty much the extent of your scumhunt. Pretty long post, but you only use a sentence of it to justify your vote! I understand if you are busy doing pushups for the military or something, but it's not your inactivity that bothers me. Rather, it's what you choose to do with your limited number of posts: telling other people to scumhunt rather than doing it yourself, and bandwagoning instead. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 05 2012 10:27 drazak wrote: If we have a medic, while he was a good town read I'm not sure if a medic would save him or another strong town read. Yeah but he was confirmed town AND the town's best poster...obvious medic save IMO. Maybe we should lynch stutters just to honor his memory lol.. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 05 2012 10:38 drazak wrote: Not to demean his memory, but he could have been good mafia convincing us he was town and trying to lead us into bad lynches. huh? he was a vanilla townie it says so in the mod post | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
We do NOT want to all be accusing different people. That is what mafia wants. We do not want to be discussing things that do not contribute to the scum hunt. Anyone have an idea for a day 2 town plan to help us? In the next post I will discuss this recent drazak vote for me. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 05 2012 12:10 JacobStrangelove wrote: + Show Spoiler + On September 05 2012 11:55 drazak wrote: I'm bringing this post, and Kushm4sta into suspiscion. It seemed like you didn't actually think Cubu was mafia. Your reasoning (and lack there of) makes it clear that you weren't voting because you thought Cubu was mafia, but because you thought there was a slim chance of it and that then Thrawn would be a townie. T I think you might be mafia trying to lead town into bad lynches. Why would you vote people who you don't think are mafia if you're town? I think you're mafia, Kush. ##Vote Kushm4sta Well this does bring an interesting side to it. While what he said makes sense, the benifit we would gain from confirmed town was lost when that confirmed town died. Also Kush is going for Xatalos, now. (which I partly agree with) also xatalos (and myself) did go on the cuba wagon when it was tied up. So my theory that Killing Xatalos having a gamble scum (kville or stutters) could be correct. But then does that make Kush innocent? Also we lost the two that were going for drazak, so is drazak scum protecting himself with NK and lynch? (information over load). He goes for kush when kush goes at Xataos. Is he the third scum, and kiville a spazzy town, along with stutters? There is just to many possibilitys it's annoying. I honestly have no idea what you are saying dude. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 05 2012 11:55 drazak wrote: I'm bringing this post, and Kushm4sta into suspiscion. It seemed like you didn't actually think Cubu was mafia. Your reasoning (and lack there of) makes it clear that you weren't voting because you thought Cubu was mafia, but because you thought there was a slim chance of it and that then Thrawn would be a townie. T I think you might be mafia trying to lead town into bad lynches. Why would you vote people who you don't think are mafia if you're town? I think you're mafia, Kush. ##Vote Kushm4sta I pushed the cubu vote because 1)he was a bad poster/lurker and it worked as a policy lynch if nothing else 2)how he turned revealed a lot about thrawn, who i assumed medic or jb would save because he was the obvious choice in my mind I thought it was very fishy that thrawn tried to redirect twice, and so I got very excited with the prospect of identifying two mafia in the first day. Also at the time I thought, as did thrawn, that kville was going to be replaced. So that's why I called him the worst townie. Now it's clear that honor belongs to kville. Also jacob I don't get how this is a good argument? It's reasoning is only one sentence: Your reasoning (and lack there of) makes it clear that you weren't voting because you thought Cubu was mafia, but because you thought there was a slim chance of it and that then Thrawn would be a townie. I think he means that then thrawn would be mafia, but right now that sentence, which is his ONLY argumentation, makes no sense. Why would you vote people who you don't think are mafia if you're town? I didn't think anyone else seemed more scumlike than he did. Although I did know that was a big chance of him not being scum. See, drazzy darling, when there are a ton of lurkers/terrible townies in the game like yourself, it makes it pretty fucking hard to win as town. And my last defense of myself is to invoke the holy name of the late thrawn, who, on the night of his untimely death, proclaimed me as his biggest town read. Read his defense of me because I'm sure it's better than anything I could do. REST IN PEACE THRAWN TT Not to OMGUS, but this actually makes drazak seem quite suspicious to me. Mostly because I am the most active poster now that thrawn is gone. Maybe I'm biased about the matter but what do other people think? I will look through his filter more tomorrow. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 05 2012 13:06 drazak wrote: Answer my questions, kushm4sta. I'm not accusing random people, I'm basing an accusation on fact. This is how you find things out in mafia. Trying to throw my suspiscions away like that is VERY mafia like. You're not making the case for yourself any better Kush. You didn't give me time to address your "argument." Also that post on town plan, if that's what you are talking about, had nothing to do with you. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
@ imcasey: I can understand why some of those behaviors you pointed out might look suspicious. Much better case than drazak IMO. Why did I even bring up no vote d1? I admitted immediately after that it was bad play. It's just that d1 lynch always seems to be town, and last game I played in we had no lurkers. That's what lead me to believe at the time that d1 no lynch might be a good idea. This game we have many lurkers, so no lynch day 1 is even more stupid. We have a huge list of people that deserved to be lynch just as policy lynches. Policy lynches is when you lynch someone not because they are mafia but because they blatantly go against town policy and are bad for town. People that fit that description: drazak early d1, stutters early d1, cubu, kville, weetee. Why did I vote for krebs so early? Because votes are not permanent and I knew that. It was more to get him to talk more since I thought his first post was very suspicious and bad. I am trying to be less impulsive now though. Then he really suspects thrawn2112 I never really suspected thrawn or thought he did anything suspicious. It's just that his style is to play very carefully, which is sometimes a trait of mafia. Town is reckless, mafia is careful. I think it would be very hard to figure out that he was mafia is he was one, simply because he would be so good at hiding it. Shite I really have to go to class.. I will defend myself from drazak after, then that's all the defense I will do unless other people bring it up, because honestly I think it's a waste of time and space. But don't bitch me out drazak... I will spend another post defending myself from you. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
ANYWAY @drazak On September 05 2012 13:38 drazak wrote:+ Show Spoiler + So, you weren't actually scum hunting, why weren't you scum hunting? Couldn't figure out who to lynch and actually make a good case for because you're mafia? Just because thrawn called you town doesn't make you town. For the record, town doesn't need a leader, a leader can hurt a town more than help, if the leader is mafia, we're all fucked. Saying that you're the most active doesn't actually make you town. We agreed that the only deciding factor is that being too lurker-ish is scummy. Active does not equate to town. Accusing me because I'm accusing you is a very bad idea, that's like, the #1 worse scum defense. So tell me, with logical terms, good reasons, and actual evidence, who your best two scum reads are? I was scumhunting, I just didn't have a great idea of who was scum day 1, as no one did. I thought cubu looked more like mafia than anyone else. Scumhunting doesn't' mean figuring out 100% who is mafia, that is impossible. Thrawn calling me town doesn't make me town--this is true. But thrawn is a confirmed innocent so at least we know that all his motivations were pro town and his beliefs genuine. Drazak I agree the town doesn't need a leader, but I think we do need to be focused. And what I mean by that is we should not all be analyzing different people. That is what mafia wants because it makes it easy for mafia to hide amidst that confusion and not to take a stance on people he doesn't want to take a stance on. You ask me who my best scum reads are atm. I will comply. As of now it's xatalos, for reasons already posted. I still want to analyze your filter more, drazak, but I will say that accusing me out of the blue, since for many I am a strong town read, was not really a safe move, and that gives you town points...minor town points though, because you may have thought that cubu flipping green justified your suspicion. Other people I am suspicious of is stutters, since he has been absent for quite a while now.. I really want to see what he is going to post today before I make a judgement on him. I will post more substantially later. PS I really don't want to lynch kville in light of his most recent post and just thinking about it more. He deserves the lynch maybe because his play was just really bad and anti town but I don't want to waste it on him. Also I think it is mostly a waste of time to discuss him, since there is not much to talk about or analyze in his posts. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
And I think he is fitting his meta. Basically this guy believe that posting and making reads on d1 is useless, and he's bitter about being lynched for believing that. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 02:17 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: I think it's a good idea to build a lot of cases today to get as much info as possible. We absolutely need to be more focused tomorrow and not all go vote on different people. Ok I can get aboard with this. Soon I will make a case against someone who has been off everyone's radar recently. He still strikes me as very suspicious though. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 07:36 JacobStrangelove wrote: If it’s a standard early lurk accusation then why mention it? Yes I did throw around connections and because of that I now know that both you and killing are far less likely to be scum. Remember there are town motivations for accusing people especially early day one when you don’t have much to go on. You can look at the reactions and see how people respond or ignore things. For example, Xatatos just re-entered the thread and didn’t mention a thing about the accusations against him. Whereas both you and killing have without giving me much to go on(in way of mafia reads). I tend to scum hunt differently because if I can confirm enough people town logically the rest must be mafia. Then you can look at the people remaining and go from most suspicious to least. Of course I find the argument weak there was almost no argument strong at all day one. Wouldn’t lynch cubu because cubu was an easy day two lynch. I have been taking a risk with killing insinuations however due to that and the responses I have gotten as I said in the last through posts he is getting more and more town like. Opposed to Xatatos. I doubt it is still the best course of action to vig shoot kville. While it is odd to go from random to logical and clear. (something I should try doing it seems) Maybe he got a prod from one of the mods about the rules? Not sure if that happens (and it would only happen as town) also if he does start posting like this then we should be able to find something out quickly. Stutters is still under the radar, this is not mindless agreeing this is fact. Happy about your comment on killing Turns out I need to go so I will cut this off here and be back later. Who are you talking to? Can you try harder to make your posts understandable? Like if you are replying to something make it clear what you are replying to. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 07:49 Kreb wrote: Ok, I dont really like the way this is going. We've had people going on hunts left and right last 24h with really no focus recently. While I did agree that leaving Kville for a while and discussing other targets in parallell was a good idea, I wasnt really expecting the amount of accusation being thrown around at people. I agree we should limit our discussion to three people for the last 24 hours. But the last 24 hours haven't started yet so I think it's ok for people to still basically give suggests as to who those three people should be. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I think kville is a bad choice to focus on. He has not posted enough to discuss meaningfully, and considering his meta I think he is a null read. Also we gain nothing by lynching him, whether he flips red or green, because his lynch is a matter of policy more than anything else. If we cannot come to a consensus on someone more active to lynch, then maybe he can be our default lynch or somthing. So yeah I'm not saying we shouldn't lynch him but I am saying we shouldn't talk about him. Stutters has been lurking hard day 2. His recent kville accusations have been very safe. At this point kville is the safest person to suspect, just because his play has been so WTF. However, I do appreciate his recent contributions on kville's metagame and I think that was a good post. I'm ok with stutters as a focus but I would prefer someone else. However I think we can all at least agree that xatalos needs some looking at for the last 24 hours. People should say if they want to lynch him or not and why. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
His attack on me seems scummy for various reasons.. possibly defending his scumbuddy by attacking his scumbuddy's attacker. Also I would like to make a post about the drazzak xatalos connection. If you read the filter xatalos has a history of defending drazzak and calling his posts good when they really aren't. On September 04 2012 00:05 Xatalos wrote: I also don't think drazak is Mafia. The typical reaction for pressured Mafia is to get angry, aggressive or desperate, but in my eyes, he has tried to be genuinely helpful - giving away a lot of unnecessary information in case he actually was Mafia. The somewhat frustrated tone in his posts also points more to town than Mafia. When i read this i was like ...huh? Drazak's defense of thrawn's vote actually made him seem more suspicious to me. I would not call him genuinely helpful at all. It seems very out of place reading xatalos' filter that he would be that accepting of drazak. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Again I want to avoid lurkers who don't really have much to talk about. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 09:22 Kreb wrote: I have a hard time seeing how that argument isnt best used on Kville. He is the definition of a not good town (if he is town). Also, people gave you towncred for your kinda unjustified attack on me. To me, drazaks attack on you is similar. I understand it might not look the same from the point of view as the attacked person. But just as people thought you had honest (but miguided) intentions on your attack on me, I definitely think drazak also has honest and misguided intentions with the attack on you. You're not having much more reason to turn things back onto drazak than I did have to turn things nack onto you. But I never did that. My attack on you was not unjustified and not misguided. Your post was a piece of shit and very suspicious and I wanted you to post more. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 09:42 Kreb wrote: + Show Spoiler + I'll also post my other townread on Drazak. Maybe Im over-analyzing things, but this one little part of a sentence actually had me fairly conviced. Let me explain: Page 14 if you wanna re-read. What had happened before was: Thrawn had made a case on Drazak. Drazak had responded with a bunch on replies. I pointed out Drazaks defense being lackluster. The drazak pointed out this: On September 03 2012 20:43 drazak wrote: I only mention a no-lynch in direct reply to what kushm4sta said, reread his post. Sorry if I'm being defensive, not sure how that's a senseless claim considering what kushm4sta said. Everything I've said has made me infinitely more useful on D2 compared to someone like kville, I have a lot to analyze, and you'll have more info. lynch me now and your future lynches get harder. See what Im getting at? Probably not. The key thing to me is this: Sorry if I'm being defensive That really had me thinking. Let me explain. That little phrase expresses the feeling of guilt. First of all, there is absolutely no reason for a mafia to feel genuine guilt at this point. He is being attack from one front (thrawn) and then has his defense kind of destroyed from another front (me). What is the feeling you get as mafia then? Desperation? Maybe. Resignation? Maybe. Anger? Maybe. Guilt? Hell no. For this to be a mafia-move, it has to be a planted feeling. A purposedly planted feeling to fool us. So, it it possible it was? To me, no. Because purposedly placing a feeling on guilt there is a pretty damn crafty move. And had drazak been a crafty mafia, he would never have put himself in that situation to begin with. He would never have replied so badly to Thrawns accusations had he been a crafty mafia. So whats more likely? A) He got taken by surprise by thrawns accusations, immediately tried to defend himself, but upon seeing my post kinda talk down on his defense feelt guilt and the need to excuse himself. B) Purposedly responded badly to thrawns accusation. Then upon seeing my comment gladly noticed that "hey, now is the perfect time to apologize for my bad defense, surely someone will make a read on me thats its genuine guilt and i'll look townish". Am I over-anazyling things? Maybe. But to me drazak is looking town at least. That whole thing about guilt.. not following it, not buying it. Guilt is a very complex emotion and I do not think you can base his innocence off of one sentence that you somehow read as guilt. Looking for other people to chime in on what they think of drazak. Also does someone follow what kreb is saying here? this quote is lolz He is being attack from one front (thrawn) and then has his defense kind of destroyed from another front (me). His defense was not a defense. The post you praise was just copying an argument I made, which did not even take into account if he was mafia or not. He had no real defense to destroy.. and to say you "destroyed" it like some master logician picking apart his arguments is an overestimation of both drazzak and yourself. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 09:58 Kreb wrote: On topic: Dont you agree Kville is the definition of a not good town? First sorry for being a dick I was pissed off in that moment about something else. Second yeah kville is really bad town, but he acted bad town in another game as well and he was town. Therefore acting like bad town doesn't make him mafia. It's just a null read. I don't want to lynch someone who has a null read. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Please table the talk about possible scumteams. I have been guilty of doing this kind of thinking myself, but I agree it is useless until one flips scum. Keep it to yourself until then. When I list a few people who I want the town to focus on I'm not trying to divert attention away from others. I'm just trying to help the town. Who is it today? Xatalos and stutters? And maybe myself since drazzak has an epic hard on for me lately? Can we at least get a preliminary vote? Waiting until the last second to bandwagon someone isn't a bad strategy, because it forces scum to act fast, but I don't think it's doable with all these eurofags. ##vote xatalos NB this is not my final vote... | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 20:50 imcasey wrote: I am sure Xatalos is mafia and he will be my vote. I get that you are new but saying something like that is absurd. It's impossible to be sure. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Killingtime Sonic Jacob Kreb I would also like to add myself to this list but seems biased to do so. I think killing's filter does look suspicious and we should resume discussion of him tomorrow. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2012 21:01 Stutters695 wrote: Kush - I need to reread the cases on him and his filter but I really want to see an answer to this post of drazak: OK stutters. So drazzak's argument here, which you can read yourself, I can summarize as thus: I say his argument is weak then I take 4 posts to defend it. Also I accuse him which makes me scum because accusing your attacker is bad defence. my reply: I still think your attack on me was bad, and if you look for closely I only put up 1 defence post for each of your attack posts. You say you were afk and had 0 posts in between my 4 posts, but that is incorrect. You have 2 substantially lengthed posts and I made 1 post each in defense of those. [*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133744 This was my post in defense of your first post. [*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133615 This had nothing to do with you. It was just talking about how we need a plan and to stay focused day 2. [*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16144834 This is not a defense. It is actually just suspicion of you. Yes I am suspicious of you and yes that is partly because you accused me. However my suspicions of you honestly are not that strong. I hope you are town and I hope I get lynched just so you can see how bad of a player you are. I think you are really bad at this game also you piss me off. ANYWAY moving on. [*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16140589 the 4th post you bring up is another defense, but that is actually in response to another, separate attacking post from you, which I quote in my post. You were not afk across those 4 posts. Also i did not attack you as my defense. Actually I tried to keep my posts attacking you (which their haven't been much of) and my arguments for defense separate. @Stutters does that satisfy you or is there something else? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Drazzak and stutters and whoever if you have suspicions of me can it wait until night? Because honestly I don't think a bandwagon on me at this point is even possible. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 00:01 KillingTime wrote: My post on Stutters was also about Kush and Xatalos - both of whom ignored it - although Xatalos may just not have seen it. Kush is not getting lynched today because too much difficulty. I don't think Xatalos or Kville are bad lynches. Sorry I didn't really mean to ignore it, it's just that there are other more direct cases against me lately that I have spent my time addressing. You think I am diverting attention away from stutters? Well I do not think he is mafia and I think his posts are good and very pro town. He is kind of lurking, but in the beginning of the game he said his activity would be low. His posts have been pretty consistent and at the moment he is just a null read to me, leaning more towards town. What I have been trying to do is narrow down our lists of lynch candidates. Everyone has a different person they are accusing! So many of my recent posts have been about that. I would only vote stutters to prevent a no lynch situation. Is there a possibility he is scum? Definitely, but I think there are more suspicious people. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 02:38 Kreb wrote: Also, the vote on Kville is not a policy lynch anymore. As I've pointed out before, he has not even tried to defend himself. Theres absolutely no reason to not do that. Stutters replied when I went on him, Kush/Drazak are replying to each others attacks, Xatalos has replied too (albeit mostly excusing himself for his lack of time). Everyone who has been attacked HAS TRIED (some with better success, some with worse), except Kville. Kville is a lurker and he comes in and comments when he feels like it. Honestly I doubt has or will read the thread. Still a null read because that's just how this dbag acts. So I think it is a policy lynch. But having said that I would vote for him just because it doesn't seem like we are able to reach a good consensus. I would rather lynch XATALOS over him, however. Xatalos flipping green tells us more than kville flipping green IMO. Xatalos flipping red tells us WAY more than kville flipping red. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
If so people who haven't voted for them should say who they are going to vote for and why. If someone wants to make a bandwagon for someone else, you have to do it very quickly or you will be the only person voting for them. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 03:50 Kville wrote: + Show Spoiler + On September 07 2012 03:36 kushm4sta wrote: Kville just voted for xatalos FYI. Not really sure how to read that. He's not here to say anything or defend himself, but he's here to vote for the other person who is suspected. quick little bugger arnt you? Yes, voted for xatalos. Because any other case would be null if it was given as there are only but a few hours left, with me and xatalos in the lead. But enough fluff. Xatalos claimed in his 10 minute made post , that casey and I were trying to mafia corner him becuase we both attacked. That is just a weak defense and he is trying to deflect accusations against him to others. It was a poor accusation. I attacked him because he tried to attack a player with little information. Which is what scum try to do. They feed off the weak in order to attack. I believe he is the best choice at this moment becuase of his suspicious attacks against both me and casey. Not only attacking but already trying to make connections. Disclaimer: phone posting. alignment of text may be off. I'm sorry for my last post and I appreciate your contribution to this thread. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 03:53 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Could you expand on what information you expect to gain from Xatalos flipping red? For instance, xatalos has been a huge defender of drazzak (huge being a relative term since his contribution has been quite limited). If xatalos flips I have a huge argument prepared for his connection to drazzak which I have been saving since it is worthless unless he's scum. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 04:11 Kreb wrote: Also, Xatalos flipping green is the worst thing which can happen atm. Ok that is a pretty good point. I will probably switch to kville. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
mods can we get a vote count? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
if you are town this is why you dont play like how you are playing... town has to waste a lynch on you now | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 06:38 Kville wrote: Uhm what? Your reason of lynch makes you a bad player as of now. your voting because you don't like me not because you want to win. The problem with your metagame is that town has no way of determining if you are mafia. Also you do not help the town win. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 07:28 Kville wrote: That is what caught my eye as well when I look ef at the voting thread. he seems to be trying to sneak everything he is doing, why claim to have a read on some one and end up fake voting on him. Only thing I can think of is that he was waiting for a folower for his band wagon before he was going to cast his. This way he would go completely under the radar So you wait until right before you're gonna die to start talking huh? I actually dont think not voting in the voting thread can be counted against him. I've done it too. I think the ##vote was just another way of saying ##fos. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 09:03 JacobStrangelove wrote: Actually I am begining to think both xatalos and kville are town. I feel the same way about kville but why xatalos? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
yeah I sheeped because I didn't see anyone else that people would agree on. There was no other bandwagon that would work. And yeah I could have voted for someone else but that vote would have done nothing but given me "i told ya so" rights after the fact. Also how the f does this clear xatalos? Just because kville said xatalos is town does not make it so. I really fail to see your reasoning with that. Kville is not some expert analyst. He's a borderline troll who voted for himself d1. His playstyle is distinctly antitown. I would not want to be in another game that he is in. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 07:34 drazak wrote: No, I figured there was no need to unvote based on the fact that THE MOD DIDN'T COUNT MY VOTE. There's enough people to lynch you anyway, kville. So Kush, why'd you scumslip? Why did you feel so threatened by me? All 4 of those posts had to do with me, either your defense or accusations against me, and I didn't post /at all/ during those 4 posts. Come on now, you'll have to do better than that as a defense. I explained this before and now I will explain again... 2 of those posts were in defense of your attacks. Every post you make attacking me I will make a defense post. You made 2 attack posts so I made 2 defense posts. 1 of the posts was accusing you, not defense. 1 post had nothing to do with you. and I didn't post /at all/ during those 4 posts. Pay attention to the times. Your first accusation: On September 05 2012 11:55 drazak wrote: + Show Spoiler + On September 04 2012 03:01 kushm4sta wrote: Why town should all vote for cuba Worst case scenario:he flips green No big deal, we lynched the worst townie (barring WeeTee whose behavior fits his meta like a glove, and kville who is being replaced). From his posts it's clear he has no intention of contributing more than he is already, which is nothing. Plus that would give thrawn some serious town points in my book, since he refuses to vote for him. Thrawn is good for town atmosphere and very active. It would be quite useful to our scumhunt if we could trust thrawn. Best case scenario: he is mafia If Cuba is mafia, I think there is a very high chance that thrawn is also mafia. In which case we will know 2 mafia first day and basically win the game. People who are specifically against lynching cuba: cuba, thrawn. People who have voted for or accused drazak: cuba, thrawn. Twice now thrawn has attempted to redirect the lynch vote away from cuba onto somebody else. Thrawn says he won't vote for cuba because unlike stutters, cuba has participated in the scumhunt. By scumhunt you mean his failed attempt to bandwagon drazak with you? We need three more votes on cuba. I'm bringing this post, and Kushm4sta into suspiscion. It seemed like you didn't actually think Cubu was mafia. Your reasoning (and lack there of) makes it clear that you weren't voting because you thought Cubu was mafia, but because you thought there was a slim chance of it and that then Thrawn would be a townie. T I think you might be mafia trying to lead town into bad lynches. Why would you vote people who you don't think are mafia if you're town? I think you're mafia, Kush. ##Vote Kushm4sta Then I post this which has nothing to do with you: On September 05 2012 13:02 kushm4sta wrote: + Show Spoiler + Thrawn was like town leader and now he is gone. We need to do is come up with a plan for day 2 so we can as a town stay focused. We do NOT want to all be accusing different people. That is what mafia wants. We do not want to be discussing things that do not contribute to the scum hunt. Anyone have an idea for a day 2 town plan to help us? In the next post I will discuss this recent drazak vote for me. Then I post this in defense of your attack: On September 05 2012 13:25 kushm4sta wrote: + Show Spoiler + On September 05 2012 11:55 drazak wrote: I'm bringing this post, and Kushm4sta into suspiscion. It seemed like you didn't actually think Cubu was mafia. Your reasoning (and lack there of) makes it clear that you weren't voting because you thought Cubu was mafia, but because you thought there was a slim chance of it and that then Thrawn would be a townie. T I think you might be mafia trying to lead town into bad lynches. Why would you vote people who you don't think are mafia if you're town? I think you're mafia, Kush. ##Vote Kushm4sta I pushed the cubu vote because 1)he was a bad poster/lurker and it worked as a policy lynch if nothing else 2)how he turned revealed a lot about thrawn, who i assumed medic or jb would save because he was the obvious choice in my mind I thought it was very fishy that thrawn tried to redirect twice, and so I got very excited with the prospect of identifying two mafia in the first day. Also at the time I thought, as did thrawn, that kville was going to be replaced. So that's why I called him the worst townie. Now it's clear that honor belongs to kville. Also jacob I don't get how this is a good argument? It's reasoning is only one sentence: Your reasoning (and lack there of) makes it clear that you weren't voting because you thought Cubu was mafia, but because you thought there was a slim chance of it and that then Thrawn would be a townie. I think he means that then thrawn would be mafia, but right now that sentence, which is his ONLY argumentation, makes no sense. Why would you vote people who you don't think are mafia if you're town? I didn't think anyone else seemed more scumlike than he did. Although I did know that was a big chance of him not being scum. See, drazzy darling, when there are a ton of lurkers/terrible townies in the game like yourself, it makes it pretty fucking hard to win as town. And my last defense of myself is to invoke the holy name of the late thrawn, who, on the night of his untimely death, proclaimed me as his biggest town read. Read his defense of me because I'm sure it's better than anything I could do. REST IN PEACE THRAWN TT Not to OMGUS, but this actually makes drazak seem quite suspicious to me. Mostly because I am the most active poster now that thrawn is gone. Maybe I'm biased about the matter but what do other people think? I will look through his filter more tomorrow. Then YOU post again, attacking me more. This is the post you seem to be forgetting about. It is in between those 4 posts you mention. On September 05 2012 13:38 drazak wrote: + Show Spoiler + So, you weren't actually scum hunting, why weren't you scum hunting? Couldn't figure out who to lynch and actually make a good case for because you're mafia? Just because thrawn called you town doesn't make you town. For the record, town doesn't need a leader, a leader can hurt a town more than help, if the leader is mafia, we're all fucked. Saying that you're the most active doesn't actually make you town. We agreed that the only deciding factor is that being too lurker-ish is scummy. Active does not equate to town. Accusing me because I'm accusing you is a very bad idea, that's like, the #1 worse scum defense. So tell me, with logical terms, good reasons, and actual evidence, who your best two scum reads are? Then I post a defense of your second attack. I do this only because stutters wants me to. Notice it is AFTER your second attacking post. On September 06 2012 00:36 kushm4sta wrote: + Show Spoiler + A girl told me she likes my glasses.. that means she wants to fuck me right? ANYWAY @drazak On September 05 2012 13:38 drazak wrote:+ Show Spoiler + So, you weren't actually scum hunting, why weren't you scum hunting? Couldn't figure out who to lynch and actually make a good case for because you're mafia? Just because thrawn called you town doesn't make you town. For the record, town doesn't need a leader, a leader can hurt a town more than help, if the leader is mafia, we're all fucked. Saying that you're the most active doesn't actually make you town. We agreed that the only deciding factor is that being too lurker-ish is scummy. Active does not equate to town. Accusing me because I'm accusing you is a very bad idea, that's like, the #1 worse scum defense. So tell me, with logical terms, good reasons, and actual evidence, who your best two scum reads are? I was scumhunting, I just didn't have a great idea of who was scum day 1, as no one did. I thought cubu looked more like mafia than anyone else. Scumhunting doesn't' mean figuring out 100% who is mafia, that is impossible. Thrawn calling me town doesn't make me town--this is true. But thrawn is a confirmed innocent so at least we know that all his motivations were pro town and his beliefs genuine. Drazak I agree the town doesn't need a leader, but I think we do need to be focused. And what I mean by that is we should not all be analyzing different people. That is what mafia wants because it makes it easy for mafia to hide amidst that confusion and not to take a stance on people he doesn't want to take a stance on. You ask me who my best scum reads are atm. I will comply. As of now it's xatalos, for reasons already posted. I still want to analyze your filter more, drazak, but I will say that accusing me out of the blue, since for many I am a strong town read, was not really a safe move, and that gives you town points...minor town points though, because you may have thought that cubu flipping green justified your suspicion. Other people I am suspicious of is stutters, since he has been absent for quite a while now.. I really want to see what he is going to post today before I make a judgement on him. I will post more substantially later. PS I really don't want to lynch kville in light of his most recent post and just thinking about it more. He deserves the lynch maybe because his play was just really bad and anti town but I don't want to waste it on him. Also I think it is mostly a waste of time to discuss him, since there is not much to talk about or analyze in his posts Even you must admit that your statement is false. I don't think you lied on purpose though, because it can be proven wrong so easily. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 07:34 drazak wrote: So Kush, why'd you scumslip? Because I'm not scum maybe. Now I have a question for you drazak. It's serious so please answer. Not omgusing, I really want you to answer this. Are you really bad at this game or are you mafia? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Look at when it starts, right as I accuse xatalos. sorry for formatting this was written on my phone. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Drazak Xatalos On the Fence Killingtime Stutters Town Sonic Jacob Kreb Iamcasey Safest person to accuse if he is town: stutters, iamcasey (because they are pretty big lurkers) i know I said I don't like lists, but I think a list without explanations is a good idea right now so we can see where everyone's suspicions lie. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 21:20 Kreb wrote: Same to kush: I'd like to see an explanation of your townread on imcasey. Ask and you shall receive: He is a null read to me bordering on town. 1Town get bored, mafia do not. I think it is less likely for mafia to quit the game like WeeTee did. 2WeeTee's posts fit his meta, which doesn't prove him town, but does clear his bad posting style of suspicion. 3Iamcasey really does seem like inexperienced town trying his best. Are there people who seem more town than him? yes Are there who seem more scum than him? Definitely yes. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
If WeeTee really didn't have that much time and he was mafia, he could have easily posted very little and hid amongst our game's many lurkers. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 07 2012 23:01 JacobStrangelove wrote: + Show Spoiler + Now I would also like to point out this. On September 07 2012 15:09 KillingTime wrote: ... well that is annoying. I agree that the reason that we ended up with a Xatalos v Kville situation was because we were all accusing each other. I said at the start of the day I really hoped that we could come up with a better lynch target.. but we did not. Scum have succeeded in thoroughly bamboozling me I have to say. I will look into the thread this evening and I'll be happy to answer questions from those who have suspicions of me. After the flip Kush and I immediately analyse it talk about it start making reads etc... Kililng comes in and makes a “annoyed post” and also says he is bamboozled and says he is happy to answer questions about himself. He makes no mention of scum hunting. Why? Because he doesn’t need to hunt scum, he is scum. This is another fluff post saying he is confused. Surely he would have an opinion on what happened. He says so much however his major posts are lists and he is very non committal. Surely someone else sees this! While my arguments up until this points haven’t been the clearest if you think I am town why do you think I hardly left Killings side. Intuition has to could for something and it has. He was not able to answer why he was so non committal his only reply was On September 07 2012 00:01 KillingTime wrote: First, if you feel I have been non-committal or weak in my play then I can only apologise and say this is my first game and I am definitely learning as I go. That is not an excuse, but it is the most likely explanation for "weak" town play on my part. I think Kreb, Drazak & Sonic are town, everyone else I am currently suspicious of. This is not really a reply, for me it is an excuse that anybody could use. Also his case on stutters is due to kush/xatalos pushing the conversation away from him. His one major non listed case was based on association. On September 06 2012 17:02 KillingTime wrote: Ok, having re-read through a bunch of filters today I think we should lynch Stutters695 - Yes his posting/lurking has been/is reason enough to lynch him. But, reading back through filters there has been way to much redirection of discussion away from him as a good lynch - particularly from kush. ... Now, this does not mean that both Kush & Xatalos are mafia if stutters flips - but that is WAY too much subtle redirecting of a target for me. Stutters is as scummy as anyone at this point, if he flips we will have some strong targets for d3. If we lynch him and he is not mafia, town is in a bad spot - but we are in a bad spot regardless of who we lynch if they flip and are not mafia (kreb has convinced me of this with his case against kville that there is no point not going for lurkers.). I would also like to point out that kush seems to be following his meta as well. Admittedly meta talk in a newbie game is a little hard but you would think rolling scum would mess with how they would act. Also if you notice stutters filter and replies I will tell you why he is likely town. He did have a slow start day one. Considering drazak kville weetee cubu all had slow day one starts two who are confirmed town and one who I pointed out seems confirmed town to me this is no reason for a scum read. What you should look at is the quality and logical reasoning in his filter. You should read the whole post but in particular. On September 06 2012 18:28 Stutters695 wrote: Please explain what part of my play has been more scummy than someone who has been trolling the thread and not contributed anything? ##FoS Killing Time I need to go through his filter but this isn't the first time he hasn't taken a stance on issues while posting "reads" that don't actually commit longterm. While kville did show up as town in the lynch he was an easy lynch, scum would want to lynch the slightly harder targets so they have a free win by the time they get to end game. For example if we lynched stutters it would be easy to convince town to lynch kville. If anything if we spent another day with him in the game we would have been frustrated into lynching him. Also he returns fire on killing time and is way more active engaged asking questions giving responces. He questions kush and drazak on the issues and responds on a manner I can only call logical. His filter isn’t filled with fluff so I suggest you read it for yourself as everything he says comes across in a pro town questioning way. Now I am going to transition to drazak. His vote on kush only caused confusion and was purely a slug fest with no real reasoning behind it. After being “caught out” as such by kville and stutters plus the kush argument he backs out and doesn’t comment. He hardly provides good reasons for his mistakes, Also he has a bad habit of calling kville useless. However enough of that I will provide posts and reasons. On September 06 2012 18:03 drazak wrote: My accusation wasn't out of nowhere, I made a read based on what happened, I reasoned, carefully. I saw that Kush wasn't scumhunting day 1. If you're not scumhunting, you're not furthering town, if you're not furthering town... you're mafia. I then saw kush slipped by overreacting to me. Feel free to poke holes in my actual reasoning instead of calling me scum for making a reasoned accusation. Kush wasn’t scum hunting day one? I’m a freaking unicycling unicorn. First his Kush isn’t scum hunting read is based on this. On September 05 2012 11:55 drazak wrote: I'm bringing this post, and Kushm4sta into suspiscion. It seemed like you didn't actually think Cubu was mafia. Your reasoning (and lack there of) makes it clear that you weren't voting because you thought Cubu was mafia, but because you thought there was a slim chance of it and that then Thrawn would be a townie. T I think you might be mafia trying to lead town into bad lynches. Why would you vote people who you don't think are mafia if you're town? I think you're mafia, Kush. ##Vote Kushm4sta But then his day one post was this On September 03 2012 21:24 drazak wrote: My best read is cubu. He's tried to throw suspiscion, he stopped posting when he had nobody to lay thin accusations on. Cubu has posted only with low content, low value posts, he hasn't had any real reads other than discussing statistics and how afk I was. I think Cubu isn't a great D1 lynch though, which is why he doesn't currently have my vote, if he continues to have such low content posts tomorrow, he will certainly have my vote. Cubu is someone we can try to analyze tomorrow and figure out if he really is mafia, we can't analyze kville, and if we wait to lynch kville it's not going to get better, we don't even have a baseline for him. To that point, I'm someone you can analyze D2, you have several posts by me, with fairly decent content. Even if kville isn't mafia, he isn't helping anyone. In addition, I felt that going for cubu would just be bandwagoning at this point, which as town doesn't help me at all, espescially considering I do have my own unique thoughts, which I have shared with everyone. The whole “even if kville isn’t mafia he isn’t helping anyone” isn’t this the same thing? They are both talking about lynching the worst townie however drazak covers himself better (something a scum would do over a town) refering to the bandwagon and trying to convince people he is town by pointing out he is town not just assuming everyone knows he is town. “which as town doesn't help me at all” This would be obvious if he was town. Anyway these are my thoughts on Drazak. Because of the lengh of this post I will save Krebs analises for my next post probably (if I find anything) My intuitive thoughts are “he has seemed town but he is saying some strange stuff that I need to look into.” Ok this is the section of jacob's recent post that accusing killing and drazak. Even though jacob's posts have been pretty WTF at times I suggest everyone read close. I agree with his argument against killing a lot and I strongly suspect killingtime right now. This quote from killing especially stuck out to me when I first read it, and the more I think about it, the more scumlike it seems: Scum have succeeded in thoroughly bamboozling me I have to say. He's gloating. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
His posts are never that wishy washy. He has not always chosen the safe targets. The only reason I see for suspecting him is how he created confusion d2 and promoted the kush/drazak feud, but it's not enough for me. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
4 town 3 mafia. That means there are a lot of mafia among us -.- If i had to guess at this point I would say xatalos, stutters and killingtime, and the fued between stutters and killing was manufactured. Also I think I might have to read sonic's poster closer. Everyone always just assumed he was town because his posts are consistently good though. But maybe that consistency come from a scumlike carefulness. We can still win but if we lynch wrong 1 day we lose. I'm pretty sure that's how it worked out. Also I assume we have a vig and they killed drazak. No idea why they didn't kill a lurker n1 though... | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
However I think I will get to check my phone often so I will be able to write shitty posts on my phone. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I know who the vig is lol... I know exactly who it is. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 08 2012 14:35 KillingTime wrote: Kush has so far pushed Drazak, Kreb & Cubu - &FOS's xatalos. Leaving aside Xatalos, that is a 100% miss rate so far and now you are pushing me because my reads are too safe and non-committal. Welp, that is pretty funny. I have no idea why town should trust anything you say at this point. Also - I have no idea why you are asking that question because the vig has only one shot? I agree.with sonic that we should roelclaim at this point - we need all the info we can get because if we mislynch again we lose I think this is a very disingenuous accusal. I pushed kreb?? For about 5 seconds early in the game d1 to get him to contribute more. And never again. I do admit to pushing cubu but why would mafia push that hard so unnecessarily d1? Yeah I suspected Drazak, but so did many other town. Plus he accused me which got me pissed at him... I'm sorry for that. And yes I FOS xatalos and I still do. Guaranteed Town Iamcasey Jacob Not sure Sonic Stutters Xatalos Scum Killing | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
##fos sonic. He has not been getting enough scrutiny as he should and I have not noticed him all game. He's been so under the radar all game, which is suspicious to me. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Xatalos, Stutters, and Killing, who had not made a post in quite a while, all post within 10 minutes of each other. Could this be a coincidence? Absolutely. But I also think it could be a scumslip and they have a scummeet to discuss who they are killing and their plan of action. I think it would be a very big coincidence that they all post at the same time after not posting for so long. What do you think jacob, iamcasey? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
so there's nothing wrong with revealing him. I'm pretty certain it's iamcasey, although the vigi only having 1 shot makes me less certain. !!there is no reason why vigi shouldn't roleclaim at this point.!! I doubt mafia would risk a counterclaim and we could have a confirmed town. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Confirm town. Ps my phone bat is running low quickly so expect a sudden drop off of activity. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
@Sonic who do you think we shouldLynch d3? Aka who is your strongest scum read atm. Because we can't get this wrong. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I think we should focus on 1 person. We have no certain mafia yet, so relying of associative cases, looking for the scumteam before the scum adds too much complexity, too many variables to our search. I think kiLLing is the most scumlike person and the best lynch. Do people agree or not? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
That seems pretty fishy to me. Stutters does not even try to defend himself. He talks about the current game situation then proceeds to attack stutters. Then xatalos comes in and says now he suspects stutters and not killing. @xatalos why don't you suspect killing now? Not why do you suspect stutters, but why don't you suspect killing? What part of his nonexistent defense convinced you? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
If it's not obvious, real vig should counterclaim if it's not stutters so 2 separate things real quick... 1 Where the fuck are you iamcasey?? He said he is actively looking at the thread just doesn't feel the need to post anything because it would be redundant. Can you post anyway? I don't care if you have nothing to add. It helps us read you. I really thought he was town, but as soon as the heat is off him he starts being completely afk. Even more afk than normal. My entire town read on him is pretty much based on how WeeTee quit really early and I wouldn't expect that from mafia. Admittedly not the most rock solid reasoning but it made sense to me. 2 As far as I'm concerned at this point, the question is not are mafia busing someone, but rather who is busing who. Think about it. It would be very stupid for mafia to not bus each other at this point and it would make it very easy to figure out who was mafia. If i were mafia I would be busing the fuck out of killing right now. If you aren't going to be able to be here for 9 pm tomorrow (fuck yall american time) please say how close to lynch time you will be able to be here so we know how late we can get a bandwagon going. ofc that's just in case we decide to change our mind about killing. All I'm going to be doing at work is reading through filters on my phone, but for now ##vote killingtime | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
What is wrong with the killing, xatalos, sonic team? I think it's a plausible team and I will vote for them in that order right now. Sonic's filter does not seem scum to me, but there's no one else who it can be. And I dont trust poker players. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
so either you vote for killing or you convince everyone else to vote for someone else. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 09 2012 20:40 JacobStrangelove wrote: Everyone was happy voting killing. Is this not strange to you kush.... No because as I said before it only makes sense for scum to bus one of their own at this point. Think about this scenario... We lynch killing and he flips red. We know that everyone who didn't vote for killing is scum, because if any town voted for someone else, mafia would have all vote changed and town would have lost. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I am not opposed to a different bandwagon, but you need to say who we are bandwagoning and see if you can convince everyone to bandwagon with you. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
And where is iamcasey seriouslty. Maybe its a bad idea to bandwagon him because he is gonna get modkilled soon maybe. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 10 2012 05:13 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: I'm afraid the reason you don't get it is because it makes no sense at all. At this point it really seems like it will put a quite an awesome exlamation mark on our abysmal performance in this game though. Wow, maffia games can be really freakin' frustrating. Sonic if you are town which I think you are I'm sorry because there is no stopping the bandwagon of fail that is about to kill you in a few hours. It's not our fault as much as the town lurkers' fault. kville, drazak, weetee, iamcasey, cubu this is all your fault...you were bad town and you helped mafia immensely. Right now I'm liking xatalos iamcasey killing scumteam. I regret not pushing Jacob to bandwagon one of those guys... At least xatalos because its supr obvious he is scum. I am willing to switch the bandwagon to xatalos if we can get everyone on board but I know its too late probably | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Yup the remaining town is awaiting your orders. We still have to guess the next mafia right, though, or mafia will win. I think it's between xatalos and killing with a high probability of xatalos. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
@mafia aka xatalos Please don't nk Jacob. He deserves more than that even you can admit. Take me instead. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
yeah its was wifom argument, but it isnt anymore because they aren't 2 unknowns. wifom gets a bad wrap, but I think it becomes more viable as there are less people. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
| ||