EPT
On June 11 2012 02:40 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
This post is smart. Unlike RNG, which is dumb and useful for scum seeing as all they need to do is "RNG" someone who already has a couple votes. It leaves no accountability for who gets lynched because everyone will say the same thing "I just RNG'd it."
This post is smart. Unlike RNG, which is dumb and useful for scum seeing as all they need to do is "RNG" someone who already has a couple votes. It leaves no accountability for who gets lynched because everyone will say the same thing "I just RNG'd it."
That's not how you RNG.
You RNG based on something verifiable, and then everyone follows the result.
For instance, Detroit play Cincinnati tonight(mlb). So you assign everyone a number of hits. Then, however many hits there are in that game, that player gets lynched. Hits are a good RNG, because they vary in quite a range, and the average is probably around 17/18 hits per game. Because players near the average are more likely to get lynched, you run it like a snake:
8 etc...
9 Ace
10 MrWiggles
11 BrownBear
12 BrownBear
13 MrWiggles
14 Ace
15 chaoser
16 Meapak_Ziphh
17 gonzaw ---- avg 17.5 hits or so?
18 Hesmyrr
19 Palmar
20 Radfield!
21 VisceraEyes
22 GreYMisT
23 Greymist
24 VisceraEyes
25 Radfield
26 ... ect
Tadaa! You have a fairly random lynch based on the amount of hits in a baseball game.
But yes, the only people accountable for the lynch at that point are the Reds and Tigers. That is pretty much the opposite of a successful day 1 in my opinion.
On June 11 2012 02:40 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
This post is smart. Unlike RNG, which is dumb and useful for scum seeing as all they need to do is "RNG" someone who already has a couple votes. It leaves no accountability for who gets lynched because everyone will say the same thing "I just RNG'd it."
This post is smart. Unlike RNG, which is dumb and useful for scum seeing as all they need to do is "RNG" someone who already has a couple votes. It leaves no accountability for who gets lynched because everyone will say the same thing "I just RNG'd it."
That being said, you're not doing anything to move along discussion either. Great, RNG sucks, at least try to move on the discussion to more productive topics.
On June 11 2012 00:05 chaoser wrote:
Backing away from RNG, Ace? I didn't realize there were DIFFERENT ways to RNG. Pray tell what the other ways are aside from RNGing using a, well, random number generator.
Backing away from RNG, Ace? I didn't realize there were DIFFERENT ways to RNG. Pray tell what the other ways are aside from RNGing using a, well, random number generator.
Obviously we are not lynching based off a screenshot you posted. I find it hard to believe that you think your RNG is remotely legitimate.
); so I don't want him lynched right now (based on what's been posted in the thread).
