EPTiGrok's Good Clean Old-fashioned Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
I love the OP!!! | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
I vote we lynch the first player to use the term 'scumslip' inappropriately. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 07 2012 09:32 GMarshal wrote: guys, I'm the Time Traveling Avenging Dragon of Rebirth and Radfield scumslipped when he said he knew the setup! Well, in theory that could be a legitimate use of the word scumslip.... in theory... I got excited for a minute and thought you were playing GM. You weren't  | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
 | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 07 2012 23:11 Hesmyrr wrote: I want to be good enough to be shot T_T You are good enough to be shot Hesmyrr. You just always replace out before that happens....  | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
No medic and no ability to confirm townies means that every player needs to actually play, and establish themselves. No spamming, no coasting, etc. Given that, lets lynch into the players who are most difficult to find and the players with the best scum play. In this case that's ace and.... uhmmm.... well, just Ace I suppose Seems like a good policy to me! | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 10 2012 08:19 chaoser wrote: I'm a townie. Let's win this. I doubt that. What a scummy thing to say. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 10 2012 08:40 Ace wrote: I'm down for an RNG lynch On June 10 2012 08:44 chaoser wrote: Me too. Let's RNG Can you hit me with the actual reasoning behind an RNG lynch. I honestly don't understand the benefit. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 10 2012 08:48 VisceraEyes wrote: Radfield is a little jumpy! I'm not used to seeing Rad this active in a game. Is it because you're not afraid of dying N1 in this game sir, or something more sinister? <.< >.> <.< I scumslipped already... crap. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 10 2012 09:11 GreYMisT wrote: Its because RNG stands for Radfield No Go I can only guess that this means they are afraid of your power. That may be so, but even the RNG agrees with lynching Ace. So Ace, still up for an RNG? | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 10 2012 09:44 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Isn't the idea behind RNG that we have nothing to talk about, so it provides a talking point, and that it makes mafia sweat, because they have no control over it, so if you decide to lynch a scum they'll freak out and the reaction will be enough to lynch them anyways? If that's truly the only reasoning behind a no-lynch then it's an endeavor that can be accomplished better via other means. Lynching someone based on meta reasoning(Ace is good as scum, Player X is detrimental to town) serves the same purpose(discussion), yet actually has some grounding, and actually has a tangible benefit to town. I don't think RNG really promotes discussion very well, as it leaves nothing to discuss. "Well, the RNG picked 3, lets all vote ace or not" *shrug*. Lynching Ace because he is a solid scum player adept at manipulation and able to control a game, while simultaneously being a semi-disruptive presence as a townie and a non-team player actually gives us something to discuss. It's superior in every way. Fact is I don't think anyone in this game takes an RNG vote remotely serious, so it fails in it's goal to generate a reaction from scum. Whereas seriously voting ace with reasoning forces scum to take a side, and actually puts pressure on Ace. On June 10 2012 15:09 VisceraEyes wrote: Oh shewt, Radfield thought of it. LOL. Ace just concurred. I think you're missing the context... | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 10 2012 21:59 GreYMisT wrote: Oh where oh where has my palmar gone. Who needs Palmar? You're here Greymist, and that's good enough. What do you think about lynching Ace? | ||
| ||
