EPTTL Mafia 'Area' LIII - Page 41
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
I"m not taking blame for that either; it was VE's own play that did that. His claim made no sense and he did us the favor of not posting the freaking case against him. I'm all into a marv. lynch for the next day given how bad he wanted VE dead. I mean seriously, his latest posts were like a dog drooling at a piece of meat. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
Remind me how I'm scum plz BJ. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On April 23 2012 09:16 Zephirdd wrote: Okay, whoever thinks what he did was reasonable should also rethink a little. I"m not taking blame for that either; it was VE's own play that did that. His claim made no sense and he did us the favor of not posting the freaking case against him. I'm all into a marv. lynch for the next day given how bad he wanted VE dead. I mean seriously, his latest posts were like a dog drooling at a piece of meat. I can see you never re-read VE's filter in this post lol you either super bad town or super bad scum | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 23 2012 09:16 Zephirdd wrote: Okay, whoever thinks what he did was reasonable should also rethink a little. I"m not taking blame for that either; it was VE's own play that did that. His claim made no sense and he did us the favor of not posting the freaking case against him. I'm all into a marv. lynch for the next day given how bad he wanted VE dead. I mean seriously, his latest posts were like a dog drooling at a piece of meat. Yuh, must be terrible standing your ground when you believe you're right. Of course scummy marv would push VE so openly and hard when it was getting clear he was going to be lynched regardless. Makes perfect sense now | ||
|
MidnightGladius
China1214 Posts
slOosh marvellosity Bill Murray Ottoxlol VE layabout Sentinel Zephirdd In order of voting time. I wonder how many scum were on VE's lynch? Tomorrow, we're taking a long hard look at Zephirdd. | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On April 23 2012 09:19 MidnightGladius wrote: ..... I can't believe we just let that happen. slOosh marvellosity Bill Murray Ottoxlol VE layabout Sentinel Zephirdd In order of voting time. I wonder how many scum were on VE's lynch? Tomorrow, we're taking a long hard look at Zephirdd. I was before VE - I forgot to change it on the other thread On April 22 2012 22:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Ok. What the hell is a "non-cooperative Jailkeeper"? Coupled with trying to sway townies so much over the course of this thread, I feel no shame in voting VE. ##Unvote: ghost_403 ##Vote: VisceraEyes St. Dan is next on my list. As for Brood, his last post was fluff but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. On April 22 2012 23:48 VisceraEyes wrote: K this game is no longer interesting to me. I'm not interested in defending myself. ##Unvote: Bill Murray ##Vote: VisceraEyes For anyone concerned about me "playing to my win-condition", D1 discussion is ruined and I can accept my part in that. Lynch me, flip me, and do what you will with the information. You'll win with it. And therefor, I'll win. I'm playing to my win-condition. gg Proof of timestamp. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On April 22 2012 22:06 VisceraEyes wrote: My vote on BM is not random. It's based on the fact that he was semi-active leading up to the game started and he's made 3 in-game posts, all of which are devoid of content and completely neutral...yet he jumps on a VE vote based on nothing but "he doesn't like gonzaw's plan!" My claim isn't "an appalling move" or "a bad move"...it's not a move at all. It's a claim, because it explains my reasoning for gonzaw's mass-claim idea, and because I don't give a shit about my role. Roles aren't going to find scum, scumhunting and logic are going to find scum. I think Bill Murray is scum, I don't think he's a "random lurker" and I've made that abundantly clear. The scum are Bill Murray, gonzaw, MidnightGladius, layabout as far as I can see. I want to kill BM first. Viscera's last scumread^^ VE did screw himself on this. He wanted to get himself lynched. On April 22 2012 23:48 VisceraEyes wrote: K this game is no longer interesting to me. I'm not interested in defending myself. ##Unvote: Bill Murray ##Vote: VisceraEyes For anyone concerned about me "playing to my win-condition", D1 discussion is ruined and I can accept my part in that. Lynch me, flip me, and do what you will with the information. You'll win with it. And therefor, I'll win. I'm playing to my win-condition. gg | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On April 23 2012 09:27 PaqMan wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 22 2012 22:06 VisceraEyes wrote: My vote on BM is not random. It's based on the fact that he was semi-active leading up to the game started and he's made 3 in-game posts, all of which are devoid of content and completely neutral...yet he jumps on a VE vote based on nothing but "he doesn't like gonzaw's plan!" My claim isn't "an appalling move" or "a bad move"...it's not a move at all. It's a claim, because it explains my reasoning for gonzaw's mass-claim idea, and because I don't give a shit about my role. Roles aren't going to find scum, scumhunting and logic are going to find scum. I think Bill Murray is scum, I don't think he's a "random lurker" and I've made that abundantly clear. The scum are Bill Murray, gonzaw, MidnightGladius, layabout as far as I can see. I want to kill BM first. Viscera's last scumread^^ VE did screw himself on this. He wanted to get himself lynched. so how do you feel about these 4 BM gonzaw midnightglad and layabout? | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
I'm null on Gonzaw although I support his case against Risen. But he hasn't posted pretty much the whole day. I'm null on midnightglad as I haven't been paying attention to his posts. I'm leaning town with layabout. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
MidnightGladius marvellosity PaqMan --insert unknown scum here-- List done out of pure feelings and zero evidence or analysis and should not be taken seriously at all Also, may I remind you that my vote was completely and ultimately worthless, as in, even if I didn't vote VE would die. Also, keep this in your mind: if I knew VE was going to die already, and if I already knew he was a JK(as in, if I was scum), why the fuck would I instantly jump right at the deadline and put a worthless vote on him when I could simply vote, say, marvellosity? Suddenly, I'm not looking that bad anymore, am I? Also I agree with BMurray being vigged. I'm not sure if he is town or scum, but it would be better if he just died and we didn't had to care about him anymore. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
shooting BM or st. daniel would be fantastic BM why do you join these games? | ||
|
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
My case against VE was simple. He told us never give up any information to the scum, then proceed to a bad claim that ensures his early death as a blue. This is bad play, hes the best player ever so he would not do that if he is indeed town JK. I tried to ask him about this decision tell me what did I miss or what was his idea what would happen, no answer. He ignored my 6 posts directed towards him, then after the votes started to pile up on him he tried defending himself, I told him what am i interested in, he talked about the massvigclaim after we already closed it and had nothing to do with his lynch. He did not read my posts, failed to comprehend them and when I asked him to explain his play he start writing in all caps, and ragequitting. Like a scum VE. The timing was strange too, the claim was around the time BM ninja voted. I did not vote on him because of his bad play, I voted him because he did not answer to my accusations or questions just gave up like a little girl. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On April 23 2012 07:45 MidnightGladius wrote: Personally, I think lynching marv would make a terrible mislynch at this point. I still think that johnny is the best scum candidate at the moment, and that it's not too late to make it happen. His defense against my allegation of sheeping was to acknowledge that he was sheeping and claim that he's a bad player. How in the world are we just letting that slide? I would also be okay with lynching VE based on his complete unwillingness to continue playing, even though I'm hesitant to lynch a D1 jailkeeper claim, ridiculously scummy play or not. My current read on Risen is null, though it's hard to tell, because the tone of his posts is really starting to get on my nerves. On April 23 2012 08:36 MidnightGladius wrote: Why do we even think BM is scum? A scum player would never blatantly disregard the game like this. So here are MG's thoughts on the D1 main lynch candidates. He is only willing to vote johnny, and would be ok lynching VE (but letting everyone know he would be hesitant). So out of the 4 people, he says nope these guys aren't scummy I'd rather lynch johnny. On April 23 2012 09:19 MidnightGladius wrote: ..... I can't believe we just let that happen. slOosh marvellosity Bill Murray Ottoxlol VE layabout Sentinel Zephirdd In order of voting time. I wonder how many scum were on VE's lynch? Tomorrow, we're taking a long hard look at Zephirdd. Then we get this post. VE just flipped blue. He subtly blames people for the VE mislynch, when he himself put in no effort to get people off, and actually would have supported the VE lynch himself. So what does MG think we should do next? He invites everyone to look into the VE voter list, the guy he thought was the scummiest out of the four D1 lynch candidates. There are some serious logical jumps made here. Either the candidates were all town, in which the scum would have no incentive to push the votes onto VE, or at least one of the candidates are scum and scum piled onto VE to avoid getting lynched, in which case he should be looking into who is that scum candidate. However, he suggests that we all look into the VE mislynch voter list. Could scum be hiding there? Certainly. Is it logically reasonable to start looking there? No. People, read MG's filter and tell me your thoughts. I don't like how VE played but he found something off in MG. So have I. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On April 23 2012 11:23 johnnywup wrote: I think it should go without saying that we lynch Zephirdd tomorrow if he's not dead in the morning. :rofl: - Take my actions and see if they make sense from a scum point of view. - ??? - profit Either way, there is also no point for scum to kill me either. I'm betting that BlazingJitsu will be dead by tomorrow, along with gonzaw or layabout. either way, sloosh is right. Check MG. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
| ||
| ||
