|
On February 28 2012 10:55 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:49 wherebugsgo wrote: you need to step up and contribute.
You are almost 100% confirmed to me but you are doing nothing. Please. Do. Something.
I just spent 2 hours on my power ranking ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif) Also, I have no idea why I would be confirmed town to you. Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:50 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2012 10:45 kitaman27 wrote:On February 28 2012 10:44 prplhz wrote: Can't you do something instead? You make me smile prpl. You don't make me smile as much as you usually do. You want to lynch me, there are people around who want to lynch me, why are you not pushing me? This is relevant to my interests. ![[image loading]](http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/2/22423/1465854-yoda1_super.jpg)
it's cause you drank the good stuff
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Also, DrH, you never responded to my question earlier. What triggered you to move to blazing over RoL yesterday? Do you believe "giving up" is a town RoL response?
|
On February 28 2012 10:55 prplhz wrote: @DoctorHelvetica This isn't another dumb ploy where you're shifting your vote from player X to player Y to pressure them and then switching back to player X because that's who you actually thought was scum all the time? Because that's pretty shabby to do mere hours before deadline. Do you actually have a scum read on anybody here or are you just going to make 50 cases and then never do anything about it?
I don't see why syllogism was fine with wherebugsgo and why he didn't see how any townie would want to lynch DoctorHelvetica. They're both quite good at this game, they're both quite active, they're both surprisingly full of shit. I changed my mind, if you can tell me why that's scummy I'll make a video of me eating soap
BC didn't impress me Day 2 and I think he's probably scum but I feel very very secure in Toades. I'm well known for second guessing myself and changing votes often. Radfield and jayjay concocted this to be the lynchpin of a fake case on me and to throw suspicion on me in Arkham City, because it is very normal in my town meta but easy to call scummy too
I thought RoL was scum Day 2, I changed my vote when BH became more suspicious to me I thought BC was scum Day 1 and still do, I changed my vote because I was equally sure about RedFF and thought Day 2 would give me a better idea about BC's alignment
I've only done one fake thing in this entire game and no one really caught onto it like I was hoping so it doesn't matter
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 28 2012 10:58 wherebugsgo wrote: it's cause you drank the good stuff
But why does that make me confirmed town?
Are scum incapable of drinking the good stuff? :/
|
On February 28 2012 10:55 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:54 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:52 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 28 2012 10:50 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:48 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:44 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 28 2012 10:41 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:16 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote: I didn't say I'd lynch you for claiming - I'll lynch you regardless. I said TOWN would lynch you for claiming - which as you've pointed out, has a pretty decent track-record. you need more than one scumbuddy to lynch me. why should mafia VE come in here and push you instead of just joining the Toad-wagon? That's a really important point I made and I'm going to bring it up again: The logical conclusion for a townie in wbg's position would be: Mafia would not try to get another wagon but unless Toad is mafia himself, therefore it's either Toad + VE mafia and VE is trying to rescue him or it's ONLY Toad mafia + a confused townie VE who joined the wrong side. OR both are townies. However, VE being mafia is while I am a townie is the most retarded thing ever. VE could hve easily joined the Toad-wagon and he did not. So now one might ask why isn't wbg asking himself those questions? I'd consider those things pretty important if I were confused about 4 people and can't figure out which of those 4 are mafia. I guess by now you guys already figured out what the funny thing about this all is: Wbg isn't asking these questions because he doesn't need to. He's not asking those questions because they are pointless and lead to absolutely no conclusion whatsoever I'm not surprised you'd concoct a defense of VE based on shaky WIFOM wat? That question PROVES I am mafia if he really thinks the way he does. IT PROVES I AM MAFIA OR NONE OF THE GUYS HE WANTS TO LYNCH IS MAFIA. How is that pointless? He said he can deliver you 3/3 mafia if we lynch into VE / RoL / ME. VE is a confirmed townie for me right now because of what I said (that' not bad either, is it?) so 1 is wrong. I am wrong as well but instead of telling people "well that proves toad is mafia" he goes on to pressure prpl? The fuck? no, it doesn't prove anything. It's complete WIFOM because I have no fucking clue what the mafia would do in this situation.The fact that you're insinuating that I could actually find out the answers to those questions makes you look redder. It's funny because if I were in VE's spot as mafia and toades was town I wouldn't vote for Toades at all why not? Why should mafia start a counterwagon and defend me? why shouldn't they? now you've delved into the realm of WIFOM; congratulations, you are now helping waste all of our time more efficiently. Ok, so you think VE is mafia and his masterplan is derping big time instead of going with the ez lynch and because we all see how much towncred got (according to you) from that ingenius move he just it's more likely that he's mafia?
Oh crap, you're going after him now, guess his masterplan wasn't that ingenius after all, OR HE'S A FUCKING TOWNIE
|
On February 28 2012 10:59 kitaman27 wrote: Also, DrH, you never responded to my question earlier. What triggered you to move to blazing over RoL yesterday? Do you believe "giving up" is a town RoL response?
Thought BH was scummier and lost confidence in my read once I started second-guessing myself mostly based on RoL's personality and remembering how things were with youngminii when we played together. I figured RoL, being more inactive, is better left to vigilantes since a bandwagon on an inactive player doesn't move discussion
|
On February 28 2012 11:00 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:58 wherebugsgo wrote: it's cause you drank the good stuff But why does that make me confirmed town? Are scum incapable of drinking the good stuff? :/
it doesn't make you confirmed, just near confirmed.
At least, if you're not town that means we've already lost.
|
Okay, I mean, it's just so stupid of wherebugsgo to be all "lets split our votes between these three, then we will hit scum today". It's stupid for the obvious reason that Toadesstern pointed out and it's stupid because one of them isn't even red on his next list. Right now wherebugsgo seems to legitimately be pushing the idea that out of the 5 people who are active in this thread right now, the 3 that are pushing him are all scum. This is just so bad.
Does stupid and bad mean that wherebugsgo is likely to be scum? Yea. He's a smart guy, I have no fucking clue why he's doing this.
|
On February 28 2012 11:01 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:55 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:54 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:52 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 28 2012 10:50 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:48 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:44 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 28 2012 10:41 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:16 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote: [quote]
you need more than one scumbuddy to lynch me. why should mafia VE come in here and push you instead of just joining the Toad-wagon? That's a really important point I made and I'm going to bring it up again: The logical conclusion for a townie in wbg's position would be: Mafia would not try to get another wagon but unless Toad is mafia himself, therefore it's either Toad + VE mafia and VE is trying to rescue him or it's ONLY Toad mafia + a confused townie VE who joined the wrong side. OR both are townies. However, VE being mafia is while I am a townie is the most retarded thing ever. VE could hve easily joined the Toad-wagon and he did not. So now one might ask why isn't wbg asking himself those questions? I'd consider those things pretty important if I were confused about 4 people and can't figure out which of those 4 are mafia. I guess by now you guys already figured out what the funny thing about this all is: Wbg isn't asking these questions because he doesn't need to. He's not asking those questions because they are pointless and lead to absolutely no conclusion whatsoever I'm not surprised you'd concoct a defense of VE based on shaky WIFOM wat? That question PROVES I am mafia if he really thinks the way he does. IT PROVES I AM MAFIA OR NONE OF THE GUYS HE WANTS TO LYNCH IS MAFIA. How is that pointless? He said he can deliver you 3/3 mafia if we lynch into VE / RoL / ME. VE is a confirmed townie for me right now because of what I said (that' not bad either, is it?) so 1 is wrong. I am wrong as well but instead of telling people "well that proves toad is mafia" he goes on to pressure prpl? The fuck? no, it doesn't prove anything. It's complete WIFOM because I have no fucking clue what the mafia would do in this situation.The fact that you're insinuating that I could actually find out the answers to those questions makes you look redder. It's funny because if I were in VE's spot as mafia and toades was town I wouldn't vote for Toades at all why not? Why should mafia start a counterwagon and defend me? why shouldn't they? now you've delved into the realm of WIFOM; congratulations, you are now helping waste all of our time more efficiently. Ok, so you think VE is mafia and his masterplan is derping big time instead of going with the ez lynch and because we all see how much towncred got (according to you) from that ingenius move he just it's more likely that he's mafia? Oh crap, you're going after him now, guess his masterplan wasn't that ingenius after all, OR HE'S A FUCKING TOWNIE
I see you want to continue wasting time.
So you're scum then? How goes the QT?
|
On February 28 2012 10:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:VisceraEyes has looked scummy for a long time. His case on WBG is grasping at straws, especially the fact that you're pushing a player Day 3 based on loud posts Day 1? You didn't catch onto his question to syllo then? Here's how scum play often works: Scum 1: I need to push a bandwagon today so X doesn't get lynched Scum 2: WBG has been pretty spammy, changed his mind a lot, etc. he might be an easy candidate Scum 1: Hm, ok I'll make a post about it I'm still reading all the posts here but it seems like VE is criticizing WBG for buddying? Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 14:56 VisceraEyes wrote: DocH I'm intrigued by your ideas and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Also this: Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 16:42 VisceraEyes wrote: That was dangerously close to role-fishing syllo - the existance of one town-tracker doesn't preclude a second town-tracker. Am I missing something? "Role fishing" imo is one of those things that scum accuses other townies of doing it's supposed to be "Scummy" but in 5 or 6 games as scum I have never really done it or known any teammates to do it either, except in PM games where it's pretty easy and often town roles have a lot of incentive to rolefish Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 15:55 VisceraEyes wrote: And BC is your strongest read right now Syllo? Like, without question?
Did you ever get around to looking at the whole WBG/chaoser thing sir? I feel like that exchange means something. chaoser's defense was solid, but I didn't mind WBG's attack either.
However, chaoser still seems to be interested in finding scum, while WBG has only recently been calling red scum...he's been tunneled in on chaoser ever since that argument.
I'm starting to get a red read on WBG. Is this really that different than what WBG did?
Inversely, for my ease of writing.
Yes, that's vastly different than what WBG asked of Syllo - for the same reasons the question I posted earlier. I asked Syllo a specific question, relevant to something I was looking at. His answer, while unhelpful to me in the long run, helped me get a read on Syllo. Not only was the question specific, I immediately gave him MY thoughts on the question I asked, encouraging him to respond in an informative and relevant way by providing context to the question. If you'll look at WBG's post, it was literally "what are your thoughts on redFF? I think I may have been mistaken all game" First of all, the question was vague as fuck. His thoughts? Does he mean regarding his skill-level or alignment? Does he mean regarding redFF's demeanor or his play in Sleeper Cell 2? Obviously we can assume he was just asking him about his alignment, but we don't REALLY know do we? Not only that, but he goes on to say "I think I may have been mistaken all game"...which doesn't provide any context at all! Why? Because all game long, all WBG has had to say is "I have no idea what redFF's alignment is! I only know that he's sooooooo bad!"
Now, regarding my comment about syllo "rolefishing" was designed specifically to gauge his reaction - because what I said was absolutely correct - the existence of one town-aligned tracker did NOT preclude the possibility of a second one and his plan was based on that assumption, which he goes on to admit in his response. The fact that he responded in that fashion pretty much cemented my town-read on syllo.
Re: WBG's Buddying - I'm not really criticizing bugs' buddying - I only pointed out that it was there and posited why it might have occurred. There have been several instances of bugs' buddying that I completely ignored, because I don't find the 'buddying' to be particularly scummy. It was the intent that I had a problem with - like, he was buddying chaoser in that post, but why? He then goes on to accuse chaoser of being scum before jumping onboard the redFF wagon.
It's all about a larger picture here that I'm trying to put together, but the only piece I'm certain of at this point is Bugs.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 28 2012 11:01 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:59 kitaman27 wrote: Also, DrH, you never responded to my question earlier. What triggered you to move to blazing over RoL yesterday? Do you believe "giving up" is a town RoL response? Thought BH was scummier and lost confidence in my read once I started second-guessing myself mostly based on RoL's personality and remembering how things were with youngminii when we played together. I figured RoL, being more inactive, is better left to vigilantes since a bandwagon on an inactive player doesn't move discussion
You think there is a vigilante after RoL or chaoser wasn't shot last night? Do you think he would be a better lynch tomorrow if he lives another night? I'm really not sure what we gain by keeping a likely scum player alive.
On that note, I've been tricked into putting off my hw yet again. bbl
|
|
On February 28 2012 11:02 prplhz wrote:Okay, I mean, it's just so stupid of wherebugsgo to be all "lets split our votes between these three, then we will hit scum today". It's stupid for the obvious reason that Toadesstern pointed out and it's stupid because one of them isn't even red on his next list. Right now wherebugsgo seems to legitimately be pushing the idea that out of the 5 people who are active in this thread right now, the 3 that are pushing him are all scum. This is just so bad. Does stupid and bad mean that wherebugsgo is likely to be scum? Yea. He's a smart guy, I have no fucking clue why he's doing this.
who's not red on my next list?
I consider RoL to be reddish but I didn't have him on that list because he didn't vote BH. I have something like 7 red reads right now. Yeah, they can't all be scum obviously. But I really wish I had a machine gun so I could just kill them all indiscriminately.
|
On February 28 2012 10:57 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:54 DoctorHelvetica wrote: That's why toades point is stupid because he has no way of knowing what any 1 particular scum would act. Scum intentionally obfuscate or make inefficient moves to cause confusion. They will defend townies and attack each other, etc.
agreed. However, I don't care atm because it's a waste of time. Do you think RoL is mafia? prpl? VE? I assume since you still have your vote on Toad you still think he is scum. If I had to guess right now I'd say the scum team is between these 5: Toades/Dirk BC VE RoL
I think it's gonna be 4 of these players. I feel uncomfortable about you and I feel uncomfortable about Kitaman, risk.nuke, and Jitsu but I need to read more on that.
I think our DT's should check inactive players.
As far as RoL, he definitely has the personality type to react this way even as town, unfortunately. I don't like lynching people like this because I'm so bad with second guessing myself. I really don't like rolling town at all.
|
On February 28 2012 11:03 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:01 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 28 2012 10:59 kitaman27 wrote: Also, DrH, you never responded to my question earlier. What triggered you to move to blazing over RoL yesterday? Do you believe "giving up" is a town RoL response? Thought BH was scummier and lost confidence in my read once I started second-guessing myself mostly based on RoL's personality and remembering how things were with youngminii when we played together. I figured RoL, being more inactive, is better left to vigilantes since a bandwagon on an inactive player doesn't move discussion You think there is a vigilante after RoL or chaoser wasn't shot last night? Do you think he would be a better lynch tomorrow if he lives another night? I'm really not sure what we gain by keeping a likely scum player alive. On that note, I've been tricked into putting off my hw yet again. bbl Dunno, could have hit a vet or a medic blocked player or a mafia vet or a mafia medic or something, or no vig, or a day vig, it's a closed setup.
I think inactive/lurky players should be lynched once the vocal scum suspects are gone. They are the lower priority imo
|
On February 28 2012 11:03 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:01 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:55 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:54 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:52 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 28 2012 10:50 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:48 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:44 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 28 2012 10:41 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:16 Toadesstern wrote: [quote]
why should mafia VE come in here and push you instead of just joining the Toad-wagon? That's a really important point I made and I'm going to bring it up again: The logical conclusion for a townie in wbg's position would be: Mafia would not try to get another wagon but unless Toad is mafia himself, therefore it's either Toad + VE mafia and VE is trying to rescue him or it's ONLY Toad mafia + a confused townie VE who joined the wrong side. OR both are townies. However, VE being mafia is while I am a townie is the most retarded thing ever. VE could hve easily joined the Toad-wagon and he did not. So now one might ask why isn't wbg asking himself those questions? I'd consider those things pretty important if I were confused about 4 people and can't figure out which of those 4 are mafia. I guess by now you guys already figured out what the funny thing about this all is: Wbg isn't asking these questions because he doesn't need to. He's not asking those questions because they are pointless and lead to absolutely no conclusion whatsoever I'm not surprised you'd concoct a defense of VE based on shaky WIFOM wat? That question PROVES I am mafia if he really thinks the way he does. IT PROVES I AM MAFIA OR NONE OF THE GUYS HE WANTS TO LYNCH IS MAFIA. How is that pointless? He said he can deliver you 3/3 mafia if we lynch into VE / RoL / ME. VE is a confirmed townie for me right now because of what I said (that' not bad either, is it?) so 1 is wrong. I am wrong as well but instead of telling people "well that proves toad is mafia" he goes on to pressure prpl? The fuck? no, it doesn't prove anything. It's complete WIFOM because I have no fucking clue what the mafia would do in this situation.The fact that you're insinuating that I could actually find out the answers to those questions makes you look redder. It's funny because if I were in VE's spot as mafia and toades was town I wouldn't vote for Toades at all why not? Why should mafia start a counterwagon and defend me? why shouldn't they? now you've delved into the realm of WIFOM; congratulations, you are now helping waste all of our time more efficiently. Ok, so you think VE is mafia and his masterplan is derping big time instead of going with the ez lynch and because we all see how much towncred got (according to you) from that ingenius move he just it's more likely that he's mafia? Oh crap, you're going after him now, guess his masterplan wasn't that ingenius after all, OR HE'S A FUCKING TOWNIE I see you want to continue wasting time. So you're scum then? How goes the QT? It's not wasting time. Remember AC when noone was asking who got RB'ed the next night? That's what syllo said to me and it was, according to him, one of the most important question to ask. You want to tell me that kind of thing is wifom as well because "hell, for all I know mafia could just chose to note use their RB TO CONFUSE TOWN". No mafia would not do that. What I am talking about is not wifom, just like mafia doing /dance is not a possible explanation to why we had no kills n1. Yet you're not telling me "well that's wifom! Mafia could have willingly chose to not shoot at all to confuse town!" because you know noone would do such a thing.
You didn't realize that I had to be mafia according to what you said because I know I can't be mafia and didn't think about it. It's that easy.
|
How about we lynch Tyrran?
What do you guys think about that?
|
On February 28 2012 11:03 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:VisceraEyes has looked scummy for a long time. His case on WBG is grasping at straws, especially the fact that you're pushing a player Day 3 based on loud posts Day 1? You didn't catch onto his question to syllo then? Here's how scum play often works: Scum 1: I need to push a bandwagon today so X doesn't get lynched Scum 2: WBG has been pretty spammy, changed his mind a lot, etc. he might be an easy candidate Scum 1: Hm, ok I'll make a post about it I'm still reading all the posts here but it seems like VE is criticizing WBG for buddying? On February 22 2012 14:56 VisceraEyes wrote: DocH I'm intrigued by your ideas and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Also this: On February 22 2012 16:42 VisceraEyes wrote: That was dangerously close to role-fishing syllo - the existance of one town-tracker doesn't preclude a second town-tracker. Am I missing something? "Role fishing" imo is one of those things that scum accuses other townies of doing it's supposed to be "Scummy" but in 5 or 6 games as scum I have never really done it or known any teammates to do it either, except in PM games where it's pretty easy and often town roles have a lot of incentive to rolefish On February 22 2012 15:55 VisceraEyes wrote: And BC is your strongest read right now Syllo? Like, without question?
Did you ever get around to looking at the whole WBG/chaoser thing sir? I feel like that exchange means something. chaoser's defense was solid, but I didn't mind WBG's attack either.
However, chaoser still seems to be interested in finding scum, while WBG has only recently been calling red scum...he's been tunneled in on chaoser ever since that argument.
I'm starting to get a red read on WBG. Is this really that different than what WBG did? Inversely, for my ease of writing. Yes, that's vastly different than what WBG asked of Syllo - for the same reasons the question I posted earlier. I asked Syllo a specific question, relevant to something I was looking at.
Holy fuck.
Okay VE. Here's where I prove you're full of shit.
Here's what I asked syllo:
On February 22 2012 06:37 wherebugsgo wrote: syllo can you give me your opinion on redFF?
I think I was completely wrong about him.
Here's something you asked BC:
On February 21 2012 11:59 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On February 21 2012 11:42 Jackal58 wrote: Dear redFF and WBG You both suck. Sincerely, Jackal58 I endorse this statement fully and from the bottom of my heart I thank you for letting me know I am not insane. Why are we debating Policy lynches this early into the day? Seriously? This isn't a game with a player like 2010 bill murray who spams while being a dick, this isn't a game with a mod hating spammer named showtime. Instead we have for the most part a fairly solid crew devoid of spammy trolls. If you want to lynch someone for being bad, wait till they start being bad / scumlike, dont lynch them for shits and giggles. Policy lynching people on retarded reasoning is worse than RNG votes for early discussion. Cut the nonsense out. Anyone who keeps talking about it from this post on be warned. as a side note, VE since you are making moderate sense for the first time ever I have to give you props for impressing me two games in a row. /salute What are your thoughts on redFF BC? I'm almost convinced that he's just bad and not scum, but I'd like your thoughts before I act on it.
Okay.
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE DIFFERENCE?
The straw grasping is just blowing my mind right now, I can't believe anyone would actually seriously consider this an adequate reason to call someone scum.
His answer, while unhelpful to me in the long run, helped me get a read on Syllo. Not only was the question specific, I immediately gave him MY thoughts on the question I asked, encouraging him to respond in an informative and relevant way by providing context to the question. If you'll look at WBG's post, it was literally "what are your thoughts on redFF? I think I may have been mistaken all game" First of all, the question was vague as fuck. His thoughts? Does he mean regarding his skill-level or alignment? Does he mean regarding redFF's demeanor or his play in Sleeper Cell 2? Obviously we can assume he was just asking him about his alignment, but we don't REALLY know do we? Not only that, but he goes on to say "I think I may have been mistaken all game"...which doesn't provide any context at all! Why? Because all game long, all WBG has had to say is "I have no idea what redFF's alignment is! I only know that he's sooooooo bad!"
rofl.
So you're calling me out for being "vague" when you were equally vague with more than half of your questions to people this game.
There is no way that anything I did was alignment-indicative yet you are grasping at straws to try and make it so, when you were guilty of the same thing you were accusing me of.
The huge double standard is pretty much why I'm leaving my vote on VE right now.
Also, I said he was unreadable for the first half of day 1. That's not all game long. What the fuck else would I ask if not syllo's thoughts on redFF's alignment?
Like seriously, the fuck is this?
First of all, the question was vague as fuck. His thoughts? Does he mean regarding his skill-level or alignment? Does he mean regarding redFF's demeanor or his play in Sleeper Cell 2? Obviously we can assume he was just asking him about his alignment, but we don't REALLY know do we?
LOL WHAT? In what world do you come to this conclusion?
this case is fucking indefensible.
|
Like seriously Bugs - just calm down and ignore me - I'm not responding to your bullshit anymore as I'm 100% convinced of your guilt.
|
Yes, VisceraEyes is fucking out of his mind. That doesn't really mean anything though. The premise of your case is "Palmar said he was getting better" and that's not good enough. Find somebody else wherebugsgo or you should really be lynched. You usually push people because they're scum, not because they said some stupid shit.
|
|
|
|