TL Mafia XLVII - Page 183

On November 30 2011 11:23 GreYMisT wrote:
Can all the people voting players with only 1 vote decide between the top canidates please? unless you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that your target is mafia, they probally are not getting lynched today.

On November 30 2011 11:26 Risen wrote:


Wasn't going to say anything until right before post time about this but...

A look needs to be taken at people who have a vote on zeks/Palmar and then a vote on a random who isn't going to be lynched.

For fucks sake. He is near being offed like I am and rather than posting near the end trying to help anyone he martyred himself and fucking left the thread? Thats townlike?

On November 30 2011 11:24 vaderseven wrote:


No his role doesnt mean he is town. But it does mean you shouldn't be trying to prove he is scum no matter what and thats what you have done this game.

In fact, the only players I could see wanting to do that ARE THE SCUM because they can't night kill him till some Bodyguard(s?) are killed. Add to that the power of his role and you can see why I might see a very mafia motive behind your weird play.

On November 30 2011 11:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote:



If he doesn't want me analyzing him then maybe he shouldnt be so scumlike? Maybe thats because hes scum? I have a clear read that is he red, why the hell would I drop that. It is not townlike to drop a read because everyone says you are wrong. It is clearly a bad move when most of the people telling you it are acting shifty, are new, or are downright using terrible arguments. As for how bodyguards work. You have no idea how many there are and as such have no idea how a scum would react with that information. Everyone would act differently. I can already say if I was red the night 1 shots would have been drastically different. You will have to take my word on that thought but as you think I am red you won't believe me.

I might've been DT checked last night and returned scum/guilty (I won't say by who).

consider your sanity / or the possibility I'm Miller!

On November 30 2011 11:29 wherebugsgo wrote:
yeah vader that's the right quote. I was mostly responding specifically to this part:



So again BC, you have not satisfactorily answered why it makes sense for someone to claim vanilla/miller in defense of there possibly being a red check on them, but then later turn around and claim vig.

You cannot be both miller and vig at the same time. So then either Zeks doesn't know that, or Zeks was lying about being one or the other.

Which one is it?

On November 30 2011 11:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote:



If he doesn't want me analyzing him then maybe he shouldnt be so scumlike? Maybe thats because hes scum? I have a clear read that is he red, why the hell would I drop that. It is not townlike to drop a read because everyone says you are wrong. It is clearly a bad move when most of the people telling you it are acting shifty, are new, or are downright using terrible arguments. As for how bodyguards work. You have no idea how many there are and as such have no idea how a scum would react with that information. Everyone would act differently. I can already say if I was red the night 1 shots would have been drastically different. You will have to take my word on that thought but as you think I am red you won't believe me.

On November 30 2011 11:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


Here is a question for you.

You have a blue role but do not want to share it as if you do you will most likely be shot during the night.

You know that the game has two investigative mechanics, one is a rolecop and one is a dt that could be one of 4 sanities. No one in their right mind would push your lynch based off your role so you figure that no one is dumb enough to push purely off clues. As no one should be. You then figure someone must be pushing you because they got a red check back on a dt check.

Do you instantly claim your blue role or give a potential reason to clear you to that dt via them not knowing their sanity by providing reasons? What he did is not unreasonable. IF he is dt and we let him live he dies tonight most likely, or is forced to shoot because he might die. If we lynch he doesn't shoot.

His play is not terrible here, you are just looking for a reason to lynch him.

On November 30 2011 11:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


Here is a question for you.

You have a blue role but do not want to share it as if you do you will most likely be shot during the night.

You know that the game has two investigative mechanics, one is a rolecop and one is a dt that could be one of 4 sanities. No one in their right mind would push your lynch based off your role so you figure that no one is dumb enough to push purely off clues. As no one should be. You then figure someone must be pushing you because they got a red check back on a dt check.

Do you instantly claim your blue role or give a potential reason to clear you to that dt via them not knowing their sanity by providing reasons? What he did is not unreasonable. IF he is dt and we let him live he dies tonight most likely, or is forced to shoot because he might die. If we lynch he doesn't shoot.

His play is not terrible here, you are just looking for a reason to lynch him.

On November 30 2011 11:32 wherebugsgo wrote:


really? WIFOM here and it's hard to see how the night shots could've gone much more differently.

Other than sandro, bum, Coag and decon almost all the vets got shot n1.

You're saying you would've shot those players over some of those who actually got shot?