On December 02 2010 11:28 JimboSilvers wrote:
Uhm lol not everyone has time to spend 24-7 on this thread like you do. But that's ok, keep attacking. You look pretty frantic right now. And if Chaos is your goal you've sure achieved it. Because sadly even after you die town has gotten nowhere.
I like this. It's like when you wreck someone in a starcraft match and they say "uh lol at least i dont practice this like u 24/7 nerd GET A LIFE." and you just chuckle to yourself. So you just pop up out of nowhere RIGHT after the day post gets through to "spill the beans" about how I'm the chaos ensuant.
And you never even PM'd me back?
I was frantic when my circle died on me but now I'm calm. It's very easy to say "wow you seem desparate". Desparate doing what? Accusing you? So it's "frantic" to scumhunt? Don't just pull out bullshit like that.
Well at least FINALLY you decide to post some analysis. But sorry, there's a lot of things wrong with your post.
For one, you can't assume I'm scum in order to prove that I'm scummy. I'm talking about how your post makes sense as a scum goal, a critical part of scum analysis. Analysing goals. If focusing on inactives means making inactives talk. Which hey! hasn't been done this game. "Talk about blue roles should be avoided"...hey, look where that has got us huh? "great way for mafia to push bandwagons onto innocent townies who are fishing for people to protect/investigate or simply trying to lead town like I am". No. From the games I've read, every town circle idea has combusted into flames. And yet you continue to insist this is pro-town. Notice how you also try to make yourself seem so innocent here when you're clearly not. Clearly not? I "try to make myself look innocent" versus what. Trying to make myself look guilty?
I said the town circle should go through a DT confirmed target and everyone ignored me and RC'd to me instead. That's not my fault. It would have worked really well in Insane if the rest of the town wasn't incompetent and I didn't second guess myself too much. Notice the mafia focused shutting down PM circles first and foremost in Insane Mafia as well.
I don't watch this thread 24-7 ok. Besides, you know what I've said in thread. Why do I have to repeat myself in PMs?A pro-town player would use the opportunity to bring up his suspicions with the person who you seem to believe is leading the town and most active in town circles. For all you know Annul had already incriminated himself in PMs to me. It's stragne you would never bring it up. Contradicting myself would be awfully suspicious, don't you think? I also never "focused" on players like youngminii. The person who was focusing on DTA/Node/YM and those people was YOU. I suppose when you post that pm bundle in your .txt file everyone can see for themselves.Yes I brought it up, but when we're talking about our suspects and you never really think to mention Annul it sets off a small alarm in my brain. And like I said, you are giving me no information by spouting all this "XX is scummy in PMs" and so forth. I don't have your PMs and I can't read your mind. I was never "set" on annul. He was the scummiest in my mind (after Kenpachi), but nothing conclusive. It certainly doesn't help when you're being anti-town and refusing to show concrete reasoning on other people. Except you. And now radfield. And soon aeres. If I don't have enough information to go off, I can't do anything.
This is just a lot of BS to make me look anti-town. You're ignoring your own intentions and actions and focusing on why what I'm doing is bad or wrong. This is called a chainsaw defense and it is a legitimate scumtell (unlike OMGUS). You're defending yourself not by defending yourself but by attacking me.
Well yes, now that we know that Kenpachi is town, of course mafia didn't switch the bandwagon to save him. I wrote this much before the day post came up. Try harder.
But I guess you knew kenpachi was town far before that right? Hindsight is perfect huh? In the context of what information we had back then, it was perfectly reasonable to think Kenpachi was saved by the mafia. And of course my post has a conclusion. My point was that Ghrur's accusation of Node/YM didn't make sense. [ The context is that people were debating whether there was any deception going on with that Ghrur PM. And when Ghrur is saying "well we should assume mafia was in contact with BB", I'm pointing out that that is nonsensical. It isn't nonsensical. It has a clear intention and that is to distract people from analysing those who early voted for BrownBear and those who tried to get him lynched early on. Yes I'm aware that includes myself. You're nitpicking and trying to isolate my words out of context. If your post wasn't pointless it's only point was to get people to shut up about ghrurs intentions and move on to the next mafia orchestrated bandwagon.
You've got it totally wrong here. In IRL mafia games I'm used to, town benefits from discussion in thread. Town doesn't need to be "protected" from information. Unless you're handling dangerous information like the information you've been receiving which never should have gotten to you. YEP I SHOULD DEFINITELY TELL THE TOWN WHO THE DT IS. Are you serious? I would be CRUCIFIED for claiming that sort of stuff and obviously there is information I should withhold like what the roles of the blues who claimed to me are. That's what I'm talking about bro. Look where its got us now? "Then get involved?" Mafia is a forum game, not a secret alliance game. Yeah and a forum has a PM system. I'm telling you it's a useful tool as a townie. Regardless, I did try to PM people. Like Glasse, KtheZ, Pandain, DTA, you, jcarls, Kenpachi, South. Guess what? Only 3 people responded to me. This is not a problem on my end, its a sort of snobish elitism on your end. wut how so? Town needs information. In the thread. Because even when I try, you guys don't seem interested in acknowledging me. So it's my fault none of them responded to you? Yeah ok. Yes town needs information and I've brought a hell of a lot more than you have. And I've kept hidden what needs to be hidden to stop the mafia from hitting our dt and our mad hatter. Keep spewing this BS.
I can't make opinions when I have no information to analyze. All I know was stuff on Kenpachi and annul. Asking me about something I have no knowledge about is unfair, especially when you give me nothing to analyze. And if you refuse to do so like you have done, I have no option but to go with the targets I have information on. Of course I'd love to hear what you have to offer, but you keep refusing to give them. You just keep asking me opinions on people who won't respond to my PMs and aren't saying anything meaningful in thread.
So in order to ask you what you think of something I should tell you everything they told me/pm'd me? You really think there is no one and nothing to analyse except kenpachi and annul? Jesus.
A misinterpretation. Pandain's point is that you cant assume someone is mafia in order to make them fit your reasoning for what scum does. Yet he contradicts himself by making that same assumption to vote DTA. Hypocrisy here. I'll have to reread that in the context of EXACTLY what Pandain is saying. But it seemed like the vote choice was icing on the cake ontop of reasons Pandain already thought made DTA scummy and I'm pretty certain I shared DTA's pms with pandain as well.
Whereas assuming ghrur voted to "save" kenpachi is exactly the reasoning the mafia want the town to believe yes?
How is this a bad attack? You seem to be the fan of the "poke people and make them react" style. Annul reacted poorly. And yet you dismiss this as a bad argument? Please, the hypocrisy is killing me here.
[blue]But not a fan of "the instant they react a way I don't like I FoS them in public or try to get them lynched"
I never used this PM in my analysis. I used this post:
Stop twisting my arguments. Maybe you didn't even actually read it. Anyway, the rest of your argument makes no sense. (Well none of it does actually).
Either way, sure, go ahead and focus on me. You won't get anywhere. The person who is obviously scum (or CE) right now is DH.
Uhm lol not everyone has time to spend 24-7 on this thread like you do. But that's ok, keep attacking. You look pretty frantic right now. And if Chaos is your goal you've sure achieved it. Because sadly even after you die town has gotten nowhere.
I like this. It's like when you wreck someone in a starcraft match and they say "uh lol at least i dont practice this like u 24/7 nerd GET A LIFE." and you just chuckle to yourself. So you just pop up out of nowhere RIGHT after the day post gets through to "spill the beans" about how I'm the chaos ensuant.
And you never even PM'd me back?
I was frantic when my circle died on me but now I'm calm. It's very easy to say "wow you seem desparate". Desparate doing what? Accusing you? So it's "frantic" to scumhunt? Don't just pull out bullshit like that.
Well at least FINALLY you decide to post some analysis. But sorry, there's a lot of things wrong with your post.
For one, you can't assume I'm scum in order to prove that I'm scummy. I'm talking about how your post makes sense as a scum goal, a critical part of scum analysis. Analysing goals. If focusing on inactives means making inactives talk. Which hey! hasn't been done this game. "Talk about blue roles should be avoided"...hey, look where that has got us huh? "great way for mafia to push bandwagons onto innocent townies who are fishing for people to protect/investigate or simply trying to lead town like I am". No. From the games I've read, every town circle idea has combusted into flames. And yet you continue to insist this is pro-town. Notice how you also try to make yourself seem so innocent here when you're clearly not. Clearly not? I "try to make myself look innocent" versus what. Trying to make myself look guilty?
I said the town circle should go through a DT confirmed target and everyone ignored me and RC'd to me instead. That's not my fault. It would have worked really well in Insane if the rest of the town wasn't incompetent and I didn't second guess myself too much. Notice the mafia focused shutting down PM circles first and foremost in Insane Mafia as well.
I don't watch this thread 24-7 ok. Besides, you know what I've said in thread. Why do I have to repeat myself in PMs?A pro-town player would use the opportunity to bring up his suspicions with the person who you seem to believe is leading the town and most active in town circles. For all you know Annul had already incriminated himself in PMs to me. It's stragne you would never bring it up. Contradicting myself would be awfully suspicious, don't you think? I also never "focused" on players like youngminii. The person who was focusing on DTA/Node/YM and those people was YOU. I suppose when you post that pm bundle in your .txt file everyone can see for themselves.Yes I brought it up, but when we're talking about our suspects and you never really think to mention Annul it sets off a small alarm in my brain. And like I said, you are giving me no information by spouting all this "XX is scummy in PMs" and so forth. I don't have your PMs and I can't read your mind. I was never "set" on annul. He was the scummiest in my mind (after Kenpachi), but nothing conclusive. It certainly doesn't help when you're being anti-town and refusing to show concrete reasoning on other people. Except you. And now radfield. And soon aeres. If I don't have enough information to go off, I can't do anything.
This is just a lot of BS to make me look anti-town. You're ignoring your own intentions and actions and focusing on why what I'm doing is bad or wrong. This is called a chainsaw defense and it is a legitimate scumtell (unlike OMGUS). You're defending yourself not by defending yourself but by attacking me.
Well yes, now that we know that Kenpachi is town, of course mafia didn't switch the bandwagon to save him. I wrote this much before the day post came up. Try harder.
But I guess you knew kenpachi was town far before that right? Hindsight is perfect huh? In the context of what information we had back then, it was perfectly reasonable to think Kenpachi was saved by the mafia. And of course my post has a conclusion. My point was that Ghrur's accusation of Node/YM didn't make sense. [ The context is that people were debating whether there was any deception going on with that Ghrur PM. And when Ghrur is saying "well we should assume mafia was in contact with BB", I'm pointing out that that is nonsensical. It isn't nonsensical. It has a clear intention and that is to distract people from analysing those who early voted for BrownBear and those who tried to get him lynched early on. Yes I'm aware that includes myself. You're nitpicking and trying to isolate my words out of context. If your post wasn't pointless it's only point was to get people to shut up about ghrurs intentions and move on to the next mafia orchestrated bandwagon.
You've got it totally wrong here. In IRL mafia games I'm used to, town benefits from discussion in thread. Town doesn't need to be "protected" from information. Unless you're handling dangerous information like the information you've been receiving which never should have gotten to you. YEP I SHOULD DEFINITELY TELL THE TOWN WHO THE DT IS. Are you serious? I would be CRUCIFIED for claiming that sort of stuff and obviously there is information I should withhold like what the roles of the blues who claimed to me are. That's what I'm talking about bro. Look where its got us now? "Then get involved?" Mafia is a forum game, not a secret alliance game. Yeah and a forum has a PM system. I'm telling you it's a useful tool as a townie. Regardless, I did try to PM people. Like Glasse, KtheZ, Pandain, DTA, you, jcarls, Kenpachi, South. Guess what? Only 3 people responded to me. This is not a problem on my end, its a sort of snobish elitism on your end. wut how so? Town needs information. In the thread. Because even when I try, you guys don't seem interested in acknowledging me. So it's my fault none of them responded to you? Yeah ok. Yes town needs information and I've brought a hell of a lot more than you have. And I've kept hidden what needs to be hidden to stop the mafia from hitting our dt and our mad hatter. Keep spewing this BS.
I can't make opinions when I have no information to analyze. All I know was stuff on Kenpachi and annul. Asking me about something I have no knowledge about is unfair, especially when you give me nothing to analyze. And if you refuse to do so like you have done, I have no option but to go with the targets I have information on. Of course I'd love to hear what you have to offer, but you keep refusing to give them. You just keep asking me opinions on people who won't respond to my PMs and aren't saying anything meaningful in thread.
So in order to ask you what you think of something I should tell you everything they told me/pm'd me? You really think there is no one and nothing to analyse except kenpachi and annul? Jesus.
A misinterpretation. Pandain's point is that you cant assume someone is mafia in order to make them fit your reasoning for what scum does. Yet he contradicts himself by making that same assumption to vote DTA. Hypocrisy here. I'll have to reread that in the context of EXACTLY what Pandain is saying. But it seemed like the vote choice was icing on the cake ontop of reasons Pandain already thought made DTA scummy and I'm pretty certain I shared DTA's pms with pandain as well.
Whereas assuming ghrur voted to "save" kenpachi is exactly the reasoning the mafia want the town to believe yes?
How is this a bad attack? You seem to be the fan of the "poke people and make them react" style. Annul reacted poorly. And yet you dismiss this as a bad argument? Please, the hypocrisy is killing me here.
[blue]But not a fan of "the instant they react a way I don't like I FoS them in public or try to get them lynched"
I never used this PM in my analysis. I used this post:
Stop twisting my arguments. Maybe you didn't even actually read it. Anyway, the rest of your argument makes no sense. (Well none of it does actually).
Either way, sure, go ahead and focus on me. You won't get anywhere. The person who is obviously scum (or CE) right now is DH.
You misunderstood the last part. I didn't format the post correctly so that part with the PM was part of my analysis of annul, it had nothing to do with you.
I'd rather lynch Radfield today, but I am requesting for the vigilante to hit you tonight.
And of course you can't consider that I'm simply a misguided townie? Your defensiveness is off the charts scummy.