TL Mafia XXXI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
## Ban Pandain for posting a game PM. Also for hacking my inbox. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On September 17 2010 09:39 Pandain wrote: Step 1: Go to TL Step 2: Put in "Sinquity" under username Step 3: Put in "I'm having mixed feelings about my own gender yet I can't bring myself to come out in the open so I express my inner frustration through this password I type every time" under password. Partly inspired by http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=83099 + Show Spoiler + Dw Sinquity, I <3 you this was just a general joke, not a joke about you. Umm, no? + Show Spoiler + You have to put SiNiquity into the username box. Special account, case-sensitive. On a more related note,try this on for size: Perfectionist - The straight A+ student, magna cum laude, etc. You're never wrong. Ever. So if you vote to kill someone and it passes, and you were wrong (i.e. blue/green died), then you sacrifice yourself, allegedly to atone for your 'crime' but really because can't come to terms with the events. However, if you are correct, the endorphin rush to your brain will give you new insights, leading you to conclude that at least 1 of 3 players must be 'bad' (i.e. mod randoms 1 red/black + 2 random players of any persuasion and PMs the list to you at dusk immediately after the lynch). Thoughts? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
http://www.freedomwriter.com/issue35/ak34.htm | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On September 22 2010 01:20 NukeTheBunnys wrote: Season 1 + 2 were really really good, season 3 started to lose it, season 4 was just ridiculous. Cylons were much better bad guys before they let us on the base ship. Haha yes, like all shows, the longer it went on the worse it got. The only exception I can think of recently is Breaking Bad and Dexter. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 10:31 Incognito wrote: In my view it is the smurf's burden to enforce the secrecy of his own identity if he so wishes. I don't think mod intervention in protecting someone's identity is fair. Agreed. Mod should neither encourage nor discourage one to reveal the smurf's identity barring any smurfing rule. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 11:24 infinitestory wrote: Well, then can you offer a logical argument as to why mafia would abstain from night-killing village idiot if village idiot is exposed and town makes the threat I outlined above? I would be glad to hear any thoughtful criticism, as this plan needs to work perfectly to actually get rid of that idiotic nuisance. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 11:38 infinitestory wrote: As long as the mafia are still in the game, they stand to lose by not night-killing the VI, regardless of whether it's also "the town's game to lose." To win, the mafia must remove both the VI and the town. A 1% chance to win the game is still preferable to simply losing. I know I've seen games where 1 mafia took out several town by himself with some clever lynch voting. :/ We should also try to start figuring out (if we've already done this, sorry, I just jumped in :/) what role Godfather is posing as, to help the DT do his job with the utmost accuracy. My first thought was that Godfather would pose as VI, and after that I can't decide which of the blue roles (barring DT of course) would be the most viable to pose as. Posing as bulletproof or veteran would cause the DT to defend him heavily against lynch kills, but I think the same probably applies for medic, mad hatter, and vigilante. Any other opinions? Once the VI is truly out in the open, we could argue that Mafia forfeits now or we lynch the the VI. My point is, by lynching the VI we -also- lose, so yes if the mafia is down then they have no reason to follow through with the kill, just as we have no reason to follow through with it. Granted I see no reason why the mafia wouldn't kill the VI just to get rid of him, but I don't agree that we would be in a position to blackmail them. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 11:40 Pandain wrote: Basically, if the town's going to be that much of a panda poacher than mafia can just do the same thing. They don't hit the VI. Then what? We doom ourselves? Chances are we change our mind and the mafia are 1 up on us. Basically, the plan revolves entirely around wifom, which should rarely be used in mafia. Alright, we have two explantions from why they voted Proctat. What about you, Sinquity? I called him out to reveal himself, he didn't. If he wants to take his identity to the grave then that's his decision. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
7. If you miss a vote or fail to post during one day cycle, you will be modkilled. Not voting: bumatlarge, kane]deth[, Infundi, Crisis_, Happy.fairytail Not posted nor voted: XeliN, JeeJee Under the current rules we're looking at 7 mod kills. Hope some of those are mafia :\ | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 12:12 Crisis_ wrote: Crisis here. Wow, just realized there were so many voters against me. I don't know how to not apologize without seeming like a good voting target, so I won't do it. Can you at least tell me what a good post would consist of, preferably by the end of the day? [url="http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=157921¤tpage=2"]Go vote for someone.[/url] | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Fixed | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 11:48 SiNiquity wrote: I called him out to reveal himself, he didn't. If he wants to take his identity to the grave then that's his decision. 10 minutes left. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Also, Prot's headed to the gallows (bum just chimed in). Sorry buddy ~ could've thwarted this whole mess if you'd have fessed up. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Now shut up like a good little hellspawn. + Show Spoiler + didn't feel like formatting On October 06 2010 13:05 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Show nested quote + On October 06 2010 13:02 Protactinium wrote: On October 06 2010 13:00 SiNiquity wrote: I getcha, heh. Also, Prot's headed to the gallows (bum just chimed in). Sorry buddy ~ could've thwarted this whole mess if you'd have fessed up. All is going exactly as I have planned. the dead don't speak The dead are currently in Twilight, since the night post hasn't gone up. Remember this post, DoctorHelvetica? I took the liberty of reading up on your games a while back, and this nice little tidbit came from Incognito's XVI: On January 28 2010 11:39 Ng5 wrote: You're dead. Now shut up like a good little hellspawn On October 06 2010 13:15 BrownBear wrote: In the interest of not having any roles dead, I've decided to spare XeliN. He only gets this one chance though >:D Well subs mean Prot's not VI (no reason to go through the hassle otherwise), and this seems to suggest that XeliN has a role. Interesting. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 13:31 Infundibulum wrote: it should be over to teach people a lesson yea teach people a lesson. you tell them how it is. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 13:44 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I there, subjunctive. better? seriously tho, it's gg. Fortunately it's on day 1, so continuing is effectively the same as rehosting. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 13:54 BrownBear wrote: Exactly. I COULD go through all the hassle of making sure everyone resigns up, reassigning roles, and remaking a new thread... but why bother? No I agree. Except then at least I'd have a chance at a mafia role ![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 13:58 XeliN wrote: Thanks flame xD The insinutation that I have a "role" due to not being modkilled is illfounded, theres arguments for it obviously, but treating it as an assumption is flawed. That was just me misreading something entirely ~ there's really no argument for it at all (as an assumed slip-up by BB anyway). | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 13:58 Bill Murray wrote: if we're restarting, ![]() You know, you're not actually supposed to edit your post to introduce the | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 13:58 Bill Murray wrote: boo not restarting LOL you're just trying to get yourself killed now.. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 06 2010 14:04 fIamewheel91 wrote: Stop. Fucking. Spamming. God, every single time. Something about a hellspawn and being quiet. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
But then again, this is mafia, where 3+ paragraphs for a simple idea are the norm ![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Alternatively a host could simply come out and confirm that the PM messages were different dependent on host, alleviating us of this meta-game aspect entirely. But if not, then the information's there, and should be taken full advantage of by the townies. Now, in short, for those that don't feel like reading the spam starting from page 29 and going really until about page 35, Bill Murray demanded players to roleclaim, but emphasized players should carefully reread their PMs before claiming. It was actually very clever, as there was an underlying secret that only town players would recognize: town players were not PM'ed the word "town" but rather "townie" as their role. XeliN sums this up nicely: On October 07 2010 16:42 XeliN wrote: My take on the whole "Town//Townie" questioning. It seems quite clear to me that the distinction Bill is trying to highlight here is not whether someone is Green or Blue, but on what a Town player was actually PM'd in their role. Seems a little bit shady as a strategy although nonetheless quite effective as I'm now fairly sure he is legitimately Town. On October 07 2010 16:47 XeliN wrote: In fact it's not even "my take" it's blatantly what he actually means as he frequently say's "go back and look at your role PM, then tell me Town//Townie" Him being established town (here's where "my take" is appropriate, you can make up your own minds!) doesn't mean he is correct in calling for bloody's lynch, but I'm going to need to go over the thread more purely with that in mind. OpZ is also suspect to me, along with BC, for missing Bill's intention which was quite blatant, although ofc if they were mafia they would miss it as their role PM would not make his intention blatant. Ironically, Bill, either in a burst of genius or insanity, incessantly insisted the correct answer was "town." And, best of yet, some people fell for it: On October 07 2010 14:02 DoctorHelvetica wrote: town but i'm more confused by your plan than anything On October 07 2010 14:49 infinitestory wrote: I claim town. I have no idea where you could possibly be going with this. On October 07 2010 14:53 BloodyC0bbler wrote: I'm town, and you already know that. (Note: BC is especially guilty in this regard, as he kept referring to the town post in the OP as his point of reference). In fact the only player that correctly roleclaimed as far as I can surmise is OpZ: On October 07 2010 15:16 ~OpZ~ wrote: Really? my role PM says townie. It was also sent by Artanis. Was yours sent by Artanis? -_- Even now Bill maintains "town" is the correct answer, and his vigilance for this charade is admirable yet simultaneously disturbing on some deeper level. However, props to him for maintaining it for so long (I'd certainly be convinced). Now there is the caveat that there were different wording in the PMs based on the host. On October 08 2010 05:41 BrownBear wrote: Both Artanis and I sent out role PMs, to make our workload easier. As such, take the following conclusions with a grain of salt: Confirmed players from my perspective:
Suspect players from my perspective:
Still need to look at the votes over the past day to see if there's anything worthwhile there. But I'm certainly curious as to what one of the "town" players will flip ~ if town, then there's possibly a host discrepancy. If not, then this only confirms my suspicions. It's the strongest lead we've got and I see no reason not to pursue it. Anyway I'm off to bed to mull this over. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 09 2010 11:32 CynanMachae wrote: What is this? I'm pretty sure we only have two double lynches Ack you're right. In that case I don't think we should be using them just yet. Going to go change it... | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 09 2010 11:41 LSB wrote: Interesting... Anyways, why not use one now, we got a good plan to go with for BM Wait. So we're double lynching just to lynch BM "for free" tomorrow? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 09 2010 12:02 LSB wrote: cSc is the only one who hasn't voted yet. That's why I voted for double lynch. See this post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=151150¤tpage=37#733 That's terrible. If BM's not mafia, there's no guarantee that Mafia won't gamble that he's not a VI and we waste our double lynch. I also don't believe there's more than 1 VI (protact), but that's just a hunch on my part. Look, now that I understand BM's plan, I agree it was utterly and ridiculously stupid (seriously - "Hey guys I'm town, so what are you, town/townie, oh and btw if you're blue answer 'town' since that's the super-secret right answer, but otherwise tell me are you town/townie" Gee I wonder what -mafia- would respond with?). From my perspective (i.e. OpZ's), I thought it was all a clever trap.. too clever for BM though, and I should've realized that. But even as bad as his version was, I think it's a stretch to suggest a non-town player would initiate such action relying on some "correct" wording of town PMs which, if wrong, would mean his doom (as it turns out, there was more than one "correct" wording so either way he was right, but he couldn't have known that). So in short, no, I don't think we should double lynch just to lynch BM, and I'm not convinced we're going to have enough information tomorrow to justify using one of our (two) double lynches. Also james is correct ~ I've only voted for double lynch so far (and now unvoted). Still weeding through the thread to find my vote candidate. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 09 2010 13:10 Protactinium wrote: So where is BrownBear... Er I could technically flip you since I know what you are, and I think there are modkills to be made. Where are the hosts? BrownBear said the night post would be coming late since it's Friday. idk 'bout Artanis | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
no, infinitestory or whoever was saying we should hold the mafia hostage with the VI, and I was pointing out that was a stupid idea over and over again. I'm absolutely thrilled that you've somehow taken that and twisted it into making me look like a moron. I hope the rest of your post isn't like this. (b) "worthless post about protacts smurf" smurfing hurts town. Lynching hurts smurf. I thought putting more pressure on protact would get him to fess up. If you were smart you'd have seen that I threatened him, he ignored me and just kept posting, and then I voted to put him in the lead and tried to keep the pressure on him, but he didn't budge. Yet you think posting "10 minutes left" with protact having a single vote lead, one of them being me, and protact actively posting, is worthless. Ironically, the fact that he did nothing was the biggest tell that he was VI: On October 06 2010 13:41 SiNiquity wrote: I'm down with the game being over. It doesn't take a genius to figure out someone who's headed to the gallows and has the ability to escape but doesn't (i.e. was leading only by one vote and could remove one vote by telling me who he was) is the VI, and I was perfectly content with that possibility. (c) SiNiquity: "[BB: let's continue.. why bother restarting?] No I agree. Except then at least I'd have a chance at a mafia role ![]() Because I'm always town aligned and it gets old after awhile, which is why I was perfectly content with protact being VI and rerolling ![]() (d) "now ALL THE WAY from page 22 to 39 he spams one-liners with NO information" you sir are a dirty little liar. I didn't post after page 25 until page 39. Not that this mischaracterization is out of line with anything else you've said. You're just as bad as BC in the last game I played when he analyzed me. Yeah I spammed a bit on 22-25 when nothing important was going on, during twilight and immediately after protact was pronounced VI. Sue me. Points (e) through (l) are referencing my large post on page 39 (e) "he claims he doesn't want to encourage durther discussion of the PM's but yet his entire post is centered around discussing EXACTLY that." I didn't want people to discuss to reveal additional PM knowledge as that was clearly banned, but wanted to reference the claims people had already made, as I thought we had some actual concrete evidence to work from, and ignoring that would be stupid. Hence the disclaimer. (f) "It had already been confirmed some pms were sent by artanis and that they were worded differently." Up until that point, there was no confirmation of different wording in the PMs. There was however confirmation that multiple hosts PMed people. Silly me for thinking anyone in this thread would need such a distinction pointed out. Oh wait, I did. In the point you're rebutting. ![]() + Show Spoiler [Blue posts from pg 33 to my pg 39] + On October 07 2010 15:22 BrownBear wrote: I just logged in and saw this. What the fuck. BM... stop. On October 07 2010 15:28 BrownBear wrote: BM, the next time I see this level of spam, it's a modkill. You've taken up like 60% of the last 3 pages BY YOURSELF. ffs stop spamming, or at least consolidate it all into one post. On October 08 2010 00:53 BrownBear wrote: Let's pleast stop talking about the PMs. It's a slippery slope, and as you all know, quoting all or part of them is illegal. Get back to scumhunting based off of analysis, not stupid PM-based shit. On October 08 2010 05:41 BrownBear wrote: It really pisses me off that role PMs are STILL being discussed here. Since this seems to be a sticky point, and since some people know this and others don't, I'll clarify it for everyone here. Both Artanis and I sent out role PMs, to make our workload easier. We had no clue it would be so much of a federal fucking issue when we did so. Now STOP TALKING ABOUT IT AS THOUGH IT'S A PART OF THE GAME. On October 08 2010 06:10 BrownBear wrote: RoL has very kindly given kane]deth[ back his role. kane will continue the game on double super-secret probation: if he gets modkilled for missing another vote, I will be very sad ![]() (g) "complains about spam despite being a terrible spammer himself." Yes, let's take an outright lie from point (d) and use it to draw a conclusion. (h) "BM's plan was clever despite the fact that it was totally useless because not every role PM was worded the same way. SiNiquity either doesn't know this or is feigning ignorance" See point (f). (i) bill maintained town was the correct answer because that's the PM he received. people received different PM's so none of what you just said matters in the slightest bit. there was no trap. See point (f). (j) (In reference to: caveat ~ PM wording may have been different) do you even realize this sentence makes your ENTIRE post fall apart? Yes which is why I put it both at the top and bottom of my post. Because it was that important. ![]() (k) (In reference to: "Take the following with a grain of salt") oh i will: Oh you're a clever one. (l) you agree with BM's methods and come out with compeltely different conclusions. there are two scenarios that makes this possible.
Or I received a role PM that said townie which meant BM was parading town as the correct answer to catch other people. But that would depend on the PM wording being the same huh. I wonder if I should, idk, make a disclaimer about that? ![]() Look, now that I understand BM's plan (i.e. he really did mean "town"), I agree it was utterly and ridiculously stupid (seriously - "Hey guys I'm town, so what are you, town/townie, oh and btw if you're blue answer 'town' since that's the super-secret right answer, but otherwise tell me are you town/townie" Gee I wonder what -mafia- would respond with?). From my perspective (i.e. OpZ's), I thought it was all a clever trap.. too clever for BM though, and I should've realized that. (m) What is this post about? Protecting BM and explaining his late vote. Mafia like to vote late so that they make sure to have the least conspicous vote possible. ~ Taking this in turn
(n) He says "I understand BM's plan" yet in his previous post he interpreted CLEARLY in the exact opposite way BM did. ![]() (o) If that is the case there is no way he understood what BM was doing unless they communicated or unless SiN has really really bad reading comprehension. The irony of your words is seeping from my monitor. If <false paraphrase> is true, then <draw conclusion> unless <conclusion #1 out of 2 from (l) is true> or <completely unrelated yet highly ironic possibility is true> (p) (Referring to me thinking Misder/XeliN are not mafia) Would you like to explain? Misder didn't end up being mafia, just a bad townie. Yeah it was totally Misder's fault for getting lynched. Stupid bad townie ![]() (q) (Continuing from prev. point) But why even say this if you aren't going to provie a reason? Not only does he not back up his defense but he doesn't propose an alternative. He isn't scumhunting which is what town should be doing. Lynching mafia. His late posts convinced me he wasn't scum which is why I didn't vote for him - I'm sorry that this wasn't obvious based on the fact that I posted that right after Misder posted. I don't think XeliN is mafia because he was the first to articulate BM's tactics, which I already stated in my "long analysis post." But you read that and picked it apart already, so you'd know this, right? ![]() [Summary]: (a) misrepresentation (b) stupid (c) ![]() (d) lies (e) misunderstanding (f) lies (g) conclusion from lies (h) unsubstantiated claim (i) unsubstantiated claim (j) ![]() (k) clever jab (l) incomplete analysis due to conclusion from unsubstantiated claim (m) misrepresentation (n) misrepresentation (o) misrepresentation / stupid (p) ![]() (q) misrepresentation / I don't even know. Stupidly high expectations? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [original post] + On October 10 2010 08:04 DoctorHelvetica wrote: This is my analysis of SiNiquity, a player of whom I have been suspicious of since day 1 but is growing ever larger now on my radar. His first posts are useless and I won't quote them for the sake of saving space. They concern the issue of protactiniums smurf. He continues throughout the beginning posting a lot but making empty arguments others have already made. "Who is protacts smurf?" This amused me: Oh really? We lose if we lynch the VI? Thanks for the input SiN. Says the same thing. Same obvious argument. Of course we can not lynch the Village Idiot. Worthless post about protacts smurf Backseat modding, no reason to post this whatsoever. Admits himself that it's not even his list, he just copy pasted it. Big waste of space. So far he has a lot of posts and ZERO content. link to the voting thread, very helpful more backseat modding. so far has added zero content or thought to this game worthless post starting on page 22 he spams relentlessly, except this post stands out to me What is the point of this? It's obvious at this point that BB wasn't going to end a game. This is a convenient time for mafia to come out and say "oh but I hate my role as (town role), let's restart". Not overtly suspicious but this is when he became a blip on my radar as "possible red" instead of just "awful and useless town player" now ALL THE WAY from page 22 to 39 he spams one-liners with NO information. Look at his post history in his profile. It's ridiculous. he goes out of his way to confirm himself as town during twilight and then just continues spamming the thread. word. Here is his first "big and useful" post. Which was utterly useless. Let's look at it (I'll be posting my thoughts inside the quote in red) Even though he interpreted BM's argument THE OPPOSITE of how BM interpreted it. He still accused bloodycobbler. It seems strange to me that there is nothing in common between their conclusions other than the fact that they both painted BC red (bill murray and SiNiquity) what did we learn from this post? 1. there is a big possibility BM and SiN have communicated out of game 2. despite interpreting BM's argument very differently SiN still accused bloodycobbler and insisted BM is 100% town. After two more useless posts SiN posts this What is this post about? Protecting BM and explaining his late vote. Mafia like to vote late so that they make sure to have the least conspicous vote possible. He says "I understand BM's plan" yet in his previous post he interpreted CLEARLY in the exact opposite way BM did. If that is the case there is no way he understood what BM was doing unless they communicated or unless SiN has really really bad reading comprehension. Would you like to explain? Misder didn't end up being mafia, just a bad townie. But why even say this if you aren't going to provie a reason? Not only does he not back up his defense but he doesn't propose an alternative. He isn't scumhunting which is what town should be doing. Lynching mafia. If SiNiquity is mafia, Bill Murray definitely is. SiNiquity you have some explaining to do. How did you "know" BM was using the word "town" to trick people and was actually looking for the word "townie". How did you understand BM's argument yet come to different conclusions? Why the spam? The nonsense one-liners? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
If your role PM said townie than what you said makes sense. If you're admitting to that then a lot of what you said makes sense under that light. Obviously you didn't say that so I hope you can see how the conclusion that you and bill murray had communicated out of game could be drawn? No I never said (and note that I -still- have not said) what my role is directly because BrownBear explicitly said to stop discussing PMs, and me saying "hey my PM said ________ and was from _______" would be violating this, as well as the disclaimer of my own post (the one from page 39, the long analysis one). I did however allude to it as heavily as I could: Smiley face by Opz when saying who I thought was likely town, saying this was all from "MY" perspective, then clarifying in a later post that "MY" perspective was the same as OpZ's perspective. I can see how the conclusion could be drawn, but you also mentioned another possibility (namely the real one) but completely dismissed it and used the other one to draw conclusions. That's just dishonest. you could be very well lying but your defense is satisfying to me. I'm not saying you're definitely mafia but pressure needed to be applied to you to clear that up, is that ok with you? you seem personally very offended lol offended? No. I'm only offended that we're making crucial decisions on analysis like that. If you are alluding to the fact that my retorts were pointed and often critical of your analysis, then sure. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 10 2010 11:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Sorry that it's a bit late guys. Night 2 Pandain missed the Mad Max night so he tried to steal the videotape from someone. That person was quite attached to his Mad Max video which was soon filled with the green blood of Pandain. Pandain the Townie is now dead Voting for day 3 has now begun. Don't forget that it's a double lynch people. I hate to state the obvious, but only one person died. Are people notified if they are hit but saved (i.e. bulletproof vest, medic save, etc)? I didn't see anything in the OP but I could be blind. Granted it's more likely that someone's been poisoned. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 10 2010 12:40 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I didn't dismiss it. If that is indeed the case then I understand why you interpreted Bill Murray's arguments the way you did. Otherwise the only explanation is that you communicated with Bill Murray outside of the game. I'm not saying one is true and that you're mafia. I'm saying that one of those MUST be true. It deserves focus because of that possibility. I really don't see any other way you could have come to the conclusions you did about BM other than that. Crucial decisions? What decision did I make here exactly other than the decision to put pressure. Mind you that's exactly what we as a town need to be doing. Pressuring people. I never said you made any decisions ~ I'm only saying that every night's lynch is based on stuff like that, and if it's inaccurate or incomplete then you're doing everyone a disservice, because they're probably not going to take the time to so thoroughly analyze your analysis. I understand the point you were driving at now, but much of your post contained inaccuracies (i.e. me spamming for 17 pages vs 3, and it's not nearly as bad as you allege), misquotes (taking "Look, now that I understand BM" as "I understand BM"), bad summaries ("siniquity saying stupid things about lynching VI, no shit"), etc. That's just off the top of my head, the rest is in my post. Ironically I'm setting the bar ridiculously high for myself now when it comes to analyzing anyone ![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 10 2010 13:22 DoctorHelvetica wrote: You didn't say "now that I understand BM", but rather "I understand BM". On October 10 2010 08:04 DoctorHelvetica wrote: After two more useless posts SiN posts this: Look, now that I understand BM's plan, ... What is this post about? Protecting BM and explaining his late vote. Mafia like to vote late so that they make sure to have the least conspicous vote possible. He says "I understand BM's plan" yet in his previous post he interpreted CLEARLY in the exact opposite way BM did. If that is the case there is no way he understood what BM was doing unless they communicated or unless SiN has really really bad reading comprehension. k? Now let's move on. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
In short, he's been moderately active but hasn't really said a whole lot. Ultimately gets boiled down into the following 4 categories:
Annd that's it. All of his posts. Could be blue skating by, could just have a lot of shit going on. I'd like to hear more. I'm also suspicious of the fact that CynanMachae is still alive, primarily because it sounded like he soft-claimed blue, Pandain even called him out on it, and he never really refuted it. Surely the Mafia didn't miss this ~ yet they haven't hit a blue yet. It could be they're not blue hunting and are instead simply targeting more experienced players (Bum, Infund, Pandain + whoever they poisoned). He also hasn't been terribly active (got put off by BM spamming which is understandable). Annnd now no one's been poisoned. :o On October 10 2010 14:05 ~OpZ~ wrote: I took a hit last night. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 10 2010 14:32 Divinek wrote: err what? it's possible that mafia could poison someone and just have one of their members claim they took a hit you know. Not saying i think that's the case atm, i've generally seen opz in a pretty good light this game, but don't jump to conclusions so easily! Sorry, should have included the word "allegedly." Agreed, it's possible. And actually regarding this: The narration usually has some indication how the player was killed (normally it doesn't matter since it's just a mafia hit). However, are players that are poisoned in this game indicated as such, or are they just "killed" like everyone else? Also, I'm near certain of OpZ's innocence, only because it seems highly unlikely that he would come out and counter-claim everyone's PM claiming, and be in alignment with mine. This also fits with my theory that the Mafia's not actually blue hunting, but rather hunting experienced players. Hmm. Opz (allegedly), Bum, Infund, Pandain. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Foreword: My analysis is not perfect, but here it is. Oh and by the way, after going through his post history and what he has said he is an excellent choice for today's lynch. Fantastic. Glad we've got that out in the open. Well since you've been through my post history, I expect all of the following will be new and enlightening, since I just responded to Dr. H yesterday. SiNiquity was extremely active prior to the start of the game, but he went 49 hours between posts once the game started ~ anyone can verify this with the "find" function Alright, let's do that. September 11 2010 - first post. September 16 2010 - 5 day gap September 17 2010 - 1 day gap September 19 2010 - 2 day gap September 20 2010 - 1 day gap September 21 2010 - 1 day gap September 22 2010 - 1 day gap September 27 2010 - 5 day gap October 04 2010 - 8 day gap October 04 2010 09:24 <-- Post that I received my role October 04 2010 13:00 <-- Game starts October 06 2010 10:41 <-- First "official post" October 06 2010 12:59 <-- Day 1 ends (a) That pre-game stuff is not "extremely active" by any stretch of the imagination, and even when I did post it was spam by definition as the game had not started. (b) No, I didn't post on day 1 until towards the end, because there was nothing of substance to post about. It's Day 1. I started posting when there was something of interest, namely the revelation by BrownBear and Protactinium that Protactinium was a smurf.
Posting about people getting mod-killed is almost as bad as posting vote lists to maintain a level of "contributing activity". One of the #1 thing that usually 1 mafia on a team does is post vote lists to seem active. This is the same general thing, what makes it worse is that this was already posted in BB's vote thread. He didn't even get it himself, he simply reposted a mods information. Yes, I was re-iterating the rules for getting mod-killed, one of which was not voting, since 5 out of the 7 people were actively posting in the thread but not voting in the voting thread. If they're posting in the main thread, but not voting, then the most obvious conclusion is that they're not reading the voting thread. So yes, I tied BrownBear's list with the rules to emphasize that 5 out of 7 people, who were participating, were about to be killed. But you take this and make it look criminal. Day 2 Keep a close eye on time stamps oh I will (at this rate I'm doubtful you'll get the joke here). Now, we can see that he posted once during the Wait, you made that dramatic "Watch the timestamps..." for that? You don't think you could've just said that? Also I was going to rail you for the night / day 1 mix up, but I think that was just an honest mistake. ... to post analysis on me... Don't take it so personally. It was not an analysis on just you, it was an analysis on everyone who claimed "town" when I thought BM meant "townie." ...claiming that I fell for bm's trap and that referring to the OP as a defense was part of my guilt. Keeping in mind that in the rules comparing PM's is against the rules and a modkillable offense. So suspecting me based on NOT breaking the rules. Keeping in mind that "BM's trap" was using "town" as bait (since the real answer was "townie.") So not only was it the wrong answer, it was someone relying on the OP. You can't deny that this is suspicious from my point of view. But then BrownBear confirmed that the PM wording differed and BM explained he really did mean "town," which nullified my theory. But congrats, you're back on my radar. Not for suspecting me, but for making me effectively reiterate everything I've already said a third time. It's almost like you prepared this last night and didn't post it until today (you said you went through my "post history" yet seem to be completely oblivious to the rebuttal I made to Dr. H which addresses most of this). After that he vanished for just shy 24 hours AGAIN... lol really, could you be any more over dramatic? This whole post reads like this. ...then started by a few one liners. Yes, I come back and see people pushing for double lynch on day 2, so I start going -wtf- why are we double lynching on day 2? From there he moved into saying Look, now that I understand BM's plan, I agree it was utterly and ridiculously stupid (seriously - "Hey guys I'm town, so what are you, town/townie, oh and btw if you're blue answer 'town' since that's the super-secret right answer, but otherwise tell me are you town/townie" Gee I wonder what -mafia- would respond with?). From my perspective (i.e. OpZ's), I thought it was all a clever trap.. too clever for BM though, and I should've realized that." First off, he had agreed to BM's plan as clever just 24 hours before hand. Because I misunderstood it. This is blatantly stated in the post that you are quoting and analyzing. ![]() He also then said that rather than having his own perspective (he was using opz's) ![]() he should have realized the clever trap he liked the day before was too clever for BM? ...Yes. Holy shit. YES. That is absolutely correct. This seems to me as not really contributing It's seeping from my computer again. as it is backtracking since he was coming under heat for supporting something really stupid. No I was "backtracking" (just to be pedantic, the correct derogatory term to use here is "backpedaling") because Bill Murray came out and said precisely what he meant. Which was not what I thought he meant. On October 08 2010 16:16 Bill Murray wrote: actually, it's the opposite, siniquity. you must be blue/mafia. I can see him doing this as both town or mafia aligned, but he should have stressed his own reasoning behind it (who convinced him, etc..) rather than just saying someones perspective and moving on. ![]() On October 10 2010 12:36 SiNiquity wrote: No I never said (and note that I -still- have not said) what my role is directly because BrownBear explicitly said to stop discussing PMs, and me saying "hey my PM said ________ and was from _______" would be violating this, as well as the disclaimer of my own post (the one from page 39, the long analysis one). I did however allude to it as heavily as I could: Smiley face by Opz when saying who I thought was likely town, saying this was all from "MY" perspective, then clarifying in a later post that "MY" perspective was the same as OpZ's perspective. I can see how the conclusion could be drawn, but you also mentioned another possibility (namely the real one) but completely dismissed it and used the other one to draw conclusions. That's just dishonest. lol offended? No. I'm only offended that we're making crucial decisions on analysis like that. If you are alluding to the fact that my retorts were pointed and often critical of your analysis, then sure. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Spent most the day removing the tint from my car (fuck you nanny states) and now playing catch-up. From what I can gather, XeliN is getting lynched for the same reason as yesterday (I actually couldn't find many posts by him recently), Amber because of OpZ's analysis, and still looking for the south / kane beginnings. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
Bill Murray: 2 NukeTheBunnys kane]deth[ | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On October 15 2010 07:13 ~OpZ~ wrote: oh. and im 99% confirmed. no body mentioned that. two people died so no one was poisoned. thank you medic. I don't follow. Someone gets poisoned and someone gets hit, after which you claim a hit (1 person dies). Then they poison someone again and hit someone again. Initial poison victim dies and new mafia hit dies, so 2 people die last night and no one knows the difference. The only way we'd be able to tell with such certainty as you claim AFAIK is if the the host were to allude to the poisoning in the narrative. I asked if this would be the case a few pages back but didn't get a clarification. I don't doubt that you're town, but I just don't follow how 2 people dying last night guarantees your innocence (even up to 99% confidence). | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
![]() | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
| ||