|
Which is how bad the comparison to TSM is 
But really its just hard to find competent teams with MId/AD as the main carries plus an inconsistent (but sometimes carrying) top, inconsistent support, and a mediocre jungler.
Unless you want to compare SKT to SKTT1K. Or, do some really insulting comparison to CLG.
|
I think that the underlying premise of the framework you're working with is missing one aspect, which is rather important for the LCS regions. The quality of play that a player is regularly exposed to. The quality of his experience, so to speak.
There's raw talent, which is the innate aptitude for something that a person is born with. There's coaching/teaching done outside of playing the game. And then there's personal experience; playing the game, expanding and refining one's game sense and knowledge through both doing and through encountering firsthand. Higher level training produces stronger players, basically (and attitude is certainly a factor in this).
So how is knowledge expanded? Organically through 'eureka' moments and experimentation, or learning from others. One is faster than the other. Next, I would put forth that the NA LCS is behind on game sense/knowledge (I think back to interviews with TiP Apollo and Adrian about how Impact has so much game knowledge to impart from his wealth of higher level experience). For a crude analogy, NA can be likened to be at the stage of inventing the wheel while Korea's already moved on ahead to... steam engine, or something. The exact difference isn't important; the important thing is that NA is at one stage of knowledge, Korea's at a higher stage. Can NA organically develop to wherever Korea is at the present? Sure, but in the time that has taken, a region like Korea's already moving on to a further higher stage. It's the trap that 'reinventing the wheel' leads to.
So the sticky thing here is, NA is effectively an isolated environment, thanks to the topology of this wonderful planet. You're essentially stuck with the organic growth option, with hilariously god awful performances at S2 and S3 worlds as examples of outcomes of pure isolation. The limited number of imports does help somewhat by bringing in players with more skill/knowledge for the region to come into contact with. But it's not enough compared to, say... Korea - Already have high level players; can play against themselves to improve, akin to a positive feedback loop China - Imported a lot of high level players, can play on Korean solo queue to play against the players still in Korea anyway, and can still scrim against LCK teams. Not as difficult to be exposed to new things as NA is. Taiwan - Like a lesser version of China's situation. Couple of imports, can play on KR solo queue, can scrim with LPL and LCK teams (although I'm only positive on something like TPA having Najin connections through their coach)
|
On May 12 2015 06:39 Saradin wrote: I think that the underlying premise of the framework you're working with is missing one aspect, which is rather important for the LCS regions. The quality of play that a player is regularly exposed to. The quality of his experience, so to speak.
There's raw talent, which is the innate aptitude for something that a person is born with. There's coaching/teaching done outside of playing the game. And then there's personal experience; playing the game, expanding and refining one's game sense and knowledge through both doing and through encountering firsthand. Higher level training produces stronger players, basically (and attitude is certainly a factor in this).
So how is knowledge expanded? Organically through 'eureka' moments and experimentation, or learning from others. One is faster than the other. Next, I would put forth that the NA LCS is behind on game sense/knowledge (I think back to interviews with TiP Apollo and Adrian about how Impact has so much game knowledge to impart from his wealth of higher level experience). For a crude analogy, NA can be likened to be at the stage of inventing the wheel while Korea's already moved on ahead to... steam engine, or something. The exact difference isn't important; the important thing is that NA is at one stage of knowledge, Korea's at a higher stage. Can NA organically develop to wherever Korea is at the present? Sure, but in the time that has taken, a region like Korea's already moving on to a further higher stage. It's the trap that 'reinventing the wheel' leads to.
So the sticky thing here is, NA is effectively an isolated environment, thanks to the topology of this wonderful planet. You're essentially stuck with the organic growth option, with hilariously god awful performances at S2 and S3 worlds as examples of outcomes of pure isolation. The limited number of imports does help somewhat by bringing in players with more skill/knowledge for the region to come into contact with. But it's not enough compared to, say... Korea - Already have high level players; can play against themselves to improve, akin to a positive feedback loop China - Imported a lot of high level players, can play on Korean solo queue to play against the players still in Korea anyway, and can still scrim against LCK teams. Not as difficult to be exposed to new things as NA is. Taiwan - Like a lesser version of China's situation. Couple of imports, can play on KR solo queue, can scrim with LPL and LCK teams (although I'm only positive on something like TPA having Najin connections through their coach)
Talent fosters talent - yes, and I haven't ignored it. I just didn't separate it from H3 and H4, because the end result is the same. The concentration of world class talent in one region helps everyone in that region improve, the effect of which is that this region gets further ahead. Thus, provided we believe that Korea lost its best talent to China, then LPL > World ought to hold even harder.
Another process you brought up is the imitation effect. I initially had a smoking gun where, in the case that raw talent is what matters, then the Korean tier 1 players in China ought to be permanently > the Chinese players in China. But I later changed my mind because that isn't logical. Just from playing against and learning from those tier 1 Korean players, China's own players ought to be able to achieve a sort of parity. Organic growth is, as you observed, a lot harder than imitation, to which end even players who'd have never achieved that level by themselves, are able to achieve it by playing against tier 1 players day after day.
But importantly, there's a ceiling on what's achievable via imitation. You won't ever surpass the people you're learning from by just doing what they do. To do that, you have to do what they did to get ahead in the first place. Thus, while China's own players are capable of raising themselves to the level of Deft, Pawn, etc. by imitating them without great difficulty, it is very difficult for them to surpass that level without going their own way.
To this end, we don't know what caused Korea's players to get ahead of the rest in the first place - and that's ultimately the hypotheses I'm testing. Did Koreans get ahead because their eSports industry simply attracted a higher quality of raw talent? In that case, China's present strategy of importing the best Koreans ought to make it very hard for LCK to retain its edge, unless they're able to stop the bleeding. And at the same time, such a situation makes it very hard for NA to ever catch up, because the quality of NA raw talent is simply poor due to the fact that talented people in NA don't go into pro-gaming.
But there are other explanations - specifically infrastructure and industry culture. Were it the case that H1, H2, and H5 are what ultimately matter, then to achieve success, different steps have to be taken than in the case of H3 and H4.
|
Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team.
|
On May 12 2015 07:22 Caiada wrote: Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team.
I suppose IPL5 Fnatic did as well because Yellowstar was a very raw support at that time.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
one problem with skt is finding out who's making the calls for these dumb 3v5 fights they take all the time. there's also the dumb dragon fights.
these are fairly low hanging fruit problems that the coaching staff should be able to fix.
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On May 12 2015 07:24 cLutZ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 07:22 Caiada wrote: Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team. I suppose IPL5 Fnatic did as well because Yellowstar was a very raw support at that time.
Yellowstar wasn't at IPL 5, lol. He joined after it as adc.
|
The big advantages of Korea and China is that when a player is underperforming they get benched where as in na there's no threat for being average.
|
On May 12 2015 07:32 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 07:24 cLutZ wrote:On May 12 2015 07:22 Caiada wrote: Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team. I suppose IPL5 Fnatic did as well because Yellowstar was a very raw support at that time. Yellowstar wasn't at IPL 5, lol. He joined after it.
Shit, still Nrated? Caomei was WE's top still then right? He did those dirty Rengar things.
|
On May 12 2015 07:22 Caiada wrote: Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team. What? Rekkles and Bang have nothing in common. Rekkles is supportish adc that goes even in laning phase and play cleaning up role in team fights. He is team dependant adc. Bang either solo carry game or is trash.
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On May 12 2015 07:44 cLutZ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 07:32 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On May 12 2015 07:24 cLutZ wrote:On May 12 2015 07:22 Caiada wrote: Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team. I suppose IPL5 Fnatic did as well because Yellowstar was a very raw support at that time. Yellowstar wasn't at IPL 5, lol. He joined after it. Shit, still Nrated? Caomei was WE's top still then right? He did those dirty Rengar things.
nRated played 1,5 splits more before Yellowstar switched to support. And Caomei played until LPL Summer 2014 as WE's toplane.
That's why Cheep is right when he says that Worlds is only tournament people remember anyway. :>
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
depends on the strength of competition and other objective factors relating to how strong and prepared the teams in the tourney are.
|
On May 12 2015 07:47 orzeu wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 07:22 Caiada wrote: Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team. What? Rekkles and Bang have nothing in common. Rekkles is supportish adc that goes even in laning phase and play cleaning up role in team fights. He is team dependant adc. Bang either solo carry game or is trash.
Speaking more broadly. They're both strong players in their team that are pretty streaky. I'm kind of ignoring EL Rekkles because it was a totally different dynamic. Febiven is still the most consistent player on the team. Reignover is either a god or trash. Huni is basically European Marin (#koreantops). Yellowstar went off this tournament, but it's not a regular thing for him by any stretch. Maybe more like Piccaboo in that case.
|
On May 12 2015 07:48 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 07:44 cLutZ wrote:On May 12 2015 07:32 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On May 12 2015 07:24 cLutZ wrote:On May 12 2015 07:22 Caiada wrote: Future Fnatic with Rekkles will probably look a lot like this SKT team. I suppose IPL5 Fnatic did as well because Yellowstar was a very raw support at that time. Yellowstar wasn't at IPL 5, lol. He joined after it. Shit, still Nrated? Caomei was WE's top still then right? He did those dirty Rengar things. nRated played 1,5 splits more before Yellowstar switched to support. And Caomei played until LPL Summer 2014 as WE's toplane. That's why Cheep is right when he says that Worlds is only tournament people remember anyway. :>
Meh, people ignoring LCS should be entirely forgivable . Also I can't recall the exact TPA or Frost lineups off hand either from S2 worlds so its more like time + me mostly remembering Rekkles from that tournament in Fnatic (also I always will hate Rengar), and jedi-mind-tricking myself, plus lots of time.
|
On May 12 2015 08:01 Caiada wrote: Yellowstar went off this tournament, but it's not a regular thing for him by any stretch. Maybe more like Piccaboo in that case.
Well, considering he had to lane with bottom 3 EU LCS ADC all split long... But he did went totally crazy mad in some games VS SKT, that was an incredible display of skills. Maybe he still have a part of him that still belongs to the old Fnatic : meh during spling, becoming cluth when it matters (now that I think of it, old Fnatic was kind of a reverse CLG :D).
|
On May 12 2015 08:14 Majax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 08:01 Caiada wrote: Yellowstar went off this tournament, but it's not a regular thing for him by any stretch. Maybe more like Piccaboo in that case. Well, considering he had to lane with bottom 3 EU LCS ADC all split long... But he did went totally crazy mad in some games VS SKT, that was an incredible display of skills. Maybe he still have a part of him that still belongs to the old Fnatic : meh during spling, becoming cluth when it matters (now that I think of it, old Fnatic was kind of a reverse CLG :D). Yellowstar is bad laner too, so you should give 'all credit' to Steelback for that.
|
On May 12 2015 08:31 orzeu wrote: Yellowstar is bad laner too, so you should give 'all credit' to Steelback for that.
Considring how Rekkles & him were doing in lane, and then how he was doint without him, I would not call him a bad laner. Not the best laner support for sure, but calling him a bad one... Really ?
|
When is the next summoning insight, I cannot wait
|
I just want to note that we can't just write Korea's infrastructural advantage off just yet. It's been what like 5 months since the exodus? Even given their infrastructure is far superior, is that really enough time? I would even say a 'failure' at Worlds is still not long enough. If there isn't another exodus this year, and they have had ample time to really just sit and redevelop, I'd wager that Korea will roar back in S6. There were a few blips in SC2 where "Korea"(different from 'Korean players') appeared to be weakening, and then they reminded everyone that they were still well beyond compare for basically everyone but Taeja(who is a weird outlier, and also muddies the decision whether you count him as a foreigner who is Korean or just full blown Korean given his tournament choices over the years).
|
On May 12 2015 09:39 niukasu1990 wrote: When is the next summoning insight, I cannot wait can't wait for that giant shit eating grin of thorin's.
On May 12 2015 09:57 red_ wrote: I just want to note that we can't just write Korea's infrastructural advantage off just yet. It's been what like 5 months since the exodus? Even given their infrastructure is far superior, is that really enough time? I would even say a 'failure' at Worlds is still not long enough. If there isn't another exodus this year, and they have had ample time to really just sit and redevelop, I'd wager that Korea will roar back in S6. There were a few blips in SC2 where "Korea"(different from 'Korean players') appeared to be weakening, and then they reminded everyone that they were still well beyond compare for basically everyone but Taeja(who is a weird outlier, and also muddies the decision whether you count him as a foreigner who is Korean or just full blown Korean given his tournament choices over the years). this is assuming china doesn't just keep buying out korean players once they've proven their worth in ogn.
|
|
|
|