EPT[Patch 4.19] Singed Reborn General Discussion - Page 36
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
justiceknight
Singapore5741 Posts
| ||
|
NovaTheFeared
United States7229 Posts
 | ||
|
pokerface
507 Posts
On November 14 2014 20:49 NovaTheFeared wrote: Riot's giving out a 4 win ip boost for positive behavior during the entire 2014 season? That's like 600 ip. At that rate, these positive players will be rewarded with one free champ after 10 years. They're really going all-out to prove how much they care about toxicity Ye man,also according to this 99,1% of the players are positive or neutral.I mean whoever is making this reports are either playing a different game or just straight up stupid.99,1% are toxic and bannable more like it. | ||
|
Volband
Hungary6034 Posts
| ||
|
Celial
2602 Posts
http://boards.pbe.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-pbe-feedback/8A646W4E-introducing-the-new-leaverbuster-a-new-system-for-aggressively-tackling-leavers-and-afks I like Lytes ultra hard line regarding connection issues: [*] That's your own goddamn problem. If your connection sucks, don't play. You still ruin the game for everyone else on your team. If you think that's fine, then deal with the consequences and Riot will protect the good little players with decent internet. [*] If you play on a toaster and take a while to reconnect - thats a paddlin too. System still flags you afk. [*] Leaving even once in ranked might give you instantly penalties. Edit: Huh, how do I do bullet points in vbb code again? | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35165 Posts
On November 14 2014 22:35 Celial wrote: Prisoners island for leaver/afk inc http://boards.pbe.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-pbe-feedback/8A646W4E-introducing-the-new-leaverbuster-a-new-system-for-aggressively-tackling-leavers-and-afks Although I like Lytes ultra hard line regarding connection issues: That's your own goddamn problem. If your connection sucks, don't play. You still ruin the game for everyone else on your team. If you think that's fine, then deal with the consequences and Riot will protect the good little players with decent internet. If you play on a toaster and take a while to reconnect - thats a paddlin too. System still flags you afk. On the flip side, my connection issues are Riot's fault. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On November 14 2014 22:39 Gahlo wrote: On the flip side, my connection issues are Riot's fault. i fail to see how. riot didn't force you to live anywhere but SoCal.  | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35165 Posts
On November 14 2014 22:41 PrinceXizor wrote: i fail to see how. riot didn't force you to live anywhere but SoCal. 2 years ago, Riot said they had a bunch of servers on a truck and just needed to find a place to put them. Then they proceeded to not do it. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On November 14 2014 22:47 Gahlo wrote: 2 years ago, Riot said they had a bunch of servers on a truck and just needed to find a place to put them. Then they proceeded to not do it. I feel your pain man. there are two servers that i get better ping to besides NA. LAN/EUW both better for me. | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
| ||
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On November 14 2014 23:46 739 wrote: Low priority queues are normally functioning in DotA2, so nothing new Riot discovered... I thought Riot said they were completely against low priority queues in league and how it doesn't help the population? | ||
|
Celial
2602 Posts
On November 14 2014 23:41 Zdrastochye wrote: Maybe we shouldn't be caring for them but I do feel bad for leavers who will have to wait out long queue times only to be in a game with 9 other people who have already had a history of dcing, meaning the odds are even higher. Negative cycle, no? what lyte is doing is basically forcing people who want to get out to be the guy who plays 4v5 for a few games | ||
|
droserin
127 Posts
On November 15 2014 00:11 Numy wrote: I thought Riot said they were completely against low priority queues in league and how it doesn't help the population? They said they were against it for being an asshole because most players don't realize they are being bad and will just think "All these other people in low priority are so much worse than me, I don't deserve to be here". | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On November 15 2014 00:41 droserin wrote: They said they were against it for being an asshole because most players don't realize they are being bad and will just think "All these other people in low priority are so much worse than me, I don't deserve to be here". I see. Think leaving/afking/feeding is far worse than just typing some crap. | ||
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
On November 14 2014 17:37 M2 wrote: Nah, not even close, nothing beats delusional jungler vs adequate jungler. This is the role where when you get skill gap, it becomes from hardest to impossible to comeback. Too many junglers think this is the easiest role since you don't have to deal with a constant enemy pressure in lane, but actually this is the hardest role, its just hidden behind a deeper understanding how the game works. So when you get a jungler who pressures the lanes in the right moments, ward own and enemy jungle, counter gank most of the time vs a standard route farming jungle that make ganks when he happens to be near a lane, then your team is in a deep shit if you don't have superior players on every single other role:-) This is an interesting discussion that I've thought about a couple of times: which role really is the most idiotproof? * A bad top can lead to a late game monster on the other side, e.g., a Jax or Nasus that got to freefarm. Sometimes it leads to a huge snowball against you, e.g., a Riven or Rumble that is just deleting your whole team. The least of my concerns. * A bad mid usually leads to an assassin on the other side that will delete anyone on the same screen (e.g., a fed Annie or Zed). This is true even for mages that are not traditionally assassins (e.g., an Orianna that can Q-R-W one shot). The second-least of my concerns. * A bad ADC means you miss out on a ton of damage, and it's really important to dive and shut down their ADC. * A bad support means you don't have good vision, and is also like having a bad ADC if they have halfway-decent dive and you can't otherwise peel. The second-worst outcome. * A bad jungler means being counterjungled, missing out on neutral objectives, missing out on buffs, and possibly snowballing every single opponent lane (or at least letting the other jungler choose which lanes he wants to snowball). I also think jungler builds are the most delicate/sensitive to the game situation, and a Warwick 30 minutes in with a Wriggle's Lantern and a Recurve Bow is going to be ugly. I think this is by far the worst. | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
| ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
Mid influences the whole map on the same scale jungle does, and I think you can lose a lane a lot harder than you can lose in the jungle. If a fed mid can't snowball bot and top they doing it wrong. Most mid champs better gankers than must jungles champs. A bad mid feeds and jump starts the opponents best play maker. | ||
|
Celial
2602 Posts
I'm about ready to quit the game. But then I can't help myself and am queuing up again... | ||
| ||
