EPTAnd this is why Replays only now in alpha testing...
[Patch 3.02: Fake Quinn] General Discussion - Page 23
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
And this is why Replays only now in alpha testing... | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On February 15 2013 13:11 Sufficiency wrote: http://www.reignofgaming.net/news/23181-unofficial-pbe-changes-for-2-14-quinn-is-here Very different from the data-mined stuff. Don't know why I had hopes up, but sigh. Probably still cool though. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
And they just made BOTRK even better for my proposed situation. | ||
|
thenexusp
United States3721 Posts
On February 15 2013 13:21 Two_DoWn wrote: Vi... Buffs? And they just made BOTRK even better for my proposed situation. They're reverting the PBE nerf to her ult, and lowering her base attack damage. So it's a nerf. Big difference between Quinn's Q and Teemo's Q / Corki's old Q is that Quinn's looks like it's a skillshot with travel time, allowing for counterplay at least. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On February 15 2013 13:29 thenexusp wrote: They're reverting the PBE nerf to her ult, and lowering her base attack damage. So it's a nerf. Big difference between Quinn's Q and Teemo's Q / Corki's old Q is that Quinn's looks like it's a skillshot with travel time, allowing for counterplay at least. Ah, hadnt followed the PBE too closely. | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35164 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On February 15 2013 13:47 Gahlo wrote: I'm very confused about the size Valor is supposed to be. Anivia-sized. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
Felt the same about Nami too, tbh. On February 15 2013 13:21 Two_DoWn wrote: Vi... Buffs? It's a PBE nerf revert. People REALLY need to read when it says "Old PBE" for the red column and compare with Live. | ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On February 15 2013 13:59 xes wrote: I'm not sure a 25 dmg nerf is going to affect Xin at all... looks more like a "look we're doing something!" nerf than a real one. They should adjust the 15% current HP to scale so he doesn't do wtfpwn damage the moment he hits 6, or maybe lower lvl 3 free resists so he doesn't get incredibly tanky off of HP items. It's a 50 damage nerf, not 25. The old PBE already had a 25 damage nerf. Again, people just need to read these with the LoL Wiki on the side when it says "old PBE". Either that or someone needs to let RoG know that nobody actually cares about "old PBE" and only ever want comparisons with Live. On February 15 2013 13:21 Two_DoWn wrote: And they just made BOTRK even better for my proposed situation. They straight-up made it a better single damage item. Not just for the situation we discussed, but also for the traditional usage of Bloodrazor as a lategame single damage item for many champs. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
Vision, a blind, a gap... thingy all look really sweet. BUT CHECK OUT THAT FUCKING ULT HOLY SHIT THAT'S SO COOL. | ||
|
IMoperator
4476 Posts
| ||
|
Phunkapotamus
United States496 Posts
On February 15 2013 13:11 Sufficiency wrote: http://www.reignofgaming.net/news/23181-unofficial-pbe-changes-for-2-14-quinn-is-here I was pretty tired talking about BotRK earlier today. But then Riot had to go do this. Holy shit. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
Assuming the recipe costs are accurate, Cutlass is 1800 and BotRK is 2975. Gives 800 more gold in stats, and is therefore breakeven cost-effectiveness without including either the passive or the active. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On February 15 2013 14:06 TheYango wrote: Those item costs don't add up, lol. Cutlass lists its total cost as 1400 when the components cost 1675. Assuming the recipe costs are accurate, Cutlass is 1800 and BotRK is 2975. Gives 800 more gold in stats, and is therefore breakeven cost-effectiveness without including either the passive or the active. Either they fucked up somewhere, or they REALLY want to break the BT rush for AD's and Mogs for Tops. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35164 Posts
On February 15 2013 14:06 TheYango wrote: Those item costs don't add up, lol. Cutlass lists its total cost as 1400 when the components cost 1675. Assuming the recipe costs are accurate, Cutlass is 1800 and BotRK is 2975. Gives 800 more gold in stats, and is therefore breakeven cost-effectiveness without including either the passive or the active. I think one of the Daggers is a typo. | ||
| ||
