|
On November 14 2012 21:55 oxxo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 14 2012 21:35 Gaslo wrote:On November 14 2012 21:18 Schwopzi wrote: Hmm i got banned for playing tiamat gp mid & tank gragas top for 3 days or so. Good thing I was unable to play during those days anyways but wtf. Not even going to bother appealing. At least I'm a cool cat like outlaw now huehue Really they said you got banned for doing that? I even asked once, and they said you could not be banned for playing outside the meta, so thats just stupid... Would be interesting to see what they would say if you appealed. They've said you can get banned for going outside meta without letting your team know/getting their consent (not communicating with team).
depends on how he did-- as long as he didnt feed abysmally he should have been fine.
|
On November 16 2012 17:18 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +On November 14 2012 21:55 oxxo wrote:On November 14 2012 21:35 Gaslo wrote:On November 14 2012 21:18 Schwopzi wrote: Hmm i got banned for playing tiamat gp mid & tank gragas top for 3 days or so. Good thing I was unable to play during those days anyways but wtf. Not even going to bother appealing. At least I'm a cool cat like outlaw now huehue Really they said you got banned for doing that? I even asked once, and they said you could not be banned for playing outside the meta, so thats just stupid... Would be interesting to see what they would say if you appealed. They've said you can get banned for going outside meta without letting your team know/getting their consent (not communicating with team). depends on how he did-- as long as he didnt feed abysmally he should have been fine.
I did go 1-5 with gp mid. Don't have the ticket anymore because I really couldn't be arsed appealing a ban during a time I couldn't play anyways, just thought it was a silly reason.
I just hope the amount of "hope you die of cancer you nazi scumbag" and other similar stuff has been reduced by the banwave.
|
i must be like 1.5% not bottom 1%
|
I love how after the admin states how they came to the conclusion of who they are banning, people still complain that "they didn't receive a warning". Your warning is accepting the terms to play the game.
|
Damn they must still be at it. Out of 20 cases in one day for me 7 of them resulted in permabans.
|
On November 19 2012 08:36 W00tbeer1 wrote: I love how after the admin states how they came to the conclusion of who they are banning, people still complain that "they didn't receive a warning". Your warning is accepting the terms to play the game.
That's the best part of being customer support for a game company. All game companies have you accept the game rules/conditions before you're allowed to play the game. If you didn't read them that's your own fault if you get banned/lose your account lol.
|
I appreciate the ban on 1%. That's a lot of people. 100,000 is 1% of 10 million.
|
On November 20 2012 13:36 Irave wrote: Damn they must still be at it. Out of 20 cases in one day for me 7 of them resulted in permabans.
True, something is going on. Out of my last 10 cases i had 4 permabans, too.
|
Can agree, had 6 permabans in my last 20 or so cases.
|
On November 20 2012 14:07 obesechicken13 wrote: I appreciate the ban on 1%. That's a lot of people. 100,000 is 1% of 10 million. How is that misinterpretation still happening? It's in the OP of this thread, and it was the first Riot post:
1) We did not ban the bottom 1% of the playerbase. They didn't ban the bottom 1%. No Riot employee ever said anything along those lines, and their fist post in the thread outright says that they didn't. Riot employees personally looked at a lot of of cases that were in the bottom 1%, but that doesn't mean anything even remotely close to banning the bottom 1% of players.
|
On November 20 2012 13:36 Irave wrote: Damn they must still be at it. Out of 20 cases in one day for me 7 of them resulted in permabans.
Same here, i went from 3 permabans to 9 in one day, i guess new season caused some troolls to show their ugly head again, and along the way caused a lot disturbence in general population caasuing them to rage more in result. Will get quite again in a few weeks i think.
|
On November 20 2012 13:46 BlackPaladin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 08:36 W00tbeer1 wrote: I love how after the admin states how they came to the conclusion of who they are banning, people still complain that "they didn't receive a warning". Your warning is accepting the terms to play the game. That's the best part of being customer support for a game company. All game companies have you accept the game rules/conditions before you're allowed to play the game. If you didn't read them that's your own fault if you get banned/lose your account lol. No, the hilarious part is how the person that complained in the thread about not getting warned, got like 8 prior bans and all the people that got perm banned had been banned at least two times within the last 6 month according to Lyte.
Lyte also said that they tried to give final warnings in the past and it almost always resulted in a permban. So, yes the people didn't get a final warning, but they knew that their behavior was bad.
|
from my tribunal cases we either have a sharp rise in nazi paroles, or I have been flagged as german speaker somewhere internally (even if my client is english) and get more cases with german sentences.
In the last three days, i had at least 3 cases daily of "ins KZ mit dir du Jude" and similar trash. Frankly I hope those end in permabans.
|
On November 20 2012 23:21 Tula wrote: from my tribunal cases we either have a sharp rise in nazi paroles, or I have been flagged as german speaker somewhere internally (even if my client is english) and get more cases with german sentences.
In the last three days, i had at least 3 cases daily of "ins KZ mit dir du Jude" and similar trash. Frankly I hope those end in permabans.
Hm, i have not seen any of those at all so far. So maybe you actually are flagged as german speaking somehow, though i would not know how that happened, and how the system then determines which reports are in german. Or you are just unlucky.
On another note, i need help here. What do i do with someone who apparently plays IE PD Thornmail Sunfire Mobos Lanerammus in every game? I have 5 games of this guy 2 won, 3 lost, no flaming, all with that build in varying states of completion. It would be interesting to know what level those games are. I assume they are not ranked, and everyone has flash, so they are not absolutely lowlevel either. Since once Kata talked about another kata being somewhere, i assume those are blind pick normals.
|
playing rammus is not against summoner code.... even more so with a ~50% win quota?
|
On November 20 2012 20:27 IronInko wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 14:07 obesechicken13 wrote: I appreciate the ban on 1%. That's a lot of people. 100,000 is 1% of 10 million. How is that misinterpretation still happening? It's in the OP of this thread, and it was the first Riot post: They didn't ban the bottom 1%. No Riot employee ever said anything along those lines, and their fist post in the thread outright says that they didn't. Riot employees personally looked at a lot of of cases that were in the bottom 1%, but that doesn't mean anything even remotely close to banning the bottom 1% of players. Leave your confrontational attitude in your games.
They said they did not ban the bottom 1%. That means that they probably did ban 1%. That's all I meant.
|
On November 21 2012 00:45 obesechicken13 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 20:27 IronInko wrote:On November 20 2012 14:07 obesechicken13 wrote: I appreciate the ban on 1%. That's a lot of people. 100,000 is 1% of 10 million. How is that misinterpretation still happening? It's in the OP of this thread, and it was the first Riot post: 1) We did not ban the bottom 1% of the playerbase. They didn't ban the bottom 1%. No Riot employee ever said anything along those lines, and their fist post in the thread outright says that they didn't. Riot employees personally looked at a lot of of cases that were in the bottom 1%, but that doesn't mean anything even remotely close to banning the bottom 1% of players. Leave your confrontational attitude in your games. They said they did not ban the bottom 1%. That means that they probably did ban 1%. That's all I meant. 1) I'm sorry for coming off as confrontational, but it's hard to seem agreeable when I'm trying to disagree with you. 2) I have absolutely no understanding how Riot repeatedly saying they didn't ban the entire bottom 1% (and directly arguing with people in the thread who gave the same number as you) means that they did exactly that.
|
On November 11 2012 08:52 craaaaack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2012 08:03 nojitosunrise wrote: That thread is freaking GOLD. You can almost hear Lyte crushing the hopes and dreams of toxic players blaming the tribunal. QFT lol take a look at this poor soul: Show nested quote + Originally Posted by MMG Dnomes View Post Lyte I would really appreciate if you responded to this post.
So I know that I am a toxic player, otherwise I wouldn't receive bans by the tribunal. So to take some kind of action and refrain from receiving further bans, I have removed the chat when I am ingame. Can I still get banned even though I don't communicate but still use pings? And do you consider optimizing word filter (adding more words to the list), since that's what triggers my aggressive emotions? Also, is it possible to make a feature where you can disable your own enter button, but you can still see what others write, since that's what I crave for the most. Also could is it possible that you can specifically come with hints as to what I am doing wrong when I get banned
Thank you in advance and have a good day! this is both sad and funny
Is there a way to send an electronic shock to my balls when I feel the urge to rage or bm?!?!?!
Glad Riot is putting in work to remove these players. Cheers!
|
I'm glad I got over that "I'm better than you" attitude during the beta. I haven't been called a Nazi or any racial slur since season 3 started so this is working on a personal level. Glad they're taking this seriously.
|
On November 21 2012 01:30 IronInko wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 00:45 obesechicken13 wrote:On November 20 2012 20:27 IronInko wrote:On November 20 2012 14:07 obesechicken13 wrote: I appreciate the ban on 1%. That's a lot of people. 100,000 is 1% of 10 million. How is that misinterpretation still happening? It's in the OP of this thread, and it was the first Riot post: 1) We did not ban the bottom 1% of the playerbase. They didn't ban the bottom 1%. No Riot employee ever said anything along those lines, and their fist post in the thread outright says that they didn't. Riot employees personally looked at a lot of of cases that were in the bottom 1%, but that doesn't mean anything even remotely close to banning the bottom 1% of players. Leave your confrontational attitude in your games. They said they did not ban the bottom 1%. That means that they probably did ban 1%. That's all I meant. 1) I'm sorry for coming off as confrontational, but it's hard to seem agreeable when I'm trying to disagree with you. 2) I have absolutely no understanding how Riot repeatedly saying they didn't ban the entire bottom 1% (and directly arguing with people in the thread who gave the same number as you) means that they did exactly that. Alright, I see, this is a misunderstanding. Let me clarify again. I did not say Riot banned the bottom 1%. I said Riot banned 1% of players and that that was a lot.
|
|
|
|