EPTOn March 23 2012 16:27 jadoth wrote:
are nasus and ren ult effected by ignite?
are nasus and ren ult effected by ignite?
No, gain of bonus health isnt a heal and isnt halved, neither is Lulu Ult
[Patch 1.0.0.136: Lulu] General Discussion - Page 56
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Remember guys, this is the general discussion thread. Keep whine/QQ posts in the appropriate QQ memorial thread! Thanks! | ||
|
sob3k
United States7572 Posts
No, gain of bonus health isnt a heal and isnt halved, neither is Lulu Ult | ||
|
valheru
Australia966 Posts
On March 23 2012 16:34 sob3k wrote: No, gain of bonus health isnt a heal and isnt halved, neither is Lulu Ult also red pot | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On March 23 2012 14:37 Shikyo wrote: ;S Is that the only spell in the game that does that then? I would assume that it's 2 spells internally. The single target part is one spell which applies the full vamp obviously, and the AoE part is added on top of that (hitting one spell triggers a "cast" of another spell if your ult is active), and that one gets the reduced vamp. After all, it reads: Ryze becomes supercharged, gaining spell vamp and causes his spells to deal 50% AoE damage. This doesn't say anything about changing the original spells. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
Watching CLG game... Am I the only one who thinks double AP without double WotA kind of sucks? And that Doublelift shouldn't play AD carries without mobility and should instead play mobility carries because he's a thousand times better with those. -_- "skarner just too tanky too big too tanky super bruiser" when he has wardens, hog, shurelyas or something at 28min. Oh and aegis was it | ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
| ||
|
Craton
United States17250 Posts
| ||
|
ihasaKAROT
Netherlands4730 Posts
| ||
|
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
Nvm, their opponent did not let them to get to that point. CLG GGed | ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
| ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
SV made some really bad call too. Go allin for the tower while dragon is going to spawn. Should back off to dragon after get mid instead go in into a really small area while they are not full HP. Thats really bad from SV. | ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
| ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
Anyway, yay more people. CLG will improve give them time, look at how productive they are with talking and stuff and it's almost heartwarming in a geeky kinda way. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On March 23 2012 18:11 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: live report in the other thread D: I don't think it's LR, I mean it's not even a tournament and this is more like discussing what should be done to win / improve the strategy, a learning experience for everyone. | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
Edit: SeltzerPlease(Rachel) made tier 1! | ||
|
mr_tolkien
France8631 Posts
On March 23 2012 18:45 Amui wrote: Oh dear, this SV ranking...............Insight into the mind of SV. On a side note one of the people I know is tier 1 on his list LOL. Chick with dick : Locodoco :o | ||
|
Craton
United States17250 Posts
The thread note also irks me to no end. How dumb do you think the average user is that they can't keep track of "multiple discussions" going on at once to the point where the thread must actively weed out a dozen topics for the poor reader to manage. Thread just isn't general discussion anymore. In fact, if the issue is that discussion is "deviating from strategy," why don't you make a strategy thread and leave everything else in GD instead of trying to transform GD into something it's not. It's completely backwards. | ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
On March 23 2012 18:56 Craton wrote: I really don't get why we're trying to split everything that should fit nicely in GD into 50 different hyper-specialized threads. It really kills a lot of potential discussion because of how much less people are going to check all the disparate threads. There isn't a need to split it in the first place since GD generally finishes a given topic in a very short period of time. Except gp10 which lasts for 10 pages huehue. | ||
|
Craton
United States17250 Posts
| ||
|
TooL
Canada275 Posts
On March 23 2012 18:56 Craton wrote: I really don't get why we're trying to split everything that should fit nicely in GD into 50 different hyper-specialized threads. It really kills a lot of potential discussion because of how much less people are going to check all the disparate threads. There isn't a need to split it in the first place since GD generally finishes a given topic in a very short period of time. You can just take a look at how incredibly inactive these threads are and see this clearly illustrated. The thread note also irks me to no end. How dumb do you think the average user is that they can't keep track of "multiple discussions" going on at once to the point where the thread must actively weed out a dozen topics for the poor reader to manage. Thread just isn't general discussion anymore. agreed | ||
| ||
