EPT[Patch 1.0.0.133: Ziggs] General Discussion - Page 58
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Heed these two simple warnings. It will help make our GD a better place. Consider this fair notice to all users. Warning will be dished out this patch. Thanks. Neo, 31.01.12 | ||
|
Niton
United States2395 Posts
| ||
|
Niton
United States2395 Posts
On February 05 2012 03:40 Craton wrote: Her ratios are pretty much even with other mages. Her ratios are even, but they're geared way more to sustained damage due to Q's CD and R being a summon. I think bursty needs the fourth spell from DFG more than it needs more AP. | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
I means I'm all for supporting Riot. But drop monies for a skin you don't use much would just be too sad. | ||
|
Dgiese
United States2687 Posts
| ||
|
ManyCookies
1164 Posts
| ||
|
starfries
Canada3508 Posts
| ||
|
RogerX
New Zealand3180 Posts
King Rammus. Little red riding hood annie <- Like seriously, how is that not obvious LOL. Btw, if your gonna make Ezreal that good, make other legendary skins better imo -.- I'd love it if trynd is all like, TIME TO SPIN 2 WIN WITH MY E, WHICH LEVELED UP TROLOL You know what i'd like to see? Companion cube Orianna :3 | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On February 05 2012 04:10 starfries wrote: I've seen Dyrus do well with solo top Olaf a few times and played him myself a bit. He can be scary in lane and beats a lot of people 1v1 if they stand and fight (damage reduction and passive OP). His main problem is that even though he seems like he would scale really well because of his ult, he's not really that disruptive in teamfights and all he can really do is ghost at you. Also, if he gets behind (in lane or in general), he's pretty screwed. most people max E which makes him really weak until seven, if you aren't afraid of him you can push him around and hopefully snowball the lane. People just don't really know what to do vs him. I usually max e if my opponent seems like an idiot, w if the lane is really bad for me and q normally. | ||
|
RogerX
New Zealand3180 Posts
What do you think is the best passive and which do you think is worse? Best for me, perhaps stat increasers such as vlads or Singed. Worse? I hate nunu, ash and Swain's passive (Swain's is just boring) | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On February 05 2012 04:20 RogerX wrote: Little red riding hood annie <- Like seriously, how is that not obvious LOL. A fairy tale from the 15th century...copyrighted? | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On February 05 2012 04:26 TheYango wrote: A fairy tale from the 15th century...copyrighted? I bet UMG will claim copyright anyways. | ||
|
ManyCookies
1164 Posts
That said, it'd be awesome if Swain and Veigar switched passives. | ||
|
RogerX
New Zealand3180 Posts
On February 05 2012 04:26 TheYango wrote: A fairy tale from the 15th century...copyrighted? idk, i've been seeing a lot of ridiculous copyright infringement policies in my life. I won't be suprised if someone tweaked something just to sue lol. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On February 05 2012 04:30 RogerX wrote: idk, i've been seeing a lot of ridiculous copyright infringement policies in my life. I won't be suprised if someone tweaked something just to sue lol. "i have no idea what i'm talking about but i wouldn't be surprised if i were right" | ||
|
Hidden_MotiveS
Canada2562 Posts
| ||
|
starfries
Canada3508 Posts
On February 05 2012 04:29 ManyCookies wrote: There's really not too much room for creativity in a passive. All you can really do is round off a champions existing kit (i.e encouraging Riven to AA, giving a bit more tankiness on a tank, etc.). That said, it'd be awesome if Swain and Veigar switched passives. I wish they would stop putting AA passives on casters. Like Lux, Orianna, Ziggs, and probably someone else I'm forgetting. I appreciate the thought behind it and it's kind of useful in lane, but I'm still never going to go around autoattacking people in a teamfight. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
 | ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On February 05 2012 04:35 UniversalSnip wrote: "i have no idea what i'm talking about but i wouldn't be surprised if i were right" lol, this was totally what I read it as. It's one thing rip off Capcom but if it's something that's over 150+ years old, there is no copyright. | ||
|
Chiharu Harukaze
12112 Posts
On February 05 2012 03:57 NeoIllusions wrote: At the very least, I hope that people who buy skins actually buy them on champs that they play, hahaha. I means I'm all for supporting Riot. But drop monies for a skin you don't use much would just be too sad. But Reverse Annie is SOOOOOO CUUUUUTTTTEEEE AMG. Why does it matter she has a lot of bad matchups mid?? On a side note, I was involved in an interesting chat while ago... ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/U3tOI.jpg) On February 05 2012 04:10 ManyCookies wrote: Speaking of the Megaman Skin, Riot is delaying it again; they want to further improve it. How they possibly could do that without blantant copyright infringment is beyond me. They have a legal team that checks everything. Copyright infringement in terms of creative design become rather tedious. For the record though, Red Riding Hood derivatives aren't infringement because it's part of the public domain. But explaining the nitty-gritty of copyright infringement and all the precedents would take too long for me to explain. Just go do a law degree if you're interested. | ||
| ||
