EPTi'm pretty sure it's possible to 1v5 bots, so wtf...?
Tribunal Discussion! - Page 21
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Parametric
Canada1261 Posts
i'm pretty sure it's possible to 1v5 bots, so wtf...? | ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
| ||
|
Gandling
United Kingdom126 Posts
| ||
|
jtype
England2167 Posts
 | ||
|
HyperionDreamer
Canada1528 Posts
AntiFragxD [02:35:30]: no is my friend AntiFragxD [02:35:36]: is my girldfriend AntiFragxD [02:35:45]: ... AntiFragxD [02:35:54]: jarvan is women Wat. | ||
|
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
Offensive Language I don't know what to think about this, really. | ||
|
Dgiese
United States2687 Posts
"My Dearest Tribunal, On this fine morning of June, we witnessed an enemy combatant displaying unsportsmanlike conduct on the battlefield. The party in question proceeded to offer himself as a sacrifice to our gods on 17 occations. While this did please our gods verily, it proved to be an uneven match, one unworthy of competition. I hearby declare said feeder a SCOUNDREL, and request the Tribunal's merciless justice upon his firey corpse. Good Day. "" Oh my... | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
I don't think Tribunal is a good idea at all. In most games whenever someone says something someone doesn't like, or don't listen to them etc, it's an instant report. People report for picking / not picking certain champions, summoner spells, item builds and such. People also report for intentional feeding even if the person might just be a bad player. Riot bans for 1 day as a warning(meaning that they don't even send a warning first) for recieving enough reports without even reviewing the case. Almost anyone who plays say, 10-20 games a day is going to be reported multiple times, especially if they like playing solo AP Janna or solo AP Soraka or AP Tristana or Yorick or Tank Yi and other things like that. Since the arrival of Tribunal, people argue alot more, and many people report others for even very poor reasons. What makes this worse is that the Tribunal doesn't even do what it's supposed to do. Most people don't even read the case they're given, they just click punish punish punish and grind out for IP. Most people also can't judge wether something requires a punishment or not - If they see bad scores like 1-10 or some relatively offensive language(no swearing, even mild insults), they're just going to punish. I think that the system is bad, doesn't work properly, and should be removed. I don't think we want to see half out playerbase banned. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On June 29 2011 22:03 Shikyo wrote: What makes this worse is that the Tribunal doesn't even do what it's supposed to do. Most people don't even read the case they're given, they just click punish punish punish and grind out for IP. Most people also can't judge wether something requires a punishment or not - If they see bad scores like 1-10 or some relatively offensive language(no swearing, even mild insults), they're just going to punish. I'm sure you have a reliable, independent, statistically relevant survery backing up this claim. | ||
|
NightWalks
Latvia252 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 29 2011 22:33 spinesheath wrote: I'm sure you have a reliable, independent, statistically relevant survery backing up this claim. What claim? That people grind IP with tribunal? Read general forums or something | ||
|
Hynda
Sweden2226 Posts
On June 29 2011 22:03 Shikyo wrote: Btw I guess I could bring this up here. I don't think Tribunal is a good idea at all. In most games whenever someone says something someone doesn't like, or don't listen to them etc, it's an instant report. People report for picking / not picking certain champions, summoner spells, item builds and such. People also report for intentional feeding even if the person might just be a bad player. Riot bans for 1 day as a warning(meaning that they don't even send a warning first) for recieving enough reports without even reviewing the case. Almost anyone who plays say, 10-20 games a day is going to be reported multiple times, especially if they like playing solo AP Janna or solo AP Soraka or AP Tristana or Yorick or Tank Yi and other things like that. Since the arrival of Tribunal, people argue alot more, and many people report others for even very poor reasons. What makes this worse is that the Tribunal doesn't even do what it's supposed to do. Most people don't even read the case they're given, they just click punish punish punish and grind out for IP. Most people also can't judge wether something requires a punishment or not - If they see bad scores like 1-10 or some relatively offensive language(no swearing, even mild insults), they're just going to punish. I think that the system is bad, doesn't work properly, and should be removed. I don't think we want to see half out playerbase banned. Well that's bullshit, I've had at least 30-40 reports since the tribunal started. While none of them have been for flaming (Ie just having a shout contest) I havn't recieved a single 1 day ban. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On June 29 2011 23:04 Shikyo wrote: What claim? That people grind IP with tribunal? Read general forums or something Because there is a direct correlation between random posts you find on some forum and the people who actually use the Tribunal? Is everyone forced to give a short recap about his last tribunal session each time? In the end every single ban is done manually, and if Riot finds that the Tribunal doesn't reduce the amount of work for them they will shut it down. Which would be the case if the majority would just mindlessly hit punish because then Riot would end up having to check every single case manually anyways. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 29 2011 23:15 spinesheath wrote: Because there is a direct correlation between random posts you find on some forum and the people who actually use the Tribunal? Is everyone forced to give a short recap about his last tribunal session each time? In the end every single ban is done manually, and if Riot finds that the Tribunal doesn't reduce the amount of work for them they will shut it down. Which would be the case if the majority would just mindlessly hit punish because then Riot would end up having to check every single case manually anyways. But every ban isn't done manually, as I said you get banned for 1 day by just getting enough reports, those cases aren't even reviewed at that point. They only review the cases for permaban or large bans. Or do you have some info from riot that contradicts this? Also, ![[image loading]](http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/3056/lolvlw.png) http://community-eu.static.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?t=270867 http://community-eu.static.leagueoflegends.com/board/attachment.php?attachmentid=37420&d=1309262383 Seriously? | ||
|
Hynda
Sweden2226 Posts
On June 29 2011 23:16 Shikyo wrote: While the is ofcourse just wild speculation, I can't possibly think that you everyone would just pardon me for all my reports. Infact if it is like you say I wouldn't be since you would just get people that punish punish punish. I'm very vocal in my games, I try to stear my team into victory, it's not something everyone can appriciate, I get at least one report a day. Shouldn't I've been banned by now?But every ban isn't done manually, as I said you get banned for 1 day by just getting enough reports, those cases aren't even reviewed at that point. They only review the cases for permaban or large bans. Or do you have some info from riot that contradicts this? Also, http://community-eu.static.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?t=270867 http://community-eu.static.leagueoflegends.com/board/attachment.php?attachmentid=37420&d=1309262383 Seriously? | ||
|
-Kato-
Spain1146 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 29 2011 23:55 -Kato- wrote: Ah man I've already been banned twice, one day and 3 days. I hate the Tribunal. I'm a sad troll. Yeah, one day and 3 days are first and second warning. No one in Riot has still even taken a look at your games to determine if you're violating their rules, it bans automatically for short amounts of time based on the amount of reports and yes-votes. On June 29 2011 23:48 Hynda wrote: While the is ofcourse just wild speculation, I can't possibly think that you everyone would just pardon me for all my reports. Infact if it is like you say I wouldn't be since you would just get people that punish punish punish. I'm very vocal in my games, I try to stear my team into victory, it's not something everyone can appriciate, I get at least one report a day. Shouldn't I've been banned by now? I get reported by at least 5 people every game so as I've not been banned yet, you probably are safe. EDIT: So just now I'm doing my first tribunal case, a 11-3-15 malzahar reported by his team for offensive language, I read the chat and he's basically complaining about his amumu not ganking and having no survivability, team suiciding in 4v5 etc. He's not swearing or anything, seems like standard stuff trying to lead the team etc. LOL This same person has a second game where he went 26-0-4 and got reported for "Spamming". He only wrote one line the entire game, it was "./ignore all", most likely followed by the correct ignore all command. And the IP grinders are going to vote yes to punish these people. I can't believe that Riot wants us to either 1. /ignore all, be quiet and hope your team knows how to play or 2. Ask nicely all the time in the midst of battle, be extremely kind and polite at all times, talk like you were talking to your boss at work or something. I don't get how this is reasonable to expect? | ||
|
-Kato-
Spain1146 Posts
| ||
|
Phrost
United States4008 Posts
They don't ban you immediately based on how many tribunal reports you get. If you get an extremely high percentage of yes intead of no, there might be an automated system. Most of the time the "Yes" votes trigger a response for a customer service rep to view the case and decide if the player should be punished or not. I've been banned for 3 days ONCE and I don't typically talk unnecessary shit but if you have a problem controlling your mouth (especially with racism) then you can consider yourself banned from this game in the eventual future. If not, in my experience, it is very hard to get long bans if you don't deserve them. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 30 2011 00:15 Phrost wrote: lol, Shikyo number 1 LoL troll. They don't ban you immediately based on how many tribunal reports you get. If you get an extremely high percentage of yes intead of no, there might be an automated system. Most of the time the "Yes" votes trigger a response for a customer service rep to view the case and decide if the player should be punished or not. I've been banned for 3 days ONCE and I don't typically talk unnecessary shit but if you have a problem controlling your mouth (especially with racism) then you can consider yourself banned from this game in the eventual future. If not, in my experience, it is very hard to get long bans if you don't deserve them. There always is an extremely high percentage of yes instead of no because most people use tribunal to farm IP, and if you've read general forums, most of the people on general ready are ready to give out bans to people who say stuff like "noobs" and such. Do you think a random 12 year old spoiled child should decide what happens with your account? Maybe if Tribunal had an age limit of 18 and you'd punish people who vote incorrectly it'd work. And yeah you have been punished for 3 days despite not typically talking unnecessary shit, doesn't that prove my point zzz | ||
| ||
