|
On June 30 2011 00:24 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 00:15 Phrost wrote:
lol, Shikyo number 1 LoL troll.
They don't ban you immediately based on how many tribunal reports you get. If you get an extremely high percentage of yes intead of no, there might be an automated system.
Most of the time the "Yes" votes trigger a response for a customer service rep to view the case and decide if the player should be punished or not.
I've been banned for 3 days ONCE and I don't typically talk unnecessary shit but if you have a problem controlling your mouth (especially with racism) then you can consider yourself banned from this game in the eventual future.
If not, in my experience, it is very hard to get long bans if you don't deserve them. There always is an extremely high percentage of yes instead of no because most people use tribunal to farm IP, and if you've read general forums, most of the people on general ready are ready to give out bans to people who say stuff like "noobs" and such. Do you think a random 12 year old spoiled child should decide what happens with your account? Maybe if Tribunal had an age limit of 18 and you'd punish people who vote incorrectly it'd work. And yeah you have been punished for 3 days despite not typically talking unnecessary shit, doesn't that prove my point zzz
You get like 3 ip a case >.< "Farming" is an overstatement.
|
On June 30 2011 00:40 Hynda wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 00:24 Shikyo wrote:On June 30 2011 00:15 Phrost wrote:
lol, Shikyo number 1 LoL troll.
They don't ban you immediately based on how many tribunal reports you get. If you get an extremely high percentage of yes intead of no, there might be an automated system.
Most of the time the "Yes" votes trigger a response for a customer service rep to view the case and decide if the player should be punished or not.
I've been banned for 3 days ONCE and I don't typically talk unnecessary shit but if you have a problem controlling your mouth (especially with racism) then you can consider yourself banned from this game in the eventual future.
If not, in my experience, it is very hard to get long bans if you don't deserve them. There always is an extremely high percentage of yes instead of no because most people use tribunal to farm IP, and if you've read general forums, most of the people on general ready are ready to give out bans to people who say stuff like "noobs" and such. Do you think a random 12 year old spoiled child should decide what happens with your account? Maybe if Tribunal had an age limit of 18 and you'd punish people who vote incorrectly it'd work. And yeah you have been punished for 3 days despite not typically talking unnecessary shit, doesn't that prove my point zzz You get like 3 ip a case >.< "Farming" is an overstatement.
5 a case, 30 per day, was it? Still only 10? Still you can do it while waiting in (login) queue.
|
I'm actually testing my voting accuracy. After a month hiatus from the Tribunal I judged 10 cases yesterday and do no plan on doing any more until I receive the results. This way I'll know for sure how accurately I judged.
I strongly suspect that voting straight Punish isn't as reliable as many assume.
|
On June 30 2011 00:53 Seuss wrote:
I'm actually testing my voting accuracy. After a month hiatus from the Tribunal I judged 10 cases yesterday and do no plan on doing any more until I receive the results. This way I'll know for sure how accurately I judged.
I strongly suspect that voting straight Punish isn't as reliable as many assume.
I would assume it is not.
Just because a vocal minority says that they vote like 5 year olds does not mean that most people vote with accuracy
|
On June 30 2011 00:56 Phrost wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 00:53 Seuss wrote:
I'm actually testing my voting accuracy. After a month hiatus from the Tribunal I judged 10 cases yesterday and do no plan on doing any more until I receive the results. This way I'll know for sure how accurately I judged.
I strongly suspect that voting straight Punish isn't as reliable as many assume. I would assume it is not. Just because a vocal minority says that they vote like 5 year olds does not mean that most people vote with accuracy
I would assume that alot of people have no idea what to punish either, so it still can count as super accurate.
|
Straight punish is probably 70-80% accurate at least, considering what it normally takes for someone to even reach tribunal.
|
On June 30 2011 06:20 Craton wrote:
Straight punish is probably 70-80% accurate at least, considering what it normally takes for someone to even reach tribunal.
We don't know under what circumstances Riot actually bans people.
|
Read back a few pages and didn't see anyone mention it. However was anyone fortunate enough to tribunal Grackis? I wasn't, I think they might keep the higher profile players off the tribunal.
|
On June 30 2011 06:20 Craton wrote:
Straight punish is probably 70-80% accurate at least, considering what it normally takes for someone to even reach tribunal.
I've had a case with only one game with reports and it had 2 reports.
What do you mean, "considering what it takes to reach tribunal" ?
|
If you guys ever get Aznwiseguy (which I'm sure he will be soon banned again) look for a game with me on his team. Pretty funny chatlog of me trolling him about sc2.
|
Why is this thread so low ? I think the tribunal is such a big source of awesomess
xxx (Yorick) [00:32:26]: Your anus is as wide as the globe twice two
xxx (Urgot) [All] [00:22:11]: 1/5 as gp, You need to be either Polish or lacking a brain to have those stats
|
Just starting the tribunal, seems like you can just go off what the reports say without even having to read the chat log. A few it's just players getting angry at each other though.
|
when I report, I like to quote the gems from the game and summarize the situation to make it easier -.- but I do so without hope that LoL will be without feeders/leavers/trolls and more
|
On January 01 2012 12:59 BlackMagister wrote:
Just starting the tribunal, seems like you can just go off what the reports say without even having to read the chat log. A few it's just players getting angry at each other though.
press punish 15 times, collect 75 ip nomnomnom
|
On June 30 2011 09:02 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 06:20 Craton wrote:
Straight punish is probably 70-80% accurate at least, considering what it normally takes for someone to even reach tribunal. I've had a case with only one game with reports and it had 2 reports. What do you mean, "considering what it takes to reach tribunal" ?
Hate to quote something from back in June... but.... If said person was in Tribunal for 2 reports, they were likely fresh off a previous ban. It's extremely easy to land oneself BACK in the tribunal.
|
I'm around a 50:50 ban/pardon rate these days.
|
i'm of the general opinion that snitching is gay as hell :B
|
Sometimes I get the feeling I'm the only person who really reviews cases rather than just 60sec yes vote every one of them...
|
Well sometimes I don't even read the logs when it's 4 games where the person has multiple reports and troll items. Other than that I at least look through what the reported person say which is usually enough to fine some "faggots" "niggers" and "gg noob" stuff.
|
On January 02 2012 13:23 BlackMagister wrote:
Well sometimes I don't even read the logs when it's 4 games where the person has multiple reports and troll items. Other than that I at least look through what the reported person say which is usually enough to fine some "faggots" "niggers" and "gg noob" stuff.
is "gg noob" really worth a report tho? The first two I auto "punish" but really just "gg noob"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
