EPTGeneral Discussion/Off-topic - Page 543
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Hynda
Sweden2226 Posts
| ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
| ||
|
NSANE.hydra
United States644 Posts
| ||
|
emucxg
Finland4559 Posts
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/5yFfp.jpg) Then this happend, he is so sad right now, I lol'd so hard | ||
|
Chrispy
Canada5878 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
Phrost
United States4008 Posts
On March 30 2011 00:06 Shikyo wrote: They hid the champion spotlight. ahaha i see what you did there | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
No you didn't. | ||
|
Hynda
Sweden2226 Posts
On March 29 2011 22:38 BlackPaladin wrote: Nothing Riot did was subtle. Urf was in every pic just chilling, like, sup guys, this is all a hoax, and his ultimate was a "roundhouse kick." real Nah but at least it was about as subtle as a single brick brick then, there were quite a few people still thinking it wasn't a hoax. | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
On March 30 2011 00:06 Shikyo wrote: They hid the champion spotlight. What do you mean "they hid the spotlight"? The joke Lee Sin one is still there so you must have found another spotlight that Riot hid, presumably the real spotlight. Either that or "they hid the spotlight" is some lame expression for it being blurry or you thinking that there's a real one out there somewhere. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On March 30 2011 00:31 phyvo wrote: What do you mean "they hid the spotlight"? The joke Lee Sin one is still there so you must have found another spotlight that Riot hid, presumably the real spotlight. Either that or "they hid the spotlight" is some lame expression for it being blurry or you thinking that there's a real one out there somewhere. http://www.youtube.com/user/RiotGamesInc | ||
|
Phrost
United States4008 Posts
On March 30 2011 00:31 phyvo wrote: What do you mean "they hid the spotlight"? The joke Lee Sin one is still there so you must have found another spotlight that Riot hid, presumably the real spotlight. Either that or "they hid the spotlight" is some lame expression for it being blurry or you thinking that there's a real one out there somewhere. he thought they deleted it because it's no longer publicly searchable on youtube but it can be viewed through the url | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On March 30 2011 00:35 Phrost wrote: he thought they deleted it because it's no longer publicly searchable on youtube but it can be viewed through the url Yeah but then I corrected it, they just hid it. | ||
|
Hynda
Sweden2226 Posts
| ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On March 29 2011 17:44 spinesheath wrote: Since everyone says that a support needs to be good without gold, Starks is a great item on a support given he can afford it somehow. It only has 20% ASpd as normal stats, everything else is provided as an aura, making it VERY efficient if your goal is to provided stats for your allies. And since you are a support, you don't need stats for yourself. I like Starks on Janna assuming I have a couple of allies that will make good use of the aura. "Isn't gold-reliant" =/= "Is good to spend gold cost-ineffectively", which is what you're doing if you're getting Stark's on Janna, because you're paying for self stats that do nothing. You don't need gold to be Janna, but that doesn't mean that it's OK to waste gold, because even if you have the team-relevant items you could use, stacking cost-effective survivability is still going to be a good use of your gold. Not to mention if you don't actually finish Stark's, you look completely dumb because having a Recurve Bow sitting in your inventory is a 1000 gold hole that could have been a Negatron, Chainmail, oracle, or more wards. If there are enough allies that actually need Stark's, there is probably at least one of them who is a good Stark's holder, who will want the stats for himself. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On March 30 2011 01:46 TheYango wrote: "Isn't gold-reliant" =/= "Is good to spend gold cost-ineffectively", which is what you're doing if you're getting Stark's on Janna, because you're paying for self stats that do nothing. You don't need gold to be Janna, but that doesn't mean that it's OK to waste gold, because even if you have the team-relevant items you could use, stacking cost-effective survivability is still going to be a good use of your gold. Not to mention if you don't actually finish Stark's, you look completely dumb because having a Recurve Bow sitting in your inventory is a 1000 gold hole that could have been a Negatron, Chainmail, oracle, or more wards. If there are enough allies that actually need Stark's, there is probably at least one of them who is a good Stark's holder, who will want the stats for himself. 1) You build starks like this: Bead > Emblem > Starks. You don't ever get any other parts, so at no point you have a Recurve in your inventory. If you have 1k, Emblem and are at fountain, you just get a stack of wards. 2) You are hardly wasting any gold, you just distribute the effects to your team instead of yourself. It's a great way to use gold if you got more than expected, for example if you somehow got a kill or have to hold lanes for a while. It's not an item I would usually rush on Janna, but as soon as you got sufficient survivability and still some gold, it's a great pick. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
| ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On March 30 2011 03:05 Shikyo wrote: I really wonder if I should get Irelia or Renekton... Both seem to suit my playstyle awesomely. =/ Choices, choices. i wasn't aware that irelia or renekton were good at feeding and then afking at fountain User was warned for this post | ||
| ||
