EPTSimple Questions and Answers - Page 93
| Forum Index > Hearthstone General |
|
wUndertUnge
United States1125 Posts
| ||
|
j-mo
United States0 Posts
On June 04 2014 11:45 wUndertUnge wrote: Do you learn more from crafting your own decks or from using pro decks? depends. pro decks are useful as a template, if you want to play a certain style (miracle rogue, aggro hunter, etc), and also as a jumping-off point for your own deck ideas (i'm gonna try tweaking these cards and see what happens) since pros hone their decks down to the last card, they're useful for practicing with and playing in tournaments. crafting your own deck will give you more flexibility in making tweaks as you climb the ladder and coming up with new ideas | ||
|
Ovid
United Kingdom948 Posts
If you equality somethings on your own board with two or higher health and someone earthshocks it it only does the one damage and silences the card. (It first silences the equality effect giving full health again and then does the damage) | ||
|
S1eth
Austria221 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ff0lfHq.jpg) | ||
|
wUndertUnge
United States1125 Posts
On June 05 2014 07:18 S1eth wrote: Does anyone know the source of this image: Where did you find it? | ||
|
S1eth
Austria221 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
S1eth
Austria221 Posts
On June 05 2014 16:07 jrkirby wrote: Mana addict + Shadowflame. Does it deal 1 damage or 3 damage? Assume no other spells of spell power. Mana Addict (whenever you cast) procs before Shadowflame resolves, just like Violet Teacher. So the minion is first buffed by the spell to a 3/3, then Shadowflame takes that value (4) and deals damage equal to it (+ spell damage). | ||
|
ashara
France22 Posts
| ||
|
Hryul
Austria2609 Posts
On June 05 2014 06:01 Ovid wrote: Just because I can't find the thread about quick tips or whatever it was called. If you equality somethings on your own board with two or higher health and someone earthshocks it it only does the one damage and silences the card. (It first silences the equality effect giving full health again and then does the damage) yes | ||
|
Flakes
United States3125 Posts
| ||
|
maugfw
United Kingdom0 Posts
On June 09 2014 04:50 Flakes wrote: Power Overwhelming vs Spellbender, does the 5/7 spellbender live through the mage's turn? It shouldn't. At least, when a Spellbender stole my Rockbiter the +3 Attack wore off after I ended my turn... | ||
|
Adron
Netherlands839 Posts
Does this card have a higher chance to be gold/epic/legendary then cards in card packs? I just think getting a single card such a waste... | ||
Conti
Germany2516 Posts
On June 10 2014 21:09 Adron wrote: Sometimes you get a single card as a reward from arena. Does this card have a higher chance to be gold/epic/legendary then cards in card packs? I just think getting a single card such a waste... I do think so, but I'm not sure. Starting at 10 wins, the worst card you can get is a golden common card (or a normal rare). But I do think that the chances of getting a better card rises the more wins you have. My last 10 win run gave me an epic card, while I usually only get a rare with 6-9 wins. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
Nm, his board was full. | ||
|
Anduin
0 Posts
| ||
|
S1eth
Austria221 Posts
On June 11 2014 22:00 Anduin wrote: Could someone work out the probability that a Mad Bomber kills my 3/2 on an empty board? Because that seems to happen all the fkn time. 25.9259% | ||
|
obesechicken13
United States10467 Posts
On June 11 2014 22:00 Anduin wrote: Could someone work out the probability that a Mad Bomber kills my 3/2 on an empty board? Because that seems to happen all the fkn time. 27 outcomes (less really since once the 3/2 dies to the first 2 hits the number of targets is reduced for the third hit). 3*3 hit, hit, X miss, hit, hit hit, miss, hit =4/27 14.8% | ||
|
meebo
Slovenia4 Posts
http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/62536-moj-deck | ||
|
ista
Austria0 Posts
On June 12 2014 04:39 obesechicken13 wrote: 27 outcomes (less really since once the 3/2 dies to the first 2 hits the number of targets is reduced for the third hit). 3*3 hit, hit, X miss, hit, hit hit, miss, hit =4/27 14.8% No, S1eth was right. hit, hit, X are actually three distinct outcomes (hit, hit, hit; hit, hit, H1; hit, hit, H2). So it's 7/27 | ||
| ||
